Can You Afford to Drive a Ferrari (1998 550 Maranello)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2008 | 01:49 AM
  #1  
Yumcha's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,734
Likes: 23,026
Lightbulb Can You Afford to Drive a Ferrari (1998 550 Maranello)?

From here: http://www.sportscarmarket.com/articles/archives/939

Only weeks into ownership, the 30,000-mile service was repeated and the front shocks were replaced, for a total of $6,196.57

By Michael Sheehan

Answering daily phone calls and emails provides a never-ending supply of topics on which to pontificate. The “real-world” cost to drive a late model Ferrari is one of the more frequent questions I’m asked.

I recently sold an unusually well-documented 1998 550 Maranello, S/N 111317, with 36,200 miles to a client in the jet aircraft industry, and comparisons between Ferrari and jet costs inspired this column. Like a private jet that requires three to four hours of maintenance for every hour of flight time, Ferraris are not cheap to own.

FIRST TWO YEARS ALMOST FREE

550 Ferrari S/N 111317 was sold new on March 19, 1998, at $225,000, to a wealthy Santa Monica real estate investor and used for weekend retreats to his ranch in Ojai, a 150-plus-mile round trip. Thanks to an unlimited mileage warranty, the first two years were relatively expense free.

The first bite came in August 2000, five months after the warranty expired. At 13,637 miles, the owner brought the car in for a 15,000-mile service, two rear tires, and an oil, filter, and coolant change for $2,665.70. Two months later, in October, at 17,220 miles, noisy cam belts and bearings were replaced at no cost (thanks to a warranty extension by Ferrari). The windshield washer reservoir was also replaced for $529.25. A month later, in November, at 17,618 miles, the front spoiler and three wheels were refinished because of road-rash, at $1,285. Total for the first year out of warranty, and about 4,000 miles: $4,479.95, or $1.12 per mile.

As 2001 rolled around, in January, at 18,124 miles, two ball joints and sway bar bushings were replaced at $253.47, a standard procedure for a heavy, high performance, front-engined car with power steering. Three months later, in April, at 18,998 miles, a coolant leak, new front tires, another repaint of the wheels, and a detail added $2,718 to the ongoing maintenance bill.

A few days later, at 19,002 miles, the check engine light came on and an O2 sensor was replaced at $261.31. A month later, in late May, at 19,329 miles, the dash pod had to come out for an instrument panel repair, at $1,290.18. Five months and 1,289 miles later, in early October, at 20,618 miles, an annual oil and filter service and new rear tires added $2,386.60 to the expense column.

$8,988 FOR SECOND YEAR OUT OF WARRANTY

In December 2001, a service at 21,358 miles for dash lights, rattles, and a radiator R & R for coolant leaks closed the year out at $2,078.82. Total for the second year out of warranty, and another 3,740 miles: $8,988.38, or $2.40 a mile.

In January 2002, at 21,966 miles, the owner had the battery replaced, new suspension bushings installed, and a wheel alignment for $1,228.35. In March, at 22,956 miles, the license plate frame was replaced for $124.99, and in May, at 23,802 miles, the power steering pump was replaced and the fluids serviced, at $500.95.

Four months and 2,657 miles later, in September, at 25,607 miles, the steering box, power steering rack, and rear shocks were replaced, and the wheels were aligned for $8,641.69. The year ended at 26,236 miles, with a compression and leakdown problem discovered in late December at the 30,000-mile service. New cam belts, engine mounts, and a valve job followed, with all 24 valves and valve guides replaced at $7,954.66. Fortunately for the owner, Ferrari supplied the valves and guides under an extended warranty. Another year, another 4,878 miles, adding up to $18,450.64, or $3.78 a mile.

TOYOTA MONEY: 37 CENTS PER MILE

The Ferrari gods were smiling in 2003, with only 672 miles added and one service for hood shocks, in March, at 26,908 miles. Cost of ownership was only $249.38. Little use means no visits to ever-vigilant Ferrari mechanics, who point out problems that need to be resolved. This year cost Toyota money—just 37 cents per mile. Of course, there weren’t many miles driven either.

In 2004, 550 S/N 111317 saw little use, but frequent visits to the service center, beginning in January, at 31,688 miles, for a seat control switch and wiper blades at $1,366.43. A week later, in early February, at 31,860 miles, sway bar bushings were replaced at $208.63. In late February, at 32,035 miles, the handbrake shoes and rear brake rotors were replaced and four new tires were fitted, at $3,365.79. In early March, at 32,122 miles, a coolant leak added $903.21 to the annual cost. Another year, another 5,214 miles, another $5,844.06. The cost per mile, $1.12.

In late December 2004, Ferrari 550 S/N 111317 moved on to her second owner, for $90,000, and no service bills were added to the year. A real estate investor and self-confessed “Porsche guy,” the second owner had always wanted a Ferrari and bought the 550 simply because he knew the car through the original owner. Only weeks into Ferrari ownership, in January 2005, at 32,945 miles, a 30,000-mile service was again done, under the “while-you’re-at-it” theory, because of oil leaks. The front shocks were also replaced, at $6,196.57. Only weeks later, the second owner also had the nose repainted, and his 550 “personalized” with the front fenders modified for fender shields and the calipers redone in yellow, at $7,759.70. NOT FOR THE TIMID: $10.27 PER MILE

A month later, in March, the steering wheel was recovered for $450, and in April the windows were tinted and a “clear bra” installed for $935. Only weeks later, the owner continued to personalize his 550 with a Tubi Exhaust for $3,155.94. In August, at 34,235 miles, the oil hoses and other minor items were replaced, at $3,194.44. Total mileage for the second owner: 2,113 miles and $21,691.65. Most of this work was pure pride-of-ownership personalization, but the financially timid need not apply, as the cost per mile, at $10.27 per mile, was approaching that of an M1 tank.

As 2006 rolled in, our second owner next had a new clutch installed, in January, at 35,625 miles, for $4,852.59. After sitting for six months, the second owner decided that he really was a “Porsche guy” at heart. The 550 was too big for his tastes and so, in August, 550 Ferrari S/N 111317 was picked up from his home and dropped off for an a/c service, at 36,196 miles, for $519.40. Cost of ownership for the second owner, for 2006: 1,961 miles at $5,371.99, or $2.73 per mile.

In August 2006, our subject 550 was again sold for $90,000, with 36,196 miles, to the third owner, the president of a corporate jet maintenance and sales company. During the pre-purchase, an oil leak was found, and while the estimate was $3,000, the final bill was $1,582.58. The third owner appreciated the subtle lines and wanted a user-friendly Ferrari that could be driven daily in New York weather and traffic.

A long-time Ferrari owner, he appreciated that virtually all of the depreciation was reflected in the purchase price and that at 36,000 miles, adding mileage wouldn’t kill the value. His last toy was a new Porsche Turbo at $160,000, and while it had been nice to order a car exactly as he wanted, the depreciation wasn’t worth the thrill when he sold it after three years for $95,000.

The warranty on 550 S/N 111317 ran out in March, 2000, at about 13,500 miles. Our subject 550 went to the third owner in September 2006 at 36,200 miles, so the total miles out of warranty was 22,700 miles, with a total spent of $65,760.50, or $2.90 a mile, right at $11,000 a year.

Ferrari ownership is both a lifestyle and a socio-economic statement, just as owning a polo pony is a different venture than keeping a draught horse. As one former owner of S/N 111317 put it, “I spend more than that on crap on eBay every year.” No other statement quite sums up the difference between those who lust for a Ferrari from those who can pay the price of ownership.
Old 02-23-2008 | 02:22 AM
  #2  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
At 13,637 miles, the owner brought the car in for a 15,000-mile service, two rear tires, and an oil, filter, and coolant change for $2,665.70.


Some cars coolant systems are a PITA, but are you serious?!

and wtf is up with this

In March, at 22,956 miles, the license plate frame was replaced for $124.99
Old 02-23-2008 | 02:44 AM
  #3  
Python2121's Avatar
The hair says it all
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,566
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, NYC
After a bill like that I'd rather be a Porsche guy too.
Old 02-23-2008 | 03:13 AM
  #4  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,329
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
I'll stick to my RL
Old 02-23-2008 | 03:18 AM
  #5  
Yumcha's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,734
Likes: 23,026
And that's why, I'd be tickled pink with a 1998 NSX.
Old 02-23-2008 | 08:45 AM
  #6  
nokiaman's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,271
Likes: 236
From: Maryland
Old 02-23-2008 | 03:27 PM
  #7  
BstonBruin's Avatar
Go B's Go
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: MA
Expensive expensive...comes with the territory though
Old 02-23-2008 | 04:25 PM
  #8  
BENDER08's Avatar
Back in a TL again.
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,091
Likes: 0
From: Find the Needle
whats the maintenance cost on an DB9
Old 02-23-2008 | 04:34 PM
  #9  
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 34,937
Likes: 638
From: Chicago Burbs
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
I'll stick to my S2000
Do it!
Old 02-23-2008 | 04:42 PM
  #10  
vishnus11's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 2
From: Lexington
And this is why an NSX is simply a better ENGINEERED car than a Ferrari counterpart. Plain and simple. Anybody can build a car that can do all sorts of wonderful things, but if it can hold up under reasonable ownership conditions, then it simply isn't a well-engineered car.

If an NSX owner had to spend even 1/4 that amount on their cars, they'd be pissed.
Old 02-23-2008 | 07:43 PM
  #11  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
Originally Posted by vishnus11
And this is why an NSX is simply a better ENGINEERED car than a Ferrari counterpart. Plain and simple. Anybody can build a car that can do all sorts of wonderful things, but if it can hold up under reasonable ownership conditions, then it simply isn't a well-engineered car.

If an NSX owner had to spend even 1/4 that amount on their cars, they'd be pissed.
While I completely agree with you, we need to realize that this is a Ferrari and the people who own these spend a lot more money outright to begin with. Anyone who owns a car thats $15,000 new will demand to know what's wrong/if there are any alternatives if there is a $200 repair bill. On the other hand, someone who owns a $150,000 car probably could care less if its $200.... they just want it done.
Old 02-23-2008 | 09:36 PM
  #12  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
While I completely agree with you, we need to realize that this is a Ferrari and the people who own these spend a lot more money outright to begin with. Anyone who owns a car thats $15,000 new will demand to know what's wrong/if there are any alternatives if there is a $200 repair bill. On the other hand, someone who owns a $150,000 car probably could care less if its $200.... they just want it done.
True. But take into account depreciation and owning a Ferrari is such a bad financial move that you need obscene amounts of liquidity and wealth to rationalize the expense IMO.

But then again there are probably dumb people that buy a Ferrari and then get their asses handed to them when the warranty runs out.
Old 02-23-2008 | 09:44 PM
  #13  
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 14,035
Likes: 27
From: WI
ferrari or not, that's a lot of work for a car w/ 36K miles. especially one that cast $225K.
a 13K mile warranty? that is ridiculous.
Old 02-23-2008 | 09:51 PM
  #14  
FiveLiterCheater's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 4
Its all relative...$2,500 at the dealer for a ferrari owner is like $500 at a mainstream car dealership for most of us.
Old 02-24-2008 | 12:03 AM
  #15  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by JJaber06
Its all relative...$2,500 at the dealer for a ferrari owner is like $500 at a mainstream car dealership for most of us.
It's many more multiples that that.
Old 02-24-2008 | 02:03 AM
  #16  
ChrisQ1980's Avatar
hates the winter
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 0
NSX any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
Old 02-24-2008 | 03:24 AM
  #17  
Will Y.'s Avatar
Registered but harmless
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,860
Likes: 1,151
From: Los Angeles, CA
Valve job, steering rack, ball joints, steering box, power steering pump, bushings, coolant and oil leaks in less than 40K miles??
None of that is normal "maintenance"-- I would call this 550 a lemon or a POS, regardless of how "exotic" it is. The car is a street car, not a race car, for pete's sake! Well, I guess the coolant and oil leaks prove that it's really an Italian car.

Yes, I'd go the NSX or Porsche route too. I wonder if Lambos are less care-intensive.

Last edited by Will Y.; 02-24-2008 at 03:26 AM.
Old 02-24-2008 | 03:47 AM
  #18  
stangg172004's Avatar
_____ like a rabbit
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,594
Likes: 12
From: Edgewater, Chicago, IL
gotta pay to play gents...
Old 02-24-2008 | 03:51 AM
  #19  
is300eater's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 22,520
Likes: 3,074
From: Vancouver BC
I couldn't even read all of it... I got to about 2001
Old 02-24-2008 | 06:58 AM
  #20  
dallison's Avatar
registered pw
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,822
Likes: 354
From: south central pa
if you can afford the purchase price.........
Old 02-24-2008 | 01:53 PM
  #21  
vishnus11's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 2
From: Lexington
its not about whether you can afford it....many can....

its about the fact that the car is a poorly engineered POS.

An NSX or even a 911TT would have held up far, far, faaaaaar better.
Old 02-24-2008 | 02:32 PM
  #22  
zeroday's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Likes: 15
Ferraris have always been high maintenance cars. Not sure why this is such a surprise.
Old 02-24-2008 | 02:33 PM
  #23  
iTimmy's Avatar
dɐɹɔ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,522
Likes: 1
From: Lexington, KY
I've read this before and cases like this are the common place, Ferrari's are just plain expensive to maintain, but then again so is every exotic. If I had a $100k+ car, I would want it to cost more to maintain then a $30k car, I don't want the same $10/hour tech working on my exotic that works on the family minivan. If you want more performance you have to expect higher costs to maintain that. One of my good friends races GTP's and he is not sponsored and his operating costs last year turned to be $28k/hour to race the car, not include the purchase price of the car and his personal travel expenses and accommodations.

I've read, though I can't find the article, an oil change on a Mclaren F1 is over $10k

No matter how much money I make I can't justify expenses like that, I'll take a 911 all day long over these more exotic cars, to me its just not worth it, I'd rather donate the difference to a charity that needs it.
Old 02-24-2008 | 06:37 PM
  #24  
ZeroPSI's Avatar
All your base belong to
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,592
Likes: 1
From: The 402, 712, and 515
If you can afford to drive a Ferrari, you probably habve 6 stacks in your pocket on an average day.
Old 02-24-2008 | 06:45 PM
  #25  
mclarenf3387's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,620
Likes: 7
From: Charlotte
I could easily afford the maintnence, its called doing it yourself.

The insurance would probably be a killer though.
Old 02-24-2008 | 07:02 PM
  #26  
FutureBagdA4's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
My dad has a '90 348TS. They are definitely expensive! Every 5000 miles or so, you're looking at the very least $5000 for a service (as they have to drop the motor which in itself is $5000). It's true that you have to pay to play. The car has 15XXX miles though, so it's not too often that a service comes up.

Someone that was mentioning depreciation needs to realize that Ferraris hold their value much, much better than any other vehicle on the road.

By the way, I believe the 30,000 mile service on the F355 is around $15,000 or so
Old 02-24-2008 | 08:40 PM
  #27  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
Originally Posted by FutureBagdA4
My dad has a '90 348TS. They are definitely expensive! Every 5000 miles or so, you're looking at the very least $5000 for a service (as they have to drop the motor which in itself is $5000). It's true that you have to pay to play. The car has 15XXX miles though, so it's not too often that a service comes up.

Someone that was mentioning depreciation needs to realize that Ferraris hold their value much, much better than any other vehicle on the road.

By the way, I believe the 30,000 mile service on the F355 is around $15,000 or so
This is one good thing about the rarer Ferraris.... garage them, drive em once in a while and maintain them, and they'll appreciate in value. That almost never happens with cars.

$10k for an oil change on a McLaren? There's nothing outside of a proprietary oil filter or removal technique that would warrant that kind of labor.... even then, I would think its just to cover the overhead, and to make up for the losses they made on each car - McLaren lost money on every F1 sold.

There is an exclusive club of Ferrari owners out there, those that own Enzos. Enzo buyers had to own at least X number of Ferraris for the past few years or something like that. Those people have had Ferraris for years. We're all trying to make ourselves feel better that most of us will never be able to afford a Ferrari. That's just the truth. You're kidding me.... an NSX ANYDAY over a 550 Maranello?
Old 02-24-2008 | 08:55 PM
  #28  
FutureBagdA4's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
This is one good thing about the rarer Ferraris.... garage them, drive em once in a while and maintain them, and they'll appreciate in value. That almost never happens with cars.

$10k for an oil change on a McLaren? There's nothing outside of a proprietary oil filter or removal technique that would warrant that kind of labor.... even then, I would think its just to cover the overhead, and to make up for the losses they made on each car - McLaren lost money on every F1 sold.

There is an exclusive club of Ferrari owners out there, those that own Enzos. Enzo buyers had to own at least X number of Ferraris for the past few years or something like that. Those people have had Ferraris for years. We're all trying to make ourselves feel better that most of us will never be able to afford a Ferrari. That's just the truth. You're kidding me.... an NSX ANYDAY over a 550 Maranello?
NSXs are not cheap to fix either people! My brother had one and his horn button broke and it cost him around $43. The Acura Legend horn button is around $3-4
Old 02-24-2008 | 09:03 PM
  #29  
EuRTSX's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 23,588
Likes: 105
From: District of Corruption
^
omg the horn. NOT THE HORN.
Old 02-24-2008 | 09:14 PM
  #30  
FiveLiterCheater's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
This is one good thing about the rarer Ferraris.... garage them, drive em once in a while and maintain them, and they'll appreciate in value. That almost never happens with cars.

$10k for an oil change on a McLaren? There's nothing outside of a proprietary oil filter or removal technique that would warrant that kind of labor.... even then, I would think its just to cover the overhead, and to make up for the losses they made on each car - McLaren lost money on every F1 sold.

There is an exclusive club of Ferrari owners out there, those that own Enzos. Enzo buyers had to own at least X number of Ferraris for the past few years or something like that. Those people have had Ferraris for years. We're all trying to make ourselves feel better that most of us will never be able to afford a Ferrari. That's just the truth. You're kidding me.... an NSX ANYDAY over a 550 Maranello?
I'd take a NSX-R over the Ferrari without looking back. Easier to maintain, more practical, and the interior is lightyears ahead of 550. Throw a supercharger in the NSX and I don't even think the Maranello would stand a chance on the track. Ferrari's are nice to read about and have internet debates on, but owning one would be a complete bitch. I'd be scared to drive it in the city, thats for sure.
Old 02-24-2008 | 09:20 PM
  #31  
Will Y.'s Avatar
Registered but harmless
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,860
Likes: 1,151
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by FutureBagdA4
NSXs are not cheap to fix either people! My brother had one and his horn button broke and it cost him around $43. The Acura Legend horn button is around $3-4
Now imagine how much the horn button would be in that POS Maranello.
Most of us scream when a dealer wants to charge $1100 for a 120K service on our Honda/Toyota XXX, which may have cost $25K-35K. A $15,000 service for a $250K car in only 30,000 miles is a little hefty for me ( now ), especially if parts keep breaking or leaking.

I would love to own a F430, Murcielago or Miura and put 8K miles per year on it, though, if it didn't spend much time with the mechanic.
Old 02-24-2008 | 09:37 PM
  #32  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
Originally Posted by JJaber06
I'd take a NSX-R over the Ferrari without looking back. Easier to maintain, more practical, and the interior is lightyears ahead of 550. Throw a supercharger in the NSX and I don't even think the Maranello would stand a chance on the track. Ferrari's are nice to read about and have internet debates on, but owning one would be a complete bitch. I'd be scared to drive it in the city, thats for sure.
Pure denial.

If you were a multi-millionaire, you would have a stable full of NSXs and nothing else huh? The Maranello is a completely different class of car, not just in terms of price. Comparing it to an NSX-R is like comparing a Lotus Elise to a Mustang Cobra. An interior designed in 1990 that remained virtually unchanged over the years.... lightyears ahead of the 550 interior?



If I was a billionaire I would be driving Corollas all day too... they're more practical and require less maintenance.
Old 02-24-2008 | 09:51 PM
  #33  
iTimmy's Avatar
dɐɹɔ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,522
Likes: 1
From: Lexington, KY
^^^^ You bring up an interesting point, we are all different. We all have a different set of values and standards, I'm a firm believer in the work hard and play harder mentality and feel that you should enjoy wealth if you have it. That said, I think the illusion that spending more will equate to greater happiness is just that, an illusion. For me, I come from a middle class family and while I feel I live a very good quality lifestyle and there is very little that I truly want that I don't have, there are still a few things I would like to accomplish, after that I want to share my wealth with those less fortunate. It brings me joy, small things like buying a kid a baseball mitt and bat are more important then a stable full of cars I don't drive or that are foolishly expensive to maintain. I've never gone to bed hungry, but I certainly wasn't wealthy growing up, I know how hard it is to make money and would rather share it how I see fit then lavish myself in a shallow, decadent lifestyle.

I didn't always feel like this, but the older I get, the less I want, the more I appreciate what I have and I have a real desire to help others improve their quality of life.
Old 02-24-2008 | 09:59 PM
  #34  
Will Y.'s Avatar
Registered but harmless
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,860
Likes: 1,151
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
An interior designed in 1990 that remained virtually unchanged over the years.... lightyears ahead of the 550 interior?
Umm... you better take a look at the NSX interior- it's beautiful, clean and well integrated, while the 550's looks like it came with parts from a Chevy, Pontiac and a Chrysler- compare the center stack, climate control knobs and the ventilation grills when you get a chance.
Old 02-24-2008 | 10:03 PM
  #35  
phil2's Avatar
has Gloryhole Girls in
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,473
Likes: 1
From: Ballston Lake, NY
I will keep my lotus thanks
Old 02-24-2008 | 10:10 PM
  #36  
FutureBagdA4's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by EuRTSX
^
omg the horn. NOT THE HORN.
I am merely showing you the drastic upmarket for this vehicle as well. It suffers from the same significant price gouging (albeit maybe not as high).
Old 02-24-2008 | 10:12 PM
  #37  
FutureBagdA4's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by Will Y.
Umm... you better take a look at the NSX interior- it's beautiful, clean and well integrated, while the 550's looks like it came with parts from a Chevy, Pontiac and a Chrysler- compare the center stack, climate control knobs and the ventilation grills when you get a chance.
If you've ever sat or been in a Ferrari, you would know the interior is unlike any other. The leather is most supple of leathers and the smell is intoxicating. There is nothing like it.
Old 02-24-2008 | 10:31 PM
  #38  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
Originally Posted by iTimmy
^^^^ You bring up an interesting point, we are all different. We all have a different set of values and standards, I'm a firm believer in the work hard and play harder mentality and feel that you should enjoy wealth if you have it. That said, I think the illusion that spending more will equate to greater happiness is just that, an illusion. For me, I come from a middle class family and while I feel I live a very good quality lifestyle and there is very little that I truly want that I don't have, there are still a few things I would like to accomplish, after that I want to share my wealth with those less fortunate. It brings me joy, small things like buying a kid a baseball mitt and bat are more important then a stable full of cars I don't drive or that are foolishly expensive to maintain. I've never gone to bed hungry, but I certainly wasn't wealthy growing up, I know how hard it is to make money and would rather share it how I see fit then lavish myself in a shallow, decadent lifestyle.

I didn't always feel like this, but the older I get, the less I want, the more I appreciate what I have and I have a real desire to help others improve their quality of life.
It's a shame more of us aren't like you. But I was thinking merely in terms of one car vs. another. I also take pleasure in doing small things for people, and them being thankful or as least acknowledge the fact. I was raised the same way but realistically most of the members on this site own Acuras, not Civics and we drool over Porsches, Aston Martins and Ferraris. I wouldn't be keeping ever single cent of my money to myself if I were rich but I would certainly indulge... and most of us here have and will continue to.

I still have a lot of growing up to do but I'm trying to be a realist here. One article about Ferrari maintenance costs, and all of a sudden everyone here is thinking, "I would never buy a Ferrari." That's true, because most of us can't afford it, otherwise we would be on Ferrarizine. But seriously, $125 for a license plate frame? There's nothing special about a Ferrari frame, nor anything difficult about replacing it. Buy one for $10 and replace it yourself, takes 2 screws, maybe 4 at best. Everyone here is focusing on the cost itself and not the difficulty (well, ease of) labor.... I thought a lot of members did DIY stuff?

Originally Posted by Will Y.
Umm... you better take a look at the NSX interior- it's beautiful, clean and well integrated, while the 550's looks like it came with parts from a Chevy, Pontiac and a Chrysler- compare the center stack, climate control knobs and the ventilation grills when you get a chance.
You know what, you're right!

I know it was clearly an exaggeration, "...the NSX interior is lightyears ahead of the 550." I never said it was ugly at all, I was actually taken aback by how nice it looks in real life. But to say that the NSX interior is way ahead of the 550 interior.... that's certainly debatable. I just happened to search for the 550 interior and found it attractive also. I think the round vents and HVAC knobs are just coincidence... that would be pretty funny if Ferrari got inspiration for its interior form GM and Chrysler.

Click for a huge detailed picture of a 550 interior:
http://www.dieselstation.com/wallpap...anello-010.jpg
Old 02-24-2008 | 10:38 PM
  #39  
FiveLiterCheater's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
Pure denial.

If you were a multi-millionaire, you would have a stable full of NSXs and nothing else huh? The Maranello is a completely different class of car, not just in terms of price. Comparing it to an NSX-R is like comparing a Lotus Elise to a Mustang Cobra. An interior designed in 1990 that remained virtually unchanged over the years.... lightyears ahead of the 550 interior?



If I was a billionaire I would be driving Corollas all day too... they're more practical and require less maintenance.
If I was a multi-millionaire, I would have a stable full of my favorite cars, which would include the NSX. Afterall, if I had that much money, I would still be a car enthusiest, and wouldn't let the greed go straight to my head and swamp my garage full of Ferraris. I'd have an S2000 in mix as well and probably an E36 M3 and an E55 AMG, how wierd!

I was never a fan of the 550...If I wanted a front engine exotic, I would get an Aston Martin over it any day of the week. As for the interior, I don't think Ferrari's main focus is interior design, as their track record has shown. Yes, its functional and i'm sure they use high quality leather and what not (they better for the price), but as far as design and aesthetics go...its nothing to write home about.

If you really want to post pictures....here you go...


I think you're the one in denial
Old 02-24-2008 | 10:41 PM
  #40  
nokiaman's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,271
Likes: 236
From: Maryland
Porsche, Lamborghini and Ferrari have always been a motivation for me to work hard at school, harder at work. It won't necessarily make you happier if you're just rich and need a car, but if you're a hardcore and die-hard car enthusiast it can simply be the result of childhood dream. I've always had a fascination for anything on four wheels for as long as I can remember and if one day I can afford a Carrera GT or an F430, I won't even second guess myself. I wouldn't be buying an expensive exotic sportscar, I would be satisfying a dream I've always strived to accomplish.Surely there are priorities to be set in life for everything, but dare I say it a car is still a car. But again spending doesn't equal happiness like iTimmy said.


Quick Reply: Can You Afford to Drive a Ferrari (1998 550 Maranello)?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 PM.