Disapointed with the Track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2008, 08:25 PM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SkillOBskilled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ann Arbor
Age: 39
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Disapointed with the Track

So I took the car to the track today, a week after my tune and dyno.

My two better runs were 14.20 @ 99.2 (2.2 60') & 14.27 @ 99.9 (2.35 60')

Considering the fact that I've added rims, tires, shocks, intake, plenums, mounts a neo and had it tuned and only ran 0.15 better, I m really disappointed. I also trapped almost three mph lower then before, which just blows my mind.

I trapped at 101 or 102 last time with a 14.35.

I am sure that if someone was a better driver they could do a little better then me, but how are people running mi-13s ?!
Old 10-18-2008, 08:47 AM
  #2  
Three Wheelin'
 
ChucksCL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Millersville, Md.
Posts: 1,649
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Are your new rims and tires a larger overall diameter? Also were weather conditions worse this time? The guys in the mid 13's have a SC. I think a 14.2 is good, and your mph was lower because your 60" was lower. The 13's are hard to hit if you ask me.
Old 10-18-2008, 10:15 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will tell you right now that your little RT CAT is your problem. The cat is like 2 inchs and the rest of your exhaust is 2.5. You have all of those mods to pull in air but you dont have the right air to get the air out. Thats your problem. Last summer my car was running 14.1s @99 with only intake, header and crank pulley. STOCK EVERYTHING ELSE. And especially since ur MPH is lower than it was with less miles, thats clearly a loss in top end flow. 102 MPHs with what u have now should easily be pulling u 13.7s

Old 10-18-2008, 10:45 AM
  #4  
Instructor
 
PowerRev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Miami
Age: 39
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
18's are kind of big for your setup. Very nice for the street, but in terms of trying to get a fast 1/4 time, i recommend you run a smaller rim on the track. This will help improve your 60 foot time.

Also I can assure you that the RT cat is hurting your top end, as it really is to small of a diameter in and out, which is good for low end TQ, but not great for high RPM, and at the track you are in high RPM the whole time after your 60 foot. Change it to 2.5 in and out, and I can guarantee you that your HP will be higher in vtec.

Another note, make sure that your flex pipe on the XS header is not leaking, as I know those always leak. I normally like to just cut out the flex that came on them and replace it with another flex pipe. If you listen to any of this advice, let me know how it works out for you. I am sure you will be happy.
Old 10-18-2008, 11:09 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PowerRev
18's are kind of big for your setup. Very nice for the street, but in terms of trying to get a fast 1/4 time, i recommend you run a smaller rim on the track. This will help improve your 60 foot time.

Also I can assure you that the RT cat is hurting your top end, as it really is to small of a diameter in and out, which is good for low end TQ, but not great for high RPM, and at the track you are in high RPM the whole time after your 60 foot. Change it to 2.5 in and out, and I can guarantee you that your HP will be higher in vtec.

Another note, make sure that your flex pipe on the XS header is not leaking, as I know those always leak. I normally like to just cut out the flex that came on them and replace it with another flex pipe. If you listen to any of this advice, let me know how it works out for you. I am sure you will be happy.
true story
Old 10-18-2008, 05:43 PM
  #6  
Instructor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SkillOBskilled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ann Arbor
Age: 39
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My tires are one size up (225/45ZR18) then what I needed, but they were 50% off at tirerack a while back. If I recall correctly the circumference is 2% larger then stock.

Power Rev,
Do you recommend going even smaller then the stock diameter? I imagine eventually I ll wont be able to get any traction, whats the sweet spot in terms of wheel diameter?

Also I can assure you that the RT cat is hurting your top end, as it really is to small of a diameter in and out, which is good for low end TQ, but not great for high RPM, and at the track you are in high RPM the whole time after your 60 foot. Change it to 2.5 in and out, and I can guarantee you that your HP will be higher in vtec
.

Are there other options then the RT Cat? I only bought it b/c I broke my regular Cat (long story) You guys don't make a 2.5" pipe spool piece to get rid of the cat, do you?

Another note, make sure that your flex pipe on the XS header is not leaking, as I know those always leak. I normally like to just cut out the flex that came on them and replace it with another flex pipe.
What brand flex pipe do you use? I guess I could get another set of headers and have a shop redo the flex pipe.
Old 10-18-2008, 05:57 PM
  #7  
Instructor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SkillOBskilled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ann Arbor
Age: 39
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, when do you guys shift? I did at redline at every gear, but with the huge drop off in tq at 6K, that may not be my best option.

http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=ddzzrccs_31q7vc6vpx

Is the goal to have the highest avg hp through the gear, or the highest avg tq, or some combination of the two?
Old 10-18-2008, 06:18 PM
  #8  
Instructor
 
dru2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto
Age: 41
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just came back from the track today -- 10 C (50 F) weather in Toronto.




The image may be a bit blurry but I ran 14.185 and a few other 14.1s

Last edited by dru2; 10-18-2008 at 06:20 PM.
Old 10-18-2008, 09:37 PM
  #9  
Instructor
iTrader: (2)
 
CivicB18B1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Windsor, ontario
Age: 38
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by PowerRev
Also I can assure you that the RT cat is hurting your top end, as it really is to small of a diameter in and out, which is good for low end TQ, but not great for high RPM, and at the track you are in high RPM the whole time after your 60 foot. Change it to 2.5 in and out, and I can guarantee you that your HP will be higher in vtec.
I have a RT cat me too.. how do you change the diameter? It is possible to take it to a exhaust shop and cut it and put a 2 1/2 diameter piping instead and weld it?
Old 10-18-2008, 11:15 PM
  #10  
Instructor
 
Oh1TypeS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Detroit
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damn, seems like a lot of $$$ in mods to get you kinda no where at the same speed...lol..
Old 10-19-2008, 01:14 AM
  #11  
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
 
poisx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: DARK ALLY
Posts: 1,558
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Oh1TypeS
damn, seems like a lot of $$$ in mods to get you kinda no where at the same speed...lol..
well true that,,,,,,,.......
Old 10-19-2008, 08:12 AM
  #12  
Instructor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SkillOBskilled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ann Arbor
Age: 39
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeh...Thanks
Old 10-19-2008, 10:12 AM
  #13  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (2)
 
Moodist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the Magnaflow High Flow Cat, I wonder if it runs into the same issues as the RT Cat:

http://www.hottexhaust.com/detail.asp?PRODUCT_ID=27403

From what I have found they say inlet and outlet are OE size. This might be a good replacement for you.

Last edited by Moodist; 10-19-2008 at 10:15 AM.
Old 10-19-2008, 12:34 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
CLS6SpeedNupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Oh1TypeS
damn, seems like a lot of $$$ in mods to get you kinda no where at the same speed...lol..
Not really, everyones cars run different and when your NA you have to keep in mind that all the mods have to work together and that one small issue like too much exhuast restriction can slow down all your potential. I mean going FI is on average adding a extra 60whp so all the back pressure in the world wouldnt stop a car for providing better results than it did NA even if its a little bit.
Old 10-27-2008, 04:47 PM
  #15  
Instructor
 
Kulrevon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: westchester, ny or philly
Age: 38
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SkillOBskilled

What track did you run at? Your problem has to be traction or a slipping clutch. or the wheels are killing you. I would say traction or wheels since you didnt have the problem on the dyno.

I ran at atco last year completely stock and got a 14.42@96.76. and I know you have the HP and TQ to destroy that.

CLS6speed......I am impressed with his numbers even with the RT cat. Don't you think it would have shown up there if it was hurting him. I mean it could be hurting him but i dont think it should be hurting his qtr mile times.
Old 11-02-2008, 01:22 AM
  #16  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (8)
 
StreetKA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Age: 37
Posts: 7,106
Received 574 Likes on 409 Posts
i ran 14.34 (!)completely stock i mean only tint and skunk2 knob is a mod right know tomorrow imma put new spark plugs 215/50/17 tires everything else stock imma try hit 13 with some mods. we'll see
Old 11-02-2008, 08:55 AM
  #17  
Instructor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SkillOBskilled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ann Arbor
Age: 39
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I went to Atco. I ran 15.2 stock, granted that was a month after I learned how to drive manual.

A few people thought that RT cat is hurting me. Vince at R/T tuning said the same thing when I asked him where he saw room for improvement.

I ll will try to work the kinks out next season. Winter tires are going on soon.
Old 11-05-2008, 03:21 PM
  #18  
Instructor
 
dru2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto
Age: 41
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
run a test pipe instead and see the difference
Old 11-17-2008, 10:33 AM
  #19  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South FL
Age: 48
Posts: 16,847
Received 222 Likes on 183 Posts
The tires are hurting your gearing. That's the main problem. Your trapping high MPH & your 60's are reasonable. The car is sapping power at low rpm trying to turn those tires, The mods you have are making up for it on the top end hence your high trap MPH. By then it's to late though. You should be at least 13.9 with your 60 foot's.
If you ran 235-40 18 or 235-45-17, or even stock 215-50-17 you will see the times shrink.
Old 11-17-2008, 10:48 AM
  #20  
3.5 psi
iTrader: (1)
 
gnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 4,487
Received 798 Likes on 636 Posts
Hey Dru, what track do you go to? I'd love to go sometime in the spring.
Old 11-17-2008, 12:38 PM
  #21  
Instructor
 
dru2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto
Age: 41
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I went to Cayuga on an early Sat. morning - didn't have to wait in line for any of the races.
Old 11-30-2008, 12:48 AM
  #22  
Instructor
 
Gregyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Levittown PA
Age: 33
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Skill are there certian req. you have to meet to use the track?
Old 11-30-2008, 04:00 AM
  #23  
4drs just wanna have fun!
iTrader: (1)
 
Accord_V6_400m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,268
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SkillOBskilled
So I took the car to the track today, a week after my tune and dyno.

My two better runs were 14.20 @ 99.2 (2.2 60') & 14.27 @ 99.9 (2.35 60')

Considering the fact that I've added rims, tires, shocks, intake, plenums, mounts a neo and had it tuned and only ran 0.15 better, I m really disappointed. I also trapped almost three mph lower then before, which just blows my mind.

I trapped at 101 or 102 last time with a 14.35.

I am sure that if someone was a better driver they could do a little better then me, but how are people running mi-13s ?!
A lot of good advice so far. Did you finish your car with tuning, was it after the RT cat was put on? Looking at your dyno, I can see you share the top end curve of a J32 with a choking exhaust. Did you run the RT cat before when you hit 101/102 traps? I managed to also hit a 102.3 with my RT cat or possibly my stock J30A1 cat, can't remember which it was at the time but the J30A1 cat is more restrictive.

Plus.... + have to toss this out there... make sure your IMRC plates are opening up.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emailnatec
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
29
09-28-2018 04:27 PM
jpadilla
3G RLX (2013+)
4
09-27-2015 07:53 PM
4drviper
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
0
09-23-2015 09:00 PM



Quick Reply: Disapointed with the Track



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 PM.