274HP AWD Mazdaspeed 6 (56K use caution).;)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2004 | 05:28 AM
  #41  
jayhawk815's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 22
From: Dodge City, KS
Originally Posted by DownUnder
To me, its mouth look a little to big, referring to the central opening on the front bumper(unless it's functional).
Old 12-22-2004 | 07:43 AM
  #42  
SilverUA5's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
From: Fog City
Mazda = Ford
Old 12-22-2004 | 12:36 PM
  #43  
DownUnder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Sunshine State
Originally Posted by SilverUA5
Mazda = Ford
They also own Aston Martin, Jaguar, Volvo, Land Rover etc. so what's your point?
Old 12-22-2004 | 12:55 PM
  #44  
SilverUA5's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
From: Fog City
Originally Posted by DownUnder
They also own Aston Martin, Jaguar, Volvo, Land Rover etc. so what's your point?

Unreliable and no resale value vs. other Japanese imports. Do you agree?
Old 12-22-2004 | 01:00 PM
  #45  
DownUnder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Sunshine State
Originally Posted by SilverUA5
Unreliable and no resale value vs. other Japanese imports. Do you agree?
Unreliable NO.

http://www.reliabilityindex.co.uk/t...128339010848601
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3131800.stm
http://www.carpages.co.uk/mazda/maz...&echo=882762942


Resale value is not great in the past, but now with the RX-8, Mazda6, Mazda3 resale is climbing high.
Old 12-22-2004 | 01:02 PM
  #46  
SilverUA5's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
From: Fog City
Just wondering why they put the intercooler on top when there's no hoodscoop. Doesn't that sort of defeats the purpose of putting it on top? I think it would make more sense if they mounted in the front like the Mazdaspeed Miata..........
Old 12-22-2004 | 01:54 PM
  #47  
DownUnder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Sunshine State
Originally Posted by SilverUA5
Just wondering why they put the intercooler on top when there's no hoodscoop. Doesn't that sort of defeats the purpose of putting it on top? I think it would make more sense if they mounted in the front like the Mazdaspeed Miata..........
Like I said before in this thread (I'm to lazy to rephrase):

Yea, it's a top mount intercooler like the WRX and Legacy GT. The hood is raised in the center so it looks like a cowl induction that forces air under the hood through an air duct that directs the air over the intercooler. Personally I prefer an FMIC, I’m sure someone will make an aftermarket FMIC for it like they do for the WRX’s.
Old 12-22-2004 | 07:42 PM
  #48  
SilverUA5's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
From: Fog City
It's impressive how they can squeeze 274hp out of a 2.3 liter 4..........well, Subaru got 300hp out of a 2.5. I think 300hp is just a modchip away for the 6, not bad. Too bad they don't make an auto for it since I'm too lazy to drive a stick after all these years.
Old 12-22-2004 | 08:07 PM
  #49  
MattT516's Avatar
My M45 loves to eat rice
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Originally Posted by EZZ
That car looks like a monster! It'll probably put a world of hurt on a TL and G35. Great job Mazda...but what happens to the RX8?
There is a turbocharged version of the RX-8 coming out in the next year or two. Should be a serious competitor versus the likes of the Evolution and the sTi, or at least in that area.
Old 12-22-2004 | 08:27 PM
  #50  
DownUnder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Sunshine State
Originally Posted by SilverUA5
It's impressive how they can squeeze 274hp out of a 2.3 liter 4..........well, Subaru got 300hp out of a 2.5. I think 300hp is just a modchip away for the 6, not bad. Too bad they don't make an auto for it since I'm too lazy to drive a stick after all these years.
Then you like the 250HP Subaru Legacy GT better since you can get an auto. But shifting your own gears in an AWD turbo car is more fun, well for me anyways.
Old 12-23-2004 | 12:55 AM
  #51  
SilverUA5's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
From: Fog City
I like that fact that they made the keyless starter just like the Nissan "Intelligent Key" feature.
Old 12-24-2004 | 10:57 AM
  #52  
r10apple's Avatar
lover and fighter
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 32
From: St Augustine, Florida
Autoweek has an article I am too lazy to link...

$29k base price and estimated 6.6sec 0-60mph from the manufacturer. The problem is the car weighs over 3600lbs. That being said, I'm sure $2k worth of mods would bring this car down into the very high 13's...

If it is here by March or so, I might just test drive it. Though the wheels suck and the tailigjts scream "race me now", the rest of the package is pretty darn good looking...

And with a 3/50 warranty, not a bad deal.
Old 12-24-2004 | 12:02 PM
  #53  
LessisBestmakingendsmeet's Avatar
Hello!
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 490
Likes: 2
I'd much rather my Acura badge than this Mazda. Whats the point of this car?
Old 12-24-2004 | 12:17 PM
  #54  
r10apple's Avatar
lover and fighter
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 32
From: St Augustine, Florida
Originally Posted by LessisBestmakingendsmeet
I'd much rather my Acura badge than this Mazda. Whats the point of this car?
The point is aggressive styling, awd, high output (albeit high weight/not so high as some others)...Whaddya mean what is the point?

What's the point of life? Silly question.
Old 12-24-2004 | 02:00 PM
  #55  
DownUnder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Sunshine State
Originally Posted by LessisBestmakingendsmeet
I'd much rather my Acura badge than this Mazda. Whats the point of this car?
Cause some people like buying and driving cars for what they can do instead of what brand it is.
Old 12-24-2004 | 03:33 PM
  #56  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DownUnder
Cause some people like buying and driving cars for what they can do instead of what brand it is.


Performance means a lot to people. Thats why the last gen RL was complete joke.
Old 12-24-2004 | 04:45 PM
  #57  
fsttyms1's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 81,383
Likes: 3,063
From: Appleton WI
Originally Posted by DownUnder
Hopefully they can sell enough MSP6's to make them think about bringing back the RX-7 with more power, cause the RX-8 is weaksauce.
Old 01-05-2005 | 02:11 AM
  #58  
LessisBestmakingendsmeet's Avatar
Hello!
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 490
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by r10apple
The point is aggressive styling, awd, high output (albeit high weight/not so high as some others)...Whaddya mean what is the point?

What's the point of life? Silly question.
Old 01-05-2005 | 02:56 AM
  #59  
phile's Avatar
Pinky all stinky
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,665
Likes: 191
Originally Posted by r10apple
A The problem is the car weighs over 3600lbs.
Where'd the weight come from? A regular 2.3L 6 weighs 3102.
Old 01-05-2005 | 03:41 AM
  #60  
reloaded's Avatar
WDP Is Faster
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
That car looks pretty pimp..interior wise I was always impressed by the interior of the 6..but this one is way better. The front looks oh so aggressive and the back... "improved." Overall I think the car improved a lot and the specs on that car is pretty intersting. Just like someone else has said already, I rather be driving an Acura than a Mazda. But, opinions are opinions..that is my personaly one. BTW.. Subaru GT>Mazda 6. (looks wise) Now..i'm just waiting for AWD TL ahhahaha.
Old 01-05-2005 | 08:57 AM
  #61  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,905
Likes: 1,675
Originally Posted by DownUnder
Cause some people like buying and driving cars for what they can do instead of what brand it is.

Old 01-05-2005 | 08:58 AM
  #62  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,905
Likes: 1,675
Originally Posted by r10apple
The point is aggressive styling, awd, high output (albeit high weight/not so high as some others)...Whaddya mean what is the point?

What's the point of life? Silly question.

Well stated.
Old 01-05-2005 | 09:49 AM
  #63  
95gt's Avatar
Outnumbered at home
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 1
From: MD
Good little write up in this months C&D. Seems to be a great legacy GT fighter. This will definetly be on my list of cars to look at next year when I replace the old CLS. Especially if they hit that price point of 28k
Old 01-05-2005 | 06:25 PM
  #64  
jayhawk815's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 22
From: Dodge City, KS
Originally Posted by phile
Where'd the weight come from? A regular 2.3L 6 weighs 3102.
AWD system would be my guess.
Old 01-05-2005 | 07:02 PM
  #65  
REDLINEN's Avatar
Missing my Acura's
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 0
From: Boston,MA
loose the taillights and make it a coupe!
Old 01-06-2005 | 07:40 AM
  #66  
samkws's Avatar
Comptech Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,555
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by DownUnder
Unreliable NO.

http://www.reliabilityindex.co.uk/t...128339010848601
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3131800.stm
http://www.carpages.co.uk/mazda/maz...&echo=882762942


Resale value is not great in the past, but now with the RX-8, Mazda6, Mazda3 resale is climbing high.
reliability is still behind honda and toyota, but they won't surpass them anyways
Old 01-06-2005 | 07:42 AM
  #67  
samkws's Avatar
Comptech Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,555
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
the car is slower than expected and not even making below 6sec

the Legacy GT will beat the Mazda 6 in any category

but the Legacy is sooo pricy, i would rather to buy a new TL for less money
Old 01-06-2005 | 08:45 AM
  #68  
95gt's Avatar
Outnumbered at home
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally Posted by samkws
the car is slower than expected and not even making below 6sec

the Legacy GT will beat the Mazda 6 in any category

but the Legacy is sooo pricy, i would rather to buy a new TL for less money

Has it even been tested yet? In the C&D they think that the mazda estimate is conservative.

Of course I am happy with any car as long as its 0-60 is below 7 (especially the 5-60 number as I find that a more realistic telling of how fast the car is)
The legacy is still like 3k less than the TL. Not bad considering it has AWD and decent power
Old 01-06-2005 | 09:50 AM
  #69  
DownUnder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Sunshine State
Originally Posted by samkws
reliability is still behind honda and toyota, but they won't surpass them anyways
Are you in denial or what? Mazda has fewer warranty claims then any other car overseas, and this by going by data collected by an independent warranty company straight from the dealers. Not like JD Powers and Consumer Reports crap that gather info from owners by mail.

Originally Posted by samkws
the car is slower than expected and not even making below 6sec

the Legacy GT will beat the Mazda 6 in any category

but the Legacy is sooo pricy, i would rather to buy a new TL for less money


The cars hasn't been tested yet, the performance numbers are ESTIMATES wait till they test it or see some on the track before you make assumptions.
Old 01-06-2005 | 10:25 AM
  #70  
95gt's Avatar
Outnumbered at home
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally Posted by DownUnder
Are you in denial or what? Mazda has fewer warranty claims then any other car overseas, and this by going by data collected by an independent warranty company straight from the dealers. Not like JD Powers and Consumer Reports crap that gather info from owners by mail.

where did you get this from? link?

Of course wouldn't they have less claims considering they sell significantly less cars than the other major japanese manufacturers?
Old 01-06-2005 | 12:20 PM
  #71  
Cornflake's Avatar
Reppin' the T-Dot!!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 2
From: Toronto, Ontario
Originally Posted by phile
Where'd the weight come from? A regular 2.3L 6 weighs 3102.
AWD for one....
Old 01-06-2005 | 12:24 PM
  #72  
95gt's Avatar
Outnumbered at home
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally Posted by jayhawk815
AWD system would be my guess.

They also stiffened the hell out of the car. That ads weight too. Bigger wheels as well
Old 01-06-2005 | 01:42 PM
  #73  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
6500rpm redline from a 4 cylinder turbo? Weak sauce
Old 01-06-2005 | 01:53 PM
  #74  
95gt's Avatar
Outnumbered at home
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally Posted by mrsteve
6500rpm redline from a 4 cylinder turbo? Weak sauce

hey some of us don't like those 9k rpm's. Give me a 4k rpm and 300 horses and I will be happy. I WANT MY POWER RIGHT NOW DAMNIT.

<---Lazy and doesn't want to wind an engine up
Old 01-06-2005 | 02:01 PM
  #75  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
With that low of a redline it probably has tall gears, otherwise you'd be shifting all the time during acceleration.

Cars with high redlines, i.e., RSX-S or S2000 have a close-ratio transmission so you climb to that high redline pretty quickly.
Old 01-06-2005 | 02:16 PM
  #76  
DownUnder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Sunshine State
I'd rather have a low revving torque monster for daily driving that has 90% of torque from 2000 to 5500 RPMS, then a high revving whiny engine that you have to rev to at least 6000RPMS to get any power from it.
Old 01-06-2005 | 02:22 PM
  #77  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
Originally Posted by DownUnder
I'd rather have a low revving torque monster for daily driving that has 90% of torque from 2000 to 5500 RPMS, then a high revving whiny engine that you have to rev to at least 6000RPMS to get any power from it.

Fair enough, its just an oddly low redline that's all
Old 01-06-2005 | 02:28 PM
  #78  
DownUnder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Sunshine State
Originally Posted by 95gt
where did you get this from? link?

Of course wouldn't they have less claims considering they sell significantly less cars than the other major japanese manufacturers?
I posted these links before in this thread.

http://www.reliabilityindex.co.uk/t...128339010848601
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3131800.stm
http://www.carpages.co.uk/mazda/mazd...echo=882762942
Old 01-06-2005 | 02:36 PM
  #79  
DownUnder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
From: Sunshine State
Originally Posted by mrsteve
Fair enough, its just an oddly low redline that's all
The SRT-4 also has a relatively low redline of around 6200RPM but they make lots of power throughout the power band. They usually dyno at around 220-230HP and 250-260lb-ft of torque at the wheels.
Old 01-06-2005 | 02:44 PM
  #80  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
Originally Posted by DownUnder
The SRT-4 also has a relatively low redline of around 6200RPM but they make lots of power throughout the power band. They usually dyno at around 220-230HP and 250-260lb-ft of torque at the wheels.

I didn't realize they also had such a low redline





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 PM.