2003 Infiniti G35 Dyno graph
#1
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
2003 Infiniti G35 Dyno graph
2003 infinity g35
Engine Specs: 3.5Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 0 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 228.7 @ 6240 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 221.5 @ 4670 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 272 @ 6240 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 264 @ 4670 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 0.0 / 30.1
Pressure (kPa): 30.1
Humidity (%): 0.0
Condition Details: Gear Ratio : 59.60 RPM/MPH Correction Factor : 0.97 SAE
Fan: off
Date and Time: 2003-03-22 - 22:09:36
Dyno Correction Factor SAE Corrected
Engine Specs: 3.5Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 0 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 228.7 @ 6240 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 221.5 @ 4670 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 272 @ 6240 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 264 @ 4670 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 0.0 / 30.1
Pressure (kPa): 30.1
Humidity (%): 0.0
Condition Details: Gear Ratio : 59.60 RPM/MPH Correction Factor : 0.97 SAE
Fan: off
Date and Time: 2003-03-22 - 22:09:36
Dyno Correction Factor SAE Corrected
#2
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Here is another one
2003 infinity g35
Engine Specs: 3.5Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 0 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 231.9 @ 6200 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 222.9 @ 4660 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 276 @ 6200 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 265 @ 4660 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 0.0 / 30.1
Pressure (kPa): 30.1
Humidity (%): 0.0
Condition Details: Gear Ratio : 59.51 RPM/MPH Correction Factor : 0.97 SAE
Fan: off
Date and Time: 2003-03-22 - 22:10:00
Dyno Correction Factor SAE Corrected
2003 infinity g35
Engine Specs: 3.5Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 0 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 231.9 @ 6200 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 222.9 @ 4660 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 276 @ 6200 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 265 @ 4660 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 0.0 / 30.1
Pressure (kPa): 30.1
Humidity (%): 0.0
Condition Details: Gear Ratio : 59.51 RPM/MPH Correction Factor : 0.97 SAE
Fan: off
Date and Time: 2003-03-22 - 22:10:00
Dyno Correction Factor SAE Corrected
#4
Senior Moderator
i really doubt they both had 0 miles.
i wish the cl-s had that kinda tq. stock.
i wish the cl-s had that kinda tq. stock.
#7
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by Crazy Sellout
how much torque does the CLS 6-speed with headers put down?
how much torque does the CLS 6-speed with headers put down?
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by Scrib
#10
Senior Moderator
fanning the flames.
#12
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by Python2121
how much more power will you get broken in?
how much more power will you get broken in?
Originally posted by mattg
i really doubt they both had 0 miles.
i really doubt they both had 0 miles.
#14
Cost Drivers!!!!
Originally posted by Python2121
how much more power will you get broken in?
how much more power will you get broken in?
#18
Lead Footed
Originally posted by Scrib
The coupe 6mt dyno looks better!!!
I've heard the VQ gets stronger with increased mileage. How much? No clue! :o
The coupe 6mt dyno looks better!!!
I've heard the VQ gets stronger with increased mileage. How much? No clue! :o
Ruf
#20
Administrator Alumnus
Originally posted by darrinb
i've seen better dynos than that for the G. where can we line up at?? i'm more interested in 1/4 slips than dyno graphs
i've seen better dynos than that for the G. where can we line up at?? i'm more interested in 1/4 slips than dyno graphs
#25
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by Scrib
I'm trying to figure out why Gavrill was trying to achieve by posting the dyno.
I'm trying to figure out why Gavrill was trying to achieve by posting the dyno.
Oh nothing specific. We were talking about how much power the SRT4 puts to the ground in a different thread and I found those dynos as well, so I thought it'd be intersting to open a thread with them.
That's all.
#28
Originally posted by Zapata
another 50hp atleast......you didn't know? VQ was created with special metals that only nissan has access too.....
another 50hp atleast......you didn't know? VQ was created with special metals that only nissan has access too.....
#31
Senior Moderator
i dont know why there's so much down play on this...im very interested in the dyno's of our closest competition the one thing know ones mentioned is...the car only goes to 6250 we get another 1000 turns of the motor on them
#32
Originally posted by typeR
i dont know why there's so much down play on this...im very interested in the dyno's of our closest competition the one thing know ones mentioned is...the car only goes to 6250 we get another 1000 turns of the motor on them
i dont know why there's so much down play on this...im very interested in the dyno's of our closest competition the one thing know ones mentioned is...the car only goes to 6250 we get another 1000 turns of the motor on them
acceleration is not all about high rpm's. just look at the vette.
#33
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by typeR
i dont know why there's so much down play on this...im very interested in the dyno's of our closest competition the one thing know ones mentioned is...the car only goes to 6250 we get another 1000 turns of the motor on them
i dont know why there's so much down play on this...im very interested in the dyno's of our closest competition the one thing know ones mentioned is...the car only goes to 6250 we get another 1000 turns of the motor on them
#35
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by gavriil
Where is the power made in the rev band is irelevant in an acceleration competition. As long as you are able to put the power on the ground, the revs dont matter.
Where is the power made in the rev band is irelevant in an acceleration competition. As long as you are able to put the power on the ground, the revs dont matter.
#37
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Age: 49
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I got to drive a G35 6spd Coupe just a few days ago, a friend bought one and came down from Dallas.
Let me tell you, that car has balls written all over it. I want oen so bad now, but its not the car I need for work at the moment. So damn. Anyways, I think its faster than a CL-S 6spd imho from what I remember the test drive being.
Let me tell you, that car has balls written all over it. I want oen so bad now, but its not the car I need for work at the moment. So damn. Anyways, I think its faster than a CL-S 6spd imho from what I remember the test drive being.
#39
Senior Moderator
i was looking at these. :P
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...threadid=80369
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...threadid=86332
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...threadid=80369
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...threadid=86332