I prefer automatic transmissions...
#1
I prefer automatic transmissions...
... depending on the situation.
Manual for:
-racing (any)
-sporty cars (200+ hp)
Automatic for:
-daily drivers
-traffic
-slow cars
-non-sporty cars
-high-powered RWD drag racing
SMG F1-type gearboxes for:
-everything
Anyone here with me? I just truely think that I'd prefer to have an automatic daily driver that's slow and uninspiring to drive, as compared to a manual one (same car though).
Manual for:
-racing (any)
-sporty cars (200+ hp)
Automatic for:
-daily drivers
-traffic
-slow cars
-non-sporty cars
-high-powered RWD drag racing
SMG F1-type gearboxes for:
-everything
Anyone here with me? I just truely think that I'd prefer to have an automatic daily driver that's slow and uninspiring to drive, as compared to a manual one (same car though).
#2
Senior Moderator
Not sure why you would prefer "slow and uninspiring". I prefer to max out the fun factor as much as possible. If you can have fun every day then why not
Unless I'm in complete bumper to bumper traffic, i'll take the fun of a slick shifting manual any day.
Unless I'm in complete bumper to bumper traffic, i'll take the fun of a slick shifting manual any day.
#5
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by 03 CL TypeS
... depending on the situation.
Manual for:
-racing (any)
-sporty cars (200+ hp)
Automatic for:
-daily drivers
-traffic
-slow cars
-non-sporty cars
-high-powered RWD drag racing
SMG F1-type gearboxes for:
-everything
Anyone here with me? I just truely think that I'd prefer to have an automatic daily driver that's slow and uninspiring to drive, as compared to a manual one (same car though).
Manual for:
-racing (any)
-sporty cars (200+ hp)
Automatic for:
-daily drivers
-traffic
-slow cars
-non-sporty cars
-high-powered RWD drag racing
SMG F1-type gearboxes for:
-everything
Anyone here with me? I just truely think that I'd prefer to have an automatic daily driver that's slow and uninspiring to drive, as compared to a manual one (same car though).
#6
I lived in Chicago so when I bought my car I bought it with an auto - the traffic jams were the reason why I didn't go stick...
#7
Team Owner
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Age: 57
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03 CL TypeS
... Anyone here with me? I just truely think that I'd prefer to have an automatic daily driver that's slow and uninspiring to drive, as compared to a manual one (same car though).
3-Pedals > Slushbox or SMG
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Moderator
My friend has an old beat up civic. The thing is slow and ugly, and definately not sporty or a "sports car" .... but its really fun to drive because of the manual.
#10
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by fdl
My friend has an old beat up civic. The thing is slow and ugly, and definately not sporty or a "sports car" .... but its really fun to drive because of the manual.
The early 70's Porsche 911's are uninspiring, at least the base T model w/ only 140hp, but in a car that weighs 2300 lbs, it like driving a go-cart.
#11
My M45 loves to eat rice
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 38
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GreenMonster
The early 70's Porsche 911's are uninspiring, at least the base T model w/ only 140hp, but in a car that weighs 2300 lbs, it like driving a go-cart.
As for the argument, I agree with everything said. I want to buy a 6-speed car as my next car and become a ''master'' at driving stick, but it would be an absolute waste with the traffic I endure on a daily basis. A lot of the guys making the argument FOR stick live, well, in the sticks, and they don't have to endure big-city life and traffic. I guess I'll just wait until I have enough money to buy a second car as a weekend car.
#12
Senior Moderator
<----- was expecting to see 03 CL TypeS' location as New York City, based on the thread title.
After years of having both AT and MT, I definitely would not have wanted MT in the I95 traffic I was in, approaching the WWB in DC this past Saturday.
Here's where I show my age: Unless it's something like an S2000 or 350Z, I cant fathom having an MT in a family or entry level luxury sedan.
After years of having both AT and MT, I definitely would not have wanted MT in the I95 traffic I was in, approaching the WWB in DC this past Saturday.
Here's where I show my age: Unless it's something like an S2000 or 350Z, I cant fathom having an MT in a family or entry level luxury sedan.
#13
Registered Abuser of VTEC
I can't fathom having an AT in an econobox. Imagine if you owned a Civic with 127hp. Would you want to further kill the driving excitement, and make it even more sluggish by opting for auto (not to mention paying an extra $1000)?
#14
That was uncalled for...
I learned how to drive on a Manual when I was 10...at first I didnt understand the concept of the AUTOMATIC, (I kept wondering where the third pedal was ...remeber, I was 10)...I much prefer Manual over automatic, more fun, more contro, and actually takes some skill to drive good....I love it...Im glad my SHO is a Manaul...Ive heard nothing but bad things about the auto's....
#15
Yeehaw
When I had both the auto cls and the s2k, I have to admit it was a good feeling to get in the cl and just cruise without shifting.
My ideal situation would be a 6mt sports car and an auto sedan, but if I only have one car, it has to be manual.
My ideal situation would be a 6mt sports car and an auto sedan, but if I only have one car, it has to be manual.
#16
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by youngTL
I can't fathom having an AT in an econobox. Imagine if you owned a Civic with 127hp. Would you want to further kill the driving excitement, and make it even more sluggish by opting for auto (not to mention paying an extra $1000)?
<---- just showed age again.
#17
Registered Abuser of VTEC
Originally Posted by F23A4
I guess to some that Civic EX can be (mis)construed as a performance oriented car but to me it's a point A to point B ride that's more than adequate with a 4AT.
<---- just showed age again.
<---- just showed age again.
In my opinion, Auto + 4cyl =
Additionally, when buying a car to save money but still get all the features you want (ala the EL), I would want to save as much as I could in operating costs. I'd get better gas mileage with the 5MT (or 6MT if they offer it in 06...must wait and see!), I'd have lower maintenance costs associated with the transmission, AND, if driven properly, a manual transmission will last the life of the car, at most requiring a clutch replacement. Many people who buy economy cars value that. It looks like with the price of gas now ($1.14/L @ 91 octane), my dreams of getting an 06 TL have gone down the drain, and I'm going to be watching the next EL. Basically I want a luxurious car that is cheap to operate. I'm sure I'm not the only one either.
Last edited by youngTL; 08-17-2005 at 01:50 PM.
#18
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by F23A4
I guess to some that Civic EX can be (mis)construed as a performance oriented car but to me it's a point A to point B ride that's more than adequate with a 4AT.
<---- just showed age again.
<---- just showed age again.
its absolutely not a performance car, but I woudl still want a manual in it for the fun factor. But thats my point, you can still have fun in a non-perforamnce oriented car with a manual transmission. Where as the initial posts states otherwise.
#20
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Doom878
Question. How many of you actually drive in bumper-to-bumper traffic everyday and prefer a stick? How do you have the endurance for that?
Get use to it.. just leave enough space in front of you and the car ahead and stay in 1st gear. Not that hard.
But i would love SMG or DSG as my next tranny choice.
#22
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by fdl
its absolutely not a performance car, but I woudl still want a manual in it for the fun factor. But thats my point, you can still have fun in a non-perforamnce oriented car with a manual transmission. Where as the initial posts states otherwise.
Originally Posted by Doom878
I can't leave a gap here. Too many nuts cut in front.
#24
F23A4: you're almost double my age, but I think just like you!
To those that say driving a low horsepower manual car can be a lot of fun, I agree.
Personally, I've had my share of "low horsepower fun" with my first car, a 2000 Civic DX coupe (manual) and I can't conceive ever wanting a manual A-to-B car again.
Maybe I'm just growing up too quickly. But my definition of automobile performance has evolved, and my needs and desires have changed.
If I'm going to be shifting gears, I'd rather do in something that can accel/brake/corner better than a manual A-to-B grocery getter.
To those that say driving a low horsepower manual car can be a lot of fun, I agree.
Personally, I've had my share of "low horsepower fun" with my first car, a 2000 Civic DX coupe (manual) and I can't conceive ever wanting a manual A-to-B car again.
Maybe I'm just growing up too quickly. But my definition of automobile performance has evolved, and my needs and desires have changed.
If I'm going to be shifting gears, I'd rather do in something that can accel/brake/corner better than a manual A-to-B grocery getter.
#25
How bout Auto - nice looking and still have power..thats also fuel efficient...like a TL or CL-S (A). hehehe..then a manual has to be a true power car...like a ford mustang Cobra, Supra, etc. etc. hehe...when u commute u definitely need a fuel efficient car, and some power to cut off some people out there...who just drive like granny. =)
#26
Originally Posted by fuzzy02CLS
Some cars are better with the auto. Cars with low power, or high power bands are a real pain with a stick.
If anything, those are exactly the cars that need to be manual.
You need to minimize power loss and that extra gear to be in the fat part of the power band definitely helps as well.
All cars should be available in manual IMO.
And I don't understand what you mean by high power bands.
#27
Registered Abuser of VTEC
Originally Posted by WiLLs TypE S
How bout Auto - nice looking and still have power..thats also fuel efficient...like a TL or CL-S (A). hehehe..then a manual has to be a true power car...like a ford mustang Cobra, Supra, etc. etc. hehe...when u commute u definitely need a fuel efficient car, and some power to cut off some people out there...who just drive like granny. =)
#28
Registered Abuser of VTEC
Originally Posted by psteng19
I don't know how some of you can say economy cars with low power shouldn't be stick.
If anything, those are exactly the cars that need to be manual.
You need to minimize power loss and that extra gear to be in the fat part of the power band definitely helps as well.
All cars should be available in manual IMO.
And I don't understand what you mean by high power bands.
If anything, those are exactly the cars that need to be manual.
You need to minimize power loss and that extra gear to be in the fat part of the power band definitely helps as well.
All cars should be available in manual IMO.
And I don't understand what you mean by high power bands.
Consider the Civic DX or VP. You save about 2MPG in the city with the manual.
Last edited by youngTL; 08-17-2005 at 06:58 PM.
#29
Team Owner
Originally Posted by youngTL
Fuel effient and auto don't usually go together in the case of economy cars. It's only in high performance cars with agressive gearing where the manual is less fuel efficient. The purpose of a commuter car, you said yourself, is to be fuel efficient. Getting an auto is counterproductive to that. I would prefer an SMG or CVT type transmission if you prefer to not shift for yourself. A traditional auto simply is far too parasitic for a little 1.7L or 1.8L engine.
#31
As for what I stated earlier..I meant to said...it WOULD BE NICE..to have a nice car with power, looks, fuel eff. and auto. To be honest with you...I think the TL gives you decent gas mileage. But if you go with 4 bucker cars...I suggest manual...but what car surprised me was the Scion tC.
#32
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by MattT516
I agree. My dad has had a '70 911 Targa for over 15 years now, and that thing is fun as all hell to drive.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=4567686088
Champagne tastes on a beer budget
#33
Beware of leakage
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana, just east of nowhere
Age: 42
Posts: 19,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BEETROOT
When I had both the auto cls and the s2k, I have to admit it was a good feeling to get in the cl and just cruise without shifting.
My ideal situation would be a 6mt sports car and an auto sedan, but if I only have one car, it has to be manual.
My ideal situation would be a 6mt sports car and an auto sedan, but if I only have one car, it has to be manual.
My GSR is much more fun to drive, but the auto CLS was nice .
#34
Team Owner
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Age: 57
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Doom878
I only know of Corvettes, Camaros, etc that get better gas on auto. Who else?
2005 Chevrolet Corvette
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Manual: 18 mpg / 28 mpg
Automatic: : 18 mpg / 26 mpg
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2005/chev.....8.Chevrolet*
#35
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by psteng19
All cars should be available in manual IMO.
#36
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
Different strokes for different folks.
Auto verses manual... it COMPLETELY changes the character of the vehicle.
As mentioned, a Civic can be fun to drive if its a stickshift, i can attest to that.
I'd love to make my TL a 6 speed manual, but its not as much of a priority as you might think. It has plenty of power.
Now for a car like an S2000... its absolute heresy in my opinion to have anything resembling an automatic in it
Auto verses manual... it COMPLETELY changes the character of the vehicle.
As mentioned, a Civic can be fun to drive if its a stickshift, i can attest to that.
I'd love to make my TL a 6 speed manual, but its not as much of a priority as you might think. It has plenty of power.
Now for a car like an S2000... its absolute heresy in my opinion to have anything resembling an automatic in it
#37
Team Owner
Originally Posted by Shawn S
Wrong answer....try again...
2005 Chevrolet Corvette
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Manual: 18 mpg / 28 mpg
Automatic: : 18 mpg / 26 mpg
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2005/chev.....8.Chevrolet*
2005 Chevrolet Corvette
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Manual: 18 mpg / 28 mpg
Automatic: : 18 mpg / 26 mpg
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2005/chev.....8.Chevrolet*
So what car is out there where its manual variant gets worse mpg, youngTL?
#38
Team Owner
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Age: 57
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Doom878
Question. How many of you actually drive in bumper-to-bumper traffic everyday and prefer a stick? How do you have the endurance for that?
Sure it’s more difficult, but it’s worth the tradeoff when you get out in the clear.
I’ve never been in traffic so bad that it made me want to sell any of my stick cars.
I live out in the suburbs.
My daily commute is 1/2 curvy county roads and 1/2 bumper to bumper city traffic.
Plus I also have one really steep hill with a stop sign at the top that I deal with nearly every day.
It’s a 45 degree slope and can be quite interesting when traffic backs up 10+ cars deep.
You get real good at learning clutch engagement points when there’s an asshole with an SUV 6” off your back bumper.
( Illick’s Mill road pulling onto Center Street in Bethlehem for any of you locals who know the area )
#39
Team Owner
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Age: 57
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Doom878
So what car is out there where its manual variant gets worse mpg, youngTL?
Still not a true BMW style SMG, but it will probably get better MPG because of the extra gears.
#40
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Shawn S
I can’t believe everyone always brings up TRAFFIC in these arguments.
Sure it’s more difficult, but it’s worth the tradeoff when you get out in the clear.
I’ve never been in traffic so bad that it made me want to sell any of my stick cars.
I live out in the suburbs.
My daily commute is 1/2 curvy county roads and 1/2 bumper to bumper city traffic.
Plus I also have one really steep hill with a stop sign at the top that I deal with nearly every day.
It’s a 45 degree slope and can be quite interesting when traffic backs up 10+ cars deep.
You get real good at learning clutch engagement points when there’s an asshole with an SUV 6” off your back bumper.
( Illick’s Mill road pulling onto Center Street in Bethlehem for any of you locals who know the area )
Sure it’s more difficult, but it’s worth the tradeoff when you get out in the clear.
I’ve never been in traffic so bad that it made me want to sell any of my stick cars.
I live out in the suburbs.
My daily commute is 1/2 curvy county roads and 1/2 bumper to bumper city traffic.
Plus I also have one really steep hill with a stop sign at the top that I deal with nearly every day.
It’s a 45 degree slope and can be quite interesting when traffic backs up 10+ cars deep.
You get real good at learning clutch engagement points when there’s an asshole with an SUV 6” off your back bumper.
( Illick’s Mill road pulling onto Center Street in Bethlehem for any of you locals who know the area )
*incidental contact = "if it aint hanging off or knocked off, what's the problem?"