Tire wear..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2009, 11:54 AM
  #1  
Punk Rocker
Thread Starter
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Tire wear..

What do you guys think of these pics? Its my rear tires at 24k miles. I think there is still about 5-10k miles left on them. They are the OEM Bridgestone RE050A non rflts on the G37S....



Old 01-18-2009, 12:14 PM
  #2  
Pro
 
calgary2800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Looks pretty much bald to me from a straight on view. Thats pretty average miles for a summer tire.
Old 01-18-2009, 12:16 PM
  #3  
dɐɹɔ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ
 
iTimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Age: 43
Posts: 7,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
They are on their last leg, if you notice the traction control engaging more in the rain you may want to act sooner then later. The mileage on the tires is pretty good for the type of tire it is and they appear to be wearing very evenly.
Old 01-18-2009, 02:08 PM
  #4  
Advanced
 
riomp300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Matawan, NJ
Age: 41
Posts: 81
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Stick a penny upside down in the treads. If your tread covers Lincoln's head, you have some life left.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=51
Old 01-18-2009, 07:23 PM
  #5  
registered pw
 
dallison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: south central pa
Age: 49
Posts: 38,822
Received 354 Likes on 252 Posts
they look worn and most likely will not pass inspection. the top pic you can see that the wear indicator is visible on the outside part of the tread. Likewise on the bottom pic, the outside tread is a little more worn than the inside. I would replace them in the next 100 or so miles. the rear doesn't appear to be too far out of alignment, but i would have it checked when you put on new tires.

is that a 4runner in the pic?
Old 01-18-2009, 07:37 PM
  #6  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
They're done. Time to get that STS-V.
Old 01-18-2009, 09:30 PM
  #7  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
no more burn outs please
Old 01-18-2009, 10:12 PM
  #8  
Punk Rocker
Thread Starter
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by dallison
they look worn and most likely will not pass inspection. the top pic you can see that the wear indicator is visible on the outside part of the tread. Likewise on the bottom pic, the outside tread is a little more worn than the inside. I would replace them in the next 100 or so miles. the rear doesn't appear to be too far out of alignment, but i would have it checked when you put on new tires.

is that a 4runner in the pic?
Nope, thats my Expedition. I'll be replacing them in the next couple thousand miles more than likely....
Old 01-18-2009, 10:17 PM
  #9  
Burning Brakes
 
lscld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, my dad had these OEM on his car. Replaced 'um at about 33k. They wore pretty well for a summer tire.
Old 01-18-2009, 10:45 PM
  #10  
Someday, an RS6 Avant+
 
mrmako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,502
Received 1,025 Likes on 543 Posts
I have them on my Subaru. I love them, but it will suck to replace them (215/45-18, $208 each at Tirerack).
Old 01-18-2009, 10:58 PM
  #11  
06 WDP / 07 WDP Type-S
 
Be-in my TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chicago
Age: 35
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Firestone has come out with a new design. RE070s. They look amazing, but I have yet to try them.
Old 01-18-2009, 11:02 PM
  #12  
dɐɹɔ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ
 
iTimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Age: 43
Posts: 7,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Be-in my TL
Firestone has come out with a new design. RE070s. They look amazing, but I have yet to try them.
Those are Bridgestone's not Firestones, they are far from new and only available in a small handful of sizes - definitely not G37 sizes. There is a lot more to a tire then how it looks
Old 01-18-2009, 11:10 PM
  #13  
AZ Community Team
 
Bearcat94's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,771 Likes on 4,342 Posts
Get a tool to measure tread depth, they are cheap and easy to use. Under ~ 3/32nds is time to replace.
Old 01-19-2009, 01:23 AM
  #14  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
I hate to keep pushing it on people but seriously.... http://www.g35driver.com/forums/whee...ome-tires.html

As for those tires, I highly recommend the penny trick for the tire tread as it was mentioned. I would get it aligned at a reputable performance alignment shop after getting new tires, as they'll probably even adjust it to your desires. as is, your alignment looks fine, I don't remember the exact spec but my friend's 350Z and other friend's 240SX had a bit of negative camber dialed in from the factory.
Old 01-19-2009, 08:08 AM
  #15  
The Box
 
vas25tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 6,680
Received 80 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by mrmako
I have them on my Subaru. I love them, but it will suck to replace them (215/45-18, $208 each at Tirerack).
I have the same size, I've heard of people going to a 225/45/18 for more options and better prices. I have to replace mine in around April so I'm going to be searching for some too.

Probably going to go with a 225.
Old 01-19-2009, 08:48 AM
  #16  
dɐɹɔ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ
 
iTimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Age: 43
Posts: 7,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
I hate to keep pushing it on people but seriously.... http://www.g35driver.com/forums/whee...ome-tires.html

As for those tires, I highly recommend the penny trick for the tire tread as it was mentioned. I would get it aligned at a reputable performance alignment shop after getting new tires, as they'll probably even adjust it to your desires. as is, your alignment looks fine, I don't remember the exact spec but my friend's 350Z and other friend's 240SX had a bit of negative camber dialed in from the factory.
A lot of 350Z guys liked to have their cars set to G35 spec because it would wear tires better, at the expense of some road feel. The tire feathering problem the early 350z's had was enough to make people try a lot of things to remedy the problem.

I like Vredestein, don't get me wrong, but they are ALWAYS on the heels of Nokian and never quite there. The tires in that link look shockingly like Nokian's old NRV, which is the problem with Vredestein, they are always chasing Nokian and never leading.
Old 01-19-2009, 05:15 PM
  #17  
Moderator
 
SodaLuvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 3,965
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
I hate to keep pushing it on people but seriously.... http://www.g35driver.com/forums/whee...ome-tires.html

As for those tires, I highly recommend the penny trick for the tire tread as it was mentioned. I would get it aligned at a reputable performance alignment shop after getting new tires, as they'll probably even adjust it to your desires. as is, your alignment looks fine, I don't remember the exact spec but my friend's 350Z and other friend's 240SX had a bit of negative camber dialed in from the factory.
The penny trick is an example of penny wise and pound foolish.

Tires should be replaced at 4/32, not 2/32. Hydroplaning resistance is significantly reduced when you have less than 4/32". A nickel is a better measuring tool for tread depth. If you see part of Washington's head, then you have 4/32" remaining.
Old 01-19-2009, 05:36 PM
  #18  
registered pw
 
dallison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: south central pa
Age: 49
Posts: 38,822
Received 354 Likes on 252 Posts
Originally Posted by SodaLuvr
The penny trick is an example of penny wise and pound foolish.

Tires should be replaced at 4/32, not 2/32. Hydroplaning resistance is significantly reduced when you have less than 4/32". A nickel is a better measuring tool for tread depth. If you see part of Washington's head, then you have 4/32" remaining.
Old 01-19-2009, 05:42 PM
  #19  
Senior Moderator
 
derrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Windsor, ON, Canada
Age: 49
Posts: 5,122
Received 30 Likes on 17 Posts
The OEM Bridgestones have a 170 wear rating, if I remember correctly. You got 24k miles from them? You did great! (And you can't really rotate the tires unless you unmount and remount, which is probably an exercise of futility at this point...)

What tires are you planning to go with? I'll be in the same dilemma in about a couple year's time but my early research has told me hardly anyone makes a tire in 225/45/19 (ie front tires) besides Bridgestone. Or ... if they do, they don't make anything to fit the rear (ie 245/40/19).

/end rant
Old 01-19-2009, 08:17 PM
  #20  
Not just a smell
 
Fishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SodaLuvr
The penny trick is an example of penny wise and pound foolish...
Ummm, you've heard of Darwin? Don't cramp his style.

Here's the tread pattern when new; nothing more needs to be said:

Old 01-20-2009, 02:58 AM
  #21  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by iTimmy
I like Vredestein, don't get me wrong, but they are ALWAYS on the heels of Nokian and never quite there. The tires in that link look shockingly like Nokian's old NRV, which is the problem with Vredestein, they are always chasing Nokian and never leading.
Hmmm really? I take everyone's opinion with a grain of salt but since you do have experience with tires all around, do you know of any comparable Nokian models? I know for sure that Nokian snow tires are highly popular, but I haven't heard of them much in the summer performance tire market. I'm usually one of the last people to jump in the deep end, so to speak..... so there needs to be several positive reviews of something before I go with it.

I used to have 245/50/ZR16 GS-D3s and now am riding on 275/40/ZR17 Ultrac Sessantas.... obviously the increase in tread width and lower profile assists in traction and response, respectively. But not only that, these are quieter and ride smoother (despite said differences) AND they are less than the 245 GS-D3s were. They've been just as great in the rain also. Not to mention I love the tread design, and how the tire just fits. Doesn't bulge out like a fat chick's muffin top.

I'm open to suggestions, if there is a better tire out there and its available in larger sizes.
Old 01-20-2009, 04:38 AM
  #22  
Pro
 
shrykhar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 656
Received 21 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by SodaLuvr
The penny trick is an example of penny wise and pound foolish.

Tires should be replaced at 4/32, not 2/32. Hydroplaning resistance is significantly reduced when you have less than 4/32". A nickel is a better measuring tool for tread depth. If you see part of Washington's head, then you have 4/32" remaining.
Quarter, not nickel.
Old 01-20-2009, 08:37 AM
  #23  
dɐɹɔ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ
 
iTimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Age: 43
Posts: 7,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
Hmmm really? I take everyone's opinion with a grain of salt but since you do have experience with tires all around, do you know of any comparable Nokian models? I know for sure that Nokian snow tires are highly popular, but I haven't heard of them much in the summer performance tire market. I'm usually one of the last people to jump in the deep end, so to speak..... so there needs to be several positive reviews of something before I go with it.

I used to have 245/50/ZR16 GS-D3s and now am riding on 275/40/ZR17 Ultrac Sessantas.... obviously the increase in tread width and lower profile assists in traction and response, respectively. But not only that, these are quieter and ride smoother (despite said differences) AND they are less than the 245 GS-D3s were. They've been just as great in the rain also. Not to mention I love the tread design, and how the tire just fits. Doesn't bulge out like a fat chick's muffin top.

I'm open to suggestions, if there is a better tire out there and its available in larger sizes.
I don't believe they are going to have big honking american sizes, their summer tires are targeted at European and entry level performance, but for educational purposes it's worth a look.

Here's a link to check http://www.nokiantires.com/product-group?group=1.02 the first row are their all-weather/season tires the H, V, Z and NRY are the performance tires. They do get expensive but they are fantastic performance tires, they typically offer fantastic dry/wet traction and are extremely quiet.
Old 01-20-2009, 09:51 AM
  #24  
Drifting
 
Rock2534's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 2,619
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
They don't look too bad at first, until you see them compared to the new pic. This is what my Yokos looked like when I took them off, didn't really neglect them on purpose, just slipped my mind. Funny thing was the car never handled badly.


Old 01-20-2009, 01:01 PM
  #25  
Punk Rocker
Thread Starter
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Yeah, I'm not too worried about them yet. They still feel exactly the same handling-wise and have not given me any problems in the wet so far. Even so, they will need replacing soon and derrick is right, most tires don't seem to come in my sizes.

I'm probably going to go with some Kuhmo Ecsta's as the price is reasonable and the performance seems pretty good from what I've read. Will have to go with slightly different sizes though...
Old 01-20-2009, 01:20 PM
  #26  
Drifting
 
Rock2534's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 2,619
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
Yeah, I'm not too worried about them yet. They still feel exactly the same handling-wise and have not given me any problems in the wet so far. Even so, they will need replacing soon and derrick is right, most tires don't seem to come in my sizes.

I'm probably going to go with some Kuhmo Ecsta's as the price is reasonable and the performance seems pretty good from what I've read. Will have to go with slightly different sizes though...
I replaced my yokos with Ecstas as well, good tire(for the money).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
udelslayer
1G RDX Problems & Fixes
12
05-06-2016 12:27 PM
DidiBob
4G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
13
01-04-2016 12:41 PM
Robospinner
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
22
09-24-2015 08:47 AM
CostcoFanAUS
4G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
5
09-18-2015 06:05 AM
fallacy
2G TSX (2009-2014)
10
09-04-2015 10:15 AM



Quick Reply: Tire wear..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 PM.