The Official Car Photo of the Day (For Pics You Have NOT Taken)
The following 2 users liked this post by komet:
civicdrivr (02-29-2012),
ttribe (02-28-2012)
#4363
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#4364
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Age: 37
Posts: 43,475
Received 3,664 Likes
on
2,495 Posts
The following users liked this post:
ttribe (02-29-2012)
#4366
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
I think mamma-mia is an appropriate adjective here.
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (02-29-2012)
#4367
Moderator
More big (click for 1600):
The following 2 users liked this post by ttribe:
Imageless83 (02-29-2012),
Mr. Maker (02-29-2012)
#4368
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Here's that lovely TechArt Porsche I posted about yesterday in big...
The following 2 users liked this post by Yumcha:
Imageless83 (02-29-2012),
ttribe (02-29-2012)
#4369
Moderator
^^^
#4370
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
And folks, while the big pics of the new Ferrari are nice from ttribe, I've found even HIGHER-RES pics here: http://www.seriouswheels.com/cars/20...berlinetta.htm
And without the Netcarshow.com words to ruin the pic too.
Yes, I'm good.
And without the Netcarshow.com words to ruin the pic too.
Yes, I'm good.
#4371
Moderator
And folks, while the big pics of the new Ferrari are nice from ttribe, I've found even HIGHER-RES pics here: http://www.seriouswheels.com/cars/20...berlinetta.htm
And without the Netcarshow.com words to ruin the pic too.
Yes, I'm good.
And without the Netcarshow.com words to ruin the pic too.
Yes, I'm good.
Now, go give dom the beatdown for calling the One-77 ugly.
#4372
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#4373
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
#4374
Moderator
#4375
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#4376
Senior Moderator
And folks, while the big pics of the new Ferrari are nice from ttribe, I've found even HIGHER-RES pics here: http://www.seriouswheels.com/cars/20...berlinetta.htm
And without the Netcarshow.com words to ruin the pic too.
Yes, I'm good.
And without the Netcarshow.com words to ruin the pic too.
Yes, I'm good.
photo freaks, they left the EXIF intact on those seriouswheels pics..........
#4377
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#4378
Moderator
#4379
Senior Moderator
With pleasure.
It's quite uncommon for official car photos like that to contain any EXIF info - which is the info showing what make and model camera was used and all the settings that were used to make the photo, along with time/date info.
Here is the info from one of the side profile pics:
This is a $55k digital camera and the lens is around $4-5k. It's just not something you pretty much ever see in an EXIF info.
It is 60 megapixels in resolution.
It's quite uncommon for official car photos like that to contain any EXIF info - which is the info showing what make and model camera was used and all the settings that were used to make the photo, along with time/date info.
Here is the info from one of the side profile pics:
Camera Maker: Phase One A/S
Camera Model: P65+
Image Date: 2010-12-26 00:00:00 +0000
Focal Length: 120mm
Aperture: f/16.0
Exposure Time: 0.333 s (1/3)
ISO equiv: 50
Exposure Bias: none
Exposure: Manual
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: Adobe RGB (1998)
GPS Coordinate: undefined, undefined
Software: Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Camera Model: P65+
Image Date: 2010-12-26 00:00:00 +0000
Focal Length: 120mm
Aperture: f/16.0
Exposure Time: 0.333 s (1/3)
ISO equiv: 50
Exposure Bias: none
Exposure: Manual
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: Adobe RGB (1998)
GPS Coordinate: undefined, undefined
Software: Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
It is 60 megapixels in resolution.
#4380
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
With pleasure.
It's quite uncommon for official car photos like that to contain any EXIF info - which is the info showing what make and model camera was used and all the settings that were used to make the photo, along with time/date info.
Here is the info from one of the side profile pics:
This is a $55k digital camera and the lens is around $4-5k. It's just not something you pretty much ever see in an EXIF info.
It is 60 megapixels in resolution.
It's quite uncommon for official car photos like that to contain any EXIF info - which is the info showing what make and model camera was used and all the settings that were used to make the photo, along with time/date info.
Here is the info from one of the side profile pics:
This is a $55k digital camera and the lens is around $4-5k. It's just not something you pretty much ever see in an EXIF info.
It is 60 megapixels in resolution.
Holy. Fawk.
#4381
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Age: 37
Posts: 43,475
Received 3,664 Likes
on
2,495 Posts
Damn shooting with a Phase One so awesome.
#4382
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
1920x1200
1600x1111
#4383
Senior Moderator
The following 2 users liked this post by srika:
Imageless83 (02-29-2012),
Mr. Maker (03-01-2012)
#4384
Senior Moderator
The following users liked this post:
Mr. Maker (03-01-2012)
#4385
Rooting for Acura
iTrader: (1)
With pleasure.
It's quite uncommon for official car photos like that to contain any EXIF info - which is the info showing what make and model camera was used and all the settings that were used to make the photo, along with time/date info.
Here is the info from one of the side profile pics:
This is a $55k digital camera and the lens is around $4-5k. It's just not something you pretty much ever see in an EXIF info.
It is 60 megapixels in resolution.
It's quite uncommon for official car photos like that to contain any EXIF info - which is the info showing what make and model camera was used and all the settings that were used to make the photo, along with time/date info.
Here is the info from one of the side profile pics:
This is a $55k digital camera and the lens is around $4-5k. It's just not something you pretty much ever see in an EXIF info.
It is 60 megapixels in resolution.
#4386
Senior Moderator
The image it generates is large enough to print on a wall. The image must be resized and then optimized to account for the reduction, using some software. In this case, that software is Photoshop.
#4388
Senior Moderator
it's a 60mp camera.
The following users liked this post:
Mr. Maker (03-01-2012)
#4390
I do agree that the front of the car looks rather strange, but the rear is amazing. Plus, with that thing's brutal acceleration... I can't say I would mind living with a front end!
Btw, this is probably a re-post:
Great picture of Senna and a NSX though (even if it isn't the highest resolution).
Btw, this is probably a re-post:
Great picture of Senna and a NSX though (even if it isn't the highest resolution).
The following users liked this post:
CLtotheTL32 (03-01-2012)
#4391
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
1920x1080
The following 4 users liked this post by civicdrivr:
#4392
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
The following 3 users liked this post by Mr. Maker:
#4393
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Awesome pictures on this page.
The picture of Senna washing the NSX was great. Maker that Fisker picture is sick!
The picture of Senna washing the NSX was great. Maker that Fisker picture is sick!
#4394
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
#4395
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
#4396
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Whoa. What Audi is that?
#4397
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
e-tron Spyder concept.
#4398
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
That thing is awesome.
#4399
Senior Moderator
#4400
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Zonda > Huayra
The following users liked this post:
rossv1 (03-01-2012)