Grand Cherokee Top speed question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 10:55 PM
  #1  
DAiNiUS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 597
Likes: 5
From: Montreal, Canada
Grand Cherokee Top speed question

I've a random question for you guys. My friend has a 1995 Grand Cherokee 5.2L. He said that he was doing 220 km/h (135mph). Now I'm kind of doubting that since the car is quite heavy, has only 220hp and is as aerodynamic as a trash dumpster. So do you guys think that it might be possible that he went that fast, or are the speed indicators unreliable in American (and other) cars when nearing these speeds?

I am doubtful since I managed only ~210 km/h (130mph) in my 200hp, lighter, and more aerodynamic TL - but it in a different location though.

Any thoughts or input?
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2009 | 11:30 PM
  #2  
Anhedonia's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,185
Likes: 1
From: Madison, Nj || Woodbridge, CT
my old 2000 sienna LE with 230hp, clocked in at 3800 lbs and i roped it up to 135mph. my e39 with 187 hp and 170 tq made it to 155mph with no problems. Hell, my 170hp CL 4 banger made it to 140+...

With enough road, any car can make it to 135... its 100% achievable, and that 5.2L is probably a tq monster, it shouldnt have any issue doing 135. actually the only issue he may have is a speed limiter.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 12:53 AM
  #3  
Will Y.'s Avatar
Registered but harmless
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,889
Likes: 1,164
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by DAiNiUS
I've a random question for you guys. My friend has a 1995 Grand Cherokee 5.2L. He said that he was doing 220 km/h (135mph). Now I'm kind of doubting that since the car is quite heavy, has only 220hp and is as aerodynamic as a trash dumpster...
Apparently the '95 Grand Cherokee isn't very heavy- maybe 3700 lbs. in with the I6 engine.

Some owners posted that they got to 75 mph before it got scary.
See http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=635829.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 06:18 AM
  #4  
alexSU's Avatar
Under construction
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,007
Likes: 96
From: Charlotte NC
yeah i wouldn't go past 65mph in a fuckin jeep, especially one that's more then 10 years old
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 07:36 AM
  #5  
DAiNiUS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 597
Likes: 5
From: Montreal, Canada
Originally Posted by Anhedonia
and that 5.2L is probably a tq monster, it shouldnt have any issue doing 135. actually the only issue he may have is a speed limiter.
I don't know where to get accurate stats for this car, since msn autos says that it has 280nm/~210ft/lb but Wikipedia states that for the 1995 model the torque was increased to 410nm/300ft/lb. If it does have 300 then its pretty good but 210 is the same as my TL.

Apparently the '95 Grand Cherokee isn't very heavy- maybe 3700 lbs. in with the I6 engine.

Some owners posted that they got to 75 mph before it got scary.
He has the 5.2l V8, and his does shake when going above 90 ...km/h(55mph)!
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 07:53 AM
  #6  
bigman's Avatar
'Big Daddy Diggler'
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,016
Likes: 4
From: Yonkers NY
Originally Posted by alexSU
yeah i wouldn't go past 65mph in a fuckin jeep, especially one that's more then 10 years old
lol, Amen to that. I had a 1995 v8 GC and it was a beast. I got it to 100+ with ease plenty of times.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 08:07 AM
  #7  
alexSU's Avatar
Under construction
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,007
Likes: 96
From: Charlotte NC
Originally Posted by bigman
lol, Amen to that. I had a 1995 v8 GC and it was a beast. I got it to 100+ with ease plenty of times.
flying brick man lol
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 09:48 AM
  #8  
thevikas87's Avatar
Your mom is in
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 3
From: Dallas, TX
I remember my 98 GC's speedometer only going up to 120....I'm not quite sure how he measured 135...
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #9  
'01White3.2CL's Avatar
TellinItLikeItIsSince1/06
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,950
Likes: 30
From: Illinois
i always thought it was 195mph
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 10:04 AM
  #10  
TheMirror's Avatar
Disinformation Terminator
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by Anhedonia
my e39 with 187 hp and 170 tq made it to 155mph with no problems.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 10:33 AM
  #11  
tsxgoogs's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Anhedonia
my old 2000 sienna LE with 230hp, clocked in at 3800 lbs and i roped it up to 135mph. my e39 with 187 hp and 170 tq made it to 155mph with no problems. Hell, my 170hp CL 4 banger made it to 140+...

With enough road, any car can make it to 135... its 100% achievable, and that 5.2L is probably a tq monster, it shouldnt have any issue doing 135. actually the only issue he may have is a speed limiter.
HMM, do you live next to a high speed oval?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #12  
alexSU's Avatar
Under construction
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,007
Likes: 96
From: Charlotte NC
^^ he meant KPH lol
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 10:56 AM
  #13  
Josh99CL's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 1
From: Franklin, Indiana
Originally Posted by alexSU
^^ he meant KPH lol
No
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 01:11 PM
  #14  
alexSU's Avatar
Under construction
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,007
Likes: 96
From: Charlotte NC
^ i know he didn't, forgot the red text
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 01:51 PM
  #15  
Josh99CL's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 1
From: Franklin, Indiana
Originally Posted by alexSU
^ i know he didn't, forgot the red text
It is surprising the CL will bury the needle but I know it will.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 04:33 PM
  #16  
mrmako's Avatar
Someday, an RS6 Avant+
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,805
Likes: 1,291
From: Japan
Originally Posted by '01White3.2CL
i always thought it was 195mph


When I lived in Germany, I had my 1995 Chrysler LHS (3.5L, 215 HP) up to 112 before the limiter cut off fuel to the fuel pump. That is a scary sound when driving that fast.

My Volvo V70 (I5, 170 HP) was good to 125 mph, and I could have pushed it more, but drag and my brakes said not a good idea.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #17  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by DAiNiUS
If it does have 300 then its pretty good but 210 is the same as my TL
Just b/c two cars have similar torque numbers does not mean they will perform the exact same. Variables such as gearing and torque curve (as well as others) will affect performance. So while your TL may not get there with 210 ft/lb of torque it does not mean the case would be the same for other vehicles.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 05:59 PM
  #18  
JS + XES's Avatar
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
OP, just try it with his car. you drive it.

post a vid!
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 05:59 PM
  #19  
JS + XES's Avatar
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
not
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
notfast
1/2G MDX (2001-2013)
9
Mar 28, 2023 08:10 AM
peti1212
ILX
22
Jan 5, 2022 05:14 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
16
Sep 14, 2015 03:16 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
3
Sep 14, 2015 10:48 AM
datadr
5G TLX (2015-2020)
6
Sep 12, 2015 09:12 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM.