C6 with some mods
02-24-2005, 11:40 PM
#3
///M POWER
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 39
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
thats pretty quick, but gawd damn 116 is a low as trap for a 11.5, it looks like he got killer traction off the line with the dr's, thats the only reason i see for having such a low trap
prolly a 1.7 or 1.6 60'
prolly a 1.7 or 1.6 60'
02-25-2005, 01:44 PM
#6
Senior Moderator
that car is running ET Streets and a 3.90 gear... the latter of which would explain the low trap speed, it's just setup for acceleration.
02-26-2005, 12:24 AM
#7
///M POWER
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 39
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by srika
that car is running ET Streets and a 3.90 gear... the latter of which would explain the low trap speed, it's just setup for acceleration.
explains alot, u know the 60'
Trending Topics
02-27-2005, 11:20 PM
#9
TQ > MPG
3.90's are not just for acceleration. Top speed would still be a theoretical 188 mph. I have 3.73's and my top speed actually increased compared to the stock 3.08's, plus the Vette's T56 tranny has a very deep 6th gear (.57:1), so some steeper rear gears wont really affect highway mileage either.
And who cares what the mph is, 116 is still cookin. The great ET just means he has killer traction and knows how to drive.
And who cares what the mph is, 116 is still cookin. The great ET just means he has killer traction and knows how to drive.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
07-16-2017 07:33 AM
InFaMouSLink
Car Parts for Sale
6
10-27-2015 06:52 PM
lanechanger
Member Cars for Sale
4
10-13-2015 10:56 AM