Acuras are getting Expensive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #41  
oonowindoo's Avatar
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 23,362
Likes: 4,273
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
My '97 TL-P was $36,000 according to the sticker
wth??? did ur 97 TL-P come with 3.5L and AWD?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 03:21 PM
  #42  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
wth??? did ur 97 TL-P come with 3.5L and AWD?
No, but my car DID come with a nice 8 speaker system thats superior to the 2nd gen TL's. Heated seats, mirrors, foglights etc. Interior materials are also superior to the 2nd gen TL. It had its own unique body.

The 2nd and 3rd gen TL's are Accords with some different styling and interior. Platform sharing reduces costs dramatically. Which is why the 2nd gen TL was $8,000 cheaper
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 03:25 PM
  #43  
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 34,937
Likes: 638
From: Chicago Burbs
Wasnt the 97 TL still made in japan? That costs money to import them also....

I could see a lot of cost cutting when they went to the 2nd gen TL.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 03:25 PM
  #44  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
Wasnt the 97 TL still made in japan? That costs money to import them also....


Thats another reason.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 04:05 PM
  #45  
zamo's Avatar
Houses Won't Depreciate?
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,238
Likes: 0
From: Weston, FL
Originally Posted by SatinSilverTypS
i see what you're saying and i agree with the concept but i have a tough time doing that because you're always paying for something you never own. as far as economics are concerned your generally better off owning a vehicle over the long term and getting enough use out of it to the point that it doesn't owe you anything.

case in point: my father owns a 99 avalon. purchased brand new. by the time he had it 4-5 years he had racked up enough miles that the trade in was much less than the remaining principle on the loan. he now has 200k miles on it and has only needed to replace the water pump. i would be willing to say he is ahead of the game since it's been paid off for some time and he is saving money that he would have otherwise been spending on a lease.

the smartest way to *own* a car is to buy it once it's out of lease. i paid $10k less for my 02 TL-S with only 27k miles on it after it came out of it's lease. had i bought the car new i would owe more than it was worth after 3 years, but had i leased it then i would have a new car (which is very nice), but i wouldn't own anything. as it stands my principle and the worth of the car have been riding neck and neck since 2004 when i bought the car. it's just the thought to me that after 5-8 years of leasing you could have owned the car had it been purchased with a loan.

plus i'm just bitching because i drive too many miles a year to lease something

SSTS

You need to enjoy both worlds. I lease, and I own. You got a point tho.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 08:31 AM
  #46  
SatinSilverTypS's Avatar
ChairmanMaoSaysRTFM
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 5
From: Dutchess County, NY
Originally Posted by zamo
You need to enjoy both worlds. I lease, and I own. You got a point tho.
that will happen once my house is a little more paid off

SSTS
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fabian43
2G RDX (2013-2018)
16
Jul 13, 2016 09:07 PM
HairyMonkey019
Car Parts for Sale
28
Apr 22, 2016 10:50 PM
V12 Inspire
2G TL (1999-2003)
4
Sep 10, 2015 04:46 PM
asahrts
Member Cars for Sale
0
Sep 4, 2015 05:55 PM
fallacy
2G TSX (2009-2014)
10
Sep 4, 2015 10:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 AM.