Crazy $$$ for performance (numbers+ pics)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-2004, 05:17 PM
  #1  
Pro
Thread Starter
 
av6ent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: us 'n a
Age: 44
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crazy $$$ for performance (numbers+ pics)

I hope its not a repost.
My buddy posted over v6p so asked his permission to steal the info

Originally Posted by 02AV6
Performance doesn't come cheap, actually its expensive especially when
big names modify your car. Here are the numbers from the latest Car&Driver
test in "Supercar Challenge — Sedan Class".

Now the numbers, enjoy!

2004 Lingenfelter 427 CTS-V
Price as tested: $93,480
Engine type: pushrod 16-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection

Street drivability: * * * * *
1/4-mile: 12.3 sec @ 117 mph



TOTAL INVESTED (in category)
engine/transmission: $30,249
suspension: $3081
brakes: $1630
wheels/tires: $6127
body/interior: $2398

Displacement 428 cu in, 7008cc
Power (mfr’s claim) 510 bhp @ 6000 rpm
Torque (mfr’s claim) 530 lb-ft @ 4600 rpm
Transmission 6-speed manual
Curb weight 3900 lb

-----------------------------------------------------

2003 Vishnu Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Price as tested: $56,874
Engine type: turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve inline-4, iron block and

aluminum head, port fuel injection

Street drivability: * * *
1/4-mile: 11.6 sec @ 120 mph



TOTAL INVESTED (in category)
engine/transmission: $18,555
suspension: $2500
brakes: $2000
wheels/tires: $2196
body/interior: $1049

Power 475 bhp @ 7800 rpm
Torque 450 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm

Transmission 5-speed manual
Curb weight 3217 lb

-------------------------------------------------------

2004 HPA Motorsports Stage II Twin Turbo R32
Price as tested: $81,840
Engine type: twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve V-6, iron block and

aluminum head, port fuel injection

Street drivability: * * * *
1/4-mile: 11.7 sec @ 119 mph



TOTAL INVESTED (in category)
engine/transmission: $41,140
suspension: $1935
brakes: $4320
wheels/tires: $2460
body/interior: $2310

Displacement 198 cu in, 3246cc
Power 450 bhp @ 5500 rpm
Torque 470 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm

Transmission 6-speed manual
Curb weight 3355 lb

-------------------------------------------------------

2002 Active Autowerke M3
Price as tested: $75,312
Engine type: supercharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and

head, port fuel injection

Street drivability: * * * * *
1/4-mile: 13.1 sec @ 109 mph



Engine type: supercharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and

head, port fuel injection

TOTAL INVESTED (in category)
engine/transmission: $11,680
suspension: $3287
brakes: $7602
wheels/tires: $3495
body/interior: $453


Power 442 bhp @ 7600 rpm
Torque 339 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm

Transmission 6-speed manual
Curb weight 3423 lb

--------------------------------------------------

So, you have to pay to play .

I guess the driver of that M3 had a bad day since stock runs low 13s . The rest have shown a good performance but with a nice price tag .

Happy driving!
Old 11-04-2004, 08:21 PM
  #2  
Burning Brakes
 
importtuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That CTS-V looks yummy!
Old 11-04-2004, 08:24 PM
  #3  
///M POWER
 
darrinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 39
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
13.1 for a blown m3, thats terrible
Old 11-04-2004, 10:02 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
18anatak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orlando
Age: 44
Posts: 11,514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i'd take the VW out of all those. Just the most sleeper. Imagine being in a V-8 and getting owned by a 'chick car'
Old 11-04-2004, 10:14 PM
  #5  
Bagged hybrid
 
BoostedM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: da bay
Age: 45
Posts: 1,498
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evosport blown 500whp M3

C2 Procharger
CF Intake
CF Intake manifold ATL cooler
Pauter Rods&Pistons (9:1 CR), balanced & blueprinted
Misc pumps, gaskets, seals, etc.
New clutch & flywheel
ECU flash
Fuel injectors & plugs

Engine mods - $21k + $4k labor

Old 11-04-2004, 10:24 PM
  #6  
Suzuka Master
 
mclarenf3387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 8,620
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
HPA TT>*

They did a write up in another mag not to long ago on that thing and 0-60 it beat practically everything out there. Even faster than the new GT, Enzo, Ford GT, plus it could pull decent times in the rain with decent titrs and help from the AWD. That car is the ultimate sleeper. I wouldn't mind the M3 either....

Originally Posted by darrinb
13.1 for a blown m3, thats terrible
M3 aren't torque monsters like some. Even with FI its not gonna produce crazy low numbers. Granted, the can light up the tires fairly easily, the car has a much stronger top-end and is built for the track, not the strip.
Old 11-04-2004, 10:43 PM
  #7  
Bagged hybrid
 
BoostedM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: da bay
Age: 45
Posts: 1,498
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mclarenf3387
HPA TT>*

They did a write up in another mag not to long ago on that thing and 0-60 it beat practically everything out there. Even faster than the new GT, Enzo, Ford GT, plus it could pull decent times in the rain with decent titrs and help from the AWD. That car is the ultimate sleeper. I wouldn't mind the M3 either....
You mean HPA Stage II R32, 0-60 3.2sec & 11.49 1/4 mile. 0-60 times are low due to AWD advantage. It was featured in MT a while back. The kit costs $35k, that's more than the price of the car!
Old 11-04-2004, 11:06 PM
  #8  
Suzuka Master
 
mclarenf3387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 8,620
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ronnie0738
You mean HPA Stage II R32, 0-60 3.2sec & 11.49 1/4 mile. 0-60 times are low due to AWD advantage. It was featured in MT a while back. The kit costs $35k, that's more than the price of the car!
But for a total of 65k you have a car that could desimate anything on the streets. Imagine cruisning around andwhopping some unsuspecting enzo/gt/(insert exotic)'s ass The drivers face would be priceless. Especially if you leave it looking like a stock R32.
Old 11-04-2004, 11:34 PM
  #9  
Bagged hybrid
 
BoostedM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: da bay
Age: 45
Posts: 1,498
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mclarenf3387
But for a total of 65k you have a car that could desimate anything on the streets. Imagine cruisning around andwhopping some unsuspecting enzo/gt/(insert exotic)'s ass The drivers face would be priceless. Especially if you leave it looking like a stock R32.
You would defintely have a fast car and would give many exotics a good run to 60mph at least. Remember it's 11.49@120mph in the 1/4 compared to the enzo/gts do 11.0@130+mph. Once you get above 60mph, you will get walked.

Personally, I would rather get an evo 8 + $10k mods & be able to run high 10s.
Old 11-04-2004, 11:46 PM
  #10  
Drifting
 
kevin79925's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Houston
Age: 44
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
nice cars.. i wouldnt mind having one of each.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
udelslayer
1G RDX Problems & Fixes
12
05-06-2016 12:27 PM
mrkingstonvi
Member Cars for Sale
2
02-22-2016 01:53 PM
BlkTxAcuraTypeS
Member Cars for Sale
3
10-18-2015 08:05 PM
PortlandRL
Car Talk
2
09-14-2015 12:01 PM



Quick Reply: Crazy $$$ for performance (numbers+ pics)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 PM.