Bumper test: TSX fares badly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2004, 07:46 AM
  #1  
Administrator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
Scrib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Northwest IN
Posts: 26,326
Received 131 Likes on 82 Posts
Bumper test: TSX fares badly

http://money.cnn.com/2004/03/01/pf/a...reut/index.htm


Bumper test: Midsize cars fare badly

Five in 6 new midsize cars fared badly in bumper-crash tests conducted by insurance industry group.
March 1, 2004: 7:08 AM EST



DETROIT (Reuters) - Five of six new midsize cars fared badly in new bumper-crash tests conducted by an insurance industry group, including two that needed nearly $4,000 in repairs after four collisions at 5 miles per hour.

"These midsize models range from inexpensive to luxury, but all but one of them share bumpers that don't bump," Adrian Lund of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, said in a statement accompanying the test results.

None of the cars tested by the institute was worthy of its highest rating. But the Galant from Mitsubishi Motors Corp. received an "acceptable," the second-highest score. It sustained total damages of $2,099 in the four tests and an average of just $525 per test.

The tests are designed to simulate fender benders in slow-moving traffic. Vehicles are crashed both front and rear into flat barriers, plus front into an angle barrier and rear into a pole.

The worst scores in the tests went to the all-new Chevrolet Malibu from General Motors Corp. (GM: Research, Estimates) and the Acura TSX from the luxury division of Honda Motor Co. Ltd. (HMC: Research, Estimates).

The Malibu racked up a total of $3,807 in damages in the four tests and an average of $952 per test, the report said.

It said the Acura TSX required $3,957 in repairs after the four tests, meanwhile, and had the highest average per test at $989 in damages.

Both cars earned "poor" low-speed crash ratings, the worst possible, and the institute said GM was re-engineering the Malibu's bumpers because of the result.

Models deserving of just "marginal" ratings in the tests, all from the 2004 model year, included the Acura TL, the Maxima from Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. and the Verona from Suzuki Motor Corp.

"Poor bumper design hits consumers in their pocketbooks," Lund said.

"A lot of the damage to these cars could have been avoided if the bumpers had been designed to absorb the energy of a minor impact."
Old 03-01-2004, 07:54 AM
  #2  
has Gloryhole Girls in
 
phil2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ballston Lake, NY
Age: 48
Posts: 11,473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wonder how the new gto will do
Old 03-01-2004, 07:56 AM
  #3  
Administrator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
Scrib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Northwest IN
Posts: 26,326
Received 131 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally posted by phil2
I wonder how the new TL will do
You may be able to sell houses, but you sure as hell can't read.

:P


"Models deserving of just "marginal" ratings in the tests, all from the 2004 model year, included the Acura TL, the Maxima from Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. and the Verona from Suzuki Motor Corp."
Old 03-01-2004, 07:58 AM
  #4  
has Gloryhole Girls in
 
phil2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ballston Lake, NY
Age: 48
Posts: 11,473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Scrib
You may be able to sell houses, but you sure as hell can't read.

:P


"Models deserving of just "marginal" ratings in the tests, all from the 2004 model year, included the Acura TL, the Maxima from Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. and the Verona from Suzuki Motor Corp."
www.hookedonphonics.com

Old 03-01-2004, 09:54 AM
  #5  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
no wonder insurance premiums are as high for it as the CLS.
Old 03-01-2004, 10:01 AM
  #6  
Outnumbered at home
 
95gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: MD
Age: 46
Posts: 5,334
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That is just ridicoulos. Why can't they make cars that can actually tap into something and not be destroyed. 4k for a bump is nasty
Old 03-01-2004, 10:56 AM
  #7  
Suzuka Master
 
KavexTrax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 8,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tradeoff: minimal safety collision engr testing saves production cost and savings is passed down to consumer.
But replacement part costs (assuming OEM parts) makes up for it for manufacturer.

Old 03-01-2004, 05:57 PM
  #8  
Pro
 
6speedctrlfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: QueensNYC
Age: 55
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Last month I backed up hard, really quick, in a Starbucks parking lot (all excited over paying $3.49 for a mediocre cappucino...) and hit a three foot tall yellow concrete post (the kind you see in drive thrus and the like...) smack in the middle of the bumper....damn it sounded really bad . I was like I felt like
BUT I get out and check and there's only a small scuff mark. Yeah Acura !! excellent bumper !!! Soooo....I was pleasantly surprised at the lack of damage from the hit
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Machine
3G TL (2004-2008)
32
09-24-2018 08:27 PM
usual suspect
2G TSX Photograph Gallery
7
12-07-2015 10:52 AM
mugen_kid
Member Cars for Sale
7
11-13-2015 10:38 PM
pistacio
2G TL (1999-2003)
10
09-26-2015 09:45 AM
PortlandRL
Car Talk
2
09-14-2015 12:01 PM



Quick Reply: Bumper test: TSX fares badly



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.