Hybrid Cars' Fantasy Mileage Ratings Drive Into the Sunset

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2007, 04:48 PM
  #1  
Team Owner
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Hybrid Cars' Fantasy Mileage Ratings Drive Into the Sunset

http://www.wired.com/cars/futuretran.../05/hybrid_mpg

Hybrid Cars' Fantasy Mileage Ratings Drive Into the Sunset

Hybrid car economics will face a new road test this month with the arrival of fresh models sporting revised mileage ratings from the Environmental Protection Agency.

This year, new test standards have forced manufacturers to lower advertised efficiency claims on most models compared to previous years, and car lots are bracing for a tougher environment for hybrid sales.

It will "make for an interesting summer," said Phil Reed, the fuel economy guide editor at auto website Edmunds.com. The estimations are based on data from Edmunds.com that assumes 15,000 miles driven per year and gasoline at an average price of $2.70.

Revised EPA Miles Per Gallon Estimates




Hybrids can cost from $1,500 to $4,500 more than their gas-only equivalents. The new mileage estimates mean it will take longer to recoup that extra cost in money saved on gas. Experts say the shift could dampen demand, although some hybrids will look better on paper than others.

According to a formula devised by Edmunds, it would take nearly 10 years to recoup the extra costs after buying a 2007 Mercury Mariner Hybrid, up from 6.6 according to the old mileage ratings. For the 2007 Honda Accord and Honda Civic hybrids it takes 14.5 and 6.5 years, respectively.

The 2007 Toyota Prius remains a good bargain when compared to a similarly equipped 2007 Toyota Camry -- it takes just 1.2 years to break even.

The latest sales figures on hybrids remain strong. Toyota sold 90 percent more gas-electric vehicles during the first two months of 2007 compared to the previous year. And in March 2007, hybrid sales nearly doubled over the previous March. But come summer, attitudes might change. Some consumers seem to have soured a bit on hybrids.

Michael Spath of Jacksonville, Florida, had considered the Prius when he purchased his last car, but he didn't trust the EPA ratings and decided on the less expensive Toyota Corolla. "It gets the same mileage as the Prius for a heck of a lot less money," Spath said in an e-mail.

The adjusted fuel-economy ratings make the economics clear. "I would not purchase a hybrid because they are in fact not cost-effective. I really wish they were because I probably would have bought one," he said.

As previously reported by Wired News, many hybrid owners have experienced fuel economy far below the EPA estimates.

Now, after more than 20 years of producing mileage estimates that were far above what most drivers experienced, the EPA has added new testing procedures that more closely match what the average driver will experience.

The EPA created an online calculator based on the revised testing methodology that generates more realistic expectations for today's vehicles.

The two top-selling hybrid vehicles, the Prius and Honda's Civic Hybrid, will lose 12 and 11 miles per gallon respectively from their city driving estimates. Other vehicles are downgraded between 2 and 4 mpg (see chart).

Overall, vehicle city mileage estimates dropped by about 12 percent, and some vehicles are expected to be rated 30 percent lower, according to EPA documents.

The new EPA tests factor in real-world conditions such as speeding, varying weather and lead-footed driving. Vehicles like hybrids with smaller engines pay a higher penalty during the acceleration test, as well as the tests that simulate going up a hill and maintaining highway speeds.

The fuel-economy estimates that appear on 2008 vehicles won't be based on actual test data, but will be an approximation (as used in EPA's calculator), according to EPA spokesman John Millett. This year, auto manufacturers can choose whether to run the additional tests, but starting with the 2010 model year, the EPA will require the tests on all new cars, he said.

Hybrid vehicle performance was previously overestimated partly because the tests included vehicles' idling for long periods, causing many hybrids to shut down their engines to conserve fuel. The old testing methodology registered "a higher fuel economy for hybrid vehicles than is achieved under typical driving conditions," according to EPA documents.

The new ratings will, on a positive note, end debate about hybrids not performing as advertised, said Dave Alexander, a senior analyst at ABI Research. Conscientious drivers (who brake and start slowly and keep the needle below 60 mph) could even surpass the EPA ratings, he said. "There is potential in the long run for better customer satisfaction."

Last edited by Sly Raskal; 05-14-2007 at 04:51 PM.
Old 05-14-2007, 06:20 PM
  #2  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,334
Received 625 Likes on 504 Posts
If you were stupid enough to base your hybrid pay back time on some window sticker numbers then you deserve to be swindled.

I wonder how the EPA gets MY08 numbers when the makers themselves don't know the numbers yet.
Old 05-14-2007, 09:45 PM
  #3  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Just to give some perspective ... This is my buddy's 1992 Honda Civic VX that he used to drive as a courier. Put 497,680 miles on it with the original tranny, engine, and put 350k miles on the original clutch. The EPA rated the car at 48 city/55 hwy and he routinely got between 55-60 highway. His personal best was 70mpg (700 miles/10 gals) in COMBINED driving on his daily route (though most highway).

Here's the window sticker:



Where's the value in a hybrid again?
Old 05-14-2007, 10:06 PM
  #4  
Team Owner
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
^^^

I still think that hybrids are overrated. I'd much rather buy a used civic or comparable vehicle that gets good mileage. There are so many used cars out there that can get good mileage yet just sit there and go unsold because of the "hybrid' bandwagon.
Old 05-14-2007, 10:40 PM
  #5  
hail to the victors
 
chungkopi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: chicago
Age: 44
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
driving my GF's 06 civic lx right now. and i get 23.5/34.5 with no AC on!
Old 05-14-2007, 10:43 PM
  #6  
F1 cart racer
 
AS3.0CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Age: 36
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
at estimated annual fuel cost. i use a little less then that in two months now with my car, i can get 30 on the highway with it and around 22 in the city. but my foot likes to be in it, so maybe a little less.
Old 05-15-2007, 06:56 AM
  #7  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,334
Received 625 Likes on 504 Posts
Wow, what subcompact in '92 got 10MPG?
Old 05-16-2007, 09:45 AM
  #8  
Drinking Beer In
 
hemhaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Age: 68
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
People don't buy hybrids to save money, they do it to feel holier than thou.

Hybrids are an environmental disaster. Google "Sudbury nickel mine". Also, once mined, the nickel travels over 10,000 miles before it finally ends up in the car. When you consider *all* of the costs, the carbon footprint of a Prius is greater than that of a H3.

Hybrid = technological masturbation for the underinformed liberal.

And don't get me started on ethanol!
Old 05-16-2007, 09:54 AM
  #9  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 44
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
"The estimations are based on data from Edmunds.com that assumes 15,000 miles driven per year and gasoline at an average price of $2.70."

Lol....we've already surpassed $2.70/gallon, at least in most places I think.
Old 05-16-2007, 10:10 AM
  #10  
07 ASM TL
 
weaselbob74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Algonquin, IL
Posts: 137
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3.59 for premium here (IL)
Old 05-16-2007, 11:01 AM
  #11  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Hybrid FTL
Fuel Cell FTW
Old 05-16-2007, 11:45 AM
  #12  
99 TL, 06 E350
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 5,030
Received 164 Likes on 110 Posts
stop selling SUV and Minivans. That will solve alot of problems.
Old 05-16-2007, 12:00 PM
  #13  
07 ASM TL
 
weaselbob74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Algonquin, IL
Posts: 137
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Black Tire
stop selling SUV and Minivans. That will solve alot of problems.
Old 05-16-2007, 04:03 PM
  #14  
Drinking Beer In
 
hemhaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Age: 68
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quit subsidizing and let gas go to its true price - $5/gal.

Start selling smaller, sporty cars with direct injection diesels.

Upgrade infrastructure so we don't sit in traffic wasting fuel.

Internal combustion is still the most mature and efficient technology out there.
Old 01-11-2011, 06:47 PM
  #15  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
Rare Earths Leave Toxic Trail to Toyota Prius, Vestas Turbines

Rare earth metals are key to global efforts to switch to cleaner energy -- from batteries in hybrid cars to magnets in wind turbines. Mining and processing the metals causes environmental damage that China, the biggest producer, is no longer willing to bear.

China’s rare earth industry each year produces more than five times the amount of waste gas, including deadly fluorine and sulfur dioxide, than the total flared annually by all miners and oil refiners in the U.S. Alongside that 13 billion cubic meters of gas is 25 million tons of wastewater laced with cancer-causing heavy metals such as cadmium, Xu Xu, chairman of the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters, said at a Beijing conference on Dec. 28.

“China supplied the world with very cheap and good-quality rare earths for more than a decade at the cost of depleting its resources and damaging its environment,” Wang Caifeng, who heads the government-affiliated China Association for Rare Earths, said at the conference. “The world should thank China.”

With China now shutting down unregulated rare earth mines and slashing exports, users from Toyota Motor Corp. to Vestas Wind Systems A/S, the world’s biggest maker of wind turbines, are concerned that supplies may be constrained.....
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...-turbines.html
Old 01-11-2011, 06:49 PM
  #16  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
U.S. Fuel-Economy Target of 62 Mpg by 2025 `Ambitious,' GM's Akerson Says

General Motors Co. Chief Executive Officer Dan Akerson said the government’s long-range goal of reaching a fuel-efficiency average of 62 miles per gallon by 2025 is “pretty ambitious.”

Federal regulators said an annual improvement of 6 percent a year may be possible in the 2017-to-2025 time period in a report last year.

“We have a stated goal of not fighting change but embracing it, and achieving it as best we can,” Akerson told reporters today after meeting with U.S. lawmakers in Washington. “The laws of physics are not going to be suspended.”

GM is rebuilding trust with U.S. car buyers through better- built cars like the Chevrolet Cruze and the plug-in electric Chevy Volt, Akerson said last month. The company is looking to ramp up Volt sales to 45,000 next year as consumers take advantage of a $7,500 federal tax credit.....
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...rson-says.html
Old 01-11-2011, 08:31 PM
  #17  
Evil Mazda Driver
 
PortlandRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 37
Posts: 11,212
Received 174 Likes on 89 Posts
Been saying it for years, much to the ire of pious Prius owners. I the Fit for this reason....little Honda 4-cylinder getting 35-45 mpg. Some owners have reported teasing 50 mpg on the highway.
Old 01-12-2011, 11:06 AM
  #18  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,334
Received 625 Likes on 504 Posts
Federal regulators said an annual improvement of 6 percent a year may be possible in the 2017-to-2025 time period in a report last year.
It's unattainable and stupid statements like this that make people want gov out of the auto business.
Old 01-12-2011, 12:41 PM
  #19  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,389
Received 22,769 Likes on 13,963 Posts
This is more car talk related...? Anil...feel free to move it back to Automotive News if you disagree but I'll move this to Car Talk for now.
Old 01-12-2011, 12:56 PM
  #20  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Why not just make it 200 mpg by 2015? Or 300 mpg. Since we're just making up arbitrary numbers that have absolutely no grounding in actual fact these days, why not?
Old 01-12-2011, 01:05 PM
  #21  
registered pw
 
dallison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: south central pa
Age: 49
Posts: 38,821
Received 354 Likes on 252 Posts
I am not a fan of teh hybrids. It takes too long to get a return of the additional expense and they are toxic.
Old 01-12-2011, 03:20 PM
  #22  
Someday, an RS6 Avant+
 
mrmako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,476
Received 986 Likes on 530 Posts
Originally Posted by hemhaw
People don't buy hybrids to save money, they do it to feel holier than thou.

Hybrids are an environmental disaster. Google "Sudbury nickel mine". Also, once mined, the nickel travels over 10,000 miles before it finally ends up in the car. When you consider *all* of the costs, the carbon footprint of a Prius is greater than that of a H3.

Hybrid = technological masturbation for the underinformed liberal.

And don't get me started on ethanol!


Originally Posted by PortlandRL
Been saying it for years, much to the ire of pious Prius owners. I the Fit for this reason....little Honda 4-cylinder getting 35-45 mpg. Some owners have reported teasing 50 mpg on the highway.
Don't forget the Volkswagen Golf TDI. They are excellent as well.


Originally Posted by dallison
I am not a fan of teh hybrids. It takes too long to get a return of the additional expense and they are toxic.
I like the idea of the world trying to ween itself, and lower oil consumption. But reality is this: The batteries and the process of mining the metals in them is far worse than CO2 emissions.

But I suppose if you eat foie grass, go to school at Cal Berkley, and have an Eco-Friendly blog, then go ahead and feel good about yourself and buy a Prius.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
peti1212
ILX
22
01-05-2022 05:14 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
9
02-25-2020 09:57 AM
divac
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
16
08-29-2018 10:13 AM
ptbarnett
3G RLX (2013+)
4
08-30-2015 12:39 PM



Quick Reply: Hybrid Cars' Fantasy Mileage Ratings Drive Into the Sunset



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 AM.