Nissan Altima capable of "0-60 in 6.28 seconds"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2001, 10:38 AM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Ahoooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nissan Altima capable of "0-60 in 6.28 seconds"

that is what the full two page ad in USA
Today says. It has (Motor Trend) as where
the time came from.
WOW!
I wonder what mods are available?
We might be looking at a 5.5 second car.
Old 10-05-2001, 01:16 PM
  #2  
Xe- For Better Hwy Vision
 
xenon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Valley Forge, PA.
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Ahoooo:
<STRONG>that is what the full two page ad in USA
Today says. It has (Motor Trend) as where
the time came from.
WOW!
I wonder what mods are available?
We might be looking at a 5.5 second car.</STRONG>
What a waste of power on a car that is advertised as driving around hitting shiet like generic "ice-cream" and loafs of fawk'n "Bread" in the road!

At least "..and that was Aspen" BMW, and the new MB commercials are more exciting and reveal honest truth.
IMO anyway

However, Nissan is up and coming and I expect that Honda will see some challenges.
Old 10-05-2001, 01:50 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
Caddy©'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ringgold, Georgia, U.S
Age: 62
Posts: 7,281
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Odd

I had read somewhere where it was just over 7 Seconds !


Originally posted by Ahoooo:
<STRONG>that is what the full two page ad in USA
Today says. It has (Motor Trend) as where
the time came from.
WOW!
I wonder what mods are available?
We might be looking at a 5.5 second car.</STRONG>
Old 10-05-2001, 02:02 PM
  #4  
Pro
 
someguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
from what I have heard the Chassis of the new Nissans lag behind thier engine power. Meaning that the brakes and suspention just aren't able to effectively deal with the speed that comes with 240-255hp.

Is this true?
Old 10-05-2001, 02:12 PM
  #5  
Powered By HONDA
 
Type S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere
Age: 49
Posts: 2,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that is a manual trans model right?if that is auto.then i am too impressive
Old 10-05-2001, 02:14 PM
  #6  
Suzuka Master
 
mrdeeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally posted by someguy:
<STRONG>from what I have heard the Chassis of the new Nissans lag behind thier engine power. Meaning that the brakes and suspention just aren't able to effectively deal with the speed that comes with 240-255hp.

Is this true?</STRONG>
i think it's true for the current maxima with it's current rear beam suspension.

but the problem with the altima is the cost cutting in the interior (from what some of you have posted). they had to cut costs somewhere to undercut the competition, but they didn't balance it out throughout the whole car.

i think that toyota's kinda got the same problem, but opposite of nissan (nissan cut costs to maximize performance, toyota minimized performance to maximize comfort).

i think that acura did a great cost-cutting job on the cl/tl...nothing was done great, and nothing was too lacking. everything was well, and i think that's why the tl sells so well, because the majority of people don't want to sacrifice anything, and the closest they can get to that is everything being done well.
Old 10-05-2001, 04:03 PM
  #7  
Advanced
 
2002 3.2 CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by someguy:
<STRONG>from what I have heard the Chassis of the new Nissans lag behind thier engine power. Meaning that the brakes and suspention just aren't able to effectively deal with the speed that comes with 240-255hp.

Is this true?</STRONG>

You know why, they took the old model and added 15 more hp and thats it. They didn't upgrade anything including the suspention. See that is why Honda is better than Nissan cause they take there time to make there car better, look at the 2001 CL-S which was upgraded for the more hp and speed. Is perfectly balanced.
Old 10-05-2001, 04:52 PM
  #8  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Ahoooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I sat in a new 2001 Maxima a while back
and thought interior was dam cheap compared
to CLS. When I closed the door it felt like
a piece of tin compared to the much heavier
Acura door. No comparison on interior
quality even if the Acura cost a bit more.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
snorf
2G RDX (2013-2018)
429
11-04-2019 06:44 AM
ExcelerateRep
4G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
8
10-14-2015 08:20 AM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
09-25-2015 12:50 PM
Eggs999bacon
2G TSX (2009-2014)
10
09-24-2015 10:08 AM
NSolace
2G TL Problems & Fixes
15
09-03-2015 08:02 PM



Quick Reply: Nissan Altima capable of "0-60 in 6.28 seconds"



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 AM.