A car you drove that totally surprised you.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2011, 01:43 PM
  #41  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by Sclass88
2010 Hyundai Sonata

I was in the "Yuck, it's a Hyundai" mindset prior to driving one. After driving it, I was cured. GREAT little car for the money. Tons of features, fun to drive, and peppy engine. I'd recommend one to anyone looking for something in its price range.


This was one of mine as well. We rented one for a road trip back to NY a couple of Thanksgiving's ago and while it looked nice, we did not have high hopes being it was a "Hyundai". But man, we loved the car. And it was a pretty base rental as well. From that point on, completely changed my perception of Hyundai.

Few other positives:
- 2010+ E350: What a completely different car from the previous gen.
- 4G TL: Ugly as fvck, but was very impressed with the ride.
- Ford Edge: When I worked at the dealer briefly, got to drive one a few times... very impressed with the ride, power, and interior (similar to 2011 Explorer). The Edge Sport was even nicer...



And this was actually a negative for me:
Originally Posted by WdnUlik2no
Mazda RX8 - 6speed
I was just bored one day and decided to go to the dealership to test drive the RX8. I didn't expect this car to be that fun to drive, I loved the style of shifter and the car itself was just buttery smooth. I already had two cars, but I considered leasing this as my weekend car, but I came to my senses and decided against it.
Loved it on the (short) test drive, bought one for a weekend car... put about 800 miles on it over 4 months, and sold it for what I paid for it. Hated that car...

Last edited by juniorbean; 09-21-2011 at 02:39 PM.
Old 09-21-2011, 10:06 PM
  #42  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
^ What didn't you like about it?

The RX-8 would be my ideal car if it didn't have a rotary.
Old 09-21-2011, 10:39 PM
  #43  
Instructor
 
acattak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Age: 43
Posts: 133
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
first gen infiniti fx45, I know a suv but that thing had punch, test drove it and bought it the same day. v8 awd and with mods it was a beast.
Old 09-21-2011, 10:39 PM
  #44  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,147
Received 4,829 Likes on 2,574 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
The RX-8 would be my ideal car if it didn't have a rotary.
There is so much dumb in this statement I don't know where to begin.
Old 09-21-2011, 10:40 PM
  #45  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,260 Likes on 11,971 Posts
^I laughed.
Old 09-22-2011, 07:48 AM
  #46  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
^ What didn't you like about it?

The RX-8 would be my ideal car if it didn't have a rotary.
Several replies in here from me (and others) kind of explaining it. Apparently i had it longer then 4 months... but still, not long... and just goes to show how forgettable it was.

https://acurazine.com/forums/car-talk-5/mazda-rx-8s-775127/

Last edited by juniorbean; 09-22-2011 at 07:52 AM.
Old 09-23-2011, 03:08 PM
  #47  
Racer
 
mmafighta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 417
Received 31 Likes on 30 Posts
Short and simple

06' E46 M3 coupe

friend let me drive his bout 2 months ago. LOVED it. handled like a beast, stiff steering, good punch off the line. I was amazed. Still looking for a low mileage (white), to replace my G. If anyone is selling or knows where to look lmk please

Originally Posted by jhumbo
2011 Kia Optima SX turbo
Very, very impressed on many counts. Optima has enough power (more than I expected at least), handles well and is loaded with goodies such as LED tails, HID headlights, heated/cooled seats, USB interface.
agreed
Old 09-23-2011, 06:40 PM
  #48  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by teranfon
Reading a Car and Driver issue in late 85', I became fascinated with a black Regal. The same basic car that had been around for years. It had, however, been treated to an engine by Buick engineer Don Runkle. I was astounded (and so was C&D), that this Grandma car accelerated from 0-60 in 4.9 seconds. Routinely. Other magazines at the time were also reporting brutal acceleration times for the Grand National. I was still skeptical.

Walking into a showroom in the fall of '85, I managed to convince the salesperson to let me take one for a test drive. None were available at the time, but they had one that was "sold". I remember it was a brutally cold fall day, but the streets were still bare. We took the thing out on the street and I began to give it moderate amounts of throttle. Damn. After a few minutes I asked the salesman if I could punch it at a roll. He said yes. Now keep in mind that this was 1985. Fast was six seconds. Unheard of was 4.9. Punching the throttle, the car waited for an agonizing couple of seconds and then all hell broke loose. Remember it was very cold, and that big intercooler was exposed to all sorts of cold air. Combined with a dense air charge, that engine exploded to life. The car began going sideways while the engine just shrieked. Getting off of the throttle I then gently applied full throttle, the car hooked, and I swear that thing was moving the earth of it's axis. It was amazing. I had to have one.

Today a black dragon sits in my garage. Throughout it's twenty-five years I haven't driven it much. I just love to know it's there.
Wow, great description. By the time I was old enough to drive in '94 I had dreamed of a GN for a while but having driven the 3.8 105hp NA carbureted Regal and Gran Prix it still made no sense how this same basic engine could be "fast" even with a turbo. I ran the Gran Prix in the bracket races and won several times because it couldn't spin the tires. 0-60 and 1/4 times were nearly identical if that tells you anything.

So I saw a GN with a for sale sign go by as I was getting out of school one day and chased him down and got the number. The next day I got to drive it and it just blew my mind how the little 3.8 came to life with the turbo. My father had to one up me with a mint condition 10,000 mile GN and the mods began.
Old 09-24-2011, 12:47 PM
  #49  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,255
Received 22,664 Likes on 13,900 Posts
A few:

- Ford Fusion
- Volvo XC60
- Nissan Maxima SE (2001)
- Fiat 500
Old 09-24-2011, 01:51 PM
  #50  
Three Wheelin'
 
pickler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,361
Received 65 Likes on 52 Posts
- Acura RDX, handling/acceleration, very much like my previous bmw e46 330i
- Lincoln MKX, acceleration/smooth/comfortable
- 2011 Camry V6, acceleration/34mpg

i can't think of anything else that surprised me, i know a lot that disappointed.
Old 09-24-2011, 06:39 PM
  #51  
In the Mid-South meow
iTrader: (2)
 
SuperTrooper169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Music City
Age: 46
Posts: 10,784
Received 2,101 Likes on 1,087 Posts
I should add one more...

1988 Honda CRX Si
I expected it to handle like a go-cart, which it did, but I didn't expect it to feel as fast as it did. Still one of my favorite cars I've ever owned.
Old 09-24-2011, 06:52 PM
  #52  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperTrooper169
I should add one more...

1988 Honda CRX Si
I expected it to handle like a go-cart, which it did, but I didn't expect it to feel as fast as it did. Still one of my favorite cars I've ever owned.
Huh?
Old 09-24-2011, 09:31 PM
  #53  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,066
Received 9,997 Likes on 5,143 Posts
LFA. I knew it was a "nice" car but I wasn't really ready for HOW nice it was. Also, I wasn't ready for the extreme mix of luxury and "race car" type of feeling. It's by far the most refined vehicle I've ever driven, and I felt nervous when I was about to go, just because it felt more like a race car than a road car. So I had a heightened sense of awareness thereof. F*cking amazing car.
Old 09-24-2011, 11:15 PM
  #54  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
There is so much dumb in this statement I don't know where to begin.


The engine is low on torque, a gas hog, and has some well-documented oil consumption issues. I'd rather have an inline-4 or low-displacement six. What do you want me to say, sorry for having an opinion?
Old 09-25-2011, 12:37 AM
  #55  
Moderator Alumnus
 
teranfon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,547
Received 196 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
Wow, great description. By the time I was old enough to drive in '94 I had dreamed of a GN for a while but having driven the 3.8 105hp NA carbureted Regal and Gran Prix it still made no sense how this same basic engine could be "fast" even with a turbo. I ran the Gran Prix in the bracket races and won several times because it couldn't spin the tires. 0-60 and 1/4 times were nearly identical if that tells you anything.

So I saw a GN with a for sale sign go by as I was getting out of school one day and chased him down and got the number. The next day I got to drive it and it just blew my mind how the little 3.8 came to life with the turbo. My father had to one up me with a mint condition 10,000 mile GN and the mods began.
I think what influenced much of it for me was the involvement of Don Runkle. I recall at the time following his involvement in Buick's Indy program. With the six. When the '86 GN came about I heard things such as "fuel injection", "turbocharging", "intercooling", "distributorless", and "computerized". This in late '85 when many manufacturers were still using carburetors. I kept on recalling that Buick engineers had to rate the car "intentionally low" as not to annoy the GM corporate brass with a horsepower rating higher than the Corvette. Years later, Don Runkle remarked the Grand National came about for only one reason: he was spanked badly at a stoplight Grand Prix by another manufacturer. At that moment he decided to build the quickest car in the world.
Old 09-25-2011, 01:24 AM
  #56  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by teranfon
I think what influenced much of it for me was the involvement of Don Runkle. I recall at the time following his involvement in Buick's Indy program. With the six. When the '86 GN came about I heard things such as "fuel injection", "turbocharging", "intercooling", "distributorless", and "computerized". This in late '85 when many manufacturers were still using carburetors. I kept on recalling that Buick engineers had to rate the car "intentionally low" as not to annoy the GM corporate brass with a horsepower rating higher than the Corvette. Years later, Don Runkle remarked the Grand National came about for only one reason: he was spanked badly at a stoplight Grand Prix by another manufacturer. At that moment he decided to build the quickest car in the world.
I remember that story. I also remember that instead of going the hotrod V8 route, he did the turbo 6 to add insult to those that got beat and it didn't hurt that it was in the G-body chassis and the luxury car at the time instead of some sports car.

Even the '84 was fuel injected and used the DIS. I made an intercooler system and did some very nice mods before eventually doing the '86-'87 conversion. I actually got to run a stock '84 Vette when my car was 99% stock. Neither was real quick but there's no doubt the GN was quicker by a fair margin. In fact, we got the '84 to go 14.0@101 just by turning the boost up, a chip, and good gas.

In fact I was very lucky to run a bone stock down to the paper air filter TTA against a 6mt LS1 WS6 to settle which was the quickest F-body ever. The TTA went 3 for 3. Even after posting video on some of the popular boards at the time, people didn't believe it or said the TTA was modded. When the time came to mod it, I removed the factory chip and air filter so I know this car was bone stock even down to the boost level.
Old 09-25-2011, 08:44 AM
  #57  
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,834
Received 4,039 Likes on 2,513 Posts
Another car came to mind, Ford Probe GT 2G (1994-5).

While helping my sister in law shop for a car in the early 90's. We test drove a Ford Probe GT 2G and a Mazda MX-6, and the Probe with a 5MT was amazing. Excellent handling, fun to drive, very little understeer, rev happy V6. Although it shared most of the chassis/powertrain with the MX-6 it was far superior in all area's (performance, styling, ...).
Old 09-25-2011, 09:15 AM
  #58  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman


The engine is low on torque, a gas hog, and has some well-documented oil consumption issues. I'd rather have an inline-4 or low-displacement six. What do you want me to say, sorry for having an opinion?
if it didnt have a rotary it would not be an RX..... thats like thats like saying i like ferraris but i wish they came with a 4 cyl
Old 09-25-2011, 11:53 AM
  #59  
In the Mid-South meow
iTrader: (2)
 
SuperTrooper169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Music City
Age: 46
Posts: 10,784
Received 2,101 Likes on 1,087 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
Huh?
Um, that's right, '88 CRX Si.
Old 09-25-2011, 02:44 PM
  #60  
AZ Community Team
Thread Starter
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,834
Received 4,039 Likes on 2,513 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperTrooper169
Um, that's right, '88 CRX Si.

that's the 2G CRX, always wanted to drive one.
My brother had a 1986 1G CRX Si, really fun car to drive.
Old 09-25-2011, 05:20 PM
  #61  
In the Mid-South meow
iTrader: (2)
 
SuperTrooper169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Music City
Age: 46
Posts: 10,784
Received 2,101 Likes on 1,087 Posts
Originally Posted by Legend2TL
that's the 2G CRX, always wanted to drive one.
My brother had a 1986 1G CRX Si, really fun car to drive.
Yep, 2nd Gen. I had a friend that had an '87 Si and it too was a fun car, but the 14 extra HP the 2nd Gen had was really felt in such a light car.
Old 09-25-2011, 05:22 PM
  #62  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
if it didnt have a rotary it would not be an RX..... thats like thats like saying i like ferraris but i wish they came with a 4 cyl
Completely different, I like Ferrari's engines more than any four cylinder. I don't like the RX-8's engine, but I do like everything else about it. It's a light, great handling, RWD coupe that can be had for a steal when bought used. Hence why it would be my ideal car.
Old 09-25-2011, 05:37 PM
  #63  
Race Director
iTrader: (7)
 
crazyasiantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Clovis CA
Age: 36
Posts: 12,594
Received 596 Likes on 430 Posts
drove my friends IS350 and i really wasnt impressed. the only thing good about was straight line speed, but i only drove it for about 5 mins.

features were nice but the car seemed a bit small.
Old 09-25-2011, 08:36 PM
  #64  
E92
 
TommySalami's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: socal
Age: 35
Posts: 8,039
Received 93 Likes on 69 Posts
Mazda MX-5 (3rd gen)

Didn't drive one, but got a ride and was impressed enough that I may very likely buy one in a couple months.
Old 09-25-2011, 08:38 PM
  #65  
08 MDX, 04 TL (sold)
iTrader: (1)
 
jhumbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago area
Age: 46
Posts: 772
Received 66 Likes on 52 Posts
Originally Posted by Legend2TL
Another car came to mind, Ford Probe GT 2G (1994-5).

While helping my sister in law shop for a car in the early 90's. We test drove a Ford Probe GT 2G and a Mazda MX-6, and the Probe with a 5MT was amazing. Excellent handling, fun to drive, very little understeer, rev happy V6. Although it shared most of the chassis/powertrain with the MX-6 it was far superior in all area's (performance, styling, ...).
I'll agree with this one. I drove a friend's 5MT Probe once way back when and was very much wow'ed. I'm not sure what year it was, but 94-95 sounds about right. (I actually had just recently learned how to drive a manual and was surprised he even let me drive it. I remember being very rev happy to avoid stalling and remember how it would take off once I'd let the clutch fully engage.)

Last edited by jhumbo; 09-25-2011 at 08:42 PM. Reason: to add that little nodding smiley
Old 09-26-2011, 11:46 AM
  #66  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
if it didnt have a rotary it would not be an RX..... thats like thats like saying i like ferraris but i wish they came with a 4 cyl
Gonna elaborate a bit here.... driving a rotary (maybe not an FC) is something you need to experience. The engine revs effortlessly and its characteristics are unlike a typical high-revving 4-cylinder engine. Perhaps it is just Mazda's chassis tuning but I doubt the RX-8 would be as fun even with an S2000 engine in it.

Even with the flaws of the rotary engine, I would still consider an RX-8. The oil-consumption isn't really an issue, it was intentional. Due to the fundamental differences between a reciprocating piston engine, if a piston engine constantly needs oil added, something is wrong. But if a rotary engine doesn't constantly need topping off, something is wrong.
Old 10-01-2011, 02:16 AM
  #67  
Racer
 
CAgine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 303
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
09' 911 Carrera 4S

Probably the best car I've test driven to date funny considering I had really no interest in this car, or the Carrera line up for that matter. Ive drove everything from the current evo, almost every gen 3 series to the NSX. Way faster than I expected too.

No other car handles better in real world imo. The wheels felt planted to the ground, the steering was precise and effortless, chassis solid long story short, overall a perfect car imo.
Old 10-01-2011, 11:54 AM
  #68  
Pro
 
calgary2800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
I just rented a 2011 Hyundai Genesis Sedan V6. The engine's preformance and sound is a A plus. The handling oh no, its not going to help sell the car. Sorry Hyundai this is no where near a sports sedan at all.
Old 10-01-2011, 12:37 PM
  #69  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Mazda3
Ford Edge
Mustang GT 5.0
Old 10-01-2011, 01:05 PM
  #70  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Originally Posted by calgary2800
I just rented a 2011 Hyundai Genesis Sedan V6. The engine's preformance and sound is a A plus. The handling oh no, its not going to help sell the car. Sorry Hyundai this is no where near a sports sedan at all.
Hyundai never marketed the Genesis sedan as a sports sedan, besides the R-Spec.
Old 10-01-2011, 01:07 PM
  #71  
Moderator
 
ttribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,270
Received 5,895 Likes on 2,903 Posts
GMC Acadia (rental). Fit and finish, power, features, all exceeded my expectations.
Old 10-01-2011, 06:04 PM
  #72  
Racer
 
Carraway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 324
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
I test drove four cars today. While it wasn't my favorite, the Hyundai Sonata was easily the most surprising. I drove the base model, as it's the only one with a manual, but the car felt solid, peppy and fairly responsive. After I got used to the clutch take-up, it and the shifter felt pretty good, as well, even though I drove it after an Accord. Steering was responsive and fairly quick. The only dislikes about it were a lack of steering feedback (common in nearly everything now), and I believe the suspension was tuned more for cruising than nimbleness. Of course, that is perfect for most people.

If anyone's curious, the other three cars were about what I expected: A 2007 Honda Accord Coupe EX-L V6, a 2012 Mazda 6 iSport (only one with a manual) and a 2006 Subaru Legacy GT. They are all really nice cars.
Old 10-01-2011, 10:07 PM
  #73  
Pro
 
calgary2800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
I've driven a bunch of Hyundai cars and by far the best was the Santa Fe, handled extremely well for its size.
Old 10-01-2011, 10:19 PM
  #74  
7th Gear
 
1997ACURArefindluxury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 Hyundai tiburon gt 5 speed - my friends car I was not expecting alot from a ''hyundai'' but it is a great car and powerful with a 2.7 v6

1998 prelude - another car that surprised me
Old 10-02-2011, 01:08 AM
  #75  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
I got to spend time with a loaded 2011 Mazda6 V6 this past winter. I was really surprised with its interior, plenty of nice looking leather and soft plastics, a ton of gadgets too. Definetely not what I was expecting from a mid-size family sedan.
Old 10-04-2011, 09:59 PM
  #76  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,637
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
2012 Chevy Impala LTZ

This has been my rental this week. I didn't expect much nor did I realize there was a big powertrain improvement on this car for 2012. The 3.6 engine produces over 300 hp and I've averaged 28.5 mpg since Saturday. The 6 speed auto certainly helps. At 80 mph its chugging along at 2,000 rpms. The car itself has decent handling, is quiet on the freeways (though Virginia highways are mostly smooth) and the stereo is decent.
Old 10-06-2011, 11:55 PM
  #77  
Three Wheelin'
 
CH46ESeaKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Merritt Island FL
Age: 46
Posts: 1,501
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
While I was TDY in AZ for 2 months from July to Sept this year i had a 2010 GMC Yukon 4x4 SLT for about 1 month as a rental. I could not stand it! It did not at all live up to my expectations being a owner of a previous gen Tahoe. They have built so much TQ managment into it. Feels very weak and underpowered and gets horrible mpg. Plastic is rampant. Thing made a lot of noises creeks and squeeks. GARBAGE!

I also got to use a 2011 Buick Lacrosse fully loaded FWD for about a month as a rental also. The 3.6 litre direct injected V6 was outstanding. Very powerfull and the car drove like a dream. Down shifts were ok and upshifts under WOT were really sweet. My only complaint was the disconnect between the steering wheel and the road. But then again its not a sports car. The interior was very sweet. Soft touch everywhere. Very little plastic.

I also got to drive a new F-150 with the 5.0 for a night. Great truck. Huge improvment over the 5.4 or 4.6.

But the F-150 with the Ecoboost 3.5 litre v6 takes the cake. I went to the dealer to test drive one. I can't say enough about how much I liked everything about the truck. Not one complaint. Power and TQ is unreal. Much more get up and go then the 5.0. This truck blew me away. I have driven the new Dodge ram 1500 with the 5.7 hemi and it does not even hold a candle to that new turbo F150. After driving it I can't imagine even considering buying a Chevy or Dodge truck. I even consider myself a Chevy fan.

Last edited by CH46ESeaKnight; 10-06-2011 at 11:59 PM.
Old 10-07-2011, 07:13 AM
  #78  
Three Wheelin'
 
pits200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mt. Lebanon
Age: 44
Posts: 1,837
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
My old 87 Dodge Shadow with it's 2.2 turbo. It was my high school car that I thought was going to be a pos. But it was around 2500lbs and the turbo made the car very peppy.

I loved that car till it blew a turbo seal and spewed smoke what felt like a football field wide in my hometown.

That is pretty much the only car that has ever surprised me in a good way.
Old 10-08-2011, 11:00 PM
  #79  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
I sat behind two guys in KC in the car business who were talking about Hyundai and they said they would never buy an Equus. They clearly had the badge whore mentality.

But they also talked as if they didn't realize what the ownership experience was like either so I took it as a representative example of the bias that Hyundai has to overcome.
Old 10-09-2011, 08:41 PM
  #80  
GSI
Three Wheelin'
 
GSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Short Pump, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I had a 2012 Ford Focus rental that was a darn good ride. It was a good little pocket rocket. The fit and finish were above par and the sync system was really cool. The auto tranny in sport mode was seamless and gas mileage was about 31mpgs. The buzziness that you get with most 4cylinders was nonexistent. The only thing i did not like was the side mirrors with the miniature mirror inside. It threw me off in DC traffic.


Quick Reply: A car you drove that totally surprised you.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 PM.