Would you get a Focus RS or Civic Type R?
#41
Type R, all day, any day.
If any of you have driven a Type R in the past, you'd likely vote the same. Nothing short of amazing, even though they're FWD. Too many people jump on that band wagon. While AWD will likely net faster times, I find it makes a car too predictable and refined- I prefer the rawness of the R.
Plus Honda reliability > ford reliability.
I'm still not convinced Fords turbo systems will stand the test of time.
If any of you have driven a Type R in the past, you'd likely vote the same. Nothing short of amazing, even though they're FWD. Too many people jump on that band wagon. While AWD will likely net faster times, I find it makes a car too predictable and refined- I prefer the rawness of the R.
Plus Honda reliability > ford reliability.
I'm still not convinced Fords turbo systems will stand the test of time.
There are only a very few makes/models where I worry about reliability... but Ford has not been one for at least a decade or more...
The following users liked this post:
RPhilMan1 (03-04-2015)
#42
If the Type R comes to NA, I'd have to give a SLIGHT edge to the Honda because well, as much e-hate I've thrown their way of late (esp. the RE: NSX), I still want to see Honda be awesome and blow my robot off.
And well, the 'Ring video had me at hello. So, the Type R...but, ONLY IF it comes to NA. Otherwise, it's yet another vaporcar in my books and I'll happily take the Ford.
And well, the 'Ring video had me at hello. So, the Type R...but, ONLY IF it comes to NA. Otherwise, it's yet another vaporcar in my books and I'll happily take the Ford.
The following users liked this post:
Aman (03-03-2015)
The following 6 users liked this post by Yumcha:
04WDPSeDaN (03-04-2015),
charliemike (03-03-2015),
crazyasiantl (03-03-2015),
juniorbean (03-03-2015),
MeehowsBRZ (03-03-2015),
and 1 others liked this post.
#47
Do people still have that opinion of Ford (or American cars for that matter)? I mean I'm sure they do since Mercedes and Audi still carry their 90's stigma around with them, but I thought most car people were over this by now.
There are only a very few makes/models where I worry about reliability... but Ford has not been one for at least a decade or more...
There are only a very few makes/models where I worry about reliability... but Ford has not been one for at least a decade or more...
The issues come from one of two sources- either bad design of components, are shitty assembly/manufacturing. The first can be fixed. The latter likely will not change, unless you force the auto unions out.
I just looked online at the 2015 Focus "predicted" reliability, and it has a score of 2.5/5 from JD Powers. 2014 is the same.
#48
That being said, if that's the bar you're going by, I'd say Honda's F1 experience is far greater than Ford's rally, as those engines scream to astronomical RPM and are turbo'd also. Let's also not forget they put out astronomically more power than a WRC car.
Let's not forget the turbo RDX has been around since 2007 and they continue to run well.
But yes, all honda does is builds lawn mower engines with no other major experience
#49
Trolling Canuckistan
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 811
From: 100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114
Fords advertising has all been "we're so awesome now, we're just as good, if not better than the Japanese in terms of reliability". Oddly enough, the people I know working as mechanics at a ford dealer, and another who's the general manager of a ford dealer don't agree with those statements at all. They say nothing really has changed. Do they look better? Absolutely. Are they more reliable? Only if you believe the advertisements.
The issues come from one of two sources- either bad design of components, are shitty assembly/manufacturing. The first can be fixed. The latter likely will not change, unless you force the auto unions out.
I just looked online at the 2015 Focus "predicted" reliability, and it has a score of 2.5/5 from JD Powers. 2014 is the same.
The issues come from one of two sources- either bad design of components, are shitty assembly/manufacturing. The first can be fixed. The latter likely will not change, unless you force the auto unions out.
I just looked online at the 2015 Focus "predicted" reliability, and it has a score of 2.5/5 from JD Powers. 2014 is the same.
#51
Fords advertising has all been "we're so awesome now, we're just as good, if not better than the Japanese in terms of reliability". Oddly enough, the people I know working as mechanics at a ford dealer, and another who's the general manager of a ford dealer don't agree with those statements at all. They say nothing really has changed. Do they look better? Absolutely. Are they more reliable? Only if you believe the advertisements.
The issues come from one of two sources- either bad design of components, are shitty assembly/manufacturing. The first can be fixed. The latter likely will not change, unless you force the auto unions out.
I just looked online at the 2015 Focus "predicted" reliability, and it has a score of 2.5/5 from JD Powers. 2014 is the same.
The issues come from one of two sources- either bad design of components, are shitty assembly/manufacturing. The first can be fixed. The latter likely will not change, unless you force the auto unions out.
I just looked online at the 2015 Focus "predicted" reliability, and it has a score of 2.5/5 from JD Powers. 2014 is the same.
No... I'm talking real world here. I worked at a Ford dealer for a while after we sold our businesses. I also know tons of friends with Fords... and overall they have very little issues. My boss actually traded in her Lexus hybrid for the Ford Fusion hybrid and not only loves the car better, but it's been bullet-proof. I believe we even have some Ford owners on this forum who love their cars and haven't had issues.
And if I was buying a truck... Ford or Chevy all the way. I'd buy a Raptor in a heartbeat and not worry about going 300k+ miles...
Last edited by juniorbean; 03-03-2015 at 04:25 PM.
#52
To each their own, I suppose. Most cars these days don't generally have issues until after the first 4 or 5 years of ownership. I'm not surprised your boss' new Ford isn't having issues at the moment.
It seems Acura screwed the pooch on that one, with their entire lineup having issues right out the gate.
It seems Acura screwed the pooch on that one, with their entire lineup having issues right out the gate.
#53
Trolling Canuckistan
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 811
From: 100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114
Fwiw, the fact that honda builds lawn mower engines is one if the reasons I was sold in the brand many any years ago.
Lawn mowers, weed whackers, portable generators, motorcycles, dirt bikes, 4 wheelers, jet skis, out board motors for boats, snow blowers....
They are the Honda MOTOR company. If it runs on an internal combustion engine, they probably make it and have a history of longevity.
Lawn mowers, weed whackers, portable generators, motorcycles, dirt bikes, 4 wheelers, jet skis, out board motors for boats, snow blowers....
They are the Honda MOTOR company. If it runs on an internal combustion engine, they probably make it and have a history of longevity.
The following users liked this post:
TacoBello (03-03-2015)
#54
I guess seeing how many people here would simply choose the Focus over the Civic is indicative enough of why Honda doesn't want to bring the CTR over. I thought there would be way more people wanting it. Guess I was wrong.
#55
Do people still have that opinion of Ford (or American cars for that matter)? I mean I'm sure they do since Mercedes and Audi still carry their 90's stigma around with them, but I thought most car people were over this by now.
There are only a very few makes/models where I worry about reliability... but Ford has not been one for at least a decade or more...
There are only a very few makes/models where I worry about reliability... but Ford has not been one for at least a decade or more...
In Asian areas, Domestic brands are still playing catch up big time in perception. Younger Asians care about brand and older Asians care about reliability. They never gave any chance to domestic brands since the 90s.
But I personally know some Asians who only buy Domestic brand because they think "Ermerica Cas ah safa den Japan nes" and they are built with thicker steel and super heavy like a tank, which is also an old perception.
The following 2 users liked this post by oonowindoo:
juniorbean (03-03-2015),
VR1 (03-03-2015)
The following users liked this post:
crazyasiantl (03-03-2015)
#57
Trolling Canuckistan
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 811
From: 100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114
It's not profitable making cars young folks love but can't afford.
The following 4 users liked this post by justnspace:
#60
The medium is WRX $26k, GTI $25k, Focus ST $24k, and other performance model of the econo box in the same market.
You can't call it a performance model when you throw a 4 banger Accord engine in there and call it a day. That is like almost as bad as a Scion tC with Camry's 4 banger.
At least all the old Si all had high rev tuned 1.8/2.0L engines that you can't find in the accord or TSX. So Si was different. Now it is just another car that share the same engine with accord, ilx, tlx, CRV and pretty much any other 4 cylinder Honda.
You can't call it a performance model when you throw a 4 banger Accord engine in there and call it a day. That is like almost as bad as a Scion tC with Camry's 4 banger.
At least all the old Si all had high rev tuned 1.8/2.0L engines that you can't find in the accord or TSX. So Si was different. Now it is just another car that share the same engine with accord, ilx, tlx, CRV and pretty much any other 4 cylinder Honda.
#61
As for when cars have issues, you're probably right... but honestly, I don't really know people with older cars... so tough to really tell.
I think the main problem with the ctr in the states is that those who lust for it can't afford it and those who can prefer something else. It was a similar problem with the mugen si, almost everyone who came into the dealership and lusted for it was was unable to afford it.
It's not profitable making cars young folks love but can't afford.
It's not profitable making cars young folks love but can't afford.
This is a hypothetical discussion about these two cars which is why I chose one, but in the real world... I wouldn't buy either. I can think of many other places to spend $30k-$35k before I'd buy either of these....
The following users liked this post:
TacoBello (03-03-2015)
#62
If the Type R comes to NA, I'd have to give a SLIGHT edge to the Honda because well, as much e-hate I've thrown their way of late (esp. the RE: NSX), I still want to see Honda be awesome and blow my robot off.
And well, the 'Ring video had me at hello. So, the Type R...but, ONLY IF it comes to NA. Otherwise, it's yet another vaporcar in my books and I'll happily take the Ford.
And well, the 'Ring video had me at hello. So, the Type R...but, ONLY IF it comes to NA. Otherwise, it's yet another vaporcar in my books and I'll happily take the Ford.
I'd love to get some seat time in both cars.
I think the main problem with the ctr in the states is that those who lust for it can't afford it and those who can prefer something else. It was a similar problem with the mugen si, almost everyone who came into the dealership and lusted for it was was unable to afford it.
It's not profitable making cars young folks love but can't afford.
It's not profitable making cars young folks love but can't afford.
The following users liked this post:
TacoBello (03-03-2015)
#63
I agree with this. It's tough to make a definitive call either way, without test drives, looking at prices etc., but the CTR excites me more than the Focus RS. That body and the 'Ring video - Wow.
I'd love to get some seat time in both cars.
Isn't that the same problem that the Evo/STi had? But they still sold relatively well.
I'd love to get some seat time in both cars.
Isn't that the same problem that the Evo/STi had? But they still sold relatively well.
#64
Trolling Canuckistan
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 811
From: 100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114
The ctr would just be lacking in many areas at the price range.
#65
Jesus Christ. It's a 300hp FWD car that looks like it's from Fast and Furious Tokyo Drift. The RS is going to kill it in every performance category and be a better car inside as well.
All this said, I'd get a Golf R over either of them as it's better than both!
All this said, I'd get a Golf R over either of them as it's better than both!
The following 2 users liked this post by charliemike:
juniorbean (03-04-2015),
justnspace (03-03-2015)
#66
Not to my knowledge. The Evo and sti both had a serious rally pedigree and sold quite well. You got a lot of bang or the buck with those cars, I'd go as far to say dollar for dollar they were the most bang for your buck under $40k.
The ctr would just be lacking in many areas at the price range.
The ctr would just be lacking in many areas at the price range.
I personally think there is still a big market at $30k (fully loaded of course) but at 35k.... hard to sell a civic at 35k...
The following users liked this post:
TacoBello (03-03-2015)
#67
The following users liked this post:
juniorbean (03-04-2015)
#68
Trolling Canuckistan
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 811
From: 100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114
This is the thing. i Think the word type R by itself will sell at least 1000 units a months... 300hp turbo Honda with name that says Type R? it just created its own prestige.
I personally think there is still a big market at $30k (fully loaded of course) but at 35k.... hard to sell a civic at 35k...
I personally think there is still a big market at $30k (fully loaded of course) but at 35k.... hard to sell a civic at 35k...
I'm not saying it's a bad car, I'm just guessing it falls into Acura zdx or Lamborghini LM002 sales numbers stateside.
The following 2 users liked this post by black label:
2012wagon (03-03-2015),
juniorbean (03-04-2015)
#70
Yes, except the team that builds crazy rally cars likely has very little to do with production vehicles. The rally teams are swamped year round.
That being said, if that's the bar you're going by, I'd say Honda's F1 experience is far greater than Ford's rally, as those engines scream to astronomical RPM and are turbo'd also. Let's also not forget they put out astronomically more power than a WRC car.
Let's not forget the turbo RDX has been around since 2007 and they continue to run well.
But yes, all honda does is builds lawn mower engines with no other major experience
That being said, if that's the bar you're going by, I'd say Honda's F1 experience is far greater than Ford's rally, as those engines scream to astronomical RPM and are turbo'd also. Let's also not forget they put out astronomically more power than a WRC car.
Let's not forget the turbo RDX has been around since 2007 and they continue to run well.
But yes, all honda does is builds lawn mower engines with no other major experience
I know you're a Honda fanboy... but why would you bring up F1 (which 1. Honda hasn't had engines in since 2005 and 2. used NA V8's) and the RDX (which was SOOOOO SUCCESSFUL with the turbo that they don't even sell it with one anymore)?
Last edited by MeehowsBRZ; 03-03-2015 at 07:17 PM.
#72
Yeah lets all be ignorant and forget for a moment that honda has had a hand in F1 racing since the 60s and provided amazing engines for teams like McLaren, Lotus, and Tyrrell.
The following users liked this post:
TacoBello (03-03-2015)
#73
2. Honda has run V6s and V12s as well. It's likely Taco is referring to their huge success as an engine supplier in the 80s. They were the sole supplier of 6 consecutive constructor & 5 consecutive drivers Championships with a V6 Turbo.
Hence maybe why people are excited to see McLaren return to having Honda build their engines again after their major success with them.
#74
Thread Starter
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
If the Type R is really going to come to the States and be sold as Civic Type R, it better not be around $35K due to the haters' perception.
I personally love both cars and their designs. And I normally don't give a shit about what others think about my car, so I wouldn't mind paying $35k for a car that is fun as hell to drive regardless of which model it is under.
BUT you can't deny the fact that people will make fun of others who will pay $35K for a Civic regardless of the performance #.
I personally love both cars and their designs. And I normally don't give a shit about what others think about my car, so I wouldn't mind paying $35k for a car that is fun as hell to drive regardless of which model it is under.
BUT you can't deny the fact that people will make fun of others who will pay $35K for a Civic regardless of the performance #.
The following 3 users liked this post by MeehowsBRZ:
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (03-03-2015)
#78
Trolling Canuckistan
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 811
From: 100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114
Personally I think the conversation is valid but it doesn't help the honda crowd. The ctr will have exactly 1 thing in common with a honda F1 car and that's the logo on the hood.
#79
Thread Starter
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
A WRC car has a lot more in common with a street car than an F1 car does. WRC cars have a direct street counterpart, yes the WRC car is beefed up but there are many shared parts from race car to street car. F1 cars are the pinnacle of engineering yet a teams success on an F1 track doesn't trickle down to street cars.
Personally I think the conversation is valid but it doesn't help the honda crowd. The ctr will have exactly 1 thing in common with a honda F1 car and that's the logo on the hood.
Personally I think the conversation is valid but it doesn't help the honda crowd. The ctr will have exactly 1 thing in common with a honda F1 car and that's the logo on the hood.
I've been on AZine for long enough to know it.
#80
I've driven a Saab SPG with about 225-250 turbocharged horses, it was a tire smoking, torque steering, terminal under steering monster. I've also been a passenger in a 500+whp civic. I think you are severely over estimating the capabilities I a fwd platform and the market for the ctr in the us.
I'm not saying it's a bad car, I'm just guessing it falls into Acura zdx or Lamborghini LM002 sales numbers stateside.
I'm not saying it's a bad car, I'm just guessing it falls into Acura zdx or Lamborghini LM002 sales numbers stateside.
As many know, i hate torque and under steering feel of FWD that is why my primary DD since 03 has always been RWD 6mt. (2 G35C, 2 S2k, 1 G37C and 335)
with that being said, if we are strictly talking about FWD Capabilities, it is very capable. I am not over estimating anything as i have seen enough Civic HB and CRX on the track that put Viper and Z06 to shame.
I am not FWD expert but i know with a light weight FWD car and enough camber and other suspension tunings can be made just as capable as RWD.
But the feel is a completely different subject.
Last edited by oonowindoo; 03-03-2015 at 09:58 PM.