LS1 in a RX-7
#1
#5
people sell rx7 cause of the rotory motor. those damn things overheat and last about 70k miles.
the ls1 rx7 has a 50/50 weight distribution and weigh in at a total of 2831lbs running a 9.8@140mph.....while still getting 28mph hwy.
anyone have a problem with that?
the ls1 rx7 has a 50/50 weight distribution and weigh in at a total of 2831lbs running a 9.8@140mph.....while still getting 28mph hwy.
anyone have a problem with that?
#7
Originally Posted by RUF 993TTR
people sell rx7 cause of the rotory motor. those damn things overheat and last about 70k miles.
the ls1 rx7 has a 50/50 weight distribution and weigh in at a total of 2831lbs running a 9.8@140mph.....while still getting 28mph hwy.
anyone have a problem with that?
the ls1 rx7 has a 50/50 weight distribution and weigh in at a total of 2831lbs running a 9.8@140mph.....while still getting 28mph hwy.
anyone have a problem with that?
The LS1 Rx7 doesn't have 50/50 weight distribution unless they added some weight in the back. The v8 totally throws off the handling of the Rx7. You're taking out a 1.3/2.6 liter engine and throwing in a v8. What do you think is gonna happen?
Trending Topics
#9
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally Posted by al900rr
The LS1 Rx7 doesn't have 50/50 weight distribution unless they added some weight in the back. The v8 totally throws off the handling of the Rx7. You're taking out a 1.3/2.6 liter engine and throwing in a v8. What do you think is gonna happen?
The v8 is actually right around the same weight as the rotary, I actually think it may be lighter
It's a bitchin car, handles awesome, my buddy actually helped Hoffines ( I think that's the spelling but couldn't find anything on the net) produce the actual first car
#10
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
the LS1 also brings a ton of benefit, A lot better gas mileage, a HUGE difference in power over the RPM range, let's not even get into reliability etc, etc.
#11
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
The aluminum GM LS1 and LS6 engines are extremely light power plants. With the complete removal of the 13B and the sequential turbo assembly, the project car's final weight is less than the total gross vehicle weight of a stock Mazda RX7. The final weight of the car is listed below. The car weighed 2,831lbs with a full Touring interior, sunroof, complete Bose sound system including the "Sound Wave," and a 1/4 tank of gas.
LF: 746 RF: 677 Total Front: 1,423lbs
LR: 675 RR: 733 Total Rear: 1,408lbs
www.hinsonsupercars.com is the site
so in other words, what i'm saying to you AL900RR is :noob:
LF: 746 RF: 677 Total Front: 1,423lbs
LR: 675 RR: 733 Total Rear: 1,408lbs
www.hinsonsupercars.com is the site
so in other words, what i'm saying to you AL900RR is :noob:
#12
Originally Posted by Edr0e
Would that fit in a miata? I remember waaay back someone fit a 5.0 mustang engine in the miata...
Im a fan of rotaries
Im a fan of rotaries
#17
If you notice the 13b sits well behind the front axle making the car "mid-engine like". I'm almost positive the v8 will not sit in the exact same place as the factory motor. The 13b is the size of a milk crate. Weight will be put into the wrong places. IN terms of reliability I will speak from personal experience, I have a heavily modded 3rd gen Rx7 that I use as a daily driver. I have had no problems yet though my motor was rebuilt at around 88,000 miles.
#18
Originally Posted by al900rr
The LS1 Rx7 doesn't have 50/50 weight distribution unless they added some weight in the back. The v8 totally throws off the handling of the Rx7. You're taking out a 1.3/2.6 liter engine and throwing in a v8. What do you think is gonna happen?
hey...since you're so sure of this...how about a lil wager? they didnt add any weight in the back. you obviously know nothing about the rotary motory's weight or the american motor's....
#19
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally Posted by RUF 993TTR
hey...since you're so sure of this...how about a lil wager? they didnt add any weight in the back. you obviously know nothing about the rotary motory's weight or the american motor's....
I think I already shut him up
#22
Originally Posted by RUF 993TTR
hey...since you're so sure of this...how about a lil wager? they didnt add any weight in the back. you obviously know nothing about the rotary motory's weight or the american motor's....
Didn't shut me up. Don't visit this forum much. My whole point was motor placement is very important. In the 3rd gen that is pictured the motor sits pretty much behind the front axle. I'm almost positive that the LS1 will sit over the front axle. You being a Porshe enthusiast should be able to appreciate and comprehend what I'm trying to say. Also, you guys mean to tell me a Chevy V8 weights as much as a two-rotor. Show me some unbias proof and I'll be quiet. What I mean by proof is true engine weights and not numbers from the guy who did the swap. I've been a rotary head for about 6 years now, hell I own a rotary. I've pulled a rotary motor before and have hands on experience. I'll even take pics for ya.
#23
Originally Posted by CLpower
and here is a pic of the motor in the car al
looks like it's mounted pretty far back like the 13B
looks like it's mounted pretty far back like the 13B
In the pic you posted the motor is right over the front axle. The rotary sits behind it and lower. Last time I checked the LS1 weighed alittle over 450lbs and the rotary weighed in around 300. Here's a link for the rotary. You still wanna bet? Do some research before talking.
http://www.rotaryaviation.com/faq.html#weight
#24
Originally Posted by CLpower
and here is a pic of the motor in the car al
looks like it's mounted pretty far back like the 13B
looks like it's mounted pretty far back like the 13B
Look how much further back the rotary sits. The motor pretty much starts where the intake manifold is. Just use the strut tower bar as a reference. Holy cow, it's behind the front axle. OMG
#29
Originally Posted by CLpower
The aluminum GM LS1 and LS6 engines are extremely light power plants. With the complete removal of the 13B and the sequential turbo assembly, the project car's final weight is less than the total gross vehicle weight of a stock Mazda RX7. The final weight of the car is listed below. The car weighed 2,831lbs with a full Touring interior, sunroof, complete Bose sound system including the "Sound Wave," and a 1/4 tank of gas.
LF: 746 RF: 677 Total Front: 1,423lbs
LR: 675 RR: 733 Total Rear: 1,408lbs
www.hinsonsupercars.com is the site
so in other words, what i'm saying to you AL900RR is :noob:
LF: 746 RF: 677 Total Front: 1,423lbs
LR: 675 RR: 733 Total Rear: 1,408lbs
www.hinsonsupercars.com is the site
so in other words, what i'm saying to you AL900RR is :noob:
#30
I m currently searching for a "weekend warrior" what would u say is a good price on a 3rd gen Rx7 w/ under 75k miles.
i have a friend who works at Autobacs in OC, he owns a jdm silvia s14 and was hollering working on the rx7 is a bitch! something about vacuum lines...
What do u think? Reliability is an issue for me, because i dont own a truck or a trailer.
i have a friend who works at Autobacs in OC, he owns a jdm silvia s14 and was hollering working on the rx7 is a bitch! something about vacuum lines...
What do u think? Reliability is an issue for me, because i dont own a truck or a trailer.
#31
Originally Posted by Edr0e
I m currently searching for a "weekend warrior" what would u say is a good price on a 3rd gen Rx7 w/ under 75k miles.
i have a friend who works at Autobacs in OC, he owns a jdm silvia s14 and was hollering working on the rx7 is a bitch! something about vacuum lines...
What do u think? Reliability is an issue for me, because i dont own a truck or a trailer.
i have a friend who works at Autobacs in OC, he owns a jdm silvia s14 and was hollering working on the rx7 is a bitch! something about vacuum lines...
What do u think? Reliability is an issue for me, because i dont own a truck or a trailer.
#32
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally Posted by al900rr
That's weak kid. Obviously you have no clue what you are talking about. Show me some unbias numbers and I'll be quiet. Have you ever seen a V8 bareblock or a rotary bareblock? Lemme guess you're just posting sh*t off the net so you can sound like you know what you're talking about? Back to the point show me some unbias numbers and I'll shutup.
I've seen both bareblocks. The V8 IS ALUMMINUM!!!!!!!!!!! then add in the weight fo the turbos, etc you see how weight adds up to the rotary. Size doesn't determine weight. They are almost identical in weight. I don't see why hinsons would be bias. Find me some weights on the stock RX7 to compare.
The weight of the motors are very similiar.
#33
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally Posted by Edr0e
I m currently searching for a "weekend warrior" what would u say is a good price on a 3rd gen Rx7 w/ under 75k miles.
i have a friend who works at Autobacs in OC, he owns a jdm silvia s14 and was hollering working on the rx7 is a bitch! something about vacuum lines...
What do u think? Reliability is an issue for me, because i dont own a truck or a trailer.
i have a friend who works at Autobacs in OC, he owns a jdm silvia s14 and was hollering working on the rx7 is a bitch! something about vacuum lines...
What do u think? Reliability is an issue for me, because i dont own a truck or a trailer.
out here in LA you can find rx7's w/ blown motors for about 5-6K. My buddy just picked one up w/ a perfect body and interior for 6.5K. Rebuilds usually can cost you about 3-4K
#34
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
[QUOTE=al900rr] Lemme guess you're just posting sh*t off the net so you can sound like you know what you're talking about?[QUOTE]
that's runny
btw, I posted up #'s and you told me I was wrong. Why don't you post up some #'s supporting your argument.
that's runny
btw, I posted up #'s and you told me I was wrong. Why don't you post up some #'s supporting your argument.
#35
[QUOTE=CLpower][QUOTE=al900rr] Lemme guess you're just posting sh*t off the net so you can sound like you know what you're talking about?
that's runny
btw, I posted up #'s and you told me I was wrong. Why don't you post up some #'s supporting your argument.
http://www.rotaryaviation.com/faq.html#weight
Last time I checked LS1's weighed in around 450. Rotaries with EVERYTHING IN FRONT OF THE FIREWALL weigh in around 345. Not only is the weight a factor but also motor placement. If you see in the pictures that you supplied, the LS1 sits right over the front axle. The rotary sits behind the axle and not on it. Look at the pics. Use the strut bar as reference.
that's runny
btw, I posted up #'s and you told me I was wrong. Why don't you post up some #'s supporting your argument.
Last time I checked LS1's weighed in around 450. Rotaries with EVERYTHING IN FRONT OF THE FIREWALL weigh in around 345. Not only is the weight a factor but also motor placement. If you see in the pictures that you supplied, the LS1 sits right over the front axle. The rotary sits behind the axle and not on it. Look at the pics. Use the strut bar as reference.
#36
Originally Posted by CLpower
I've seen both bareblocks. The V8 IS ALUMMINUM!!!!!!!!!!! then add in the weight fo the turbos, etc you see how weight adds up to the rotary. Size doesn't determine weight. They are almost identical in weight. I don't see why hinsons would be bias. Find me some weights on the stock RX7 to compare.
The weight of the motors are very similiar.
The weight of the motors are very similiar.
#37
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Dude, do you realize at all how light an all aluminum motor is? I know you have a 7 yourself so you know how much those 2 turbos add to the weight, etc.
It doesn't take a genious to realize that an alluminum motor is light as hell and most likely lighter then some 4 cyl's out there!
How many cyl's are in a motor do not judge how much it weights
It doesn't take a genious to realize that an alluminum motor is light as hell and most likely lighter then some 4 cyl's out there!
How many cyl's are in a motor do not judge how much it weights
#38
Originally Posted by CLpower
Dude, do you realize at all how light an all aluminum motor is? I know you have a 7 yourself so you know how much those 2 turbos add to the weight, etc.
It doesn't take a genious to realize that an alluminum motor is light as hell and most likely lighter then some 4 cyl's out there!
How many cyl's are in a motor do not judge how much it weights
It doesn't take a genious to realize that an alluminum motor is light as hell and most likely lighter then some 4 cyl's out there!
How many cyl's are in a motor do not judge how much it weights
If this doesn't seal the deal then I don't know what will. Here ya go.Scroll down to the rotaries. You can look up the v8s too.
http://www.angelfire.com/ar/dw42/engfyi.htm
#40
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally Posted by al900rr
Here's some more numbers. I'm not judging the wieghts by the amount of cylinders. I'm not the stupid.
If this doesn't seal the deal then I don't know what will. Here ya go.Scroll down to the rotaries. You can look up the v8s too.
http://www.angelfire.com/ar/dw42/engfyi.htm
If this doesn't seal the deal then I don't know what will. Here ya go.Scroll down to the rotaries. You can look up the v8s too.
http://www.angelfire.com/ar/dw42/engfyi.htm
that doesn't help either of us. All it states is that some GM motors use alluminum heads. The LS1 has a full alluminum block also. It also doesn't show the weights of a TT 13B