Audi A5??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 04:43 AM
  #1  
westhaventl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moe T
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 37
From: CT
Audi A5??

So I'm currently considereing buying a new car. I really would like a S5 but even used they're way out of my price range. I looked into the Audi A5 instead. Used of course and definetly something with the S Line Package. Has anyone looked into this car also? Maintence cost etc.? I'm just interested to get everyones take on the car.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 05:14 AM
  #2  
SimonCL-S6's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 830
Likes: 38
From: Chicago/London
Just buy an FRS, everyone's doing it!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 08:17 AM
  #3  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
The A5 is a good car. The 2.0T pulls pretty well for a car with AWD. An APR flash should get you to 250/250 for a few hundred bucks too.

There is a reason the A5/S5 hold their value so well. They are great cars.

I would take an A5 in a heartbeat.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 08:19 AM
  #4  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,293
Likes: 16,291
I'd take an A5 as well.
Dont they come in a 3.2 variant as well?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 08:35 AM
  #5  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Love them and would get one in a heartbeat. Personally I'd get the 2.0T and chip it. Great performance and killer gas mileage. We used to have a B7 A4 2.0T and that car was just fantastic and trouble-free for our entire ownership.

You will pay more for maintenance once you get out of the warranty period compared to a Japanese brand, but that's pretty standard with German cars. Not a big deal to me... you'll have to decide if it matters to you.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 08:57 AM
  #6  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by justnspace
I'd take an A5 as well.
Dont they come in a 3.2 variant as well?
Yeah but there is very little you can do to improve performance with it.

The 2.0T is a better engine IMO too.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 09:02 AM
  #7  
SuperTrooper169's Avatar
In the Mid-South meow
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 2,298
From: Music City
No denying they're incredibly sexy looking cars. And as charliemike mentioned, lots of performance upgrades available with the 2.0T.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 09:35 AM
  #8  
myron's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,205
Likes: 269
From: Edmonton, Canada
do it, they are sexy as hell. I like that engine too (2.0T), and it's easily modified compared to 3.2.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 10:44 AM
  #9  
c0v3rr1d3's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 13
From: RI
they are great, but good luck finding one with the s-line package, its hard enough to find them with just the sport package. And if u want a manual, its even harder.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 11:01 AM
  #10  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
They are out there but rare for sure.

Damn you, OP. Now I want one again
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 12:40 PM
  #11  
It's Clutch's Avatar
Hello Officer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 24
From: So-Cal
Originally Posted by westhaventl
So I'm currently considereing buying a new car. I really would like a S5 but even used they're way out of my price range. I looked into the Audi A5 instead. Used of course and definetly something with the S Line Package. Has anyone looked into this car also? Maintence cost etc.? I'm just interested to get everyones take on the car.
My thoughts about the S5.
Slow. Heavy. Sh*tbox. Warranty is a must have.


An A5.. please you have much better options for the same $.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 01:08 PM
  #12  
Aretardedorange's Avatar
A6 and TL
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 145
From: New York/Brampton Canada/SoCal
Please get it, you are going to love it! Lots of options for the 2.0T. Check out audizine.com for more info!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 01:12 PM
  #13  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by It's Clutch
My thoughts about the S5.
Slow. Heavy. Sh*tbox. Warranty is a must have.


An A5.. please you have much better options for the same $.


Yeah, the 3-series is SO much better
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 01:19 PM
  #14  
It's Clutch's Avatar
Hello Officer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 24
From: So-Cal
Originally Posted by charliemike


Yeah, the 3-series is SO much better
oh, I've got my rants about 3-series as well. Thanks for reminding me to change my avatar.

Any consideration of a 370z?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 01:24 PM
  #15  
khannie112's Avatar
Niner Faithful
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 670
Likes: 14
From: Dirty Jersey
Originally Posted by justnspace
I'd take an A5 as well.
Dont they come in a 3.2 variant as well?
They discontinued the 3.2 a year or so ago - but you could definitely find them used.

I love the A5 - was looking at that or a G37 before I found out my wife was pregnant. Then I got the ultimate Honda "grown up" fan boy SUV - the MDX.

Please share pictures! I might look at a used A5 when my TL reaches 150k
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 03:06 PM
  #16  
mmafighta's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 417
Likes: 31
From: Los Angeles
From what I read, they're quite reliable.

I test drove the 2.0T last summer, and I remember being taken back how hard it pulled with 3 people in the car (me, salesman, and friend in the tiny cramped backseats.) The interior was solid, and materials used were good, better than my TSX. I did not test drive the sport trim model, so I won't comment on that.

Hell, the only gripe I would have about this car is probably the backseats...almost useless if you're taller than 5'6.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2012 | 09:50 PM
  #17  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by charliemike
The A5 is a good car. The 2.0T pulls pretty well for a car with AWD. An APR flash should get you to 250/250 for a few hundred bucks too.

There is a reason the A5/S5 hold their value so well. They are great cars.

I would take an A5 in a heartbeat.
The APR flash will net you much more than 250 tq, but it's not much on the hp. Of course these numbers are at the crank, but they're still impressive for just a tune. 93 octane bumps each up just a little bit.

http://www.goapr.com/products/ecu_up...sivl_long.html

91 octane ~ 229hp/323tq
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 05:19 AM
  #18  
westhaventl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moe T
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 37
From: CT
Originally Posted by charliemike
The A5 is a good car. The 2.0T pulls pretty well for a car with AWD. An APR flash should get you to 250/250 for a few hundred bucks too.

There is a reason the A5/S5 hold their value so well. They are great cars.

I would take an A5 in a heartbeat.
Thanks, I wondered why they were still so expensive. From what I've been reading owners love them

Originally Posted by justnspace
I'd take an A5 as well.
Dont they come in a 3.2 variant as well?
The 3.2 has a better exhaust note once a after market exhaust is installed. That's why I really wanted a 3.2

Originally Posted by c0v3rr1d3
they are great, but good luck finding one with the s-line package, its hard enough to find them with just the sport package. And if u want a manual, its even harder.
I found a manual 3.2 S line near my house. Navi and all, 09 33k with 31k on the odo. Only thing is its black I'm done with black cars so hard to maintain

Originally Posted by Aretardedorange
Please get it, you are going to love it! Lots of options for the 2.0T. Check out audizine.com for more info!
Thanks, I never even considered the ECU reflag for the turbo

Originally Posted by It's Clutch
oh, I've got my rants about 3-series as well. Thanks for reminding me to change my avatar.

Any consideration of a 370z?
Actually I did, but I'd like something luxury but sporty at the same time. Something I can hop out with a suit on or just shorts and a t shirt you know?

Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
The APR flash will net you much more than 250 tq, but it's not much on the hp. Of course these numbers are at the crank, but they're still impressive for just a tune. 93 octane bumps each up just a little bit.

http://www.goapr.com/products/ecu_up...sivl_long.html

91 octane ~ 229hp/323tq
I'm definitely going to look into this
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 06:59 AM
  #19  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by charliemike
They are out there but rare for sure.

Damn you, OP. Now I want one again
lol... same here. After my initial response I went to eBay and started snooping around ...
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 09:07 AM
  #20  
myron's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,205
Likes: 269
From: Edmonton, Canada
Originally Posted by It's Clutch
My thoughts about the S5.
Slow. Heavy. Sh*tbox. Warranty is a must have.


An A5.. please you have much better options for the same $.
it's heavy, and it's not really slow, it only feels slow.

Not everything is about speed, and HP. a5 s-line looks SO much better than 370Z, interior is sick in new audis.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 09:09 AM
  #21  
myron's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,205
Likes: 269
From: Edmonton, Canada
Originally Posted by mmafighta
From what I read, they're quite reliable.

I test drove the 2.0T last summer, and I remember being taken back how hard it pulled with 3 people in the car (me, salesman, and friend in the tiny cramped backseats.) The interior was solid, and materials used were good, better than my TSX. I did not test drive the sport trim model, so I won't comment on that.

Hell, the only gripe I would have about this car is probably the backseats...almost useless if you're taller than 5'6.
I am 5'10" and I saw fine in the back seat. There was 4 of us in the car, all around the same height, 2 guys and 2 girls, we had no problem fitting in there. Obviously I wouldn't wanna sit back there on a 12 hour long trip, but just around town, it's not bad at all.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 09:21 AM
  #22  
ThermonMermon's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 111
From: NYC
OP, if youre buying, not leasing, i would not think twice about finding a 2.0 and chipping it. hopefully, you can also locate a manual/s-line as well.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 09:25 AM
  #23  
Jakes_tl's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 360
From: Lititz, PA
My friend owns a shop and works on then and he said they have a lot of issues but if you have money to spend on maintenance than that might be a different story. Also I know a guy that works for a towing company and he said the most cars he tows from roadside breakdowns are vw's and audi's and a lot of them are new models.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 09:38 AM
  #24  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Jakes_tl
My friend owns a shop and works on then and he said they have a lot of issues but if you have money to spend on maintenance than that might be a different story. Also I know a guy that works for a towing company and he said the most cars he tows from roadside breakdowns are vw's and audi's and a lot of them are new models.
Back to the TL forum with you!
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 10:11 AM
  #25  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by westhaventl
I'm definitely going to look into this
It's definitely worth it. I have it on my B7 Avant. Unfortunately the tune on the 2.0T in the B7 only nets me 273ft-lb on 91 octane. The upgrades Audi made to the motor for the B8 are why APR can get it above 300 with just a tune IIRC. And from time to time, APR has a deal where you pay the price for a single tune and you get to choose 4 tunes and you get all the optional features. That's what I did and I got stock tune, 91, 93 and valet and the throttle body adaptation, fault code erase and anti-theft features for $599. In fact they have the sale going on right now till August 3rd (http://www.goapr.com/news/2012/07/02...to-august-3rd/).

Also look into the stasis tune. It won't net you as much power as the APR tune will, but they have performed studies to put their tune at a point that won't 'jeopardize' the reliability of the car in the long run. I"m actually considering downgrading my tune to it, but need to give it more thought.

There are other simple things you can do as well like upgrading to a HFC, upgrading mounts that make a world of difference and they are relatively cheap as well. I just upgraded the snub mount on my Avant. Part cost $40, had the dealer install it yesterday while I was getting my 35K service done. I can't believe how much easier it is to shift into gears now because of that simple part.

Yes the A5 is underpowered, but there is a lot you can do, for very cheap to get it to perform MUCH better.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 10:56 AM
  #26  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
The A5/S5s are also Gran Turismos and not sports cars. They aren't designed to do 7:22s around the 'Ring.

So when people derisively call them slow, I don't think they understand the purpose of the execution Audi put into the car.

Now, the RS5 is a different story. They screwed up on that one. It should have had the 4.0T from the S8 in it and not what amounts to two Civic Si engines.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 11:17 AM
  #27  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by charliemike
The A5/S5s are also Gran Turismos and not sports cars. They aren't designed to do 7:22s around the 'Ring.

So when people derisively call them slow, I don't think they understand the purpose of the execution Audi put into the car.

Now, the RS5 is a different story. They screwed up on that one. It should have had the 4.0T from the S8 in it and not what amounts to two Civic Si engines.

Well, I wouldn't go as far as to say the S5 isn't a sports car. But overall, I do agree with you.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 11:24 AM
  #28  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
Well, I wouldn't go as far as to say the S5 isn't a sports car. But overall, I do agree with you.
My definition (relative to their price point/class):

Gran Turismos (luxury first, performance second): Audi A5/S5, Jaguar XK, MB C-class coupe

Sports Cars (performance first, luxury second): 911/Cayman, CTS-V coupe

Sorta does both pretty well: M3

It's 100% subjective but that's my logic.

Last edited by charliemike; Jul 20, 2012 at 11:29 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 11:26 AM
  #29  
Jakes_tl's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 360
From: Lititz, PA
Originally Posted by charliemike
My definition (relative to their price point/class):

Gran Turismos (luxury first, performance second): Audi A5/S5, Jaguar XK, MB C-class coupe

Sports Cars (performance first, luxury second): 911/Cayman, CTS-V coupe

Sorta does both pretty well: M3

It's 100% subjective but that's my logic.
I agree with you.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 11:37 AM
  #30  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by charliemike
My definition (relative to their price point/class):

Gran Turismos (luxury first, performance second): Audi A5/S5, Jaguar XK, MB C-class coupe

Sports Cars (performance first, luxury second): 911/Cayman, CTS-V coupe

Sorta does both pretty well: M3

It's 100% subjective but that's my logic.
I can agree to this.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 01:36 PM
  #31  
vwong's Avatar
n00b
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 45
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
It's definitely worth it. I have it on my B7 Avant. Unfortunately the tune on the 2.0T in the B7 only nets me 273ft-lb on 91 octane.
Again, that's the crank hp #, but it does worth it for the 2.0T tune. I had it also in my B7 A4. Here's the before and after dynos of my car.



Would love to get the tune for my S4, but my priorities have changed.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 01:59 PM
  #32  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,293
Likes: 16,291
^even with a tune, its still >200whp.
the torque is amazing tho.

the 3.2 would be some where in the 230hp 230tq range.

Last edited by justnspace; Jul 20, 2012 at 02:01 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 02:08 PM
  #33  
It's Clutch's Avatar
Hello Officer
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,471
Likes: 24
From: So-Cal
Used RS4?
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 02:12 PM
  #34  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by vwong
Again, that's the crank hp #, but it does worth it for the 2.0T tune. I had it also in my B7 A4. Here's the before and after dynos of my car.
I mentioned it in my previous post, just didn't mention it again.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 02:57 PM
  #35  
MTEAZY's Avatar
brahs be jelly
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 247
Originally Posted by charliemike
Now, the RS5 is a different story. They screwed up on that one. It should have had the 4.0T from the S8 in it and not what amounts to two Civic Si engines.
It has 4/5 of a Lambo V10.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 10:43 PM
  #36  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by MTEAZY
It has 4/5 of a Lambo V10.
No it doesn't. Look at the torque numbers. Barely over 300lb-ft in a 450hp engine.

It is woefully anemic. Plus the RS5 engine is really just a further tweak of the RS4's 414hp 4.2 FSI V8.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 11:33 PM
  #37  
MMMalex's Avatar
7th Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
OP whats your budget?
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 11:39 PM
  #38  
MTEAZY's Avatar
brahs be jelly
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 247
Originally Posted by charliemike
No it doesn't. Look at the torque numbers. Barely over 300lb-ft in a 450hp engine.
It is literally 4/5 of the V10. Bore & stroke figures are identical. The 4.16L displacement is exactly 80% of the 5.2L.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
70
Dec 7, 2020 05:39 PM
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
Dec 4, 2019 02:11 PM
jmaxima03
Member Cars for Sale
1
Sep 27, 2015 10:22 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
Sep 15, 2015 06:44 PM
MyBlackBeauty
Canada
0
Sep 14, 2015 05:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 PM.