Clear license plate cover ticket

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 09:25 AM
  #1  
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,847
Likes: 223
From: South FL
Clear license plate cover ticket

Helping a friend out who got a ticket for a clear license plate cover.
The FL statute says....

(1) Every vehicle, at all times while driven, stopped, or parked upon any highways, roads, or streets of this state, shall be licensed in the name of the owner thereof in accordance with the laws of this state unless such vehicle is not required by the laws of this state to be licensed in this state and shall, except as otherwise provided in s. 320.0706 for front-end registration license plates on truck tractors and s. 320.086(5) which exempts display of license plates on described former military vehicles, display the license plate or both of the license plates assigned to it by the state, one on the rear and, if two, the other on the front of the vehicle, each to be securely fastened to the vehicle outside the main body of the vehicle in such manner as to prevent the plates from swinging, and all letters, numerals, printing, writing, and other identification marks upon the plates regarding the word "Florida," the registration decal, and the alphanumeric designation shall be clear and distinct and free from defacement, mutilation, grease, and other obscuring matter, so that they will be plainly visible and legible at all times 100 feet from the rear or front. Nothing shall be placed upon the face of a Florida plate except as permitted by law or by rule or regulation of a governmental agency. No license plates other than those furnished by the state shall be used. However, if the vehicle is not required to be licensed in this state, the license plates on such vehicle issued by another state, by a territory, possession, or district of the United States, or by a foreign country, substantially complying with the provisions hereof, shall be considered as complying with this chapter. A violation of this subsection is a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable as a nonmoving violation as provided in chapter 318.

Now I see this as the cover is fine as long as the plate is clearly visible from 100 feet away which it is.
But the next sentence says...
"Nothing shall be placed upon the face of a Florida plate except as permitted by law or by rule or regulation of a governmental agency."

What do you guys think?
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 09:28 AM
  #2  
Pull_T's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,746
Likes: 0
From: मुंबई, भारत
"Nothing shall be placed upon the face of a Florida plate except as permitted by law or by rule or regulation of a governmental agency."

Seems simple enough to me.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 09:29 AM
  #3  
RaviNJCLs's Avatar
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 37,141
Likes: 626
From: Landisville, PA
Is it one of those that distorts camera images? I don't know that there is a way out of it. What's the fine?
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 09:37 AM
  #4  
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,847
Likes: 223
From: South FL
That 2nd sentence is contradicting. It says except as permitted by law. The sentence above that says as long it's clearly visible from 100 feet away it's ok.

It's like a $76 fine. It's just a plain clear plate cover any auto store carries.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 09:39 AM
  #5  
Pull_T's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,746
Likes: 0
From: मुंबई, भारत
Originally Posted by fuzzy02CLS
The sentence above that says as long it's clearly visible from 100 feet away it's ok.
No it doesn't.

You are just a poor reader.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 09:54 AM
  #6  
phipark's Avatar
Not Asian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,409
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by Pull_T
"Nothing shall be placed upon the face of a Florida plate except as permitted by law or by rule or regulation of a governmental agency."

Seems simple enough to me.
black and white, open and shut

This is true for Misouri as well.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 10:09 AM
  #7  
FiftyFive's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,823
Likes: 52
From: SW Connecticut
opened and closed
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #8  
Bdog's Avatar
Not Registered
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 87
From: Virginia
Same here in VA, cannot have a clear cover over any plate.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 10:23 AM
  #9  
GIBSON6594's Avatar
My Garage
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 13,386
Likes: 11
From: NY
Originally Posted by fuzzy02CLS
That 2nd sentence is contradicting. It says except as permitted by law. The sentence above that says as long it's clearly visible from 100 feet away it's ok.

It's like a $76 fine. It's just a plain clear plate cover any auto store carries.
One thing has nothing to do with the other
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 11:09 AM
  #10  
brakejob's Avatar
:brakejob:
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
offical answer: you can't have a clear plate cover, so your friend is screwed.

it's like california tint law. One code section says you can have tints. But the other says you cannot put anything on the window. Verdict? No tints.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #11  
EuRTSX's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 23,588
Likes: 106
From: District of Corruption
Originally Posted by fuzzy02CLS
Helping a friend out who got a ticket for a clear license plate cover.
The FL statute says....

(1) Every vehicle, at all times while driven, stopped, or parked upon any highways, roads, or streets of this state, shall be licensed in the name of the owner thereof in accordance with the laws of this state unless such vehicle is not required by the laws of this state to be licensed in this state and shall, except as otherwise provided in s. 320.0706 for front-end registration license plates on truck tractors and s. 320.086(5) which exempts display of license plates on described former military vehicles, display the license plate or both of the license plates assigned to it by the state, one on the rear and, if two, the other on the front of the vehicle, each to be securely fastened to the vehicle outside the main body of the vehicle in such manner as to prevent the plates from swinging, and all letters, numerals, printing, writing, and other identification marks upon the plates regarding the word "Florida," the registration decal, and the alphanumeric designation shall be clear and distinct and free from defacement, mutilation, grease, and other obscuring matter, so that they will be plainly visible and legible at all times 100 feet from the rear or front. Nothing shall be placed upon the face of a Florida plate except as permitted by law or by rule or regulation of a governmental agency. No license plates other than those furnished by the state shall be used. However, if the vehicle is not required to be licensed in this state, the license plates on such vehicle issued by another state, by a territory, possession, or district of the United States, or by a foreign country, substantially complying with the provisions hereof, shall be considered as complying with this chapter. A violation of this subsection is a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable as a nonmoving violation as provided in chapter 318.

Now I see this as the cover is fine as long as the plate is clearly visible from 100 feet away which it is.
But the next sentence says...
"Nothing shall be placed upon the face of a Florida plate except as permitted by law or by rule or regulation of a governmental agency."

What do you guys think?

You might see it as being fine. Cops don't.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 12:27 PM
  #12  
65 Fury Convert's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 21
You freind can dipute the ticket with the DA and chances are it'll be dropped or the fine reduced. Your freind and you will see it as a win, and it it will be. But the cop already knows that although he was in his rights to write the ticket (as many on here agree), that this will probably be contested and dropped. But the inconvenience of being pulled over and having to go to court to fight it is the real lesson learned.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #13  
brakejob's Avatar
:brakejob:
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by 65 Fury Convert
You freind can dipute the ticket with the DA and chances are it'll be dropped or the fine reduced. Your freind and you will see it as a win, and it it will be. But the cop already knows that although he was in his rights to write the ticket (as many on here agree), that this will probably be contested and dropped. But the inconvenience of being pulled over and having to go to court to fight it is the real lesson learned.
no, the law is pretty clear here...
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 01:04 PM
  #14  
65 Fury Convert's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 21
Originally Posted by brakejob
no, the law is pretty clear here...
Yes it is and I agree. But like it or not he could get the charges dropped or reduced.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 01:23 PM
  #15  
brakejob's Avatar
:brakejob:
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by 65 Fury Convert
Yes it is and I agree. But like it or not he could get the charges dropped or reduced.
but you make it seem like any clear cover ticket will get dropped or reduced because of the way the law is written...

that is not the case here, as our laws are very similar. these tickets almost always stand, unless there is some other technicality (ticket filled out wrong, etc...)

and it's an equipment violation, not a mover.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #16  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,019
Likes: 1,740
<---- received a ticket in Old Bridge Twp for a lightly tinted (but very transparent plate cover) while driving my Accord. I have a slightly darker tinted cover on my Maxima and Quest....and just do not go to Old Bridge anymore.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #17  
65 Fury Convert's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 21
Originally Posted by brakejob
but you make it seem like any clear cover ticket will get dropped or reduced because of the way the law is written...

that is not the case here, as our laws are very similar. these tickets almost always stand, unless there is some other technicality (ticket filled out wrong, etc...)

and it's an equipment violation, not a mover.
Never said is was an equipment or a moving violation. You read into things to much.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 10:56 AM
  #18  
brakejob's Avatar
:brakejob:
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by 65 Fury Convert
Never said is was an equipment or a moving violation. You read into things to much.
ugh
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 11:13 AM
  #19  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
Confused
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 237
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Pull_T
No it doesn't.

You are just a poor reader.
. . . and a victim!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Machine
3G TL (2004-2008)
32
Sep 24, 2018 08:27 PM
Silvermoon_Knight
Car Parts for Sale
3
Oct 22, 2015 06:25 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
Sep 17, 2015 08:57 PM
darksky
3G TL Problems & Fixes
2
Sep 5, 2015 03:11 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 PM.