Accord EX-L V6 vs TSX I4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2011, 08:54 PM
  #41  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,901
Received 1,671 Likes on 932 Posts
Originally Posted by doopstr
I decided that I can't look at Accord without giving the Camry a shot. The SE V6 looks pretty nice and can go 0-60 around 6. So i think my shopping list is looking pretty good now.


Once the Camry V6 went to a 2GR-FE motor, the Accord V6 AT became a joke by comparison. IMHO, Honda should have given the AV6 the J35Z6 powertrain from the base TL instead of its current Z2. (Having driven both the TL and 8G AV6, the TL seems -- to me anyway -- much quicker over the AV6 than it's 9hp paper advantage.)
Old 12-08-2011, 09:11 PM
  #42  
mmmmmm....
 
S14 n Tsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 20,524
Received 95 Likes on 81 Posts
Really?

Front looks decent, but the rear is





Old 12-08-2011, 09:51 PM
  #43  
Op is too busy to care
 
KillerG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,257
Received 913 Likes on 540 Posts
get used to it, you will see dozens everyday on the road forever from now on
Old 12-08-2011, 09:58 PM
  #44  
I'm Craig
iTrader: (2)
 
cjTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Age: 31
Posts: 4,899
Received 299 Likes on 207 Posts
^Amen. It'll grow on people if they don't like it. It's bound to.
Old 12-09-2011, 01:47 AM
  #45  
Pro
 
calgary2800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
I use to have a Accord V6 and now enjoy driving 4 cylinder cars more. I'll probably never go back to 6 cylinders unless its a BMW inline6.

I would pass on the TSX 4 cylinder, not the best value out there and choose a Accord 4 cylinder, the people at car and driver know their shit.
Old 12-09-2011, 02:44 AM
  #46  
Burning Brakes
 
Moose Muscles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Age: 38
Posts: 771
Received 83 Likes on 48 Posts
GTI? Genesis 2.0T? Mazda 3, Mazda 6 and If you can take a small hit on gas mileage the Mazdaspeed3.

Just throwing things out in the price range, this doesn't include the used market, 30k is a big number when looking for used cars.
Old 12-09-2011, 04:37 AM
  #47  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,901
Received 1,671 Likes on 932 Posts
The OP seems to be looking for a new mid-sized sedan around the 30k price point. So of ^ group above, the Mazda6 could be a consideration.
Old 12-09-2011, 05:46 AM
  #48  
Burning Brakes
 
Moose Muscles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Age: 38
Posts: 771
Received 83 Likes on 48 Posts
Well, I did see some used E350s and CTS's in that range as well, they were typically 2009 or 2010 with less than 45k.

You might also be able to get into one of the new turbo regal, they start at like 29,700. Just tossing some ideas, test driving is where the decisions are made.
Old 12-09-2011, 07:12 AM
  #49  
The Dumb One
iTrader: (1)
 
Rockstar21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Age: 37
Posts: 11,810
Received 373 Likes on 249 Posts
Originally Posted by Infamous425
kia optima sx. 274hp, regular gas, 34mpg. pano roof, memory seats with heat/cool, navi, hids, led tails... you can get this for well under 30k.
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Optima 2.0 T

34 MPG HWY....more features and tech than Honda or Acura.
Originally Posted by phee
x3 on the optima. boy that thing is
i cant agree on this one.

this car isnt ugly by any stretch, but its def. a strange looking one. maybe its the wheels, idk.

Old 12-09-2011, 09:26 AM
  #50  
Pro
 
calgary2800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: seattle
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
You can name your price on a Mazda6, dealers dont move those things, havent done it for years in the current body style. Gets good reviews though.
Old 12-09-2011, 12:17 PM
  #51  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 42
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4


Once the Camry V6 went to a 2GR-FE motor, the Accord V6 AT became a joke by comparison. IMHO, Honda should have given the AV6 the J35Z6 powertrain from the base TL instead of its current Z2. (Having driven both the TL and 8G AV6, the TL seems -- to me anyway -- much quicker over the AV6 than it's 9hp paper advantage.)
I agree that Honda should be using the J35Z6 in the accord as well. Throw a 6AT on it and the gas mileage would be better than the Current VCM Z2. Plus on VTEC.net the TSX V6 put down 230+WHP and 219+WTQ! It would be as fast if not faster than the Camry as the TSX V6 is already in the mid 14's with just the 5AT!

I think that Honda has forgotten that the Accord is Honda's bread and butter. They cut corners with the accord because they don't want the accord coming to close to the TL and TSX. They have made that mistake for years. The TSX is a great car but Honda should have made the accord more like it in the states since the TSX is the accord in many other countries around the world.
Old 12-09-2011, 05:28 PM
  #52  
fap fap fap
 
Infamous425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kirkland
Age: 44
Posts: 4,239
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by S14 n Tsx
Really?

Front looks decent, but the rear is




that looks a lot better than the accord's rear end with its pep boys reflectors
Old 12-09-2011, 05:38 PM
  #53  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by Rockstar21
i cant agree on this one.

this car isnt ugly by any stretch, but its def. a strange looking one. maybe its the wheels, idk.
You must like ugly

The vast majority of critics and the buying public think it's a beautiful design.
Old 12-09-2011, 05:43 PM
  #54  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Rockstar21
i cant agree on this one.

this car isnt ugly by any stretch, but its def. a strange looking one. maybe its the wheels, idk.

Kia Optima has been getting so many great reviews on its design.

Much better looking than Accord imo.
Old 12-09-2011, 06:04 PM
  #55  
Instructor
 
n-spring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 180
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by doopstr
I decided that I can't look at Accord without giving the Camry a shot. The SE V6 looks pretty nice and can go 0-60 around 6. So i think my shopping list is looking pretty good now.
My advice is to stay away from any Honda V6 with VCM. I ditched my '09 Accord EX-L V6 after only four months because it drove me nuts on the highways around Houston.
Old 12-09-2011, 06:13 PM
  #56  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
zeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 5,911
Received 1,855 Likes on 1,496 Posts
Originally Posted by n-spring
My advice is to stay away from any Honda V6 with VCM. I ditched my '09 Accord EX-L V6 after only four months because it drove me nuts on the highways around Houston.
What did it do that drove you nuts?
Old 12-09-2011, 06:29 PM
  #57  
Instructor
 
n-spring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 180
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by zeta
What did it do that drove you nuts?
The highways around Houston are constantly changing grade ... up an overpass and down the other side. The VCM would deactivate cylinders on the downside and then kick them back in on the incline ... over and over again. The cylinder deactivation/activation is not as seamless as they claim.
Old 12-09-2011, 06:35 PM
  #58  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
zeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 5,911
Received 1,855 Likes on 1,496 Posts
Originally Posted by n-spring
The highways around Houston are constantly changing grade ... up an overpass and down the other side. The VCM would deactivate cylinders on the downside and then kick them back in on the incline ... over and over again. The cylinder deactivation/activation is not as seamless as they claim.
Got it. The constant change in load, thus activation/deactivation of VCM would tend to grate.

Thanks.
Old 12-09-2011, 06:53 PM
  #59  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
VCM is
Old 12-09-2011, 07:18 PM
  #60  
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
doopstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Jersey
Age: 52
Posts: 25,456
Received 2,211 Likes on 1,210 Posts
Does the Toyota 6 do that as well?
Old 12-10-2011, 03:20 PM
  #61  
Racer
 
CAgine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 303
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by silver3.5


The current Accord is and the TSX just looks weird. I like the 1st gen better!
Really? come on, it's both models aren't that ugly. Problem with both 1st generation cars were they're too bland and round. No sharp edges, never caught my attention. Albeit, I agree...Not a big fan of the Accord sedan...Honda really went in the wrong direction there, but the coupe and the new tsx are pretty good looking cars

anyways, I'm a big fan of the Optima. If you don't mind brand image, it's really hard to pass up on. Fully loaded with more tech, power, and turbo engine for right around 30K...Hmmm
Old 12-10-2011, 07:22 PM
  #62  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,901
Received 1,671 Likes on 932 Posts
Although nowhere near as sharp looking as the Optima or Sonata, the problem with the Accord sedan is not with its styling.
Old 12-11-2011, 12:14 AM
  #63  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Anyone driving 100mile per day. I will stayaway from Turbos/V6 type cars. Not only they have less fuel economy but will have higher maintainance (timing belt) and those Korean cars cannot drive in straight line. they will need tire sooner and are not that much refined.



Old 12-11-2011, 08:39 AM
  #64  
it's a car-drive it
 
nj2pa2nc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,375
Received 262 Likes on 199 Posts
My husband test drove both the 2012 Hyundai Sonata turbo and the hybrid. He was very impressed with the turbo which drove very straight. It has a timing chain. The battery in the hybrid takes up a lot of the trunk space along with the regular battery which is also in the trunk.
Old 12-11-2011, 11:43 AM
  #65  
Three Wheelin'
 
SpiderX1016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Age: 32
Posts: 1,785
Received 96 Likes on 74 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
Anyone driving 100mile per day. I will stayaway from Turbos/V6 type cars. Not only they have less fuel economy but will have higher maintainance (timing belt) and those Korean cars cannot drive in straight line. they will need tire sooner and are not that much refined.
I'd take a V6 over a 4 cyl and I commute that much daily. The 4 cylinders I've driven are too rough for my tastes.
Old 12-11-2011, 10:54 PM
  #66  
Racer
 
jchan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 32
Posts: 333
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I'll toss in a nod for the Kia Optima 2.0T as well. If you don't like the design as much, the Hyundai Sonata 2.0T is pretty much the same thing.

I would also suggest a Nissan Altima V6- the car seems to be nearing the end of its life-cycle and dealers look like they want to move these things. My parents have a 4-cylinder Altima and it's been a great car over the past 3, almost 4, years.
Old 12-11-2011, 11:25 PM
  #67  
Banned
 
ParaSurfer1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 45
Posts: 3,138
Received 113 Likes on 91 Posts
The Accords v6 is not real 3 lobe cam vtec. It's i-vtec because of the cylinder deactivation. The only accord v6 with vtec is the 6spd. The accord v6 lack low-end tq too. If the accord had true vtec its 271hp engine would pull as fast as 3rd gen tl auto 0-60 6.8sec instead of it doing it in 7.5sec. The TSX auto does 0-60 in 8sec range so id say tsx plus you get vga navi, surround sound audio, xm traffic, hids in projector optics and just a firmer ride.
Old 12-12-2011, 06:23 AM
  #68  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,117 Posts
Originally Posted by doopstr
I'm looking for a car that I can put about 100 miles a day on. The Accord EX-L V6 and base TSX are similarly priced. Accord V6 offers 30MPG highway while TSX I4 is rated at 31MPG. Accord V6 calls for regular gas while Acura recommends premium to achieve max power and fuel efficiency. On paper it looks to me like Accord would have more power and run cheaper since it calls for regular gas instead of premium.

Has anyone cross shopped these two cars? What's your opinion? Is there anything else around $30k that can get at least 30MPG that I should be looking at? I would keep this car a long time so reliability is a must.
I bought the Accord. Get it. Cheaper maintenance, cheaper gas (especially on 100 miles a day).

Let's say you get the advertised gas mileage between the two: 30 for the Accord (V6 BTW) and 31 for the TSX. If you go 100 miles a day, that translates to:

Accord: 100 miles/day X 1 gal/30 miles X $3.30/gal = $11 a day = $4,015 in gas for the year (on average).

TSX: 100 miles/day X 1 gal/31 miles X $3.60/gal (premium) = $11.61 a day = $4,239

Add in the cheaper maintenance and I'd say go with the Accord.
Old 12-12-2011, 09:47 AM
  #69  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 42
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by ParaSurfer1979
The Accords v6 is not real 3 lobe cam vtec. It's i-vtec because of the cylinder deactivation. The only accord v6 with vtec is the 6spd. The accord v6 lack low-end tq too. If the accord had true vtec its 271hp engine would pull as fast as 3rd gen tl auto 0-60 6.8sec instead of it doing it in 7.5sec. The TSX auto does 0-60 in 8sec range so id say tsx plus you get vga navi, surround sound audio, xm traffic, hids in projector optics and just a firmer ride.
The accord V6 auto, even with the VCM is as fast as a 3rd gen TL auto. Really they are both low 15 second 1/4 mile cars. The 3rd gen auto TL lacks low end as well. Both are pulling 2.3 60fts on the average. I have seen 0-60 for the accord around 6.6-7.0 on you tube.
Old 12-12-2011, 01:01 PM
  #70  
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
doopstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Jersey
Age: 52
Posts: 25,456
Received 2,211 Likes on 1,210 Posts
I bought a car! The last time I bought a car for myself was 1997.

Since I'm going to be putting over 100 miles a day on this thing I decided to see if I could live with a normally aspirated 4cyl and it turns out that I can. I purchased a 2012 4cyl Camry SE. I went with Magnetic Grey Metallic paint with black interior.

I went with the Camry over the others for a few reasons. I'm mainly going to point this car in a straight line and cruise. The Camry is great at that. It's quiet and handles the bumps well. The suspension on the SE is a little bit stiffer than the standard Camry and it's satisfactory for the kind of driving that I will be doing. The main reason I scratched the Accord is that they don't offer integrated Bluetooth until you step up to the EX-L.

The Toyota dealer was eager to sell. No problem getting a Camry at or below invoice. I was a bit surprised at that considering that 2012 was the Camry refresh. Hyundai must really be eating into their sales.

I'll post some pics when I have a chance.
Old 12-12-2011, 01:50 PM
  #71  
it's a car-drive it
 
nj2pa2nc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,375
Received 262 Likes on 199 Posts
Originally Posted by doopstr
I bought a car! The last time I bought a car for myself was 1997.

Since I'm going to be putting over 100 miles a day on this thing I decided to see if I could live with a normally aspirated 4cyl and it turns out that I can. I purchased a 2012 4cyl Camry SE. I went with Magnetic Grey Metallic paint with black interior.

I went with the Camry over the others for a few reasons. I'm mainly going to point this car in a straight line and cruise. The Camry is great at that. It's quiet and handles the bumps well. The suspension on the SE is a little bit stiffer than the standard Camry and it's satisfactory for the kind of driving that I will be doing. The main reason I scratched the Accord is that they don't offer integrated Bluetooth until you step up to the EX-L.

The Toyota dealer was eager to sell. No problem getting a Camry at or below invoice. I was a bit surprised at that considering that 2012 was the Camry refresh. Hyundai must really be eating into their sales.

I'll post some pics when I have a chance.
congrats-many miles of safe driving
owned many brands of car but never owned a Toyota-
Old 12-12-2011, 02:20 PM
  #72  
The Dumb One
iTrader: (1)
 
Rockstar21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Age: 37
Posts: 11,810
Received 373 Likes on 249 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
You must like ugly

The vast majority of critics and the buying public think it's a beautiful design.
i wast aware kia was outselling honda.

my bad.

i thought we based what the "public" thought, on sales...

Last edited by Rockstar21; 12-12-2011 at 02:22 PM.
Old 12-12-2011, 02:27 PM
  #73  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by doopstr
I bought a car! The last time I bought a car for myself was 1997.

Since I'm going to be putting over 100 miles a day on this thing I decided to see if I could live with a normally aspirated 4cyl and it turns out that I can. I purchased a 2012 4cyl Camry SE. I went with Magnetic Grey Metallic paint with black interior.

I went with the Camry over the others for a few reasons. I'm mainly going to point this car in a straight line and cruise. The Camry is great at that. It's quiet and handles the bumps well. The suspension on the SE is a little bit stiffer than the standard Camry and it's satisfactory for the kind of driving that I will be doing. The main reason I scratched the Accord is that they don't offer integrated Bluetooth until you step up to the EX-L.

The Toyota dealer was eager to sell. No problem getting a Camry at or below invoice. I was a bit surprised at that considering that 2012 was the Camry refresh. Hyundai must really be eating into their sales.

I'll post some pics when I have a chance.
Congrats, Co-worker has that exact same car and color. I like the way it looks. Interior looked good too. Enjoy!
Old 12-12-2011, 04:09 PM
  #74  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Old 12-12-2011, 04:44 PM
  #75  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Originally Posted by doopstr
I bought a car! The last time I bought a car for myself was 1997.

Since I'm going to be putting over 100 miles a day on this thing I decided to see if I could live with a normally aspirated 4cyl and it turns out that I can. I purchased a 2012 4cyl Camry SE. I went with Magnetic Grey Metallic paint with black interior.

I went with the Camry over the others for a few reasons. I'm mainly going to point this car in a straight line and cruise. The Camry is great at that. It's quiet and handles the bumps well. The suspension on the SE is a little bit stiffer than the standard Camry and it's satisfactory for the kind of driving that I will be doing. The main reason I scratched the Accord is that they don't offer integrated Bluetooth until you step up to the EX-L.

The Toyota dealer was eager to sell. No problem getting a Camry at or below invoice. I was a bit surprised at that considering that 2012 was the Camry refresh. Hyundai must really be eating into their sales.

I'll post some pics when I have a chance.
Congrats!

Camry is one of the great comfortable highway cruisers for sure!
Old 12-12-2011, 04:52 PM
  #76  
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oceanside, Ca
Age: 42
Posts: 1,825
Received 74 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by doopstr
I bought a car! The last time I bought a car for myself was 1997.

Since I'm going to be putting over 100 miles a day on this thing I decided to see if I could live with a normally aspirated 4cyl and it turns out that I can. I purchased a 2012 4cyl Camry SE. I went with Magnetic Grey Metallic paint with black interior.

I went with the Camry over the others for a few reasons. I'm mainly going to point this car in a straight line and cruise. The Camry is great at that. It's quiet and handles the bumps well. The suspension on the SE is a little bit stiffer than the standard Camry and it's satisfactory for the kind of driving that I will be doing. The main reason I scratched the Accord is that they don't offer integrated Bluetooth until you step up to the EX-L.

The Toyota dealer was eager to sell. No problem getting a Camry at or below invoice. I was a bit surprised at that considering that 2012 was the Camry refresh. Hyundai must really be eating into their sales.

I'll post some pics when I have a chance.
Nice ride! You bought a great car
Old 12-12-2011, 08:23 PM
  #77  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,901
Received 1,671 Likes on 932 Posts
Originally Posted by doopstr
I bought a car! The last time I bought a car for myself was 1997.

Since I'm going to be putting over 100 miles a day on this thing I decided to see if I could live with a normally aspirated 4cyl and it turns out that I can. I purchased a 2012 4cyl Camry SE. I went with Magnetic Grey Metallic paint with black interior.

I went with the Camry over the others for a few reasons. I'm mainly going to point this car in a straight line and cruise. The Camry is great at that. It's quiet and handles the bumps well. The suspension on the SE is a little bit stiffer than the standard Camry and it's satisfactory for the kind of driving that I will be doing. The main reason I scratched the Accord is that they don't offer integrated Bluetooth until you step up to the EX-L.

The Toyota dealer was eager to sell. No problem getting a Camry at or below invoice. I was a bit surprised at that considering that 2012 was the Camry refresh. Hyundai must really be eating into their sales.

I'll post some pics when I have a chance.
Congratulations!! We should get together and have a slow sedan race for the heck of it (12 Accord EX vs 12 Camry SE). Can't wait to see the pics.
Old 12-12-2011, 08:41 PM
  #78  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Nice.

Had a Camry before my Accord. The new Camry is much better than the 8th gen Accord.
Old 12-13-2011, 05:53 AM
  #79  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,652 Likes on 1,117 Posts
Post pics Doopstr!
Old 12-13-2011, 07:57 AM
  #80  
J M U ... DUUUKEESSSS
iTrader: (1)
 
SHYUperman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chantilly VA
Age: 40
Posts: 2,267
Received 266 Likes on 131 Posts
congrats! My wife had the previous gen camry SE, really loving the new ones. Definitely a big improvement in the interior and quality.


Quick Reply: Accord EX-L V6 vs TSX I4



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 AM.