C&D e92 M3 Test : Full Scans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2007, 07:39 PM
  #41  
has Gloryhole Girls in
 
phil2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ballston Lake, NY
Age: 48
Posts: 11,473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
335ci has more potential for 15-20k less....no thanks

If I want a v8 I will buy a c6.
Old 08-01-2007, 07:46 PM
  #42  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Meh... Id rather have the C63 AMG
Old 08-01-2007, 07:59 PM
  #43  
Blown LS6!!
 
Seattle Cl-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA
Age: 51
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Meh... Id rather have the C63 AMG

I have to say, I'm not a huge fan of AMG cars...mainly b/c they lack a manual trans and don't tend to handle as well as other cars in that category. However, the new Motortrend article on the C63 makes the car seem pretty promising and likely to give the new M3 a very good run for the money. In a straight line, it'll probably flat out kill the new M3 due to it's HUGE torque advantage.
Old 08-01-2007, 08:20 PM
  #44  
has Gloryhole Girls in
 
phil2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ballston Lake, NY
Age: 48
Posts: 11,473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Seattle Cl-S
I have to say, I'm not a huge fan of AMG cars...mainly b/c they lack a manual trans and don't tend to handle as well as other cars in that category. However, the new Motortrend article on the C63 makes the car seem pretty promising and likely to give the new M3 a very good run for the money. In a straight line, it'll probably flat out kill the new M3 due to it's HUGE torque advantage.

Anyone that is a "driver" like myself will agree. Nobody wants an automatic while tracking there car at watkins glen, limerock, vir, etc. etc.


I must say I am less than impressed with the new m3. It is similar weight to my old gto and less horse power which owned the advanced instructor group being 3800lbs so I must say that 8500 rpms it wont stand a chance on a road course.
Old 08-01-2007, 08:24 PM
  #45  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Meh... Id rather have the C63 AMG
The CTS-V is another one to watch out for, that thing is going to be crazy.

I'm actually also interested in the IS-F.

As a DD, I don't rule out automatic's anymore. If I like the car, I'll consider it.
Old 08-02-2007, 06:10 PM
  #46  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Beltfed
The CTS-V is another one to watch out for, that thing is going to be crazy.

I'm actually also interested in the IS-F.

As a DD, I don't rule out automatic's anymore. If I like the car, I'll consider it.
100% the V should be a real animal. And also agree on the trans. For 99.9% of the people on the road they will never use the manual to its fullest potential where it shines, a race track
Old 08-02-2007, 06:32 PM
  #47  
whut
 
theslik1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SC
Age: 60
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beltfed
Actually there seems to be a number of people doing the reverse...the 135i will be lighter, probably more fun to drive, easy mods for more power, and a shit load cheaper.

Doesn't handle as well? For the $ saved, do a suspension.

Neither is gorgeous imo, so that point is subjective and moot.
+1. I've also heard of a few M3 deposits being pulled in favor of the 135i. Don't get me wrong, I think the new M3 is very nice and hope to soon see it kick some RS4 ass. However, it will also be humorous to read the wailing on M3post when Proceded 135i's start showing them their taillights.

We live in interesting times.
Old 08-02-2007, 07:18 PM
  #48  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is it deliberate that car and driver put that "436 hp Corvette" headline on top of the new M3? That would be very tough to decide, this new 414hp M3 or the 436hp Corvette. if they were the same price, what would you pick??

But, M3, is hot!! now, someone please loan me $60,000.
Old 08-02-2007, 11:58 PM
  #49  
intelligentsia
 
SRK85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Land of cheap vodka, hot girls, and great nightlife
Age: 38
Posts: 4,376
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 04EuroAccordTsx
is it deliberate that car and driver put that "436 hp Corvette" headline on top of the new M3? That would be very tough to decide, this new 414hp M3 or the 436hp Corvette. if they were the same price, what would you pick??

But, M3, is hot!! now, someone please loan me $60,000.
Um M3 has way better handling. I would take an M3 anyday. But the interior kinda looks like the audi a5?


Bmw M3 interior

Old 08-02-2007, 11:58 PM
  #50  
intelligentsia
 
SRK85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Land of cheap vodka, hot girls, and great nightlife
Age: 38
Posts: 4,376
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A side from the colors I think they look the same. Sorry for the double post but it wont let me indent to the next line for some reason.
Old 08-03-2007, 12:16 AM
  #51  
Suzuka Master
 
nokiaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,271
Received 236 Likes on 97 Posts
I agree there is a certain similarity between the two.While I like the BMW interior, I prefer Audi interiors better
Old 08-03-2007, 07:36 AM
  #52  
whut
 
theslik1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SC
Age: 60
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SRK85
Um M3 has way better handling.
Way better handling than a base C6 'Vette? That isn't even remotely correct. And you can forget about comparing it to a Z06 around the track...the M3 is too damn heavy.

Ultimately I'd choose the ///M but it would be for my own highly subjective reasons. Objectively, the Chevy is a much better deal and supposedly the 2008 model has some major refinements on the way.
Old 08-03-2007, 07:47 AM
  #53  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Wow. I can't think of a car I want more.
Old 08-11-2007, 04:49 AM
  #54  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,904
Received 10,923 Likes on 5,541 Posts














Old 08-11-2007, 09:03 AM
  #55  
Burn some dust here
 
cob3683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Age: 41
Posts: 5,709
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
It's actually really starting to grow on me
Old 08-11-2007, 10:21 AM
  #56  
Moderator Alumnus
 
Beltfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cob3683
It's actually really starting to grow on me
Honestly, really good looking designs shouldn't have to grow on you.

I personally think the M3 is sloppy looking, standard 335 looks much better.
Old 08-15-2007, 09:46 PM
  #57  
K-Fed's Stunt Double
 
broly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 465
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Forget the M3. I've wanted one forever and I've been waiting a year. No DCT? WTF?!

S5 or C63 AMG for me unless the DCT Comes by launch. Rumors have been that BMW is pushing hard for DSG to come by launch since they understand it's importance.

While you claim to be "drivers", I'll still beat you going schumacher on you with an f1-paddle-shifting torque converterless transmission.

I'm ready to pay to play. I can't wait till I get either of the 3. PSYCHED.
Old 08-16-2007, 04:27 AM
  #58  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
First you guys say "oh well who cares about a manual, you only use it's maximum potential 0.01% of the time anyway, pretty much only on the track"

Then you say "anyway the DCT is much faster than a manual so I'll beat you on the track"



All I know is that the transmission that will win me over is the type that involves actuating a clutch pedal with my left foot. The endless day-to-day enjoyment of using the clutch pedal tops any sort of advantage granted by using a DSG. I don't care if your shift times are 0.05 milliseconds or they don't even exist at all, a la CVT. My statement holds firm unless the car has a garbage clutch/gearbox, at which point shifting is just a chore.

And as for the advantage of having an automatic while driving in heavy traffic, why did you buy a C63 so that you could drive it during rush hour? Take the Honda Fit to the track and the M5 to work, eh?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jamus22
2G TL Problems & Fixes
24
06-11-2023 10:08 AM
detailersdomain
Wash & Wax
3
10-09-2015 10:13 PM
MilanoRedDashR
3G TL Problems & Fixes
2
10-02-2015 10:49 AM
saturno_v
5G TLX (2015-2020)
21
09-27-2015 08:13 AM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
09-25-2015 12:50 PM



Quick Reply: C&D e92 M3 Test : Full Scans



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.