Observations: 3 weeks w/G35 after TL
#41
One thing G35 has the TL doesn't
Is a class action lawsuit filed in California against Nissan NA because the G35 brakes are wearing prematurely and it's having a negative impact on resale value - according to the lawsuit that is.
This item was just published today at Automotive News. You have to be registered on the site to read the entire story.
www.autonews.com
This item was just published today at Automotive News. You have to be registered on the site to read the entire story.
www.autonews.com
#42
Dave,
You bought the right car for your needs and I'm happy for you. I was in the same situation as you and I too felt the SIGNIFICANT difference in handling between the two cars. Not even a comparison IMHO. I have the coupe w/18s and this thing handles like a beast I agree with the posts here about the TL having more refinement, better interior, quieter ride and I really wish I had those things sometimes when I am in my G...but when the roads are clear and I really push her, I'm very happy with the decision I made. BTW, I played with some TLs on the highway and I usually pull on them; has anyone pulled on a G?
You bought the right car for your needs and I'm happy for you. I was in the same situation as you and I too felt the SIGNIFICANT difference in handling between the two cars. Not even a comparison IMHO. I have the coupe w/18s and this thing handles like a beast I agree with the posts here about the TL having more refinement, better interior, quieter ride and I really wish I had those things sometimes when I am in my G...but when the roads are clear and I really push her, I'm very happy with the decision I made. BTW, I played with some TLs on the highway and I usually pull on them; has anyone pulled on a G?
#43
P.S... what is the little compartment/handle looking thingy to the right of the G's dash under the glovebox ??[/QUOTE]
That's where they put the Nav./DVD player. If this was a CD changer or even a DVD player I would understand the location. But how often do you need to access the Nav./DVD player that you would put it above the glove box.
That's where they put the Nav./DVD player. If this was a CD changer or even a DVD player I would understand the location. But how often do you need to access the Nav./DVD player that you would put it above the glove box.
#44
I also think the interior looks better in black, but I think that of the Acura interiors too.
http://users.adelphia.net/~jrockcls/console.jpg
Sorry about the angle, was at at stoplight. =p
http://users.adelphia.net/~jrockcls/console.jpg
Sorry about the angle, was at at stoplight. =p
#45
Originally Posted by JRock
I also think the interior looks better in black, but I think that of the Acura interiors too.
http://users.adelphia.net/~jrockcls/console.jpg
Sorry about the angle, was at at stoplight. =p
http://users.adelphia.net/~jrockcls/console.jpg
Sorry about the angle, was at at stoplight. =p
#46
Racer
I think that ES interior is pretty ugly too. I dunno why, just does. I'm not a big fan of wood, and it looks rather lowtech. The head unit just screams 'Audiovox' to me.
#48
Instructor
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've always believed that all of the components of a dashboard should flow together. Basically, there should be one continuous line which can be drawn along the dash that would encompass all of the components. The TL follows this rule.
The G35, on the other hand, looks like it is made up of three different sections. You have the center control panel which abruptly ends at the top. The second section then starts; this is that weird center panel that holds the clock. Finally, the instrument cluster looks like it is an entirely separate section. Bottom line- you have three distinct dash sections which are sort of mish-mashed together. To me, that ruins the entire interior, as it doesn't have a single, solitary theme or flow to it.
All of the components on the TL flow together. The instrument panel looks like a natural extension of the dash and there is no real division between the upper dash and the center console. At the end of the day, it looks like the TL interior was carved out of a single block, whereas the G interior was created by placing three blocks together.
The G35, on the other hand, looks like it is made up of three different sections. You have the center control panel which abruptly ends at the top. The second section then starts; this is that weird center panel that holds the clock. Finally, the instrument cluster looks like it is an entirely separate section. Bottom line- you have three distinct dash sections which are sort of mish-mashed together. To me, that ruins the entire interior, as it doesn't have a single, solitary theme or flow to it.
All of the components on the TL flow together. The instrument panel looks like a natural extension of the dash and there is no real division between the upper dash and the center console. At the end of the day, it looks like the TL interior was carved out of a single block, whereas the G interior was created by placing three blocks together.
#49
Instructor
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And I don't like the ES330 interior. Too much wood. And am I alone in thinking that the whole center console looks like a big blister that is going to pop?
#50
Originally Posted by EZZ
Forbidden, doesn not work for me I think black hides everything that is ugly. Just look at the new Maxima....IT EVEN looks decent in black.
Originally Posted by kosh2258
Is a class action lawsuit filed in California against Nissan NA because the G35 brakes are wearing prematurely and it's having a negative impact on resale value - according to the lawsuit that is.
This item was just published today at Automotive News. You have to be registered on the site to read the entire story.
www.autonews.com
This item was just published today at Automotive News. You have to be registered on the site to read the entire story.
www.autonews.com
I doubt they wear out in 9.500 miles though
#51
Originally Posted by shodog
The materials used in the G35 are higher quality than those used in the TL. the only thing you can argue is the design which is subjective for most. one thing the G35 thankfully doesn't have is that thin aluminum trim that dents easily and burns the $hit out of your arm when you car has been sitting in the hot sun.
#52
Advanced
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Glenmoore, PA
Age: 73
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jhunter9999
P.S... what is the little compartment/handle looking thingy to the right of the G's dash under the glovebox ??
That's where they put the Nav./DVD player. If this was a CD changer or even a DVD player I would understand the location. But how often do you need to access the Nav./DVD player that you would put it above the glove box.[/QUOTE]
On non-nav cars, the area above the glove box is an additional storage compartment. If you mean the small piece on the right side of the console, that's a power point with a small pocket beneath it.
#53
Advanced
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Glenmoore, PA
Age: 73
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EZZ
Dave,
You bought the right car for your needs and I'm happy for you. I was in the same situation as you and I too felt the SIGNIFICANT difference in handling between the two cars. Not even a comparison IMHO. I have the coupe w/18s and this thing handles like a beast I agree with the posts here about the TL having more refinement, better interior, quieter ride and I really wish I had those things sometimes when I am in my G...but when the roads are clear and I really push her, I'm very happy with the decision I made. BTW, I played with some TLs on the highway and I usually pull on them; has anyone pulled on a G?
You bought the right car for your needs and I'm happy for you. I was in the same situation as you and I too felt the SIGNIFICANT difference in handling between the two cars. Not even a comparison IMHO. I have the coupe w/18s and this thing handles like a beast I agree with the posts here about the TL having more refinement, better interior, quieter ride and I really wish I had those things sometimes when I am in my G...but when the roads are clear and I really push her, I'm very happy with the decision I made. BTW, I played with some TLs on the highway and I usually pull on them; has anyone pulled on a G?
#54
Black
i'm lucky - my household has both (TL and G35). In one year we have a total of 12000 miles spread among two cars so there's not a lot of driving for either. The TL is better for long-distance cruising, whereas the G35 (base model w/ leather and auto) is a better performance car. For what it's worth, the COMBINED lease on BOTH was less than a single lease on ONE 2004 BMW 530i... without navigation
Ironically enough, the G35 has Turanza EL-42's. We may update the G35 with a rear spoiler, 18" TSW alloys and sport springs...
-josh
Ironically enough, the G35 has Turanza EL-42's. We may update the G35 with a rear spoiler, 18" TSW alloys and sport springs...
-josh
#55
Three Wheelin'
I went the other way. After a year and a half with the G35, I traded for a TL. I liked the G for the most part, but the TL just plain "feels" better to me. It fits me better, and has an all around more refined feel. Yes, I wish the TL had the RWD platform, and I even wish it had the G's engine (even with the 4mpg worse gas mileage).
This car for me is used mostly for commuting to work in Houston traffic. I have another car I drive on weekends. So I can live with the very slight performance differences. But I will also say that I'd be happy with either car.
This car for me is used mostly for commuting to work in Houston traffic. I have another car I drive on weekends. So I can live with the very slight performance differences. But I will also say that I'd be happy with either car.
#57
Originally Posted by jjsC5
I went the other way. After a year and a half with the G35, I traded for a TL. I liked the G for the most part, but the TL just plain "feels" better to me. It fits me better, and has an all around more refined feel. Yes, I wish the TL had the RWD platform, and I even wish it had the G's engine (even with the 4mpg worse gas mileage).
This car for me is used mostly for commuting to work in Houston traffic. I have another car I drive on weekends. So I can live with the very slight performance differences. But I will also say that I'd be happy with either car.
This car for me is used mostly for commuting to work in Houston traffic. I have another car I drive on weekends. So I can live with the very slight performance differences. But I will also say that I'd be happy with either car.
#58
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 40
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rock
The G35 might seem cheaper because it doesn't have struts, but I was happy when I found that my G Coupe had a prop rod. I've had two other cars in the past that the struts started to give way after about 5 years. This prop rod will last me a long time As for the interior, I've gotten used to it. It's not all that bad, but I definitely like the 3rd gen. TL interior. I also liked my old TLS interior. Actually, I miss the whole car
#59
Originally Posted by missmyprelude
Funny. The prop rod was the only thing that ever broke on my 97 Prelude. Ok, so I bent it the wrong way...
#60
Originally Posted by blufox
ES is blah its a camry in light camo its hidious inside and out like a friggin prostitue
No, both cars hide their cheaper siblings part sharing very well.
Hoods without gas struts are to SAVE MONEY. Plain and simple. It is CHEAP. You will notice LUXURY CARS have gas struts as a convience for their owners, CHEAP cars have hood props to save money (Kia, Chevy, Mitsu, etc).
The G35 AWD was not preferred over the RWD model b/c of weight and a slight increase in ride height (for enthusiests). Most people could not tell the difference.
The TL interior is fantastic. It is common knowledge that is a place of opportunity for the G35. It pretty much NAILS everything else.
As for the ES interior, it offers REAL WOOD choices and is as well built as any car for any price.
#61
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 40
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Hoods without gas struts are to SAVE MONEY. Plain and simple. It is CHEAP. You will notice LUXURY CARS have gas struts as a convience for their owners, CHEAP cars have hood props to save money (Kia, Chevy, Mitsu, etc).
The G35 AWD was not preferred over the RWD model b/c of weight and a slight increase in ride height (for enthusiests). Most people could not tell the difference.
The G35 AWD was not preferred over the RWD model b/c of weight and a slight increase in ride height (for enthusiests). Most people could not tell the difference.
#62
I agree. Also, whoah, apparently the ES becomes a spaceship when you get the dark interior. 0__o
(Looks like stars and space in the background lol.)
Here's a fresh pic of dark interior in the G35 Coupe. I think it looks infinitely better than a light interior with silver trim, and I feel the same way about Acura ebony interiors over parchment/camel/saddle, when you have aluminum or silver trim. Wood goes best with light interior, silver/alum better with dark interior.
Interior2
(Looks like stars and space in the background lol.)
Here's a fresh pic of dark interior in the G35 Coupe. I think it looks infinitely better than a light interior with silver trim, and I feel the same way about Acura ebony interiors over parchment/camel/saddle, when you have aluminum or silver trim. Wood goes best with light interior, silver/alum better with dark interior.
Interior2
#63
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Like the TL being an Accord in light camo?
No, both cars hide their cheaper siblings part sharing very well.
Hoods without gas struts are to SAVE MONEY. Plain and simple. It is CHEAP. You will notice LUXURY CARS have gas struts as a convience for their owners, CHEAP cars have hood props to save money (Kia, Chevy, Mitsu, etc).
The G35 AWD was not preferred over the RWD model b/c of weight and a slight increase in ride height (for enthusiests). Most people could not tell the difference.
No, both cars hide their cheaper siblings part sharing very well.
Hoods without gas struts are to SAVE MONEY. Plain and simple. It is CHEAP. You will notice LUXURY CARS have gas struts as a convience for their owners, CHEAP cars have hood props to save money (Kia, Chevy, Mitsu, etc).
The G35 AWD was not preferred over the RWD model b/c of weight and a slight increase in ride height (for enthusiests). Most people could not tell the difference.
#64
Originally Posted by F23A4
Doesnt happen often but, !
Originally Posted by missmyprelude
My wife's Lexus IS300 has a prop rod. The TL has gas struts. Neither she nor I could care less either way. The fact is that most people with LUXURY CARS probably don't know the difference - chances are they wouldn't know how to open the hood to begin with. I would say it's less of a convenience to owners than a "nice to have". I notice that lots of non-car guys point out the prop rod rather than looking at the engine and other goodies under the hood. I agree that this is a money saving technique, but a damn good one in my opinion since it saves me little effort to have gas struts hold up the hood. And that's coming from someone that actually does know how to open the hood (among other things).
#65
Intermediate
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gretna, NE
Age: 63
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One question I have not seen addressed by people that have owned both cars:
Which one has the better gas mileage? Not that it would be a deal breaker, but I'm considering both cars, and the gas mileage thing might be a deal breaker with the war department (yes I know, I'm whipped.) Thanks
Which one has the better gas mileage? Not that it would be a deal breaker, but I'm considering both cars, and the gas mileage thing might be a deal breaker with the war department (yes I know, I'm whipped.) Thanks
#66
Originally Posted by RJPoteet
One question I have not seen addressed by people that have owned both cars:
Which one has the better gas mileage? Not that it would be a deal breaker, but I'm considering both cars, and the gas mileage thing might be a deal breaker with the war department (yes I know, I'm whipped.) Thanks
Which one has the better gas mileage? Not that it would be a deal breaker, but I'm considering both cars, and the gas mileage thing might be a deal breaker with the war department (yes I know, I'm whipped.) Thanks
#68
Not a Blowhole
Strip the cars down to their humble origins, and a Honda is a Honda. A Nissan is a Datsun. Get it? And which F1 car has the Nissan engine in it? - I keep forgetting.
Nissan makes a good car, and they have fought their way back from the brink - which i respect - but Honda has never been even near the brink, and having my car be a "gussied up Honda" just rings truer and cleaner than a "gussied up Nissan". I owned a 1990 300ZX hardtop (no T-Top!!!), one of the few that they brought over here for racers, who wanted a rigid platform. With mods I made (sprinfs, shocks, Turbo oil cooler, power adder, etc) I had a rocket that looked unique - kinda miss it now and then, but the handling could not compare to the S2K. Plus, like nearly every Japanese design, after a while the looks get old on Nissan - I hink the TL will always be regarded as a nice design, from every angle. The Maxima already looks a bit upside down to me, the Altimas clear tailights scream 1998 or too much money spent at the 'Zone, and so forth.
I think the best Nissan ever made was the 1991 Stanza with the 2.4L four - buzzy, lots of torque down low, chain cams drive, and they run forever. I know a car guy who OWNED the first Datsun/Nissan dealership in Richmond, had a Porsche Turbo, BMW M5, the whole deal. He ended up buying 3 or 4 of the Stanzas because he wanted to simplify his life - wife, daughter and son all had one, plus Millard (The Mallard) himself. He wanted transportation that was cheap and indestructible.
Nissan makes a good car, and they have fought their way back from the brink - which i respect - but Honda has never been even near the brink, and having my car be a "gussied up Honda" just rings truer and cleaner than a "gussied up Nissan". I owned a 1990 300ZX hardtop (no T-Top!!!), one of the few that they brought over here for racers, who wanted a rigid platform. With mods I made (sprinfs, shocks, Turbo oil cooler, power adder, etc) I had a rocket that looked unique - kinda miss it now and then, but the handling could not compare to the S2K. Plus, like nearly every Japanese design, after a while the looks get old on Nissan - I hink the TL will always be regarded as a nice design, from every angle. The Maxima already looks a bit upside down to me, the Altimas clear tailights scream 1998 or too much money spent at the 'Zone, and so forth.
I think the best Nissan ever made was the 1991 Stanza with the 2.4L four - buzzy, lots of torque down low, chain cams drive, and they run forever. I know a car guy who OWNED the first Datsun/Nissan dealership in Richmond, had a Porsche Turbo, BMW M5, the whole deal. He ended up buying 3 or 4 of the Stanzas because he wanted to simplify his life - wife, daughter and son all had one, plus Millard (The Mallard) himself. He wanted transportation that was cheap and indestructible.
#69
Originally Posted by Road Rage
Strip the cars down to their humble origins, and a Honda is a Honda. A Nissan is a Datsun. Get it? And which F1 car has the Nissan engine in it? - I keep forgetting.
Nissan makes a good car, and they have fought their way back from the brink - which i respect - but Honda has never been even near the brink, and having my car be a "gussied up Honda" just rings truer and cleaner than a "gussied up Nissan". I owned a 1990 300ZX hardtop (no T-Top!!!), one of the few that they brought over here for racers, who wanted a rigid platform. With mods I made (sprinfs, shocks, Turbo oil cooler, power adder, etc) I had a rocket that looked unique - kinda miss it now and then, but the handling could not compare to the S2K. Plus, like nearly every Japanese design, after a while the looks get old on Nissan - I hink the TL will always be regarded as a nice design, from every angle. The Maxima already looks a bit upside down to me, the Altimas clear tailights scream 1998 or too much money spent at the 'Zone, and so forth.
I think the best Nissan ever made was the 1991 Stanza with the 2.4L four - buzzy, lots of torque down low, chain cams drive, and they run forever. I know a car guy who OWNED the first Datsun/Nissan dealership in Richmond, had a Porsche Turbo, BMW M5, the whole deal. He ended up buying 3 or 4 of the Stanzas because he wanted to simplify his life - wife, daughter and son all had one, plus Millard (The Mallard) himself. He wanted transportation that was cheap and indestructible.
Nissan makes a good car, and they have fought their way back from the brink - which i respect - but Honda has never been even near the brink, and having my car be a "gussied up Honda" just rings truer and cleaner than a "gussied up Nissan". I owned a 1990 300ZX hardtop (no T-Top!!!), one of the few that they brought over here for racers, who wanted a rigid platform. With mods I made (sprinfs, shocks, Turbo oil cooler, power adder, etc) I had a rocket that looked unique - kinda miss it now and then, but the handling could not compare to the S2K. Plus, like nearly every Japanese design, after a while the looks get old on Nissan - I hink the TL will always be regarded as a nice design, from every angle. The Maxima already looks a bit upside down to me, the Altimas clear tailights scream 1998 or too much money spent at the 'Zone, and so forth.
I think the best Nissan ever made was the 1991 Stanza with the 2.4L four - buzzy, lots of torque down low, chain cams drive, and they run forever. I know a car guy who OWNED the first Datsun/Nissan dealership in Richmond, had a Porsche Turbo, BMW M5, the whole deal. He ended up buying 3 or 4 of the Stanzas because he wanted to simplify his life - wife, daughter and son all had one, plus Millard (The Mallard) himself. He wanted transportation that was cheap and indestructible.
#70
Advanced
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Glenmoore, PA
Age: 73
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RJPoteet
One question I have not seen addressed by people that have owned both cars:
Which one has the better gas mileage? Not that it would be a deal breaker, but I'm considering both cars, and the gas mileage thing might be a deal breaker with the war department (yes I know, I'm whipped.) Thanks
Which one has the better gas mileage? Not that it would be a deal breaker, but I'm considering both cars, and the gas mileage thing might be a deal breaker with the war department (yes I know, I'm whipped.) Thanks
#71
Just to answer the question, my CL TypeS got 26-28mpg, my G35Coupe gets 18-19mpg (though it is more city driving with the G, the CLS definitely got better mpg). I'd trade the mpg anyday though, to have the G over the 04TL, and that's what I did. =)
#72
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Southern California
Age: 39
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
all i know is that my family has been with acura forever and now we switched to infiniti. Build quality and service is way better than acura in every way. I had a TL-S and had nothing but problems. Lately, acura build quality has been crap. It would take alot to sway me back to acura...
#74
Originally Posted by iNteGraz92
no gas struts because the hood is aluminum? plenty of cars w/ aluminum hoods have gas struts. you are just pulling stuff out of...
and a barrier to prevent things from entering the passenger compartment? isn't that what the firewall is for?
you sound like a disgruntled g owner. if the g's interior materials are so great, why do so many people, tl owners or not , complain about it's poor quality? the g coupe is very nice to look at, but the interior is just a sore to most eyes.
and a barrier to prevent things from entering the passenger compartment? isn't that what the firewall is for?
you sound like a disgruntled g owner. if the g's interior materials are so great, why do so many people, tl owners or not , complain about it's poor quality? the g coupe is very nice to look at, but the interior is just a sore to most eyes.
#75
Originally Posted by dwcolt
Sorry, but there's only one way to put it: the G35 interior is hideous. I like the overall lines of the car, but it's as if the interior designers decided to latch on to that awful "wedge" concept that permeates the entire Cadillac lineup. And the pop-up navigation screen?
To me, the TL interior is one of the finest designs I have ever seen. And no, I'm not talking about material quality, but overall ergonomic design. If the G35 interior weren't so hideous, I really would have considered the car as a worthy alternative. But when you put the two interiors head-to-head, there is really no comparison:
To me, the TL interior is one of the finest designs I have ever seen. And no, I'm not talking about material quality, but overall ergonomic design. If the G35 interior weren't so hideous, I really would have considered the car as a worthy alternative. But when you put the two interiors head-to-head, there is really no comparison:
The G35 is just plainly built better, the TL isn't. For looks, the TL has it. Thats it.
#76
Originally Posted by JRock
I also think the interior looks better in black, but I think that of the Acura interiors too.
http://users.adelphia.net/~jrockcls/console.jpg
Sorry about the angle, was at at stoplight. =p
http://users.adelphia.net/~jrockcls/console.jpg
Sorry about the angle, was at at stoplight. =p
#77
Originally Posted by JRock
Nah, I just find silver trim looks infinitely better with black interior than lighter interior colors.
Really? Never heard of it. I would be interested in free brakes whenever they wear out.
I doubt they wear out in 9.500 miles though
Really? Never heard of it. I would be interested in free brakes whenever they wear out.
I doubt they wear out in 9.500 miles though
#78
Originally Posted by dseag2
You've obviously been sitting in your G35 too long and have been overcome by plastic fumes.
#79
Without proof on your asummtion you are wrong. Because I even installed gas struts on my G35 hood, it flexed in the middle with the lightest strut I could get. Alum hoods can not use struts. It is not cheap because Infiniti used struts on the trunk when they didn't need too. lol
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Like the TL being an Accord in light camo?
No, both cars hide their cheaper siblings part sharing very well.
Hoods without gas struts are to SAVE MONEY. Plain and simple. It is CHEAP. You will notice LUXURY CARS have gas struts as a convience for their owners, CHEAP cars have hood props to save money (Kia, Chevy, Mitsu, etc).
The G35 AWD was not preferred over the RWD model b/c of weight and a slight increase in ride height (for enthusiests). Most people could not tell the difference.
The TL interior is fantastic. It is common knowledge that is a place of opportunity for the G35. It pretty much NAILS everything else.
As for the ES interior, it offers REAL WOOD choices and is as well built as any car for any price.
No, both cars hide their cheaper siblings part sharing very well.
Hoods without gas struts are to SAVE MONEY. Plain and simple. It is CHEAP. You will notice LUXURY CARS have gas struts as a convience for their owners, CHEAP cars have hood props to save money (Kia, Chevy, Mitsu, etc).
The G35 AWD was not preferred over the RWD model b/c of weight and a slight increase in ride height (for enthusiests). Most people could not tell the difference.
The TL interior is fantastic. It is common knowledge that is a place of opportunity for the G35. It pretty much NAILS everything else.
As for the ES interior, it offers REAL WOOD choices and is as well built as any car for any price.
#80
Originally Posted by RJPoteet
One question I have not seen addressed by people that have owned both cars:
Which one has the better gas mileage? Not that it would be a deal breaker, but I'm considering both cars, and the gas mileage thing might be a deal breaker with the war department (yes I know, I'm whipped.) Thanks
Which one has the better gas mileage? Not that it would be a deal breaker, but I'm considering both cars, and the gas mileage thing might be a deal breaker with the war department (yes I know, I'm whipped.) Thanks