does anyone else hate the RDX?
does anyone else hate the RDX?
I took one for a test drive today, and I did not like it. The acceleration feels nice past 4k or 4.5k, but it kept on being an automatic car and shifting to the highest gear where it has no power thanks to the turbo. I would downshift in anticipation of passing someone, and after a few seconds the car decided to take over and upshift a couple gears. Besides that, i think the front is ugly, but it does have a nice sound system and center console.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by afici0nad0
i'm more interested with the turbo-4 and sh-awd configuration.
hint hint...next gen tsx...
hint hint...next gen tsx...
saw one today at the dealer, very nice insdie and out. didn't drive one because i went in to tlak to the guys about a possible TL and to tell the GM how badly Infiniti treated me the other day. i pretty much know everyone at my acura dealer, call my cell phone when something good comes in. haha
i test drove one yesterday, it felt quick but the paddle shifter was something you have to get used to... if it had a tranny which behaved more like the TSX auto i would have liked it more...
the car was quick, but i was annoyed at the lack of touch screen, something i really like on my TSX... TSX is definitely more of a fun ride...
the car was quick, but i was annoyed at the lack of touch screen, something i really like on my TSX... TSX is definitely more of a fun ride...
Originally Posted by antrasyte03
I'll tell you what, a tsx with sh-awd and a 2.4L turbo? HOT car if it comes in stick, or at the very least a real tiptronic.
yeah as i was driving it i just kept thinking about how this powertrain would be in the TSX, combined with a better tranny though...
it was fun driving a car with a honda engine which had lots of torque and loved to rev... makes me think of the S/C for the TSX...
Originally Posted by antrasyte03
I'll tell you what, a tsx with sh-awd and a 2.4L turbo? HOT car if it comes in stick, or at the very least a real tiptronic.
RDX seems like a screaming deal compared to the BMW X3. Which I think would be the most appropriate competitor. But then again, I'd probably take the new Toyota RAV4 3.5 over both of these. Lighter, faster, cheaper, roomier, better gas mileage, and doesn't need premium gas. And, IMHO, just a little less fugly than the RDX or X3.
Originally Posted by taitando
RDX seems like a screaming deal compared to the BMW X3. Which I think would be the most appropriate competitor. But then again, I'd probably take the new Toyota RAV4 3.5 over both of these. Lighter, faster, cheaper, roomier, better gas mileage, and doesn't need premium gas. And, IMHO, just a little less fugly than the RDX or X3.
RDX is
in terms of exterior looks.
The engine is the wrong engine for this car. Should have been a V6.
This engine should be in the TSX.
The interior however is nice.
in terms of exterior looks.The engine is the wrong engine for this car. Should have been a V6.
This engine should be in the TSX.
The interior however is nice.
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
RDX is
in terms of exterior looks.
The engine is the wrong engine for this car. Should have been a V6.
This engine should be in the TSX.
The interior however is nice.
in terms of exterior looks.The engine is the wrong engine for this car. Should have been a V6.
This engine should be in the TSX.
The interior however is nice.
Does i4+turbo charger weigh significantly less than Accord's V6?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post









