Audi A5??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2012, 04:43 AM
  #1  
Moe T
Thread Starter
 
westhaventl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CT
Age: 40
Posts: 505
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Audi A5??

So I'm currently considereing buying a new car. I really would like a S5 but even used they're way out of my price range. I looked into the Audi A5 instead. Used of course and definetly something with the S Line Package. Has anyone looked into this car also? Maintence cost etc.? I'm just interested to get everyones take on the car.
Old 07-19-2012, 05:14 AM
  #2  
Burning Brakes
 
SimonCL-S6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago/London
Posts: 830
Received 38 Likes on 34 Posts
Just buy an FRS, everyone's doing it!
Old 07-19-2012, 08:17 AM
  #3  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
The A5 is a good car. The 2.0T pulls pretty well for a car with AWD. An APR flash should get you to 250/250 for a few hundred bucks too.

There is a reason the A5/S5 hold their value so well. They are great cars.

I would take an A5 in a heartbeat.
Old 07-19-2012, 08:19 AM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,261 Likes on 11,972 Posts
I'd take an A5 as well.
Dont they come in a 3.2 variant as well?
Old 07-19-2012, 08:35 AM
  #5  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Love them and would get one in a heartbeat. Personally I'd get the 2.0T and chip it. Great performance and killer gas mileage. We used to have a B7 A4 2.0T and that car was just fantastic and trouble-free for our entire ownership.

You will pay more for maintenance once you get out of the warranty period compared to a Japanese brand, but that's pretty standard with German cars. Not a big deal to me... you'll have to decide if it matters to you.
Old 07-19-2012, 08:57 AM
  #6  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by justnspace
I'd take an A5 as well.
Dont they come in a 3.2 variant as well?
Yeah but there is very little you can do to improve performance with it.

The 2.0T is a better engine IMO too.
Old 07-19-2012, 09:02 AM
  #7  
In the Mid-South meow
iTrader: (2)
 
SuperTrooper169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Music City
Age: 47
Posts: 10,793
Received 2,126 Likes on 1,093 Posts
No denying they're incredibly sexy looking cars. And as charliemike mentioned, lots of performance upgrades available with the 2.0T.
Old 07-19-2012, 09:35 AM
  #8  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
myron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Age: 39
Posts: 8,205
Received 269 Likes on 229 Posts
do it, they are sexy as hell. I like that engine too (2.0T), and it's easily modified compared to 3.2.
Old 07-19-2012, 10:44 AM
  #9  
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (4)
 
c0v3rr1d3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: RI
Age: 42
Posts: 1,414
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
they are great, but good luck finding one with the s-line package, its hard enough to find them with just the sport package. And if u want a manual, its even harder.
Old 07-19-2012, 11:01 AM
  #10  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
They are out there but rare for sure.

Damn you, OP. Now I want one again
Old 07-19-2012, 12:40 PM
  #11  
Hello Officer
iTrader: (6)
 
It's Clutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: So-Cal
Age: 32
Posts: 2,471
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by westhaventl
So I'm currently considereing buying a new car. I really would like a S5 but even used they're way out of my price range. I looked into the Audi A5 instead. Used of course and definetly something with the S Line Package. Has anyone looked into this car also? Maintence cost etc.? I'm just interested to get everyones take on the car.
My thoughts about the S5.
Slow. Heavy. Sh*tbox. Warranty is a must have.


An A5.. please you have much better options for the same $.
Old 07-19-2012, 01:08 PM
  #12  
A6 and TL
iTrader: (2)
 
Aretardedorange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New York/Brampton Canada/SoCal
Posts: 1,597
Received 145 Likes on 123 Posts
Please get it, you are going to love it! Lots of options for the 2.0T. Check out audizine.com for more info!
Old 07-19-2012, 01:12 PM
  #13  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by It's Clutch
My thoughts about the S5.
Slow. Heavy. Sh*tbox. Warranty is a must have.


An A5.. please you have much better options for the same $.


Yeah, the 3-series is SO much better
Old 07-19-2012, 01:19 PM
  #14  
Hello Officer
iTrader: (6)
 
It's Clutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: So-Cal
Age: 32
Posts: 2,471
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike


Yeah, the 3-series is SO much better
oh, I've got my rants about 3-series as well. Thanks for reminding me to change my avatar.

Any consideration of a 370z?
Old 07-19-2012, 01:24 PM
  #15  
Niner Faithful
 
khannie112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dirty Jersey
Age: 43
Posts: 670
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by justnspace
I'd take an A5 as well.
Dont they come in a 3.2 variant as well?
They discontinued the 3.2 a year or so ago - but you could definitely find them used.

I love the A5 - was looking at that or a G37 before I found out my wife was pregnant. Then I got the ultimate Honda "grown up" fan boy SUV - the MDX.

Please share pictures! I might look at a used A5 when my TL reaches 150k
Old 07-19-2012, 03:06 PM
  #16  
Racer
 
mmafighta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 417
Received 31 Likes on 30 Posts
From what I read, they're quite reliable.

I test drove the 2.0T last summer, and I remember being taken back how hard it pulled with 3 people in the car (me, salesman, and friend in the tiny cramped backseats.) The interior was solid, and materials used were good, better than my TSX. I did not test drive the sport trim model, so I won't comment on that.

Hell, the only gripe I would have about this car is probably the backseats...almost useless if you're taller than 5'6.
Old 07-19-2012, 09:50 PM
  #17  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
The A5 is a good car. The 2.0T pulls pretty well for a car with AWD. An APR flash should get you to 250/250 for a few hundred bucks too.

There is a reason the A5/S5 hold their value so well. They are great cars.

I would take an A5 in a heartbeat.
The APR flash will net you much more than 250 tq, but it's not much on the hp. Of course these numbers are at the crank, but they're still impressive for just a tune. 93 octane bumps each up just a little bit.

http://www.goapr.com/products/ecu_up...sivl_long.html

91 octane ~ 229hp/323tq
Old 07-20-2012, 05:19 AM
  #18  
Moe T
Thread Starter
 
westhaventl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CT
Age: 40
Posts: 505
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
The A5 is a good car. The 2.0T pulls pretty well for a car with AWD. An APR flash should get you to 250/250 for a few hundred bucks too.

There is a reason the A5/S5 hold their value so well. They are great cars.

I would take an A5 in a heartbeat.
Thanks, I wondered why they were still so expensive. From what I've been reading owners love them

Originally Posted by justnspace
I'd take an A5 as well.
Dont they come in a 3.2 variant as well?
The 3.2 has a better exhaust note once a after market exhaust is installed. That's why I really wanted a 3.2

Originally Posted by c0v3rr1d3
they are great, but good luck finding one with the s-line package, its hard enough to find them with just the sport package. And if u want a manual, its even harder.
I found a manual 3.2 S line near my house. Navi and all, 09 33k with 31k on the odo. Only thing is its black I'm done with black cars so hard to maintain

Originally Posted by Aretardedorange
Please get it, you are going to love it! Lots of options for the 2.0T. Check out audizine.com for more info!
Thanks, I never even considered the ECU reflag for the turbo

Originally Posted by It's Clutch
oh, I've got my rants about 3-series as well. Thanks for reminding me to change my avatar.

Any consideration of a 370z?
Actually I did, but I'd like something luxury but sporty at the same time. Something I can hop out with a suit on or just shorts and a t shirt you know?

Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
The APR flash will net you much more than 250 tq, but it's not much on the hp. Of course these numbers are at the crank, but they're still impressive for just a tune. 93 octane bumps each up just a little bit.

http://www.goapr.com/products/ecu_up...sivl_long.html

91 octane ~ 229hp/323tq
I'm definitely going to look into this
Old 07-20-2012, 06:59 AM
  #19  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
They are out there but rare for sure.

Damn you, OP. Now I want one again
lol... same here. After my initial response I went to eBay and started snooping around ...
Old 07-20-2012, 09:07 AM
  #20  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
myron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Age: 39
Posts: 8,205
Received 269 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by It's Clutch
My thoughts about the S5.
Slow. Heavy. Sh*tbox. Warranty is a must have.


An A5.. please you have much better options for the same $.
it's heavy, and it's not really slow, it only feels slow.

Not everything is about speed, and HP. a5 s-line looks SO much better than 370Z, interior is sick in new audis.
Old 07-20-2012, 09:09 AM
  #21  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
myron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Age: 39
Posts: 8,205
Received 269 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by mmafighta
From what I read, they're quite reliable.

I test drove the 2.0T last summer, and I remember being taken back how hard it pulled with 3 people in the car (me, salesman, and friend in the tiny cramped backseats.) The interior was solid, and materials used were good, better than my TSX. I did not test drive the sport trim model, so I won't comment on that.

Hell, the only gripe I would have about this car is probably the backseats...almost useless if you're taller than 5'6.
I am 5'10" and I saw fine in the back seat. There was 4 of us in the car, all around the same height, 2 guys and 2 girls, we had no problem fitting in there. Obviously I wouldn't wanna sit back there on a 12 hour long trip, but just around town, it's not bad at all.
Old 07-20-2012, 09:21 AM
  #22  
Safety Car
 
ThermonMermon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 4,068
Received 111 Likes on 79 Posts
OP, if youre buying, not leasing, i would not think twice about finding a 2.0 and chipping it. hopefully, you can also locate a manual/s-line as well.
Old 07-20-2012, 09:25 AM
  #23  
Three Wheelin'
 
Jakes_tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lititz, PA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,974
Received 360 Likes on 319 Posts
My friend owns a shop and works on then and he said they have a lot of issues but if you have money to spend on maintenance than that might be a different story. Also I know a guy that works for a towing company and he said the most cars he tows from roadside breakdowns are vw's and audi's and a lot of them are new models.
Old 07-20-2012, 09:38 AM
  #24  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by Jakes_tl
My friend owns a shop and works on then and he said they have a lot of issues but if you have money to spend on maintenance than that might be a different story. Also I know a guy that works for a towing company and he said the most cars he tows from roadside breakdowns are vw's and audi's and a lot of them are new models.
Back to the TL forum with you!
Old 07-20-2012, 10:11 AM
  #25  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by westhaventl
I'm definitely going to look into this
It's definitely worth it. I have it on my B7 Avant. Unfortunately the tune on the 2.0T in the B7 only nets me 273ft-lb on 91 octane. The upgrades Audi made to the motor for the B8 are why APR can get it above 300 with just a tune IIRC. And from time to time, APR has a deal where you pay the price for a single tune and you get to choose 4 tunes and you get all the optional features. That's what I did and I got stock tune, 91, 93 and valet and the throttle body adaptation, fault code erase and anti-theft features for $599. In fact they have the sale going on right now till August 3rd (http://www.goapr.com/news/2012/07/02...to-august-3rd/).

Also look into the stasis tune. It won't net you as much power as the APR tune will, but they have performed studies to put their tune at a point that won't 'jeopardize' the reliability of the car in the long run. I"m actually considering downgrading my tune to it, but need to give it more thought.

There are other simple things you can do as well like upgrading to a HFC, upgrading mounts that make a world of difference and they are relatively cheap as well. I just upgraded the snub mount on my Avant. Part cost $40, had the dealer install it yesterday while I was getting my 35K service done. I can't believe how much easier it is to shift into gears now because of that simple part.

Yes the A5 is underpowered, but there is a lot you can do, for very cheap to get it to perform MUCH better.
Old 07-20-2012, 10:56 AM
  #26  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
The A5/S5s are also Gran Turismos and not sports cars. They aren't designed to do 7:22s around the 'Ring.

So when people derisively call them slow, I don't think they understand the purpose of the execution Audi put into the car.

Now, the RS5 is a different story. They screwed up on that one. It should have had the 4.0T from the S8 in it and not what amounts to two Civic Si engines.
Old 07-20-2012, 11:17 AM
  #27  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
The A5/S5s are also Gran Turismos and not sports cars. They aren't designed to do 7:22s around the 'Ring.

So when people derisively call them slow, I don't think they understand the purpose of the execution Audi put into the car.

Now, the RS5 is a different story. They screwed up on that one. It should have had the 4.0T from the S8 in it and not what amounts to two Civic Si engines.

Well, I wouldn't go as far as to say the S5 isn't a sports car. But overall, I do agree with you.
Old 07-20-2012, 11:24 AM
  #28  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
Well, I wouldn't go as far as to say the S5 isn't a sports car. But overall, I do agree with you.
My definition (relative to their price point/class):

Gran Turismos (luxury first, performance second): Audi A5/S5, Jaguar XK, MB C-class coupe

Sports Cars (performance first, luxury second): 911/Cayman, CTS-V coupe

Sorta does both pretty well: M3

It's 100% subjective but that's my logic.

Last edited by charliemike; 07-20-2012 at 11:29 AM.
Old 07-20-2012, 11:26 AM
  #29  
Three Wheelin'
 
Jakes_tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lititz, PA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,974
Received 360 Likes on 319 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
My definition (relative to their price point/class):

Gran Turismos (luxury first, performance second): Audi A5/S5, Jaguar XK, MB C-class coupe

Sports Cars (performance first, luxury second): 911/Cayman, CTS-V coupe

Sorta does both pretty well: M3

It's 100% subjective but that's my logic.
I agree with you.
Old 07-20-2012, 11:37 AM
  #30  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
My definition (relative to their price point/class):

Gran Turismos (luxury first, performance second): Audi A5/S5, Jaguar XK, MB C-class coupe

Sports Cars (performance first, luxury second): 911/Cayman, CTS-V coupe

Sorta does both pretty well: M3

It's 100% subjective but that's my logic.
I can agree to this.
Old 07-20-2012, 01:36 PM
  #31  
n00b
 
vwong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,738
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
It's definitely worth it. I have it on my B7 Avant. Unfortunately the tune on the 2.0T in the B7 only nets me 273ft-lb on 91 octane.
Again, that's the crank hp #, but it does worth it for the 2.0T tune. I had it also in my B7 A4. Here's the before and after dynos of my car.



Would love to get the tune for my S4, but my priorities have changed.
Old 07-20-2012, 01:59 PM
  #32  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,261 Likes on 11,972 Posts
^even with a tune, its still >200whp.
the torque is amazing tho.

the 3.2 would be some where in the 230hp 230tq range.

Last edited by justnspace; 07-20-2012 at 02:01 PM.
Old 07-20-2012, 02:08 PM
  #33  
Hello Officer
iTrader: (6)
 
It's Clutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: So-Cal
Age: 32
Posts: 2,471
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
Used RS4?
Old 07-20-2012, 02:12 PM
  #34  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by vwong
Again, that's the crank hp #, but it does worth it for the 2.0T tune. I had it also in my B7 A4. Here's the before and after dynos of my car.
I mentioned it in my previous post, just didn't mention it again.
Old 07-20-2012, 02:57 PM
  #35  
brahs be jelly
 
MTEAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,836
Received 247 Likes on 169 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
Now, the RS5 is a different story. They screwed up on that one. It should have had the 4.0T from the S8 in it and not what amounts to two Civic Si engines.
It has 4/5 of a Lambo V10.
Old 07-20-2012, 10:43 PM
  #36  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by MTEAZY
It has 4/5 of a Lambo V10.
No it doesn't. Look at the torque numbers. Barely over 300lb-ft in a 450hp engine.

It is woefully anemic. Plus the RS5 engine is really just a further tweak of the RS4's 414hp 4.2 FSI V8.
Old 07-20-2012, 11:33 PM
  #37  
7th Gear
 
MMMalex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
OP whats your budget?
Old 07-20-2012, 11:39 PM
  #38  
brahs be jelly
 
MTEAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,836
Received 247 Likes on 169 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
No it doesn't. Look at the torque numbers. Barely over 300lb-ft in a 450hp engine.
It is literally 4/5 of the V10. Bore & stroke figures are identical. The 4.16L displacement is exactly 80% of the 5.2L.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
70
12-07-2020 05:39 PM
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
12-04-2019 02:11 PM
jmaxima03
Member Cars for Sale
1
09-27-2015 10:22 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
09-15-2015 06:44 PM
MyBlackBeauty
Canada
0
09-14-2015 05:28 PM



Quick Reply: Audi A5??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.