RSX officially dead (+ info on all models)
#43
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by dom
:ibsomeonesays"butitsFWDandhasa4cylinder"andthenco mparesHondatoNissanandmentionstheVQ:
#44
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by F23A4
I have to admit (as a Nissan guy) that Acura's TSX entry seems to be far more successful than Infiniti's go at this segment with the G20. But while I do give props to Acura for the TSX (a terrific sedan with its only caveat being power), I am not too eager to see an entry level C-platform Infiniti G20 (or C20) anytime soon.
The only thing you didn't do was mention the VQ.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#45
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by dom
The only thing you didn't do was mention the VQ. ![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
....I wouldn't mind seeing an entry level, C-platformed Infiniti offering with a VQ powertrain.
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#46
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by Sdog2012
So this is just pretty much so they can release a TSX Coupe, its a good move
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
#47
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by F23A4
....I wouldn't mind seeing an entry level, C-platformed Infiniti offering with a VQ powertrain. ![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I would'nt mind seeing a G25 or G30. Something with a smaller V6.
#48
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by dom
I would'nt mind seeing a G25 or G30. Something with a smaller V6.
I think you meant to write... "I wouldn't mind seeing a TSX with a turbo 4 or a small V6"
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#49
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by GreenMonster
You misspelled that...
I think you meant to write... "I wouldn't mind seeing a TSX with a turbo 4 or a small V6"![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I think you meant to write... "I wouldn't mind seeing a TSX with a turbo 4 or a small V6"
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![Chuckle](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/chuckle.gif)
But much like you Greeniie, I'd like my next ride to be RWD. Although I'd take a close look at AWD.
#50
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by GreenMonster
I think you meant to write... "I wouldn't mind seeing a TSX with the engine and driveline from the new RDX." ![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
If I can't have RWD in a TSX-type Honda, I'll take that powertrain.
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#53
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Considering that the TSX will weigh about 400 pounds less that the RDX, I would have to imagine that the TSX would get better gas mileage.
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
The SH-AWD system may add about 150 lbs to the TSX if it were to ever happen. It's actually a pretty lightweight design.
#54
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Considering that the TSX will weigh about 400 pounds less that the RDX, I would have to imagine that the TSX would get better gas mileage.
Ya I know, just pointing out how poor IMO the RDX is on fuel. But even if it weighs 400 lbs less, having 22/27 TSX isn't very impressive either.
#55
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by kurt_bradley
You took the words right out of my mouth.
The SH-AWD system may add about 150 lbs to the TSX if it were to ever happen. It's actually a pretty lightweight design.
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
The SH-AWD system may add about 150 lbs to the TSX if it were to ever happen. It's actually a pretty lightweight design.
I've heard the RL's system weights 300+ lbs.
#56
WAS HONDATAFIED IN
if the 2008/09 TSX has the RDX motor and drivline with a slick shifting 6sp, then i think i'll be back in a TSX, while i love the Legacy, i still miss the refinement in the TSX, and Navi.
given the RDX, the motor is 240hp/260tq, but i imagine acura would tune it for a car application, meaning 260HP/240tq..... or 260/260...... now, if they can go back to cable throttle (i doubt) and make the ecu a bit easier to crack, and SH-AWD, then yea, i wouldn't mind paying 35,000 for a fully loaded TSX...
edit: dom, doesn't the TSX already have 27 or 29MPG highway??? but with the addition on my injen i saw that go up to 31 consistantly and 33 when being careful....
given the RDX, the motor is 240hp/260tq, but i imagine acura would tune it for a car application, meaning 260HP/240tq..... or 260/260...... now, if they can go back to cable throttle (i doubt) and make the ecu a bit easier to crack, and SH-AWD, then yea, i wouldn't mind paying 35,000 for a fully loaded TSX...
edit: dom, doesn't the TSX already have 27 or 29MPG highway??? but with the addition on my injen i saw that go up to 31 consistantly and 33 when being careful....
#57
Senior Moderator
Its officially rated at 22/31 AT and 22/30 MT.
I can't see it equally those figures with the 2.3 from the RDX even if it comes in at 400lbs less. Maybe if its tuned for 220-230 lb-ft
I can't see it equally those figures with the 2.3 from the RDX even if it comes in at 400lbs less. Maybe if its tuned for 220-230 lb-ft
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#58
WAS HONDATAFIED IN
well with a turbo car its all about throttle and keeping the turbo from kicking in, as gas milage will suck, exponentially..... and i agree there is no way the RDX motor will get 30, or anything close.... i think the legacy with 2.5 T gets 25 highway, which i still can' get i get about 23, 24 tops....
edit: i coulda sworn my 04 TSX 6MT didn't say 30MPG
edit: i coulda sworn my 04 TSX 6MT didn't say 30MPG
#59
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by dom
I've heard the RL's system weights 300+ lbs.
![Snicker](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/emot-laugh.gif)
![Captain Obvious](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/captainobvious.gif)
Remember, I used to work for Acura. I had to memorize all that crap regarding SH-AWD upon introduction on not only the sales side, but also service. It sucked going through all that just to learn about this new driveline, but it is a rather unique system.
#61
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by dom
Ya I know, just pointing out how poor IMO the RDX is on fuel. But even if it weighs 400 lbs less, having 22/27 TSX isn't very impressive either.
![EEK!](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#62
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by F23A4
I did not know that the TSX listed @ 22/27.
I had always pressumed the TSX to be in the 23/30 range. (Comparatively speaking, the EPA on an Altima 3.5SE 5MT is 21/27.)
![EEK!](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
No, the TSX is rated at 22/31 AT and 22/30 AT. I was just suggesting that a possible future TSX with an RDX engine would rate 22/27 compared to the RDX's 19/24 considering it will weigh less.
BTW - I average 26 MPG on my TSX in mostly city driving.
#63
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by dom
BTW - I average 26 MPG on my TSX in mostly city driving.
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
#64
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by F23A4
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SidhuSaaB
3G TL Problems & Fixes
18
05-30-2020 12:40 AM
kixo
2G TSX (2009-2014)
43
09-25-2015 03:07 PM