Never seen one like it before, in person it looks really sweet. nice asanti wheels. it belongs to pat williams on the minnesota vikings

 

If it was all black, it'd be perfect.

 

i like the two tone sets it off nicely

 

ugly

 

That's hideous!

 

a mini maybach

 

 

Typical BMW done up by a tasteless rich owner

 

i'd hit it

 

Looks like crap.

 

well put. I don't understand that paint job at all

 

fugly

 

looks like a 1977 chevy caprice derived paint scheme...

 

Where's the NEON license plate??

 

haha, I saw that on Sunday and was wondering what Viking it belonged to!
Looks hot in person.

 

tacky...

 

 

 

Except that a '77 Caprice Classic somehow looked better with that two-tone paint job.

 

Thought that was a Texas State Trooper patrol car at first.

 

 

Yuck.

 

x 432542

If it was all black and didn't have the extreme wide tires and ho-hum rims, then it would be

 

The lines look fine, but the trunk makes it look like a POS.

 

looks like the opposite of z3ro's car

 

I think its a ugly car to begin with...The paint and rims helped a little, All black would have been better...

 

I agree-its pretty gross-two tone only works for maybach. I love how they put huge rims on and do nothing else to the car. I was talking to the guy that handles all the body work at my shop, and he was telling me how they get all these guys in that have rear-ended someone because they put huge heavy rims on, a heavy system and don't upgrade the brakes. they also bitch that the car handles like shit

 

you're right...I actually owned one but it was one color and had "wire wheel" hub caps...whoooo, whoooooooo

 

 

loooks like a blingin' taxicab.

 

I saw a Dodge Magnum just the other day with the same type of paintjob.......

 

A huge system and heavy wheels probably won't weigh much more than a couple of passengers would.

 

meh on the 2tone

 

Even the heaviest of rims aren't more than 40lbs. are they?
and a "huge system" adds what, 100 lbs. at most?

 

-fabulous??? no.......fugly

 

Adding 80 pounds or so of rotating mass (not unreasonable when going from 17"->22" bling) will require the brakes to dissipate MUCH more energy. Moment of inertia increases with the radius SQUARED, so increase the radius of your wheels just 30% and the mass 100%, and you have just increased your moment of inertia by 340%. Also, the kinetic energy of the rotating wheels increases with the square of the speed, so at higher speeds, the rotational kinetic energy of the wheels can be HUGE compared to the linear kinetic energy of the rest of the car.

Here in Blacksburg, VA, we only have one rich person (Marcus Vick), and he drives a blinged-out 745i. Something about football players and making ugly cars even uglier...

 

the only good thing about that car is its able to fit pat williams' fat ass in it



thats all

 

damn thats sick, not even in the NFL yet and he rolls like that

 

E. James' brother was pimpin, I believe, an S500(some benz) blinged out when he was playing ball at the school i went to (back around 2000)

 

I accept the idea that the rotational kinetic energy of the wheels increases dramatically but I disagree wtih the last part. Doesn't the kinetic energy attributed to the forward motion of the car also increase with the square of the vehicle's speed?