Tire wear..
#1
Tire wear..
What do you guys think of these pics? Its my rear tires at 24k miles. I think there is still about 5-10k miles left on them. They are the OEM Bridgestone RE050A non rflts on the G37S....
#3
They are on their last leg, if you notice the traction control engaging more in the rain you may want to act sooner then later. The mileage on the tires is pretty good for the type of tire it is and they appear to be wearing very evenly.
#4
Stick a penny upside down in the treads. If your tread covers Lincoln's head, you have some life left.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=51
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=51
#5
they look worn and most likely will not pass inspection. the top pic you can see that the wear indicator is visible on the outside part of the tread. Likewise on the bottom pic, the outside tread is a little more worn than the inside. I would replace them in the next 100 or so miles. the rear doesn't appear to be too far out of alignment, but i would have it checked when you put on new tires.
is that a 4runner in the pic?
is that a 4runner in the pic?
Trending Topics
#8
they look worn and most likely will not pass inspection. the top pic you can see that the wear indicator is visible on the outside part of the tread. Likewise on the bottom pic, the outside tread is a little more worn than the inside. I would replace them in the next 100 or so miles. the rear doesn't appear to be too far out of alignment, but i would have it checked when you put on new tires.
is that a 4runner in the pic?
is that a 4runner in the pic?
#12
Those are Bridgestone's not Firestones, they are far from new and only available in a small handful of sizes - definitely not G37 sizes. There is a lot more to a tire then how it looks
#14
I hate to keep pushing it on people but seriously.... http://www.g35driver.com/forums/whee...ome-tires.html
As for those tires, I highly recommend the penny trick for the tire tread as it was mentioned. I would get it aligned at a reputable performance alignment shop after getting new tires, as they'll probably even adjust it to your desires. as is, your alignment looks fine, I don't remember the exact spec but my friend's 350Z and other friend's 240SX had a bit of negative camber dialed in from the factory.
As for those tires, I highly recommend the penny trick for the tire tread as it was mentioned. I would get it aligned at a reputable performance alignment shop after getting new tires, as they'll probably even adjust it to your desires. as is, your alignment looks fine, I don't remember the exact spec but my friend's 350Z and other friend's 240SX had a bit of negative camber dialed in from the factory.
#15
Probably going to go with a 225.
#16
I hate to keep pushing it on people but seriously.... http://www.g35driver.com/forums/whee...ome-tires.html
As for those tires, I highly recommend the penny trick for the tire tread as it was mentioned. I would get it aligned at a reputable performance alignment shop after getting new tires, as they'll probably even adjust it to your desires. as is, your alignment looks fine, I don't remember the exact spec but my friend's 350Z and other friend's 240SX had a bit of negative camber dialed in from the factory.
As for those tires, I highly recommend the penny trick for the tire tread as it was mentioned. I would get it aligned at a reputable performance alignment shop after getting new tires, as they'll probably even adjust it to your desires. as is, your alignment looks fine, I don't remember the exact spec but my friend's 350Z and other friend's 240SX had a bit of negative camber dialed in from the factory.
I like Vredestein, don't get me wrong, but they are ALWAYS on the heels of Nokian and never quite there. The tires in that link look shockingly like Nokian's old NRV, which is the problem with Vredestein, they are always chasing Nokian and never leading.
#17
I hate to keep pushing it on people but seriously.... http://www.g35driver.com/forums/whee...ome-tires.html
As for those tires, I highly recommend the penny trick for the tire tread as it was mentioned. I would get it aligned at a reputable performance alignment shop after getting new tires, as they'll probably even adjust it to your desires. as is, your alignment looks fine, I don't remember the exact spec but my friend's 350Z and other friend's 240SX had a bit of negative camber dialed in from the factory.
As for those tires, I highly recommend the penny trick for the tire tread as it was mentioned. I would get it aligned at a reputable performance alignment shop after getting new tires, as they'll probably even adjust it to your desires. as is, your alignment looks fine, I don't remember the exact spec but my friend's 350Z and other friend's 240SX had a bit of negative camber dialed in from the factory.
Tires should be replaced at 4/32, not 2/32. Hydroplaning resistance is significantly reduced when you have less than 4/32". A nickel is a better measuring tool for tread depth. If you see part of Washington's head, then you have 4/32" remaining.
#18
The penny trick is an example of penny wise and pound foolish.
Tires should be replaced at 4/32, not 2/32. Hydroplaning resistance is significantly reduced when you have less than 4/32". A nickel is a better measuring tool for tread depth. If you see part of Washington's head, then you have 4/32" remaining.
Tires should be replaced at 4/32, not 2/32. Hydroplaning resistance is significantly reduced when you have less than 4/32". A nickel is a better measuring tool for tread depth. If you see part of Washington's head, then you have 4/32" remaining.
#19
The OEM Bridgestones have a 170 wear rating, if I remember correctly. You got 24k miles from them? You did great! (And you can't really rotate the tires unless you unmount and remount, which is probably an exercise of futility at this point...)
What tires are you planning to go with? I'll be in the same dilemma in about a couple year's time but my early research has told me hardly anyone makes a tire in 225/45/19 (ie front tires) besides Bridgestone. Or ... if they do, they don't make anything to fit the rear (ie 245/40/19).
/end rant
What tires are you planning to go with? I'll be in the same dilemma in about a couple year's time but my early research has told me hardly anyone makes a tire in 225/45/19 (ie front tires) besides Bridgestone. Or ... if they do, they don't make anything to fit the rear (ie 245/40/19).
/end rant
#20
#21
I used to have 245/50/ZR16 GS-D3s and now am riding on 275/40/ZR17 Ultrac Sessantas.... obviously the increase in tread width and lower profile assists in traction and response, respectively. But not only that, these are quieter and ride smoother (despite said differences) AND they are less than the 245 GS-D3s were. They've been just as great in the rain also. Not to mention I love the tread design, and how the tire just fits. Doesn't bulge out like a fat chick's muffin top.
I'm open to suggestions, if there is a better tire out there and its available in larger sizes.
#22
The penny trick is an example of penny wise and pound foolish.
Tires should be replaced at 4/32, not 2/32. Hydroplaning resistance is significantly reduced when you have less than 4/32". A nickel is a better measuring tool for tread depth. If you see part of Washington's head, then you have 4/32" remaining.
Tires should be replaced at 4/32, not 2/32. Hydroplaning resistance is significantly reduced when you have less than 4/32". A nickel is a better measuring tool for tread depth. If you see part of Washington's head, then you have 4/32" remaining.
#23
Hmmm really? I take everyone's opinion with a grain of salt but since you do have experience with tires all around, do you know of any comparable Nokian models? I know for sure that Nokian snow tires are highly popular, but I haven't heard of them much in the summer performance tire market. I'm usually one of the last people to jump in the deep end, so to speak..... so there needs to be several positive reviews of something before I go with it.
I used to have 245/50/ZR16 GS-D3s and now am riding on 275/40/ZR17 Ultrac Sessantas.... obviously the increase in tread width and lower profile assists in traction and response, respectively. But not only that, these are quieter and ride smoother (despite said differences) AND they are less than the 245 GS-D3s were. They've been just as great in the rain also. Not to mention I love the tread design, and how the tire just fits. Doesn't bulge out like a fat chick's muffin top.
I'm open to suggestions, if there is a better tire out there and its available in larger sizes.
I used to have 245/50/ZR16 GS-D3s and now am riding on 275/40/ZR17 Ultrac Sessantas.... obviously the increase in tread width and lower profile assists in traction and response, respectively. But not only that, these are quieter and ride smoother (despite said differences) AND they are less than the 245 GS-D3s were. They've been just as great in the rain also. Not to mention I love the tread design, and how the tire just fits. Doesn't bulge out like a fat chick's muffin top.
I'm open to suggestions, if there is a better tire out there and its available in larger sizes.
Here's a link to check http://www.nokiantires.com/product-group?group=1.02 the first row are their all-weather/season tires the H, V, Z and NRY are the performance tires. They do get expensive but they are fantastic performance tires, they typically offer fantastic dry/wet traction and are extremely quiet.
#24
They don't look too bad at first, until you see them compared to the new pic. This is what my Yokos looked like when I took them off, didn't really neglect them on purpose, just slipped my mind. Funny thing was the car never handled badly.
#25
Yeah, I'm not too worried about them yet. They still feel exactly the same handling-wise and have not given me any problems in the wet so far. Even so, they will need replacing soon and derrick is right, most tires don't seem to come in my sizes.
I'm probably going to go with some Kuhmo Ecsta's as the price is reasonable and the performance seems pretty good from what I've read. Will have to go with slightly different sizes though...
I'm probably going to go with some Kuhmo Ecsta's as the price is reasonable and the performance seems pretty good from what I've read. Will have to go with slightly different sizes though...
#26
Yeah, I'm not too worried about them yet. They still feel exactly the same handling-wise and have not given me any problems in the wet so far. Even so, they will need replacing soon and derrick is right, most tires don't seem to come in my sizes.
I'm probably going to go with some Kuhmo Ecsta's as the price is reasonable and the performance seems pretty good from what I've read. Will have to go with slightly different sizes though...
I'm probably going to go with some Kuhmo Ecsta's as the price is reasonable and the performance seems pretty good from what I've read. Will have to go with slightly different sizes though...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CostcoFanAUS
4G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
5
09-18-2015 07:05 AM