Mid-size family sedan comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 11:06 AM
  #1  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
Mid-size family sedan comparison

Recently, I took the opportunity to test a variety of the family sedans currently available on the market for an article on my blog. I thought I would share my thoughts with the folks here on AcuraZine. The focus was on keeping to the more volume models rather than the top end models. Hope you all enjoy.

Over the course of the last few weeks, we have individually examined a number of mid-size family sedans. You can read the detailed individual reviews by clicking on the followings links:

2013 Ford Fusion SE
2013 Honda Accord Sport
2013 Kia Optima LX
2014 Mazda 6 Touring
2013 Nissan Altima S
2013 VW Passat SE

Each car had its strengths and weaknesses, so declaring a winner was fairly challenging, though a clear loser was evident from the start. Continue reading to see how the cars performed in the various categories.

Exterior
1st place = Mazda 6
2nd place = Ford Fusion
3rd place = Kia Optima
4th place = Honda Accord
5th place = VW Passat
6th place = Nissan Altima

While exterior styling is subjective, the clear winner in this group is the Mazda 6. Bringing a concept car to production often results in the radical styling getting tossed in favor of something more inoffensive, but Mazda has managed to carry the concept cars gorgeous looks into production. Ford, following a similar vein, have brought us a family sedan that is a doppelganger for the uber pricey Aston Martin. Kia just edges out the Honda here with an edgier look while the Passat's clean, but boring appearance trumps the Altima's amorphous blob of a sedan.

Interior

1st place = Honda Accord
2nd place = Mazda 6
3rd place = VW Passat
4th place = Ford Fusion
5th place = Kia Optima
6th place = Nissan Altima

When looking at the interiors, we must consider not just the design, but the ergonomics, comfort, material quality, and overall use of space. On this front, the Accord and Mazda 6 come in extremely close to each other with the Accord's slightly better ergonomics. The Passat, despite its aged design, gets high marks for quality feel. Ford's Fusion, while one of the newest designs with tons of gadgets, loses out for its mediocre interior material quality. Kia's interior is actually decent, but in this group, it gets dinged for design and ergonomics that cannot quite compete. And once again, the Altima brings up the rear for a combination of mediocre ergonomics with terrible material quality.

Engine and Transmission

1st place = Honda Accord
2nd place = Mazda 6
3rd place = Ford Fusion
4th place = Kia Optima
5th place = VW Passat
6th place = Nissan Altima

Honda, as an engine company, owns this category, especially because of the excellent manual transmission in the Accord Sport. The 6 is edged out by the Accord in part because the manual transmission is not yet available on the Touring model until later this year and the engine note is so quiet as to be virtually non-existent. The Fusion, with its small turbocharged engine, leads this pack with not just strong power delivery down low but also a nice induction note, though loses out because of the lack of a manual transmission. While it runs out of steam higher up in the rev range, in daily driving, one would hardly ever notice it. Kia's motor offers the best power of this group but good luck finding one with a manual transmission. The Passat's 2.5L 5-cylinder feels so flat and characterless that it falls to 5th place, with the antiquated 5-speed manual transmission doing nothing to help it out. No surprise, the anemic Altima once again plays the caboose with its horrid CVT.

Handling, Steering, and Ride Quality

1st place = Honda Accord
2nd place = Mazda 6
3rd place = Ford Fusion
4th place = Kia Optima
5th place = VW Passat
6th place = Nissan Altima

This one is a particularly difficult category to address because what is most important here is balancing good handling with ride quality while providing good feedback through the steering wheel without making it difficult to drive in day-to-day traffic or on long trips, but still keeping everything fun for the enthusiast with a family. Honda has managed to capture the essence of this well with the new Accord. The handling is very capable, but the ride quality remains comfortable and the steering provides decent feedback and good precision. The 6 gets edged out largely because of ride quality, which is stiffer than the Accord, but exhibits handling and steering that is just as good as the Accord. The Fusion and the Optima felt very similar and both give up some handling prowess to the Accord and 6, with the Fusion edging out the Optima slightly due to its better damping. VW places low in large part because the steering is so floppy and lifeless, though the handling is not off the mark with the rest of the group and ride quality is very good. Once again, the Altima plays the anchor with its combination of harsh ride, numb lifeless steering, and only average handling.

Noise, Vibration, Harshness

1st place = Mazda 6
2nd place = VW Passat
3rd place = Honda Accord
4th place = Kia Optima
5th place = Ford Fusion
6th place = Nissan Altima

NVH is an area that will be important to the buyers of these cars and the Mazda 6 does the best job of handling all of this. It was easily the quietest car, in part because the engine is so quiet. The Passat also does an excellent job of managing NVH. The Accord and Optima both exhibit more road noise than the front runners with the Accord managing it ever so slightly better. The Fusion loses major points here for its poor management of wind noise at highway speeds. The Altima, not surprisingly, comes up last once again, the result of lots of road noise entering into the cabin and an incessant buzzing from a vibrating trim piece.

Gadgets

1st place = Ford Fusion
2nd place = Mazda 6
3rd place = Honda Accord
4th place = Nissan Altima
5th place = VW Passat
6th place = Kia Optima

An important part of vehicle ownership decisions these days, gadgets are often the make-or-break deciding factor for many buyers. All of these cars have the basic requirements of bluetooth phone connectivity and hands free calling, but from there, Ford takes the cake with its TFT instrument panel and MyFord Touch center console. The Mazda 6 follows close behind with its center console touch screen, multimedia control knob, and standard blind-spot monitoring and back-up camera. The Accord also has a center console screen, though it lacks any additional gadgets to set itself apart. A surprise is that the Nissan Altima ranks higher here with its fancy instrument cluster panel and small center console display. The VW loses ground here for its lack of a back-up camera, which all of the first 4 competitors have, and the Kia brings up the rear with its complete throwback to simplicity.


Value

1st place = Honda Accord
2nd place = Mazda 6
3rd place = Ford Fusion
4th place = Kia Optima
5th place = VW Passat
6th place = Nissan Altima

Value for money will play a big part for many buyers in this segment and the Honda Accord is hard to beat here. It offers a lot of car for a reasonable price and has well thought out option packages allowing you to pick the one that best fits your needs. Mazda has done a great job packaging the 6 as well with much more standard equipment, but fewer packages and more individual options to tailor the car to your desires. The Fusion offers a lot of car and a lot of gadgets, but has a complicated options arrangement and can be difficult to navigate with the price ramping up very quickly. Kia does well here with a nice car that options well and offers a great value especially given the design, space, and performance. VW really needs to redesign the Passat or make it less expensive because at its current price, it is hard to justify given its lack of any sort of stand out character. Finally, the Altima, struggles to justify its pricetag with the terrible material quality, horrible driving experience, and miserable transmission.

And the winner is...

The 2014 Mazda 6 Touring sedan. With either a 1st or 2nd place finish in every category, this sedan presents one of the best values in the mid-size family sedan marketplace. It offers enthusiasts a decent engine, excellent chassis, comfortable interior, plenty of gadgets to keep the driver happy, and one of the most attractive exterior designs out there. While the Accord kept the race very close and actually took more 1st place categories, it struggles a bit with a slightly bland exterior design and NVH. The Fusion trails the two front runners by a fair margin, struggling a bit with NVH and interior quality. The Passat and Optima actually tie with both cars ranking very close in most areas, struggling mostly from inability to stand out in a group of strong competitors. The clear loser here the Altima, which loses every category except one.

So at the end of the day, if we were to put our own money down, the Mazda 6 would be at the top of the list. The fact that the Touring model will be available with a manual transmission and a high-output 2.2L turbo-diesel is just around the corner makes it an increasingly attractive choice. For the enthusiast with a family, Zoom-Zoom is the way to go for a great looking car that delivers on performance, fuel economy, and, most importantly, driving dynamics.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 01:11 PM
  #2  
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 120 Days
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 29,785
Likes: 6,544
From: Spring, TX
Well written.
The new M6 & the '14 Accord Sport both have my eye right now, though I'm leaning more toward the ILX at the moment
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 01:54 PM
  #3  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
though I'm leaning more toward the ILX at the moment
You better hide.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 02:31 PM
  #4  
SuperTrooper169's Avatar
In the Mid-South meow
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 2,298
From: Music City
Awesome caparison! I can't wait to read through each blog entry after work.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 03:20 PM
  #5  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
Well written.
The new M6 & the '14 Accord Sport both have my eye right now, though I'm leaning more toward the ILX at the moment
Honestly, if the choice were up to me between the M6 Touring and the ILX, I would take the Mazda. It is a bigger car, drives better, and has more gadgets. The interior is nearly as good and the fuel economy is significantly better.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 03:21 PM
  #6  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
Originally Posted by dom
You better hide.
Did you buy your new car yet?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 04:17 PM
  #7  
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 120 Days
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 29,785
Likes: 6,544
From: Spring, TX
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Honestly, if the choice were up to me between the M6 Touring and the ILX, I would take the Mazda. It is a bigger car, drives better, and has more gadgets. The interior is nearly as good and the fuel economy is significantly better.
If you could get a 6MT in the higher trims, I'd be more inclined to lean toward it.
I'll likely still test drive the M6 before buying anything, but I'm more torn bewteen the Accord Sport 6MT & the 2.4l ILX.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 04:28 PM
  #8  
Shoofin's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 17,085
Likes: 740
From: Brooklyn, NY USA
Being that I haven't done a detailed review of all those these vehicles in a test, but I am in a business in which I sell these cars almost on a daily basis, I get to drive them all at different times and can get enough of an impression. I would say that you're pretty spot on in all of your standings, and your winner, I would tie between the Mazda and Honda. Both are very good cars. The Mazda is a pinch more sporty and fun to drive though. I never noticed the NVH in the Accord to bother me, it could be because I'm so used to it...

Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 06:13 PM
  #9  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Great comparison! It's really down to the Accord or Mazda 6. Both are the best in class.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 06:36 PM
  #10  
leedogg's Avatar
RAR
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,783
Likes: 1,286
From: DC Metro
Originally Posted by Shoofin
Being that I haven't done a detailed review of all those these vehicles in a test, but I am in a business in which I sell these cars almost on a daily basis, I get to drive them all at different times and can get enough of an impression. I would say that you're pretty spot on in all of your standings, and your winner, I would tie between the Mazda and Honda. Both are very good cars. The Mazda is a pinch more sporty and fun to drive though. I never noticed the NVH in the Accord to bother me, it could be because I'm so used to it...

last i heard, mazda's cant hold their value for shit...still the case?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 06:40 PM
  #11  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Did you buy your new car yet?
Nope, which is why I appreciate the timing of your post.

Not really interested in a NA 4 cylinder which moves the Accord V6 to the top of the list. Just not sure I want to spend that much. I have until late May to decide.

I've only driven 2 of the 6 you listed. I guess the Fusion you drove was 1.6? I would rate the 2.0L Fusion SE I drove ahead of the Accord EX-L overall. Better handling and more engaging to drive IMO but not exactly apples to apples either. Although pricing was in line.

I guess the Accord you drove was an MT? Be interested to hear your thoughts on the CVT. I'm honestly a bit surprised at the lack of....negativity....might not be the right word and while I'm sure the Honda CVT is the best in he business it doesn't hold a candle to the 6AT in the Fusion or Accord V6 IMO.

Last edited by dom; Apr 15, 2013 at 06:43 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 06:40 PM
  #12  
Shoofin's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 17,085
Likes: 740
From: Brooklyn, NY USA
Originally Posted by leedogg
last i heard, mazda's cant hold their value for shit...still the case?
Accord still has a higher resale value. Mazda is the underdog. People don't take notice of it. And truthfully, I still don't think Mazda will produce or sell any numbers close to what the ToyoHondaNissanDub bunch is pushing....
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 07:04 PM
  #13  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,017
Likes: 1,737
In the areas that most compel me (engine/tranny, handling, ergonomic and value), looks like your review reveals the Accord as my preference of the bunch. Good write up.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 07:37 PM
  #14  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
Originally Posted by Shoofin
Being that I haven't done a detailed review of all those these vehicles in a test, but I am in a business in which I sell these cars almost on a daily basis, I get to drive them all at different times and can get enough of an impression. I would say that you're pretty spot on in all of your standings, and your winner, I would tie between the Mazda and Honda. Both are very good cars. The Mazda is a pinch more sporty and fun to drive though. I never noticed the NVH in the Accord to bother me, it could be because I'm so used to it...

I did not include the exact tally, but the Mazda and the Accord were separated by a couple of points and there was a big spread to the Fusion.

And the NVH never bothered me much either, but it is ever so slightly noticeable when you drive the two cars back to back.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 07:43 PM
  #15  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
Originally Posted by dom
Nope, which is why I appreciate the timing of your post.

Not really interested in a NA 4 cylinder which moves the Accord V6 to the top of the list. Just not sure I want to spend that much. I have until late May to decide.

I've only driven 2 of the 6 you listed. I guess the Fusion you drove was 1.6? I would rate the 2.0L Fusion SE I drove ahead of the Accord EX-L overall. Better handling and more engaging to drive IMO but not exactly apples to apples either. Although pricing was in line.

I guess the Accord you drove was an MT? Be interested to hear your thoughts on the CVT. I'm honestly a bit surprised at the lack of....negativity....might not be the right word and while I'm sure the Honda CVT is the best in he business it doesn't hold a candle to the 6AT in the Fusion or Accord V6 IMO.
Yeah, drove the 1.6L motor in the Fusion. Peppy down low, but really runs out of puff higher up in the rev range. I suspect the 2.0L will be better since they can get away with a slightly larger turbo given the extra displacement over the 1.6.

And yes, manual transmission on the Accord. I hate CVTs. In fact, the only CVT in this group came on the Altima and if you read that in-depth review, you can see just how much I hate CVTs.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 07:43 PM
  #16  
oo7spy's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 31,897
Likes: 7,251
From: Austin, TX
Saw a Mazda 6 the other day pull up to a stop sign as I passed. Drove up thinking, "Jaguar? Fisker? Maserati?" Drove by, "Nope. Mazda"



God job Mazda. I hate to tell Honda to follow another brands styling, but since they're gonna do it anyway, Mazda wouldn't be a bad choice.

Last edited by oo7spy; Apr 15, 2013 at 07:46 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2013 | 10:05 PM
  #17  
oo7spy's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 31,897
Likes: 7,251
From: Austin, TX
*Good job.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2013 | 02:22 AM
  #18  
HBaJ's Avatar
Welcome to Olliewood
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 63
From: CT/EU
Does the Accord Sport have a different tire ratio/profile that could attribute to the NVH as opposed to say the EX or EX-L?

My brother in law is shopping in the 25-30ish range and we narrowed it down so far to:

1) Accord EX-L
2) ILX w/ tech
3) VW CC Sport Plus (my pick)
4) Jetta TDI w/ Premium + Nav packages
5) Maybe TSX w/o Tech

so I can definitely appreciate this thread and saving me the effort of perhaps even starting one of my own. Also if you, Shoofin or anybody else has some insight on the VW's that would help me out too.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2013 | 07:59 AM
  #19  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
Originally Posted by HBaJ
Does the Accord Sport have a different tire ratio/profile that could attribute to the NVH as opposed to say the EX or EX-L?
The Accord Sport comes with a set of 18-inch wheels and tires, which probably contributes a bit to ride stiffness and potential ride harshness, of which there is not much at all, but not to noise or vibration.

Tire choice, which is entirely the result of Honda's partnership with Michelin, does make a tremendous difference on road noise as the tires that come on the car from the factory tend to be quite loud. Simply swapping a different set of tires will contribute to reduced road noise.

Otherwise, the NVH is actually quite good on the Accord.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2013 | 08:14 AM
  #20  
fsttyms1's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 81,385
Likes: 3,068
From: Appleton WI
^ honda/acura in general have never been known to be quiet cars though. While they have come quite a ways from past models, they still seem to lack sound deadening that others have
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2013 | 01:52 PM
  #21  
oo7spy's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 31,897
Likes: 7,251
From: Austin, TX
:cough-rl/rlx-cough:
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2013 | 02:47 PM
  #22  
Mr Marco's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,490
Likes: 609
Eh-um, these sorts of compos are subjective.
The only way to really tell if the car is a good choice is to just go out and test drive it yourself. One persons noise is anothers melody.
Certainly I can attest to my HVAC guy's experience* with the Maxima Vs Accord/TL. *the seats were just not a good fit for his ass.
With that said, "seat of the pants" examinations are invalueable.


BTW: Even thought the Altima is considered a comp for the Accord, it's really a closer comp to the Civic-and therefore overpriced IMHO.

Last edited by Mr Marco; Apr 17, 2013 at 02:51 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2013 | 07:02 PM
  #23  
batman's Avatar
Aint Doing Sh*t
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 5
From: GA
Nice review. Those two would be on the top of my list but something about the fusion 2.0T AWD.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2013 | 07:31 PM
  #24  
gatrhumpy's Avatar
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35,532
Likes: 1,654
The Accord's side view camera on the navigation system actually inspired me to repeat the marvel on my TL. I like that feature.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2013 | 06:13 AM
  #25  
dallison's Avatar
registered pw
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,859
Likes: 366
From: south central pa
Originally Posted by oo7spy
:cough-rl/rlx-cough:
nice car but 15-20k too high and a different class of car.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2013 | 05:41 PM
  #26  
leedogg's Avatar
RAR
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,783
Likes: 1,286
From: DC Metro
Originally Posted by gatrhumpy
The Accord's side view camera on the navigation system actually inspired me to repeat the marvel on my TL. I like that feature.
What did you do?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2013 | 11:46 AM
  #27  
jayhawk815's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 22
From: Dodge City, KS
Thanks for posting this review! I'm all over the place in terms of what type of car I'll buy next, but I find the Mazda6 to be very tempting. The features/fuel economy/styling/price combo is very intriguing.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2013 | 01:36 PM
  #28  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
^ honda/acura in general have never been known to be quiet cars though. While they have come quite a ways from past models, they still seem to lack sound deadening that others have
True. The RLX is quiet as a Lexus though. No exaggeration.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2013 | 03:55 PM
  #29  
oo7spy's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 31,897
Likes: 7,251
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by dallison
nice car but 15-20k too high and a different class of car.
Wasn't talking about the class comparison, just the noise. As for the price, have you seen the price of a 4-banger, Civic sized, 328i?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
adrian_s2k
1G RDX (2007-2012)
23
Jan 12, 2016 04:25 PM
spoiler900
5G TLX (2015-2020)
1
Sep 23, 2015 04:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM.