0-200 in a C6 Z06 (Tach and Speedo view)!
04-28-2006, 04:39 PM
#5
Engineer
god damn that is fast... i love how it just jumps up like 5-10 mph on the shift from 1st to 2nd... some wheelspin prob...
04-28-2006, 05:26 PM
#7
Senior Moderator
seen faster.
Trending Topics
04-28-2006, 11:53 PM
#14
Senior Moderator
finally watched it, lol. the deceleration is crazy too!
04-29-2006, 03:41 AM
#17
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Donte99TL
Your R6 top speed is like 165 I think. You would beat to 165 though 
Some general bike performance data here:
http://sportrider.com/bikes/146_stre...ormance_times/
04-29-2006, 04:17 AM
#19
The Oracle of Acurazine!
Originally Posted by Donte99TL
Your R6 top speed is like 165 I think. You would beat to 165 though
04-29-2006, 09:59 AM
#21
I
I reat the article in motortrend and there's a pic of the lingenfelter litterally smoking it's tires (not just a chirp) at 125 mph while shifting into third. 
04-29-2006, 10:03 AM
#22
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
My old carburated '88 Accord could beat it from 2nd gear on
04-29-2006, 11:18 AM
#23
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
Actually, R6 vs Z06 on the street wouldn't be a bad race. On the street, the R6 is an 11-second bike and won't trap much higher than the Z06 in the 1/4, if at all. (But the R6 will do low-mid 10's @ close to 130 mph at the strip, when setup properly.) Now, I don't have 100% conclusive evidence on this - but I think the Z06 will beat the R6 from 0-150 - by a long shot. I couldn't find times for the R6 but the Z06 will do it in 17.5 sec. By comparison, a '05 Triumph Daytona 650 does the 1/4 in 10.94 @ 129 and 0-150 in 26 sec. '05 ZX-6RR does the 1/4 in 11.2 @ 129 and 0-150 in 26.1 sec <- both bikes comparable to the R6. I looked for a while on Google but came up empty. If anyone knows what the R6 will do 0-150 in, please, enlighten us.
Some general bike performance data here:
http://sportrider.com/bikes/146_stre...ormance_times/
Some general bike performance data here:
http://sportrider.com/bikes/146_stre...ormance_times/
04-29-2006, 11:24 AM
#24
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Maximized
A good driver in a Z06 would be a good race from a dig. R6s ain't low-mid 10 second bikes. My buddy Brian has a modded R6 and ran his an Byron. It ran something like low 11s. If you started from a highway roll, the Z06 would pull the R6 hard.
From Sport Rider April '05:
Honda CBR600 RR
1/4 Mile: 10.49 @ 133.3mph
Kawasaki ZX-6R
1/4 Mile: 10.38 @135.6mph
Suzuki GSX-R600
1/4 Mile: 10.62 @ 130.5mph
Triumph Daytona 650
1/4 Mile: 10.72 @ 129.1 mph
Yamaha YZF-R6
1/4 mile: 10.54 @132.9 mph
1/4 Mile: 10.49 @ 133.3mph
Kawasaki ZX-6R
1/4 Mile: 10.38 @135.6mph
Suzuki GSX-R600
1/4 Mile: 10.62 @ 130.5mph
Triumph Daytona 650
1/4 Mile: 10.72 @ 129.1 mph
Yamaha YZF-R6
1/4 mile: 10.54 @132.9 mph
04-29-2006, 11:38 AM
#25
Bagged hybrid
thats given that the rider can / have the balls to launch the bike hard.
the Z06 is pretty damn fast
Originally Posted by Maximized
A good driver in a Z06 would be a good race from a dig. R6s ain't low-mid 10 second bikes. My buddy Brian has a modded R6 and ran his an Byron. It ran something like low 11s. If you started from a highway roll, the Z06 would pull the R6 hard.
the Z06 is pretty damn fast
04-29-2006, 11:40 AM
#26
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
Look at the link above. Times for all past year R6's have been in the 10's. And this is not including the '05 and '06, which are faster. Look at times on the forums.
From Sport Rider April '05:
these newer 600's are pretty damn fast, eh?
From Sport Rider April '05:
these newer 600's are pretty damn fast, eh?
Last edited by Maximized; 04-29-2006 at 11:42 AM.
04-29-2006, 11:52 AM
#27
Senior Moderator
well sure. is that the R6's fault? 
serious though, call me a mag-racer but I don't have a bike so what am I going to base my times on. Same thing I'm gonna base my times on for cars I don't have. The Z06 did 11.5 @ 127 at the hands of a pro driver, what should I say, its actually a 12-second car? :0
btw "normal" ppl have got mid-high 10's on the R6.
no I don't know Brian.
serious though, call me a mag-racer but I don't have a bike so what am I going to base my times on. Same thing I'm gonna base my times on for cars I don't have. The Z06 did 11.5 @ 127 at the hands of a pro driver, what should I say, its actually a 12-second car? :0
btw "normal" ppl have got mid-high 10's on the R6.
no I don't know Brian.
04-29-2006, 11:58 AM
#28
The Oracle of Acurazine!
guys guys, my first post was supposed to be sarcasm but I'd still love to see race between z06 and 06 R6 (remember there are two R6 now, one is race bike and other is R6S).
04-29-2006, 12:02 PM
#30
Senior Moderator
ud lose Jatt, 
04-29-2006, 12:05 PM
#32
The Oracle of Acurazine!
Originally Posted by subinf
alright, jatts got the bike end covered. now we need someone to come up with a new z06
I need to work on my launch....
04-29-2006, 12:13 PM
#34
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Teh Jatt
I need to work on my launch....
04-30-2006, 12:43 PM
#35
Senior Moderator
Damn thing is fast!!!
Oh and i ran high 10's on my ZX-6R at the track left and right.
Oh and i ran high 10's on my ZX-6R at the track left and right.
04-30-2006, 01:10 PM
#36
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Damn thing is fast!!!
Oh and i ran high 10's on my ZX-6R at the track left and right.
Oh and i ran high 10's on my ZX-6R at the track left and right.
thank you.
btw.. got any vids?
04-30-2006, 01:18 PM
#37
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
well sure. is that the R6's fault?
serious though, call me a mag-racer but I don't have a bike so what am I going to base my times on. Same thing I'm gonna base my times on for cars I don't have. The Z06 did 11.5 @ 127 at the hands of a pro driver, what should I say, its actually a 12-second car? :0
btw "normal" ppl have got mid-high 10's on the R6.
no I don't know Brian.
serious though, call me a mag-racer but I don't have a bike so what am I going to base my times on. Same thing I'm gonna base my times on for cars I don't have. The Z06 did 11.5 @ 127 at the hands of a pro driver, what should I say, its actually a 12-second car? :0
btw "normal" ppl have got mid-high 10's on the R6.
no I don't know Brian.
05-01-2006, 02:01 AM
#40
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 37
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its in the new Motor Trend magazine. Its a Lingenfelter C6. They are doin compare of tuner cars vs a stock C6 Z06.
They test a Hennessey Viper, Accufab Ford GT, Lingenfelter C6, Livernois Mustang, MTI Pontiac GTO, and a stock C6 Z06
Oh yeah. They race all these cars on a new navel base in California. 3 miles
They also clock fighter jets. Close to 11 billion dollars worth of jets, etc, on the base.
They test a Hennessey Viper, Accufab Ford GT, Lingenfelter C6, Livernois Mustang, MTI Pontiac GTO, and a stock C6 Z06
Oh yeah. They race all these cars on a new navel base in California. 3 miles
They also clock fighter jets. Close to 11 billion dollars worth of jets, etc, on the base.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ITSJESTER
4G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
17
12-06-2018 02:29 AM
lanechanger
Member Cars for Sale
4
10-13-2015 10:56 AM
0150, 0200, 2006, bike, c6, gto, lingenfelter, motor, speedometer, stock, tachometer, time, trend, z06, zo6
