Talk me out of it...
Talk me out of it...
Okay folks, here's the situation.
I really do like my Elantra as everybody knows but I've been fighting with it recently and its complete inability to deliver anywhere close to the EPA fuel mileage numbers. Now I know those figures are just an estimate but I cannot get within spitting distance of them. In city, I get 24 to 25 and the car is rated for 29. I drove it like grandma en route to bingo for a whole week and only managed 26.9. Two all-highway tanks netted me 33.3 and 33.6 MPG and the highway rating is 40. In fact, my lifetime average is a miserable 25.1 MPG.
Resetting the average MPG meter gives me an idea of just how hard it is to reach the figures with this car. I was traveling up I-5 at 65 MPH a few nights ago with the cruise control on, driving on what I thought was a flat surface. I switched to the MPG display and watched in horror as it dropped from 35 to 33 to 31 to 29. Apparently there was the slightest of inclines (totally imperceptible) and that lead to a 25% drop in fuel consumption!
I traded the Santa Fe in mainly to save time at the shop and the Elantra has performed that task admirably. It has been a flawless traveling companion over 5,600 miles that I've put on so far but the fuel economy is what's killing me. I sacrificed a V6 with 276 horsepower and a torque curve that seemingly never ended because I was willing to trade it off for better mileage. Well the fact is I'm not getting it and my love affair with the car is waning quickly. I've owned slow cars my whole life and the Santa Fe was here and gone within 15 months.
That brings me to this....the 2012 Kia Optima SX Turbo in Corsa Blue. This is my dream Optima; cheaper than the Sonata Turbo, more equipment than my car, more power and in the real world, similar if not better mileage. Not to mention the color is astonishing. Trade-in values for the Elantra are excellent because it's in very high demand. If I can get the numbers I want, I'll only have lost $1,000 in the deal and if I sell it privately, may even be able to break even and my payments on the Optima will be very similar.
Please tell me this is a bad idea....or don't.
I really do like my Elantra as everybody knows but I've been fighting with it recently and its complete inability to deliver anywhere close to the EPA fuel mileage numbers. Now I know those figures are just an estimate but I cannot get within spitting distance of them. In city, I get 24 to 25 and the car is rated for 29. I drove it like grandma en route to bingo for a whole week and only managed 26.9. Two all-highway tanks netted me 33.3 and 33.6 MPG and the highway rating is 40. In fact, my lifetime average is a miserable 25.1 MPG.
Resetting the average MPG meter gives me an idea of just how hard it is to reach the figures with this car. I was traveling up I-5 at 65 MPH a few nights ago with the cruise control on, driving on what I thought was a flat surface. I switched to the MPG display and watched in horror as it dropped from 35 to 33 to 31 to 29. Apparently there was the slightest of inclines (totally imperceptible) and that lead to a 25% drop in fuel consumption!
I traded the Santa Fe in mainly to save time at the shop and the Elantra has performed that task admirably. It has been a flawless traveling companion over 5,600 miles that I've put on so far but the fuel economy is what's killing me. I sacrificed a V6 with 276 horsepower and a torque curve that seemingly never ended because I was willing to trade it off for better mileage. Well the fact is I'm not getting it and my love affair with the car is waning quickly. I've owned slow cars my whole life and the Santa Fe was here and gone within 15 months.
That brings me to this....the 2012 Kia Optima SX Turbo in Corsa Blue. This is my dream Optima; cheaper than the Sonata Turbo, more equipment than my car, more power and in the real world, similar if not better mileage. Not to mention the color is astonishing. Trade-in values for the Elantra are excellent because it's in very high demand. If I can get the numbers I want, I'll only have lost $1,000 in the deal and if I sell it privately, may even be able to break even and my payments on the Optima will be very similar.
Please tell me this is a bad idea....or don't.

When I was car shopping it seemed to me that peeps in the Optima forum were saying that the turbo did not get anywhere near its rated MPG. When the turbo is engaged the MPG goes to
. From what I could gather the turbo MPG was similar to a normally aspirated V6. Take a Camry SE (both I4 and V6) for a test drive.
The only thing I don't like about mine is that I see too many of them now. If you really want high MPG the Camry Hybrid has near V6 power and great MPG.
In short, the Optima Turbo is a nice car but don't expect the high MPG numbers. If you want the MPG stick with the normally aspirated model.
. From what I could gather the turbo MPG was similar to a normally aspirated V6. Take a Camry SE (both I4 and V6) for a test drive.
The only thing I don't like about mine is that I see too many of them now. If you really want high MPG the Camry Hybrid has near V6 power and great MPG.In short, the Optima Turbo is a nice car but don't expect the high MPG numbers. If you want the MPG stick with the normally aspirated model.
Last edited by doopstr; Apr 7, 2012 at 08:49 AM.
If you're that concerned about mileage, get a Prius.
The Kia Optima Turbo is advertised at 22/34, so why would you even consider a car that is advertising a less mpg than what you are currently driving. Knowing what you know now, that the Optima would probably get less MPG than what is advertised.
I don't think this is about the mpg at all. You want a more fun car than a boring Elantra.
I think that if you can live with getting worse gas mpg than what you are currently getting, get the Optima.
The Kia Optima Turbo is advertised at 22/34, so why would you even consider a car that is advertising a less mpg than what you are currently driving. Knowing what you know now, that the Optima would probably get less MPG than what is advertised.
I don't think this is about the mpg at all. You want a more fun car than a boring Elantra.

I think that if you can live with getting worse gas mpg than what you are currently getting, get the Optima.
Trending Topics
Who in their right mind would tell you to keep the Elantra and not go for the Optima?
If you can stay out of the boost you'll get a pretty good return on the MPGs, but if you put your foot in it all the time forget getting anywhere near the Elantra's MPGs. It's a stunning looking car, especially in that blue.
If you can stay out of the boost you'll get a pretty good return on the MPGs, but if you put your foot in it all the time forget getting anywhere near the Elantra's MPGs. It's a stunning looking car, especially in that blue.
It seems to me you're wanting a car to settle down with so you need something that will make you happy. The Santa Fe was a lemon, the Elantra isn't living up to expectations on certain levels, so you want to try something else.
If you can really make the deal into basically a wash, then go for it.
If you can really make the deal into basically a wash, then go for it.
As you know my girlfriend recently got a 2011 Elantra and she's getting 33 mpg mixed. Is your car full of stuff? Weight is a big contributor to bad mpg.
And while I love the new Optima, I highly doubt your mpg will be better. How many tanks of gas could you get for the Elantra in that $1000 you're losing?
And while I love the new Optima, I highly doubt your mpg will be better. How many tanks of gas could you get for the Elantra in that $1000 you're losing?
Only if you talk me out of mine first. 
Have you considered anything outside of the Kia/Hyundai family? It sounds like the real-world MPG will be disappointing compared to their estimated MPG if that's something you are considering.

Have you considered anything outside of the Kia/Hyundai family? It sounds like the real-world MPG will be disappointing compared to their estimated MPG if that's something you are considering.
You'll lose only $1,000 on trading in the Elantra, or you lose $1,000 getting the Optima?
I think you said earlier that Hyundais don't get their rated mileage until after they're broken in, about 10,000 miles right? 5,600 means you're not even close to getting there. Either give it time to get the rated mileage, or get rid of it now and cut your losses.
If I were you, I'd look elsewhere too. The Optima is a great-looking car and a great deal, but from what I've heard, it doesn't feel like it has as much power as it does, and the mileage isn't that great. Cross-shop other brands. If you get an Optima, it'll be your fourth Hyundai in a row.
Like others have said, you only live once. See what else there is on the market. Or give your Elantra a chance to prove itself.
I think you said earlier that Hyundais don't get their rated mileage until after they're broken in, about 10,000 miles right? 5,600 means you're not even close to getting there. Either give it time to get the rated mileage, or get rid of it now and cut your losses.
If I were you, I'd look elsewhere too. The Optima is a great-looking car and a great deal, but from what I've heard, it doesn't feel like it has as much power as it does, and the mileage isn't that great. Cross-shop other brands. If you get an Optima, it'll be your fourth Hyundai in a row.
Like others have said, you only live once. See what else there is on the market. Or give your Elantra a chance to prove itself.
If this helps at all, the last time I checked my parents' MPG numbers in their Sonata Turbo, they were averaging right around 30 MPG in 70/30 highway/city driving.
YMMV with the Sonata/Optima though, as I've heard numbers all over the board on that car.
YMMV with the Sonata/Optima though, as I've heard numbers all over the board on that car.
So you want to get rid of your weaker car that's not getting good gas mileage because you sacrificed a car that had good power but sucky fuel economy because you wanted better mpg?
I don't think the Optima is the answer, I think you want one just because the Elantra isn't enough car. I've driven the Sonata turbo and it did not feel that powerful.
I don't think the Optima is the answer, I think you want one just because the Elantra isn't enough car. I've driven the Sonata turbo and it did not feel that powerful.
Not going to do it, guys.
I was thinking about it all morning at work and even if I sell my car privately, I still have to pay off the $3,400 I still owe and then the rest would go towards the Optima. Even the best case scenario has me going into debt by about ten thousand dollars, two and a half times what I currently owe on the Elantra.
I didn't want to go into debt to begin with and my current payment is incredibly easy to live with although if I get the Optima, it goes up to $277 a month over 36 months before interest. No thanks.
I appreciate all the kind words.
I was thinking about it all morning at work and even if I sell my car privately, I still have to pay off the $3,400 I still owe and then the rest would go towards the Optima. Even the best case scenario has me going into debt by about ten thousand dollars, two and a half times what I currently owe on the Elantra.
I didn't want to go into debt to begin with and my current payment is incredibly easy to live with although if I get the Optima, it goes up to $277 a month over 36 months before interest. No thanks.
I appreciate all the kind words.
Do people ever do a cost analysis when talking about the difference of 30mpg and 27mpg. If you drive an average of 12,000 miles per year with gas costing $4.00 per gal and you getting 30mpg, that means you'll spend $1,600 in gas for the year
12,000/30mpg = 400 gallons X $4.00 = $1,600/52 weeks = $31/per week
12,000/27mpg = 444 gallons X $4.00 = $1,776 /52 weeks = $34/per week
So you are losing $3/week due to a 3mpg difference in gas mileage.
Just saying, if you don't do 30k miles per year in a car, those small mileage differences aren't compounded as much as you think.
Not saying anyone wants to lose money but I'm fine losing a few bucks per week for less mpg if the trade-off is worth it.
12,000/30mpg = 400 gallons X $4.00 = $1,600/52 weeks = $31/per week
12,000/27mpg = 444 gallons X $4.00 = $1,776 /52 weeks = $34/per week
So you are losing $3/week due to a 3mpg difference in gas mileage.
Just saying, if you don't do 30k miles per year in a car, those small mileage differences aren't compounded as much as you think.
Not saying anyone wants to lose money but I'm fine losing a few bucks per week for less mpg if the trade-off is worth it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jterp7
3G MDX (2014-2020)
9
Feb 3, 2016 08:34 PM
GWEEDOspeedo
Car Parts for Sale
4
Jan 15, 2016 10:39 PM












