3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2013 Accord V6 EX-L 6MT Coupe (J35W2) vs 2007 Acura TL Type-S 6MT (J35A8) DYNO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2013, 01:23 PM
  #1  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
2013 Accord V6 EX-L 6MT Coupe (J35W2) vs 2007 Acura TL Type-S 6MT (J35A8) DYNO

I thought you guys might like this. TOV dyno'd the new 2013 Accord EXL V6 Coupe 6MT. The numbers were quite impressive. Hell even the test on the 2013 Accord V6 auto was impressive as that put out 240WHP!

Video and dyno plot comparisons
http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-ar...&page_number=2

Here is the 2013 Accord V6 Coupe 6MT vs the TL-S 6MT dyno test comparison from their results. Enjoy!

http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-ar...&page_number=2
Old 02-12-2013, 04:01 PM
  #2  
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
paperboy42190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alhambra, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 6,992
Received 1,162 Likes on 847 Posts
wow! i want to see how much the automatic makes!
Old 02-12-2013, 04:36 PM
  #3  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Great post man! Awesome results, nearly 260whp. By far the most powerful Accord. Gathering what I know about our intake manifold/TB, I'd say the new Accord may use the 3.7 TL IM/TB, or some larger version of the 3.5. I say this because the 'real' gains start @4K, which is where our butterflies open up. That and the fact that my dyno of the 3.7 IM/TB looked very similar to the comparison plots.

What I'm really suprised at, is the insane torque drop off around 6K. I've never seen anything like that on a N/A V6. It drops off from 226 @6K, to almost 170 @6800. That makes almost no sense to me.
The following users liked this post:
SatinSilverAV6 (02-12-2013)
Old 02-12-2013, 05:11 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
ParaSurfer1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 44
Posts: 3,138
Received 113 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonnick
Great post man! Awesome results, nearly 260whp. By far the most powerful Accord. Gathering what I know about our intake manifold/TB, I'd say the new Accord may use the 3.7 TL IM/TB, or some larger version of the 3.5. I say this because the 'real' gains start @4K, which is where our butterflies open up. That and the fact that my dyno of the 3.7 IM/TB looked very similar to the comparison plots.

What I'm really suprised at, is the insane torque drop off around 6K. I've never seen anything like that on a N/A V6. It drops off from 226 @6K, to almost 170 @6800. That makes almost no sense to me.

Very good observation. I wonder if Honda ever thought of doing a J40...
Old 02-12-2013, 05:35 PM
  #5  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by paperboy42190
wow! i want to see how much the automatic makes!
Here you go!

http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-ar...cle_id=1123025
The following users liked this post:
paperboy42190 (09-16-2013)
Old 02-14-2013, 12:10 PM
  #6  
Burning Brakes
 
Dave_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Age: 49
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonnick
What I'm really suprised at, is the insane torque drop off around 6K. I've never seen anything like that on a N/A V6. It drops off from 226 @6K, to almost 170 @6800. That makes almost no sense to me.
Based on the comparison dynos, the drop in power at around 6000-6200rpms is pretty common across all these motor varients. I wouldn't loose too much sleep over it. Power under the curve is key and even at the 6800rpm fuel cut, the motor is still making about 88% of peak power. That's pretty good in my book. That basically means the 1-2 shift should occur at near fuel cut, the 2-3 at around 6500rpm, and the 3-4 at 6300rpms.

The torque curve is very broad in this motor, therefore, making it very flexible and most anything above 3000rpms. I'd much rather have this sort of broad power rather than putting in higher lift cams and short intake runners to gain some more high rpm pull at the expense of low and midrange power where you spend most of your time driving.

Companies like Nissan make some seriously high revving V6s (7600rpm fuel cut) to extract that extra power because HP is what sells the car. What many don't understand is that these 3.5 and 3.7 VQ motors don't feel extremely strong below 4500rpms. By the seat of the pants, this Honda motor will probably feel stronger on the street. In a 1/4 mile drag race, I see manual cars posting similiar numbers. The 7AT VQs will probably be quicker though due to the superior gearing compared to the Honda 6AT.
Old 02-14-2013, 03:10 PM
  #7  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Check out my most recent dyno below. This is comparing my I/Full exhaust/Ported Stock manifold/UR Pulley to my current setup; addition of 3.7 IM/TB/Runners/4" CAI. The torque drop from 6K to redline is 'only' ~25 ft lbs; half that of the 3.5. Don't get me wrong, I expect it to drop, but not 50 ft lbs. Obviously I'm not stock, but still.

Name:  photo-11.jpg
Views: 1928
Size:  109.6 KB

Last edited by Sonnick; 02-14-2013 at 03:14 PM.
Old 02-15-2013, 09:39 AM
  #8  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
anx1300c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Posts: 5,020
Received 930 Likes on 612 Posts
If the dyno is correct, assuming a ~14% drivetrain loss, that Accord is making 300 at the crank. Still doesn't seem to be any faster than the 8G from the couple road tests out there, but time will tell. This one's also 50 or so lbs lighter than the 8G.

If it is in fact making 5-6 whp more than a Type-S 6MT with the same displacement and a point lower CR, there are only a few ways Honda could pull that off. More aggressive cams, (probably least likely) freer flowing induction or more aggressive tuning are the only real ways for them to have done it. It surely isn't exhaust considering their ULEV bragging rights and since the Type S already had decently flowing cats. I'm sure this Accord has the same crushed J Pipe as all previous models as well.

Looking forward to seeing some other dynos in the future to see if this is a fluke or not.


Just remembered reading about the new earth dream engines and wondered if they'd gone with direct injection on the V6, because that would explain some of the increase in power, but I think just the 2.4 is DI?
Old 02-15-2013, 10:37 AM
  #9  
Burning Brakes
 
bouncer07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
Received 182 Likes on 140 Posts
The accord cams aren't that aggressive. That needs to be upgraded to give the motor a more responsive power. The Motor in the accord looks to be beefed up after the first release of the J35 on the TL-S.
Old 02-15-2013, 11:48 AM
  #10  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
I don't think the new 3.5L is direct injection. It was rumored to be, but I don't believe it came to fruition.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
9
02-25-2020 09:57 AM
tonio
Car Talk
252
02-05-2019 05:43 PM
Zonian22
Member Cars for Sale
3
11-14-2015 01:20 PM
kuzdu
5G TLX (2015-2020)
3
09-10-2015 08:42 PM
Zonian22
Member Cars for Sale
1
09-02-2015 08:19 AM



Quick Reply: 2013 Accord V6 EX-L 6MT Coupe (J35W2) vs 2007 Acura TL Type-S 6MT (J35A8) DYNO



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 AM.