WHP rating for '06 6MT??
WHP rating for '06 6MT??
Please refresh my memory, what is our accepted figure for wheel horse power on a 06 6MT TL?
I've got 230 in my head, but I can't remember if that figure is for the 5AT
Thanks
I've got 230 in my head, but I can't remember if that figure is for the 5AT
Thanks
Basic Automotive 101 buddy,
1. Power to weight ratio
2. Gearing ratio (Also, automatic vs manual) (LSD vs Non LSD differential)
3. Force induction vs N/A.
4. Drive terrain power % loss (fwd, AWD, Rwd)
Just because the base 6MT has less power, doesn't mean it's slower than a type-s Automatic.
For example:
There are plenty of 2.0 Turbo cars that on paper put down less power than the 3rd gen but would perform better on a 1/4 run.
1. Power to weight ratio
2. Gearing ratio (Also, automatic vs manual) (LSD vs Non LSD differential)
3. Force induction vs N/A.
4. Drive terrain power % loss (fwd, AWD, Rwd)
Just because the base 6MT has less power, doesn't mean it's slower than a type-s Automatic.
For example:
There are plenty of 2.0 Turbo cars that on paper put down less power than the 3rd gen but would perform better on a 1/4 run.
Last edited by 04WDPSeDaN; Mar 8, 2016 at 06:12 PM.
Trending Topics
sayitainttom faster because the power to weight ratio and the close gearing in the MT. AT has about 125 lbs heavier than MT, beside within the first 3 gear its almost the same for AT and MT until you hit that ugly 4th gear in AT and sweet pull in MT 4th gear. If you wind out third gear the MT RPM will drop about 1.5k meanwhile the AT drop ~ 2.5k, its take more than power to consider to be "faster" number isn't the absolute answer.
AT Type S (not mine lol)
MT Base look at the RPM drop when shift into 4th.
AT Type S vs MT Base and you should know why.
AT Type S (not mine lol)
MT Base look at the RPM drop when shift into 4th.
AT Type S vs MT Base and you should know why.
OP, a stock base 04-06 6MT is usually around 220 whp SAE on a Dynojet.
Eh don't get hung up on the numbers. I ran my TL and my Integra on a "measuring stick" that plenty of other Honda and Acura cars have run on, like I_love_cars beast of a TL-S. I am only providing some runs from a dyno of my relatively stock TL, to cite the ~220WHP to ~230WHP numbers.
Thought I'd throw this out as I had some time to kill.
Just as a comparision:
........6MT...5 A/T....'07 5A/T
1st - 3.93...2.563...2.70
2nd -2.48...1.552...1.61
3rd - 1.70...1.021...1.07
4th - 1.25......666.....69
5th - 0.98......480.....49
6th - 0.77
Final drive - 3.293..4.428..4.31
However the overall ration
1st -12.84/11.358/11.647
2nd- 8.17/6.87/6.94
3rd - 5.59/4.52/4.61
4th - 4.12/2.95/2.97
5th - 3.23/2.13/2.11
6th - 2.54
As you can see the M/T has quite a lower overall ratio in each gear selected for more grunt.
Just as a comparision:
........6MT...5 A/T....'07 5A/T
1st - 3.93...2.563...2.70
2nd -2.48...1.552...1.61
3rd - 1.70...1.021...1.07
4th - 1.25......666.....69
5th - 0.98......480.....49
6th - 0.77
Final drive - 3.293..4.428..4.31
However the overall ration
1st -12.84/11.358/11.647
2nd- 8.17/6.87/6.94
3rd - 5.59/4.52/4.61
4th - 4.12/2.95/2.97
5th - 3.23/2.13/2.11
6th - 2.54
As you can see the M/T has quite a lower overall ratio in each gear selected for more grunt.
From a different thread, I don't know about the 07 5AT TL ratio change, but look at the difference!
Oh wow I didn't know they squeezed an LSD into the new AT. Does this include base 07/08?
AT DIFFERENTIAL for 2008 Acura TL
MT DIFFERENTIAL for 2008 Acura TL










.