Reliability of BMW's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2010, 11:54 AM
  #1  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
btomcik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sagamore Hills, OH
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reliability of BMW's

Over in the 4g TL forum, lots of people repeatedly say that BMW has severe reliability problems and that's one of the reasons why they bought a TL instead. Is anyone speaking based on experience - I doubt it.

I have yet to hear of multiple people having reliability problems with their BMW's. And I'm not talking their 1985 BMW that has problems nowadays.

I asked my dad about his BMW - a 2005 328xi sportwagon, and he said it has been a very reliable car for him. He has 125k miles and he said the only major repair was that the rear springs/shocks went out and he had to have them replaced. He leased a 2002 BMW 325i but that was for 3 years so you wouldn't expect problems at that point.

Thoughts on the true reliability of BMW's? No rumors or comments without some sort of personal experience please.
Old 04-26-2010, 12:01 PM
  #2  
Pro
 
graphicguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Received 181 Likes on 73 Posts
Originally Posted by btomcik
Over in the 4g TL forum, lots of people repeatedly say that BMW has severe reliability problems and that's one of the reasons why they bought a TL instead. Is anyone speaking based on experience - I doubt it.

I have yet to hear of multiple people having reliability problems with their BMW's. And I'm not talking their 1985 BMW that has problems nowadays.

I asked my dad about his BMW - a 2005 328xi sportwagon, and he said it has been a very reliable car for him. He has 125k miles and he said the only major repair was that the rear springs/shocks went out and he had to have them replaced. He leased a 2002 BMW 325i but that was for 3 years so you wouldn't expect problems at that point.

Thoughts on the true reliability of BMW's? No rumors or comments without some sort of personal experience please.
bt.....have had two BMWs, one a 325i and the other a 330i. While both weren't any more problematic than say a Chevy, it was the maintenance and parts replacement cost after the warranty and "fee maintenance" was over that will kill you.

Don't have to look too far to see that the 335i has some major issues with fuel delivery. Granted, those issues will be taken care of under the warranty. But after?
Old 04-26-2010, 12:02 PM
  #3  
One on the right for me
 
subinf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 27,913
Received 271 Likes on 173 Posts
A guy I knew in college had a 2003 M3 and he had no major issues. He did have some electrical malfunctions but the dealer fixed those problems. I haven't spoken with him in a few years but I would assume everything is fine. General maintenance was quite expensive though.
Old 04-26-2010, 12:03 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
acurazinetl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Age: 42
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMWs are great cars when under warrenty. I don't even know why anyone would buy one.. I used to own a 03 3 series. I leased it and once the lease ended i got rid of it.
Old 04-26-2010, 12:09 PM
  #5  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
I'd say its a hit or miss.

Some owners have zero issues where others have multiple issues. Its bound to happen considering how many BMWs are sold.

TL is still more reliable but i wouldnt say BMWs have severe reliability issues.
Old 04-26-2010, 12:18 PM
  #6  
Drifting
 
Pete2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Boston Metro
Age: 44
Posts: 2,761
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
I think the recent fuel pump issues have turned some buyers off.... But if I was leasing, 335 all the way, hand it back in at the end of the term. But buying and keeping, TL wins.

I'd bet over the same period of time (150k miles), that Acura has a lower maintenance cost than BMWs. Not sure if that's true or not.
Old 04-26-2010, 12:26 PM
  #7  
The Box
 
vas25tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 6,680
Received 80 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy Acura
I'd say its a hit or miss.

Some owners have zero issues where others have multiple issues. Its bound to happen considering how many BMWs are sold.

TL is still more reliable but i wouldnt say BMWs have severe reliability issues.
I agree. It's a total hit or miss. Also, a 745 is bound to have many more issues than a basic 3 series due the amount of electronic components in it.

I have a friend with a 97 528i with 240K on it and has had no problems in the last 80K. I just had a friend trade in his 02 525i with 106K on it because he spent $4700 in the last 1.5 years on repairs.
Old 04-26-2010, 12:26 PM
  #8  
'10 Hyundai Genesis Coupe
 
Eoanou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CT
Age: 38
Posts: 4,779
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I think they say reliability issues but what they mean is maintenance costs are much higher. Check the labor rates at your local dealership BMW of Bridgeport is $130 and possibly higher and requires a $150 diagnostic charge before even checking out the issue on your car. Where as Acura of Norwalk is $105 and requires no diagnostic charge.
Old 04-26-2010, 12:40 PM
  #9  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
a hit or miss

/thread
Old 04-26-2010, 12:40 PM
  #10  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
but if you are into leasing, who cares?

BMW > Acura in driving characteristics.
Old 04-26-2010, 12:45 PM
  #11  
registered pw
 
dallison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: south central pa
Age: 49
Posts: 38,822
Received 354 Likes on 252 Posts
from what i hear, the 3 series is the most reliable. The 7 and 5 series have issues, more or less electrical ones.
Old 04-26-2010, 12:49 PM
  #12  
Safety Car
 
tmnhs81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,812
Received 46 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy Acura
I'd say its a hit or miss.

Some owners have zero issues where others have multiple issues. Its bound to happen considering how many BMWs are sold.

TL is still more reliable but i wouldnt say BMWs have severe reliability issues.


My friend has a 99 323i base model . Car runs good. I like the driving dynamics of BMW. It is pretty good, never left him stranded. Its just the one of gazillion sensors in the car that goes bad every once in a while..Brake sensors, transmission something sensor.
Old 04-26-2010, 01:51 PM
  #13  
My Garage
 
GIBSON6594's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NY
Age: 42
Posts: 13,386
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
since I got a software update, my 335i has been rock solid
Old 04-26-2010, 02:01 PM
  #14  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Oh yeah, my gf's previous car was 04 325i with premium and sport package. I don't exactlly remember how many miles it had, but it was like 50k miles or something. It was running strong and solid til she traded it in. All she did was engine oil change every 10k, nothing else in terms of maintenaince.
Old 04-26-2010, 02:11 PM
  #15  
MR1
05/5AT/Navi/ABP/Quartz
 
MR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central CA
Age: 74
Posts: 3,348
Received 53 Likes on 50 Posts
All you can get is a small number of individual biased opinions from this relatively small sample. It is necessary to to seek out organizations that collect and analysis this information to get reliable unbiased conclusions imho.

The individual responses will be everywhere depending on how all terms are defined.
Old 04-26-2010, 02:28 PM
  #16  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy Acura
I'd say its a hit or miss.

Some owners have zero issues where others have multiple issues. Its bound to happen considering how many BMWs are sold.

TL is still more reliable but i wouldnt say BMWs have severe reliability issues.


That said, I have owned a 1998 CL 3.0 and a 2002 TL-S. My wife has owned a B7 2.0T A4 and 2006 A6 (current) and both of her Audi's were more reliable then either of my Acura's.

As far as I'm concerned as long as the car is under warranty, I have no concerns with any of the Germans. I would think twice about owning our A6 past the 100k warranty, however, I have never owned an Acura out of warranty either, so they're all fair game in my book.

For the ownership and driver experience (plus looks), give me German any day. I sold my '02 TL-S in 2005 and it's likely the last Acura I'll own unless I decide to pickup a pre-owned NSX as a weekend car down the road. But for newer cars, German all the way.
Old 04-26-2010, 02:29 PM
  #17  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Is the fuel pump still an issue on 08+ 335's? I thought it was only 07's that had the issue.

Last edited by dom; 04-26-2010 at 02:49 PM.
Old 04-26-2010, 02:34 PM
  #18  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,649
Received 22,945 Likes on 14,060 Posts
If you wanna play, you gotta pay.
Old 04-26-2010, 02:38 PM
  #19  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Forgot to add, we have several friends and neighbors with 3 and 5 series BMW's ranging in years from 2006 to 2010 and none of them have had any real issues.

So overall is BMW going to be more reliable then Acura... very likely. But in the grand scheme of things you'll have good and bad experiences with every brand... even Acura. So just buy what you like and enjoy and don't sweat the small stuff
Old 04-26-2010, 02:44 PM
  #20  
Burning Brakes
 
brizey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: DFW
Age: 54
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by MR1
All you can get is a small number of individual biased opinions from this relatively small sample. It is necessary to to seek out organizations that collect and analysis this information to get reliable unbiased conclusions imho.

The individual responses will be everywhere depending on how all terms are defined.
This.

Why would you want or care about anecdotes? The 10 to 20 responses you get here are going to have effectively zero correlation to any future experience.

There are two major sources of information for car reliability:

JD Powers works for the car companies by charging them licensing fees to use their logo and results in advertising. They also charge them for the results themselves.

Consumer Reports works for the consumer by charging consumers directly for the results.

I prefer CR because I think JD Powers business model is intrinsically flawed from a consumer's perspective, but other people trust them even though they are not paying for the results directly. Their results often are similar anyway.
Old 04-26-2010, 03:05 PM
  #21  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,901
Received 1,671 Likes on 932 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy Acura
I'd say its a hit or miss.

Some owners have zero issues where others have multiple issues. Its bound to happen considering how many BMWs are sold.

TL is still more reliable but i wouldnt say BMWs have severe reliability issues.
I'm gonna have agree with ^^ post.
Old 04-26-2010, 03:20 PM
  #22  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by brizey
This.

Why would you want or care about anecdotes? The 10 to 20 responses you get here are going to have effectively zero correlation to any future experience.

There are two major sources of information for car reliability:

JD Powers works for the car companies by charging them licensing fees to use their logo and results in advertising. They also charge them for the results themselves.

Consumer Reports works for the consumer by charging consumers directly for the results.

I prefer CR because I think JD Powers business model is intrinsically flawed from a consumer's perspective, but other people trust them even though they are not paying for the results directly. Their results often are similar anyway.
Honestly I do not put much faith into CR. I know that whenever we sent in surveys, it was usually when we were pissed about a product and we wanted to warn others against buying something. We never sent in a positive survey, even when the positives outweighed the negatives. I can also guarantee we're not the only one's who do that... so even CR's results are likely scewed.

Just like car forums. Acura generally rates very high, however, go to the model specific forums on here and you'll generally see people complaining and listing problems much more then you'll see a random, everything has been fine for 50k miles thread.

I prefer personal experience or recommendations over any publication or website all day every day.
Old 04-26-2010, 03:38 PM
  #23  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by juniorbean
Honestly I do not put much faith into CR. I know that whenever we sent in surveys, it was usually when we were pissed about a product and we wanted to warn others against buying something. We never sent in a positive survey, even when the positives outweighed the negatives. I can also guarantee we're not the only one's who do that... so even CR's results are likely scewed.

I agree that one would typically only send a survey when they were pissed about something. But by using that logic, those companies and models that rate highly on CR reports are those that didn't get as many negative surveys. (pissed off people) If there are less pissed off Toyota owners compared to GM owners that doesn't it stand to reason that the Toyota is likely more reliable?
Old 04-26-2010, 03:52 PM
  #24  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Is the fuel pump still an issue on 08+ 335's? I thought it was only 07's that had the issue.

Yep the issue is still there although guessing a small % since BMW didnt send out a recall, they just extended the warranty to 100k miles.
Old 04-26-2010, 03:54 PM
  #25  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy Acura
Yep the issue is still there although guessing a small % since BMW didnt send out a recall, they just extended the warranty to 100k miles.
So after 100K you're SOL? Reminds me of a Honda tranny.

How much is that repair?
Old 04-26-2010, 03:56 PM
  #26  
My Garage
 
GIBSON6594's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NY
Age: 42
Posts: 13,386
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
So after 100K you're SOL? Reminds me of a Honda tranny.

How much is that repair?
I think it's 120K, but honestly, how many 335 owners do you think are going to keep their cars that long?
Old 04-26-2010, 04:00 PM
  #27  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Not sure the cost of the pump. Guessing at least over $500?

Forgot to mention BMW did come out with a newer version of the fuel pump a month ago? No issues as of yet from what i been reading.

So its not exactly like Acura's tranny issues. BMW actually did at least go ahead and make a new part.

Last edited by Crazy Bimmer; 04-26-2010 at 04:04 PM.
Old 04-26-2010, 04:00 PM
  #28  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by GIBSON6594
I think it's 120K, but honestly, how many 335 owners do you think are going to keep their cars that long?
I was thinking in km's. 120K = 192,000 km's. I guess its reasonable to have to pay for that repair at that mileage.

But I'd rather see a company fix the design defect rather than simply extend the warranty.

EDIT: Just saw Jesals' post. Good news.
Old 04-26-2010, 04:04 PM
  #29  
Suzuka Master
 
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,259
Received 1,239 Likes on 703 Posts
Personal experience, they have been great cars to my family. We've been leasing them for 20 years and have had several 5s, a 3, & an 8 Series, all problem free.

Old 04-26-2010, 04:07 PM
  #30  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
EDIT: Just saw Jesals' post. Good news.

Werd, but for the record i am not 100% sure. Im still reading up on it on the forums.
Old 04-26-2010, 04:17 PM
  #31  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
I agree that one would typically only send a survey when they were pissed about something. But by using that logic, those companies and models that rate highly on CR reports are those that didn't get as many negative surveys. (pissed off people) If there are less pissed off Toyota owners compared to GM owners that doesn't it stand to reason that the Toyota is likely more reliable?
Definitely a logical conclusion.

But, it could go the other way as well... where people with good things to say sent in surveys but people with negative things to say didn't bother. My old neighbor in NY sent in surveys for all his appliances when they were good, but never bothered when they sucked b/c he didn't want to be bothered. I tried explaining that the bad surveys are the ones that really need to be sent, but he disagreed and only sent in positive surveys... so basically the opposite of me!

So for me, bottom line, I don't trust CR b/c I don't trust the general public to report on these things accurately. I'd rather take recommendations from friends or first hand experience/knowledge.
Old 04-26-2010, 04:28 PM
  #32  
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
 
Steven Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes on 5,162 Posts
I used to own a 535i a while ago. It was a beautiful car (white with a red leather interior-very rare), but it nickeled and dimed me to death. Little things would go out all the time.

The air conditioning went out and it would have cost more to fix the A/C than the entire car was worth...yikes!



National Acura Meet-June 6th/Kansas City. Click here for details and to sign up!



.
Old 04-26-2010, 04:33 PM
  #33  
Someday, an RS6 Avant+
 
mrmako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,503
Received 1,027 Likes on 544 Posts
i think asking around (current or previous owners) is a great way to do it. You will get biased views, but they are real, and the car being talked about is a representative sample. Not one that the factory makes available to a tester (magazine, website, etc...)
Old 04-26-2010, 05:10 PM
  #34  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Originally Posted by Steven Bell
I used to own a 535i a while ago. It was a beautiful car (white with a red leather interior-very rare), but it nickeled and dimed me to death. Little things would go out all the time.

The air conditioning went out and it would have cost more to fix the A/C than the entire car was worth...yikes!

.
Guessing this was an 1980s 535i? Those were hawt.
Old 04-26-2010, 05:24 PM
  #35  
The Sicilian
 
jspagna1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: CT
Age: 63
Posts: 1,632
Received 47 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by Eoanou
I think they say reliability issues but what they mean is maintenance costs are much higher. Check the labor rates at your local dealership BMW of Bridgeport is $130 and possibly higher and requires a $150 diagnostic charge before even checking out the issue on your car. Where as Acura of Norwalk is $105 and requires no diagnostic charge.
That is of no surprise to me if you go to the Dealer, your definitely going to get screwed in labor costes for sure.
The fact is that the parts are going to be more expensive as well to replace just because it's a BMW or MB.
It's just like buying a BIG house. Nobody thinks about the maintenance costs(Heat,electrcity,air conditioning,etc.) and what about those property taxes. It just does'nt end with the purchase price of the home.
Old 04-26-2010, 07:10 PM
  #36  
 
ghttf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy Acura
So its not exactly like Acura's tranny issues. BMW actually did at least go ahead and make a new part.

after 3 years

Acura 5AT's stopped failing after 4 years (2005)...not a huge difference
Old 04-26-2010, 07:35 PM
  #37  
Administrator Alumnus
 
Scrib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Northwest IN
Posts: 26,326
Received 131 Likes on 82 Posts
Old 04-26-2010, 07:55 PM
  #38  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by Scrib


Scrib definitely had a "miss" in terms of reliability
Old 04-26-2010, 08:07 PM
  #39  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Originally Posted by MTwEeZi
after 3 years

Acura 5AT's stopped failing after 4 years (2005)...not a huge difference

Acura fixed the transmissions on the 2nd gen TL? So if i were to buy an 03 TL, the transmission wouldnt fail because its an all new system?

Or you just saying the transmissions stopped failing in the 3rd gen TLs? I wouldnt call that a fix for the 2nd gen TL owners...
Old 04-26-2010, 08:42 PM
  #40  
Racer
 
kingofire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 286
Received 42 Likes on 23 Posts
Here is one who hopes BMWs are reliable. Just finalized a deal for a 2010 Alpine White BMW 535ix and traded my beautiful 2009 Mayan Bronze TL.

I will say this, I have a couple of friends who have BMW's and as much as they like the engine, they have had electrical issues but all covered under warranty. They both advised me to keep this BMW under warranty otherwise fork over around $3000 on a extended warranty.
I have not owned a BMW before but the more I have dealt with the process of buying a BMW, I know that the new stance Acura has in calling their vehicles "smart luxury" it fits them to a tee. It truly is for a smart, savvy buyer. I just got bit by the "need to own a BMW bug" right now.

Knocking on wood that the 535ix is reliable and that I don't get stranded because my high pressure fuel pump decided to cough up a moth ball.


Quick Reply: Reliability of BMW's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 PM.