So I had a talk with my girlfriend....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 05:42 PM
  #1  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
So I had a talk with my girlfriend....

....about how the new M5 was not going to be offered with a conventional manual transmission (and how they crushed my dreams, but part's not important). Her response was that this was a good idea because BMW would sell more cars since more people are "able" to drive it.

My thought was that BMW M-cars (and the M5, specifically) had the business of people who were LOOKING FOR a manual transmission in a car like that and couldn't get it with Mercedes AMG, Audi RS6, Jaguar Rs, etc. Basically, the previous M5 had no competition in terms of the type of car + manual tranny. So I think those customers like me will now be more willing to look to AMG since they can no longer get the third pedal from Bimmer.

So what do you guys think? Will BMW sell more M5s now that it's not manual-tranny-only? Or will everyone be getting an E55 (or other)?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 06:28 PM
  #2  
mg7726's Avatar
She said: it's GINORMOUS!
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 2
From: NYC
it's a disgrace the M cars autos...sad indeed. i refuse to get a M in auto.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 06:57 PM
  #3  
robert_tsxgeek's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: CT
I think you gf is cool...chicks that talk german is sexy.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 07:41 PM
  #4  
Helicobacter Pylori's Avatar
I'm allergic to bull
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
From: Earth
It's not exactly an auto. It's a 7-gear sequential shift. Yes, 7 freaking gears. That's gonna kill my left foot if it comes with a clutch.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 07:43 PM
  #5  
Lung Fu Mo Shi's Avatar
Registered AssHat
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
I like SMG anyway. It's part of BMW's push forward and hopefully the future.

So, true clutch/stick manual being gone...not a loss. It's more trackable with SMG anyway.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 08:09 PM
  #6  
ks112's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: victoria
don't some race cars have smg's but also a clutch pedal??? i seen cars where to up shift and down shift all you have to do is press the lever up or down but they have a third peddle as well. Have i been smoking crack again or can someone verify this for me
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 08:34 PM
  #7  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
I've never seen a street car with a sequential manual and a clutch pedal but F1 cars have a clutch that is operated by hand but only for 1st gear.

Every sequential manual transmission I have seen on street cars are all electrohydraulic with no clutch pedal.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 08:38 PM
  #8  
ks112's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: victoria
no i was refering to race cars. sorry it was out of topic. But however i think you answered my question. So for F1 cars you would only need to operate the clutch when engaging first gear? meaning the only time you press the clutch is when your trying to get out of the pit?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 08:51 PM
  #9  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
Yep. AFAIK it's meant for creeping around the pits and for the launch at the start. The rest of the gears definitely don't need the driver to operate the clutch.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 09:34 PM
  #10  
Junkster's Avatar
Teh ?
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,784
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
It's all about the benji's these days, and BMW isn't an exception to the rule...

I think it might open up a few more people to the market, which would be added profit. Some enthusiasts might be turned off, but if they are true fans, they'll buy into the new changes...

I mean, come on, let's be honest. The M5 might well be the most complete luxury sports sedan in the world, hands down.

Junkster, who only wishes the look would change
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 03:41 AM
  #11  
sauceman's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 6
From: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
.. So I think those customers like me will now be more willing to look to AMG since they can no longer get the third pedal from Bimmer.

So what do you guys think? Will BMW sell more M5s now that it's not manual-tranny-only? Or will everyone be getting an E55 (or other)?
I understand you need the clutch to be happy, but if you were in the market for such a car, why in the hell would you choose an AT over an SMG?? There's no clutch pedal, but there still is noo comparison.

Have you actually tried an SMG, or is this just couch ranting?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 12:36 PM
  #12  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by sauceman
...Have you actually tried an SMG, or is this just couch ranting?
Couch ranting. I've never had the pleasure (?) of driving an SMG. But I'm pretty sure I won't like it as much as a real manual tranny.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 01:01 PM
  #13  
Soze75's Avatar
Bound for Europe
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: My crib in Burnaby, BC
So it's official then? I read of rumors of a manual offering just for NA.

I'd probably enjoy the SMG after a while, but for some reason, a clutch-less M5 doesn't get me as excited as usual.

Soze, who loves the new M5, thank you
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 05:09 PM
  #14  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
So nobody except Junkster answered the real question:

Will BMW sell more or less M5's now that it's not the only (MT) game in town?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 05:14 PM
  #15  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Junkster
...I mean, come on, let's be honest. The M5 might well be the most complete luxury sports sedan in the world, hands down...
It WAS, most definitely. But will it STILL be? Probably, but it's not automatic (pardon the pun) anymore.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 05:16 PM
  #16  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by sauceman
I understand you need the clutch to be happy, but if you were in the market for such a car, why in the hell would you choose an AT over an SMG?? There's no clutch pedal, but there still is noo comparison....
And you're right. I probably wouldn't end up choosing an AT E55 over an SMG M5. But before I didn't even have to THINK about it. Now it's That's the problem.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 05:18 PM
  #17  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
I'm really whoring it up now, but this topic is really close to my heart. Another thing:

Now that the SMG is a ///M norm, what stops BMW from making an M7 (they still claim that they won't do it)? Now THAT would be a car I'd like to see with an SMG (a manual would be a little too much for that car, but SMG might just work). Thoughts?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 07:01 PM
  #18  
toddstuh's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
SMG is definately a paradigm shift (NPI) from the old school but from what I recall back when Car and Driver tested the manual M3 vs the SMG M3 there was no significant loss in performance. I think that once one experiences the SMG and it's futuristic ease of operation, there will be many converts from the old to the new.
I'm a diehard stick & three pedal man but after driving tiptronic Porsches and the paddle shifters on the Audi A8, the engagement of the gears is pretty much as quick as a manual ... and I think it's rather cool !
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 09:25 PM
  #19  
Soze75's Avatar
Bound for Europe
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: My crib in Burnaby, BC
To CP...

They will sell a crapload of M5s now.

No longer is it only offered with a manual, a factor that may have scared off hundreds in recent years.

Then I think maybe there will be similar or less sales of the new M5.

M5 loyalists may be so offended by the new design that the number of repeat buyers may diminish.

The SMG may draw in new faces but the looks may drive off old faces at the same time.

We'll see how it goes.

I can't wait to drive it! My friend who got promoted to sales finally has promised a drive when it arrives. He's got me lined up for a 645 6-speed test next month!! Yay!!!
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 12:42 PM
  #20  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by toddstuh
....I'm a diehard stick & three pedal man but after driving tiptronic Porsches and the paddle shifters on the Audi A8, the engagement of the gears is pretty much as quick as a manual ... and I think it's rather cool !
But those are both automatics....

I'm not really worried about losses/gains in performance and/or how quickly the shift is made (sometimes I don't WANT a quick shift!). All I want to do is control my own clutch. Is that too much to ask, BMW?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 12:33 PM
  #21  
gfxdave99's Avatar
6MT Snob
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,276
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland
If you want a clutch get an S4 or an S6

Or if you are going to be speinding phat cash dare i say it a CTS-V or the upcoming STS-V
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 12:42 PM
  #22  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
I like the S4 a lot, but it's too small to be competitive with M5/E55/etc. S6 is the right size, but you can't get it with a manual tranny. And it doesn't have enough HP to be competitive with M5/E55/etc.

If anyone ever sees me driving a Cadillac, please shoot me in the face. Thanks.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 01:29 PM
  #23  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
please shoot me in the face. Thanks.

Just say when
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 01:45 PM
  #24  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
I like the S4 a lot, but it's too small to be competitive with M5/E55/etc. S6 is the right size, but you can't get it with a manual tranny. And it doesn't have enough HP to be competitive with M5/E55/etc.

If anyone ever sees me driving a Cadillac, please shoot me in the face. Thanks.
Clutch, I hear you were having this delivered

Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 01:52 PM
  #25  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by jlukja
Clutch, I hear you were having this delivered




And whats worse, that thing probly has a 3 Speed Auto.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 04:12 PM
  #26  
MarkPinTx's Avatar
Orangeblood
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Dude.

The CTS-V is niiiiice. Guess you can crab about the squared-off ends, but for 50k, a helluva deal.

Check this out: http://www.mallettcars.com. For $65K I think I'd rather have one of these.

At 3890 pounds and 471 hp, the Mallett CTS-V's power-to-weight ratio takes on all comers, working out to 8.3 pounds per hp, which outdoes the C5 Corvette (9.2 pounds per hp), Mercedes E55 AMG (8.5 pounds) and-you guessed it-the M5 (10.2 pounds). On paper, the Mallett CTS-V's 4.3-second 0-to-60-mph time would readily dispatch the M5s of the world
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 02:30 PM
  #27  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MarkPinTx
Dude.

The CTS-V is niiiiice. Guess you can crab about the squared-off ends, but for 50k, a helluva deal.

Check this out: http://www.mallettcars.com. For $65K I think I'd rather have one of these.
I'll pass, thanks.

I think that quote you posted was based on the old M5's power rating. I'm not sure how much the new car will weigh, but even assuming that it weighs something ridiculously high like 4000 pounds, that's 8 pounds/HP even. To get the 8.3 that this mallett car has, it'd have to weigh 4150lbs. M5 > CTS-V no matter how you stroke it.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2004 | 12:27 PM
  #28  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,437
Likes: 639
From: Orlando, Fl
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 10:08 PM
  #29  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Hey guys. Here's a great PM that Soze75 sent me on this topic. He puts my feelings into words beter than I ever could. Enjoy:
Originally Posted by Soze75
Hey CP

I think we're totally alike in our love of the clutch. Only a select few like us rate the clutch as essential to motoring. My first car was an '82 Prelude with 55HP and I could work that mutha because of the clutch. There's a certain magic to those times when you see the play, gear down, and release the clutch just as you punch the throttle. Command and control - another seamless transfer of torque and HP that comes from you. This shit is personal.

Take the M5. I'll ALWAYS rate it higher than the Eclass AMG model because of the clutch. It's too bad Mercedes doesn't do manuals. I love their looks but without a manual, they're an instant no-go.

That used to be part of the M5 mystique for me. None of those poseurs would go near it. The clutch was our last defense against the M5 becoming "the one". You know, when a car is purchased just because it's the best and most expensive offering. The poseur market is just too strong. We lost the M3 just recently and now the M5 will be the car of choice for those who have money to burn and driving skills yet to be learned. I'm gonna cry when I see a new M5 being driven at a snails pace by a 40something woman, the front rims black as night from a combo of riding the brakes and lack of care. NOOO!!!

As far as looks, I gotta admit, the E39 M5 looks so ordinary now in light of the new 5. I'm a pretty progressive thinker and a creator at heart, and the new 5 is awesome(sport package mandatory - looks horrible with standard wheels). I saw a black 545i the other day and did my usual check. That check being the one where I check to see if its AT or MT. (There's something blasphemous about AT beemers. I've warmed to F1 paddles on the M3, but still I see it as a letdown). So I get to this car and...FINALLY...a six-speed manual! The car instantly becomes iconic in my head. A real driver is near.

Now I've been thinking...let's say that I finally win 15mil on the lotto. Probably, I'd be at the BMW lot within minutes of discovering my luck. M5, dark blue, deleted badges, thank you very much. Now, I think I might hesitate, maybe even look elsewhere. People tell me you get used to clutch absence, but everyday I drive, my satisfaction is derived from my clutch technique. Everyday, its a challenge to be smooth and precise with that left foot. My happiness depends on it! Without it, where am I going to go to feel involved. I guess figuring out the iDrive will occupy me, if it doesn't kill me first.

"Wow, what a drive!"
"I took that set of twisties like a pro, while all the time using my right hand to navigate 4 menus and 16 sub-sections on the iDrive!!"
"What a car!!"

All the best ~ Soze75
Wow man..... Wow! Thoughts?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 05:46 AM
  #30  
sauceman's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 6
From: Windsor-Quebec corridor
I have to agree, altough I am attracted to the SMG, probably by curiosity. My reserves are more located in the reliability dept, though.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 10:12 AM
  #31  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
I understand your dissappointment but look at it this way. F1 went away from the clutch because the technology made for faster shifting. Production automobiles followed suit. If BMW wants the M5 to be as fast as possible from pt. A to pt. B then it only makes sense for them to include the technology to make that happen. I do agree that a clutch could be included as an option for those purists out there like you and Soze.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 10:48 AM
  #32  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Right. Soze and I don't care about shifting fast. We care about shifting, period. And BMW doesn't really have to worry. If the new M5 really does end up with 500HP, it wins automatically. Not only does it have the most HP of any sedan in its size class, but it's got a manual transmission (whether regular or SMG, the basic mechanicals are the same). Even with a "conventional" six gears, you'll still be handing E55s, S-Type Rs and RS6es their asses. This thing's got seven! What are they afraid of? The 0-60 races in the inevitable magazine comparos will be won by the M5 not because it SHIFTS 0.05 seconds faster, but because it has more balls in terms of engine and tranny. Plain and simple. With a standard transmission, the M5 wouldn't be as fast as possible from point A to point B, but it'd still be pretty freakin' fast.

I think Soze brought up an interesting point about the previous M5 keeping the "poseurs" away from such a fine automobile. You had to really want to DRIVE one to spend $80k buying it. Look at how the faces in M3s changed once SMG was an option. Now the same thing going to happen to the M5 (which is an even bigger disappointment because it'll be done by even OLDER women with even MORE money who care even LESS about the car). It really is a shame...
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 11:18 AM
  #33  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Thats our Soze

domn, who sometimes misses his Clutch.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 11:26 AM
  #34  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
I'm pretty sure that old rich women are not the target demographic for the M5 but who cares really? I enjoy shifting as much as anyone else but if a computer can do it faster and more efficiently than I so be it. If SMG opens the door to more potential owners that's a good thing even if they are old rich women. More M5s sold = more development money for the next M5.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 11:34 AM
  #35  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
I'm pretty sure that old rich women are not the target demographic for the M5.....
Of course they're not. But they'll buy the car simply because it's the top-of-the-line 5-series (and it doesn't have a transmission that'll stave them off). These old, rich women aren't the target demographic for the M3 either. But I see them driving them ALL THE TIME. One lady I talked to said she bought her (convertible M3--SMG, of course) because she "was going to get a 5-series, but this one was cuter" :shakehd:

Demographics don't mean crap when people have money to waste.
I enjoy shifting as much as anyone else but if a computer can do it faster and more efficiently than I so be it. If SMG opens the door to more potential owners that's a good thing even if they are old rich women. More M5s sold = more development money for the next M5.
And the next M5 = even more watered down and "accessible".
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 11:43 AM
  #36  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
Have you driven SMG? It's hardly watered down. I'm sure BMW is doing it for performance reasons not accessibility.

Don't worry about who buys the cars. Be confident in your driving ability and show them who owns who on the track.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 12:02 PM
  #37  
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
ARGH! No I haven't driven an SMG-equipped car. I've actually never tried, but I don't think BMW dealers will let 23-year-olds test drive M3s just for fun. And the people I knew/know who had/have them I don't know well enough to ask them to drive their car. It might be a while until I actually get to test the system out for myself.

So for now this is armchair ranting. But like I told someone in some other thread: I'm not just sitting in this armchair complaining. People I talk to who've driven them say that although SMG IS fundamentally a manual tranny, from the driver's perspective it's much more like driving an auto with a gear selection option (like the TSX sportshift) than driving a stick. Car mags don't like it as much. Acquaintences of mine who had conventional M3s made fun of the guys with SMG because they can't get a smooth shift out of it. And I think everyone will agree that SMG will prove to be less reliable.

Originally Posted by Soze75
There's a certain magic to those times when you see the play, gear down, and release the clutch just as you punch the throttle. Command and control - another seamless transfer of torque and HP that comes from you. This shit is personal.
It's true.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 01:07 PM
  #38  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.

I've driven both and I have seen the light. SMG is the future.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 04:12 PM
  #39  
gfxdave99's Avatar
6MT Snob
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,276
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.

I've driven both and I have seen the light. SMG is the future.
You'll pry my clutch from my cold dead foot...
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 04:34 PM
  #40  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
Originally Posted by gfxdave99
You'll pry my clutch from my cold dead foot...
Which, coincidentally, is how it used to feel after 1.5 hours of rush hour traffic.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 AM.