NFL: ESPN ranks 80 Superbowl teams...
01-24-2007 | 01:24 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,734
Likes: 23,026
NFL: ESPN ranks 80 Superbowl teams...
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...rankings/80-61
Naturally, I'm biased and I don't agree with their placement of #1 and #2...but, oh wells.
Naturally, I'm biased and I don't agree with their placement of #1 and #2...but, oh wells.
01-24-2007 | 03:47 PM
#5
Senior Moderator
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Not sure if he was ever looking for work but I could never understand why 2 time SB wiining head coach George Seifert couldn't find another job.
Same goes with 2 time World Series winner Cito Gaston.
Same goes with 2 time World Series winner Cito Gaston.
01-24-2007 | 04:02 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,734
Likes: 23,026
Originally Posted by dom
Not sure if he was ever looking for work but I could never understand why 2 time SB wiining head coach George Seifert couldn't find another job.
Totally forgot about Carolina. NM.
Trending Topics
01-24-2007 | 04:15 PM
#9
Just dial 1911
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,144
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by dom
Not sure if he was ever looking for work but I could never understand why 2 time SB wiining head coach George Seifert couldn't find another job.
Same goes with 2 time World Series winner Cito Gaston.
Same goes with 2 time World Series winner Cito Gaston.
01-24-2007 | 10:09 PM
#15
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,734
Likes: 23,026
Originally Posted by Scottman111
Hmm.......Bengals ranked #62 and #69.............
:scottmangoespostal:
:scottmangoespostal:
I'd also like to point out Polkadotman111 that they also are Superbowl LOSERS.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...perlist/070124
And of course, ESPN has kindly bolded that for you. You're welcome.
01-24-2007 | 10:47 PM
#16
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,734
Likes: 23,026
...annnnnd meanwhile, Da Bears are #2. Which I think is totally bogus cuz they really should be #1...
But still...#2 is about 100,000,000,000,231,000,999,034.99 light years ahead of number 62...
But still...#2 is about 100,000,000,000,231,000,999,034.99 light years ahead of number 62...
01-24-2007 | 10:48 PM
#17
1919
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,467
Likes: 162
Originally Posted by Yumchah
I'd also like to point out Polkadotman111 that they also are Superbowl LOSERS.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...perlist/070124
And of course, ESPN has kindly bolded that for you. You're welcome.
Everything will be okay when the '06 Bears are ranked behind both of these (preferably 82nd)
01-24-2007 | 10:51 PM
#18
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,734
Likes: 23,026
Originally Posted by Scottman111
Everything will be okay when the '06 Bears are ranked behind both of these (preferably 82nd)
01-25-2007 | 03:30 AM
#19
Cruisin'
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
As a life long Seahawk fan it was nice to see that we (yep, after you have been a fan for more than 25 years you can say "we" when referring to your favorite team) were ranked near the top of the SB losers.
There is always next year....hopefully we get healthy in the off season.
There is always next year....hopefully we get healthy in the off season.
