integra vs. cl?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2011, 12:52 PM
  #1  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
hpcacura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 37
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
integra vs. cl?

I've got to buy a car for my daily commute (80 miles/day) and want something fun, but under $6000. I like the Integra and CL (and also the Accords) and they seem to get good gas mileage (I need to get 30 mpg freeway) but have read that the CL's and Accords in my price range have a serious transmission problem. Are the later Integras (say 1998 - 2000) good cars, or do they also have tranny or similar problems? I wish I could afford a TSX or 2005+ Cl, but they are out of my price range.

Thanks for any ideas.
Old 01-31-2011, 03:30 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
LasVegasTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Las Vegas/Bay Area
Posts: 1,675
Received 27 Likes on 26 Posts
Haven't heard of too many problems with the Integras. Plus they're pretty easy to work on if something goes wrong.
Old 01-31-2011, 03:54 PM
  #3  
Team Owner
iTrader: (15)
 
Flipster23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35,747
Received 2,334 Likes on 1,962 Posts
CL isnt very good for commuting nice car but not good for commuting.. Have to use Prem gas and with gas prices rising I dont suggest you buy a CL for commute.

no CL and TL have tranny problems havent really heard of the accord having alot of problems like the TL/CL


Integra more likely to get jacked good MPG but there a top car to get jacked if u park outside with no alarm sorry to say but you more than likely to get your car stolen
Old 01-31-2011, 04:04 PM
  #4  
Mile High
 
DigitalEmpire22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Denver,CO
Age: 38
Posts: 229
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Flipster23
CL isnt very good for commuting nice car but not good for commuting.. Have to use Prem gas and with gas prices rising I dont suggest you buy a CL for commute.

no CL and TL have tranny problems havent really heard of the accord having alot of problems like the TL/CL


Integra more likely to get jacked good MPG but there a top car to get jacked if u park outside with no alarm sorry to say but you more than likely to get your car stolen
I had a 1999 CL 2.3L before I got my TL-S (absolutely loved it too), and it just used regular Unleaded. I was getting around 30mpg (its been awhile so not sure on exact mpg). But I always liked the CL better than the Teg. CL is much more refined

Last edited by DigitalEmpire22; 01-31-2011 at 04:13 PM.
Old 01-31-2011, 04:08 PM
  #5  
Team Owner
iTrader: (15)
 
Flipster23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35,747
Received 2,334 Likes on 1,962 Posts
OP what year CL do u want?

if u want the 2nd gen u have to put prem gas in it 1st gen u can run unleaded according to digitalempire22... I would have never known that though thats useful info D.E
Old 02-01-2011, 11:00 AM
  #6  
Cruisin'
 
mwang408's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
used to own an integra. wanted to rip my hair out after the first year. but then again it all depends. just make sure whatever car you get that you have it properly checked out even if it costs money. you will save in the long run.
Old 02-10-2011, 12:53 AM
  #7  
H&R
7th Gear
 
H&R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Norcal
Age: 40
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CL is definitely more comfy, but Integra is very good on fuel and fun to drive. It will get stolen the first weekend tho lmao
Old 02-10-2011, 01:42 AM
  #8  
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
silvertl510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bay, CA
Age: 32
Posts: 498
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
^ lol at the stolen part haha
Old 02-10-2011, 10:02 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
ParaSurfer1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 44
Posts: 3,138
Received 113 Likes on 91 Posts
If you want to commute, any CL is better than an Integra. Integra is a great car but its loud/buzzy at highway speed. At 65-70 the CL is at 3000rpm while the integas B18 is at 4000-4500rpm. If you want something civil yet a tad fun, get a 98-99 CL 5speed. That way no worry about the automatics unreliability. The 0-60 time for CL 5 spd is 7.7sec. It also has a lot more torque and doesn't have to be "rung out" to get to speed which saves gas. It's a rare find but will be easier to live with.
Old 02-18-2011, 08:24 AM
  #10  
User Awaiting Email Confirmation
iTrader: (5)
 
nf3d0149ab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco
Age: 41
Posts: 7,786
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CL > Integra.
Old 02-18-2011, 10:13 AM
  #11  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
hpcacura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 37
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks for all the input. I'm now looking for a 98-99 5 speed per Para's suggestion, but I keep seeing 2003 type S models with the six speed that look VERY sexy. If I can find a low mileage 98-99 I'll probably buy it.

If I can't find one, I might have to take the hit on lower gas mileage and paying for premium gas and get a newer type S with the six speed and have a lot more fun!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1fatcrxnem1
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
22
06-01-2018 01:23 AM
George Knighton
3G RLX (2013+)
25
07-21-2016 07:21 PM
iRaw
ILX Photograph Gallery
18
09-17-2015 07:23 PM
Joe Tschida
Audio, Video, Electronics & Navigation
0
09-13-2015 12:22 AM



Quick Reply: integra vs. cl?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.