GT-R to 2013 GT500????
#121
![Snicker](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/emot-laugh.gif)
Though ironically I'd take wagyu over Ruth Chris....
#122
Senior Moderator
#126
My first Avatar....
^
Yeah, who would want a slow, ugly, boring, 2013 GT500?
Yeah, who would want a slow, ugly, boring, 2013 GT500?
#127
My first Avatar....
#128
Drifting
Getting a little defensive here? While saying the '13 GT500 is simply a high performance Mustang might be a slight understatement, it's still reasonably accurate. While I'd love to own the GT500, I'd take a GT-R over it any day.
#129
My first Avatar....
Nope, not defensive at all. It's just funny to me how people don't recognize the R&D that goes into producing a Shelby. It's not just dropping a big motor in a Mustang body. But everybody is entitled to their opinion.
#131
Drifting
Not defensive at all? You sure could have fooled me. When did someone say that all Ford did was drop a big motor in a Mustang body? You're countering an argument that no one is making.
#132
#133
My first Avatar....
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Bye](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/bye.gif)
#135
My first Avatar....
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
I love the 25yo know it all douchebag.
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
I'm not going to shit on this thread any further. But please feel free to continue.
Last edited by pttl; 06-27-2012 at 11:47 AM.
#136
The Dumb One
iTrader: (1)
get personal, its the internet, i really dont care TBH.
let em rip!
the irony of personal insults and age reference to ME was pretty hilarious though.
let em rip!
the irony of personal insults and age reference to ME was pretty hilarious though.
Last edited by Rockstar21; 06-27-2012 at 12:05 PM.
#137
Moderator
The GT500 IS unique in many respects. I don't think anyone's arguing it's a mundane base model Mustang. I, for one, love the GT500. All else equal, would I take the GT-R over the GT500? Yes, for several reasons, not the least of which is the sophisticated AWD system that lets the car handle in a way the GT500 can't. But, that's not everyone's preference. If we all liked the same thing, there would be no variation at all in product lines; where's the fun in that?
#138
The Dumb One
iTrader: (1)
i think i just touched a nerve, much like when people refer to SRT-4's as Neons...
sure its a whole different animal, nobody is arguing the performance differences when they call it a neon though... nor was i here...
sure its a whole different animal, nobody is arguing the performance differences when they call it a neon though... nor was i here...
The following users liked this post:
Rockstar21 (06-27-2012)
#141
Moderator
Oh, and a SRT-4 is a (crap) Neon!
![Snicker](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/emot-laugh.gif)
The following users liked this post:
ttribe (06-27-2012)
#144
Moderator
I was giving you a hard time...should have had red text, I guess. Everyone's a little touchy, it seems.
#148
Senior Moderator
The GT500 IS unique in many respects. I don't think anyone's arguing it's a mundane base model Mustang. I, for one, love the GT500. All else equal, would I take the GT-R over the GT500? Yes, for several reasons, not the least of which is the sophisticated AWD system that lets the car handle in a way the GT500 can't. But, that's not everyone's preference. If we all liked the same thing, there would be no variation at all in product lines; where's the fun in that?
The following users liked this post:
ttribe (06-27-2012)
#149
Fahrvergnügen'd
I think in the next iteration of the Mustang they need to get away from this whole "it has more horsepowers" nonsense that is too reminiscent of the 60s "go faster in a straight line" mentality and make the GT500 about being better at everything than a Mustang GT.
Then it becomes truly special and not "They masked fundamental problems with the car by throwing 660hp at it to justify the price."
IMO of course.
Then it becomes truly special and not "They masked fundamental problems with the car by throwing 660hp at it to justify the price."
IMO of course.
#150
Your Friendly Canadian
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,431
Received 1,485 Likes
on
1,049 Posts
^ I don't think the Mustang really has that problem. This is only from what I've read in car mags, but it seems to actually handle really well and be a good all-around sports car. Maybe it's the stigma that needs to be shaken off.
#151
Burning Brakes
I would never think twice, GTR all day. Mustangs all look the same to me, nothing special IMO
. When someone starts throwing insults and starts referring to age, they are losing the internet "battle"
, they just have nothing else to say.
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
![Snicker](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/emot-laugh.gif)
#152
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Wow! Thanks for all the great responses. I think I will plan on keeping the GT-R for a while. I can't really have both, my wife wouldn't really be too on board with me having two cars she can't drive. (She can barely drive stick and is scared she'll hurt the GT-R). She loves the Vagon and I am considering picking up one as a DD and dumping my truck. I have read Neuronbob's whole V thread again and one of the big things that bothers me about the V is the fuel range. I'd drive this thing 20k a year as a daily and I am used to getting 550 mi per tank versus less than 250 for a V. I am really blessed to be able to have these options. Adding a fourth car to the fleet is kind of silly and while it wouldn't be much of a financial strain one can always save-invest more.
#153
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
Id invest..........
.....In an AMS Alpha 10 kit
.....In an AMS Alpha 10 kit
![Snicker](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/emot-laugh.gif)
#154
Senior Moderator
![pofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/pofl.gif)
Anyway since we're discussing the GT500, i just received the Aug issue of C/D in which it's featured (vs Camaro ZL1). There's no question, it looks as though this is the most potent version of the Mustang ever:
0-60 mph in 3.5 seconds
0-100 mph in 7.9 seconds
1/4 mile in 11.8 seconds @ 125 mph
So, it definitely has the goods vs the stock GT-R in a straight line.
#155
Burning Brakes
![pofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/pofl.gif)
Anyway since we're discussing the GT500, i just received the Aug issue of C/D in which it's featured (vs Camaro ZL1). There's no question, it looks as though this is the most potent version of the Mustang ever:
0-60 mph in 3.5 seconds
0-100 mph in 7.9 seconds
1/4 mile in 11.8 seconds @ 125 mph
So, it definitely has the goods vs the stock GT-R in a straight line.
#156
Senior Moderator
Id look at the ZL1. In the latest C&D comparo the ZL1 was picked the winner over the stang. It tied it on the streets of willow even though it was down 100hp. Being the motor it is it wouldnt take much to get close to the same hp numbers the stang is offering.
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
#157
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
The ZL1 looks like a Hot Wheels car though. The Mustang doesnt look as, dare I say, ricey.
#159
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
![Woot](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/woot.gif)
#160
Senior Moderator