FIRST DRIVE: 2009 NISSAN GT-R (Autoweek)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2007, 10:55 PM
  #1  
styling on you
Thread Starter
 
SeCsTaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Age: 34
Posts: 5,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
FIRST DRIVE: 2009 NISSAN GT-R (Autoweek)

By MARK VAUGHN







PHOTO GALLERY
Yes, it lives up to all the hype!

The coming Nissan GT-R is a world-class supercar: Top speed of 193 mph, 0-60 in 3.5 seconds, a 473 hp, 433 lb ft twin-turbo V6 mounted in the front and driving all four wheels through a rear-mounted transaxle. Take a breath. Okay, continue. And a dual-clutch six-speed automatic you can operate via paddles on the steering wheel.

After a full day driving it on the Nurburgring, the Autobahn and up and over numerous little German country roads we can easily say this is one car that was not over hyped. It is truly a world-class supercar on par with, if not just ahead of, the iconic Porsche Turbo. (They had a Porsche Turbo on hand, too, and we thought the GT-R felt better tied down.)

But it’s one thing to put a license plate on a race car and call it streetable. Chief engineer Kazutoshi Mizuno said the new GT-R was designed and engineered as an all-around, all-season, all-weather car that is comfortable to drive every day, even at normal speeds on a normal day.

During the few minutes we drove at what could be called a “normal pace” that day we’d have to say we agree with him. But given only a few hours at the wheel of this, the most highly anticipated supercar in years, we were only in “normal” mode for very brief spurts. The rest of the time we were at some level between “pushing it” and “hammering on the mutha’.”

Our first time behind the wheel was on the A48 autobahn in Germany somewhere out around Koblenz or Koln or some other K-town where the German socialist government had not yet succeeded in adding those awful 120-km-hr speed limits. It was like Bonneville with elevation changes and guardrails. The only limitation out here was aerodynamic. Hence, we were obliged to go all-out whompin’ fast the whole time.

Rolling right out of the autobahn rest stop where we rendezvoused with the Japanese engineering support crew, we nailed the throttle to the floor and man did the throttle respond. The 3.8-liter VR38 V6 sits up front, with two of its six cylinders forward of the front axle and four aft. Two bagel-sized IHI turbos sit right at the exhaust manifold for quick response. The 433 lb ft of torque rails across the tach from 3200 to 5200 rpm. Peak 473 hp comes at 6400 revs.

A carbon fiber prop shaft (“Good damping and stiffness”) runs back to the transaxle, incorporating the clutch, transmission and transaxle altogether. The shifting is done via a direct, twin-clutch system. One clutch handles the odd gears and another clutch handles the even ones. Shifts take 0.2 seconds. There are BorgWarner triple-cone synchronizers for all gears. Another shaft runs forward from that transaxle to send power to the front wheels. Below 25 mph the torque split is 50/50, above that, under normal driving, the split is 40/60. But it can split up to 2/98 under hard acceleration, which was what we were giving it.

Our car rode on 20-inch wheels wrapped by Bridgestone Potenza RE070s, 255/40 in front and 285/35 rears. Front suspension was upper and lower A-arms and the rear was a five-link.

It’s always fun to go from zero to warp factor in a right hand-drive car using a jet-lagged left hand-drive brain, trying not to turn on the windshield wipers when you think you’re hitting the turn signal.

The GT-R lists quarter-mile time at 11.7 seconds and entering the Autobahn we had no reason to doubt that. The turbo boost was, as promised, very progressive, with little or no discernable lag, just smooth, even power delivery.

Despite the late-morning hour and the mid-week day, there were still a few cars in the way. When we eased onto the 15.2-inch ventilated cross-drilled Brembo brakes from well into triple-digit speeds the car slowed without drama. But then traffic would clear out and the GT-R resumed its high velocity chase with ease.

There are three settings for the Bilstein Damptronic shocks: R, Sports and Comfort. We went out in Sports.

Top speed is listed at 193 mph but with traffic the best we could do was 176. You wouldn’t try that in any country but Germany, where you can usually assume everyone else is paying attention. There was a Japanese engineer riding shotgun over on the left whom we dubbed “Bushido engineer-o” or brave engineer. He thought that was pretty funny.

While the coefficient of drag is an impressive 0.27, more than almost any production car, the GT-R also produces downforce at each axle, something very few production cars can claim.

“Cd is more important than downforce on a G35,” said chief designer Hiroshi Hasegawa. “But in the case of the GT-R we have to make downforce.”

At 193 mph you might appreciate that philosophy.

The first time we went out, the right front wheel felt just a little out of balance, so we came back in and they changed all four wheels. They’re efficient, these guys. After that the car was smooth as well as stable and safe, due in equal parts to the German roadway and the Japanese engineering.

The whole car sits on the new PM platform, PM meaning Prime Midship. The PM incorporates what Mizuno-san called a “hybrid superstructure body.” There is carbon-injected material in the front end and carbon composite material underneath for aerodynamic downforce. There’s even some polypropylene in the body, too.

We truly enjoyed the Autobahn experience. This is the perfect car for such a top-speed run—it gives such a sense of control at those speeds that you feel like you could do anything.

Next on our agenda of “anything” were some miles of country road. We were able to drive the GT-R back-to-back with a Porsche Turbo.

“Okay now, please enjoy,” said the Nissan technician as we exited the company compound down the street from the Nurburgring.

After “much spirited driving,” we can say the Turbo had a good deal more lag and more dive and squat than the GT-R. But once the Porsche got spooled up, achtung, baby. It felt lighter and the steering felt quicker, too. The biggest difference between the two was that the Turbo demanded more of its driver while the GT-R was easier to handle, flatter and more stable. We’d be happy with either one, if you’re considering a birthday present or anything.

Next up on this Disneyland of a day was Der Nurburgring. This is what all those teenagers whose parents have not taken away their Playstation access really want to do: drive an actual GT-R around the actual Nurburgring as fast as grip, guts and gasoline allow.

Man-oh-flippin’-man. The real deal is about 100 times more thrilling than any computer simulation, even those with the little plastic steering wheel and feet pedals attached.

This was the new Nurburgring, too. Nissan wasn’t foolish enough to turn this small squadron of car writer hacks loose on the narrow, blind, crazy-dangerous Nordschliefe. At the time of our drive there were only three prototype GT-Rs extant in the world, and all the apologizing on Earth wouldn’t bring one back if you crunched it.

The new Nurburgring is faster, with wide, sweeping turns bordered by runoff areas so huge that even the most no-talent buffoon could likely stay on the pavement. So we did.

All the Japanese engineers and executives had been telling everyone that there was a 35-mph speed limit in the pits, but in all the excitement we kind of forgot about it and nailed the throttle right out of the parking spot right there in pit lane. The wide, low, squealing run-flat tires laid down long patches of black rubber as we launched past the closed garages, pulling back on the right paddle to shift the rear-mounted dual-clutch six-speed transaxle every time the engine got close to its 7000-rpm redline.

In no time at all we were roaring onto pit-out near the end of the straight and directly into the low, evening sun. By the time we got fully out on the front straight and were shifting up from four to five or so, the sun was directly in front of the GT-R and streaming into the windshield; we were trying to remember if that first right-hander came at this rise or just past it. It was just past it, but we’d already started braking and downshifting, the GR6’s “synchro-rev control,” which perfectly matched each downshift with a throttle blip much better than we’d ever have been able to match it.

Tiptoeing through the first couple turns to avoid the infamy of the run-off gravel, the car felt perfectly safe and willing. So we hammered it up through the gears down the hill and to the far 180-degree turn and started to feel more confident. By the end of the first lap we were flat out on the front straight, roaring up through all six gears for all it was worth.

Nissan lists lateral g’s at 0.99, and we certainly bumped up against that in many a Nurburgring corner.

We only got three full laps and no one was timing us, so you’ll just have to assume we set the lap record. Earlier, Mizuno-san had offered some lap times from the Nordschliefe for various cars driven by the German magazine SportAuto. Those times are driver-dependent, track-knowledge-dependent, weather-, traffic- and bunny-crossing-the-track dependent. But Mizuno suggested the GT-R could get anywhere from 7:44 on up, with most laps coming in between 7:55 and 7:58. So he suggested the GT-R’s strong suit was that it offered “the best cost per lap time.” For whatever that’s worth.

The GT-R will be worth somewhere in the low-$70,000 range, which does make it perhaps the best cost per lap. We’ll know for sure when it enters U.S. showrooms in May or June. Japan will get first crack at it, we get second and the Europeans, who did such a great job of getting out of our way during our Autobahn drive, will have to get it third.



SPECS: 2009 Nissan GT-R
On Sale: May/June

Base Price: Low 70s

Drivetrain: 3.8-liter, 473-hp, 433-lb-ft twin turbocharged V6; awd, six-speed automatic

Curb Weight: 3792 pounds

0-60: 3.5 seconds

Fuel Economy (EPA Combined): 21 mpg (mfg. target)


http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl.../71017001/1065
Old 10-17-2007, 11:18 PM
  #2  
Burning Brakes
 
picus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Age: 44
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old 10-17-2007, 11:20 PM
  #3  
Burn some dust here
 
cob3683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Age: 41
Posts: 5,709
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
It definitely has impressive #'s but there is something about the styling that is "throwing it off."

Nice car but, after all the years of waiting and hype, the GT-R needed to absolutely blow me away...it just doesn't.
Old 10-17-2007, 11:30 PM
  #4  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
the back end is cool, but the rest of it reminds me of a mitsubishi for some reason. meh

the numbers are awesome though!
Old 10-17-2007, 11:32 PM
  #5  
Lamborghini Aventador FTW
iTrader: (4)
 
AMGala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: CT
Age: 39
Posts: 7,597
Received 73 Likes on 52 Posts
Originally Posted by cob3683
It definitely has impressive #'s but there is something about the styling that is "throwing it off."

Nice car but, after all the years of waiting and hype, the GT-R needed to absolutely blow me away...it just doesn't.
Lookswise I like everything except the front face.
Old 10-18-2007, 01:47 AM
  #6  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes on 519 Posts
7:44, isn't that the same as Porsche 911 Turbo?
Old 10-18-2007, 06:59 AM
  #7  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,891
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
to Nissan for not using a CVT, which probably cannot handle 433 lb-ft.

That said, 0-60 in 3.5 seconds and 193mph look to be numbers that hit the 911 Turbo dead on. The .27 Cd is remarkably better than the 911 Turbo's (.31 CD ).
Old 10-18-2007, 07:01 AM
  #8  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,891
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
7:44, isn't that the same as Porsche 911 Turbo?
7:42
Old 10-18-2007, 07:30 AM
  #9  
Senior Moderator
 
GreenMonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Swansea, MA
Age: 57
Posts: 35,218
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
SeCsTaC, why the fuck did you repost your self ??

https://acurazine.com/forums/showpos...&postcount=987

Crossposting is bad... mmmkay...
Old 10-18-2007, 02:40 PM
  #10  
Race Director
 
RMATIC09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY
Age: 38
Posts: 12,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
awesome car...
Old 10-18-2007, 05:16 PM
  #11  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes on 519 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
interesting, since before, rumors were that it could do 7:15, then later changed to 7:30..now 7:44.....rumours are always rumours....so does that mean it's slower than a Z06?
Old 10-18-2007, 05:46 PM
  #12  
Glacier Frost Mica CL-S
iTrader: (1)
 
INSPIRE 32V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Age: 39
Posts: 2,168
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
so the vette killer has arrived ayyyy
Old 10-18-2007, 09:23 PM
  #13  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,891
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
Originally Posted by INSPIRE 32V
so the vette killer has arrived ayyyy
...at least until this arrives:

Old 10-19-2007, 11:20 PM
  #14  
Safety Car
iTrader: (2)
 
minkl81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Beaverton, OR
Age: 42
Posts: 3,584
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
finally the design is growing on me. i want one now
Old 10-19-2007, 11:39 PM
  #15  
Racer
 
Jackygor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 36
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
...at least until this arrives:

Not in the same price range, unless you are talking about Z07.
Old 10-20-2007, 12:20 AM
  #16  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,387
Received 2,869 Likes on 1,427 Posts
but automatic tranny tho?
Old 10-20-2007, 12:24 AM
  #17  
'Big Daddy Diggler'
 
bigman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Yonkers NY
Age: 43
Posts: 11,016
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
interesting, since before, rumors were that it could do 7:15, then later changed to 7:30..now 7:44.....rumours are always rumours....so does that mean it's slower than a Z06?
I wonder why everyone is so bent out of shape if this car is slower than a Z06. I love the GTR and the vette the same. But I have soken to a lot of haters at work and they are praying that this car knocks the vette off as the affordable super car.
Old 10-20-2007, 01:00 AM
  #18  
I SMELL NAWZ
 
SanJoseRoller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: East Side San Jose, CA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bigman
I wonder why everyone is so bent out of shape if this car is slower than a Z06. I love the GTR and the vette the same. But I have soken to a lot of haters at work and they are praying that this car knocks the vette off as the affordable super car.

Some people are just to tied up in who's better at what. We should just be car enthusiasts and like cars for what they are?
Old 10-20-2007, 01:09 AM
  #19  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes on 519 Posts
hmmm apparently Nissan is now claiming 7:38 on Nurburgring....which is supposed to be 2 seconds faster than 911 Turbo..
Old 10-20-2007, 01:19 PM
  #20  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,891
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
Originally Posted by Jackygor
Not in the same price range, unless you are talking about Z07.

Ostensibly, Inspire's post was irrespective of cost.
Old 10-20-2007, 03:20 PM
  #21  
I need 2 more gears
 
sbuswell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springvale, Maine
Age: 45
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
love it, visually I bet it looks ten times better in black. Crazy power and I'm sure there will be a heavy aftermarket for this car to make it insanely fast.
Old 10-20-2007, 03:33 PM
  #22  
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
 
RaviNJCLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Landisville, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 37,110
Received 598 Likes on 416 Posts
Looks to be a bad ass car.
Old 10-20-2007, 07:38 PM
  #23  
Burn some dust here
 
cob3683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Age: 41
Posts: 5,709
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by bigman
But I have soken to a lot of haters at work and they are praying that this car knocks the vette off as the affordable super car.
Are they ?
Old 10-20-2007, 08:02 PM
  #24  
I can't find my garage
 
mltk53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SoCal
Age: 35
Posts: 4,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice
Old 10-21-2007, 02:56 AM
  #25  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,186
Received 10,258 Likes on 5,221 Posts
the design is growing on me too... like a fungus. :forl:
Old 10-21-2007, 03:55 AM
  #26  
There's alot of asian in
iTrader: (1)
 
sifuacura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dallas/Irving, TX
Posts: 1,134
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
yep the back end is a great eye catcher.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
quanaman
4G TL (2009-2014)
7
01-09-2023 07:33 PM
udelslayer
1G RDX Problems & Fixes
12
05-06-2016 12:27 PM
AcuraKidd
Non-Automotive & Motorcycle Sales
0
09-25-2015 11:18 PM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
09-25-2015 12:50 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
09-21-2015 08:44 AM



Quick Reply: FIRST DRIVE: 2009 NISSAN GT-R (Autoweek)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 AM.