Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

those digital picture frames...

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #1  
is300eater's Avatar
Thread Starter
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 3,664
From: Vancouver BC
those digital picture frames...

okay, so for Christmas I decided I was going to get one of those digital picture frames (to give to someone) ... the particular one I ordered from Costco.com is also portable (has a battery so you can carry it around)... which is what sold me on... anyway the idea was to load up a SD card with tons of pictures and give it to someone... I got it in the mail yesterday... dropped the SD card in... and the quality sucks! It takes at least 5-10 seconds just to go from one pic to another (loading time). The resolution's terrible... pictures are stretched out There's no way I'm going to give this to the intended person...

My question is... are quality all the same on these things?

I'm going to return it at Costco...

Do you guys have any experience with these things? Or know of a brand that's got better resolution?

fyi, I got her the 7" screen but if the smaller ones have better quality, I'd rather get that instead
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 01:04 PM
  #2  
Whiskers's Avatar
Go Giants
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 70,003
Likes: 1,260
From: PA
I have a Phillips which seems good enough...
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 01:05 PM
  #3  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,134
Likes: 14,284
I had the same experience with one sometime in 2006.. was going to give it to someone as a gift. and I felt the same exact way! There's no way I could give this to anyone! I spent a good amount on it too :< I think it's resolution was pretty low though. It was my thinking that what you would ideally need to do is get one with a good resolution (like at least 800x600) and then resize all the pictures to that size. Yeah it's a PITA but I think that's what you have to do - maybe one of the much higher $$ are better at resizing but I think there are a LOT of crappy ones out there.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #4  
is300eater's Avatar
Thread Starter
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 3,664
From: Vancouver BC
whoa, that IS a PITA! But at least its only Dec.2nd... which gives me plenty of time to work on this... thanks!
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #5  
Shalooby's Avatar
Secret Agent
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,298
Likes: 31
From: N Va
I've been wanting to get one of these as well. From what I've found out so far, you get what you pay for. The one my mom has is decent. It was quite pricey but all they had to do was load the photos and go. No resizing or anything and the resolution is great.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #6  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,134
Likes: 14,284
I'm not surprised to hear that - the pricing on these varies wildly, for seemingly similar specs..
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 09:23 AM
  #7  
agean's Avatar
yeah i'm bored.
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
From: clifton, nj
Got one as a gift about two years ago from Brookstone, the quality is very good I'd say. Cost about $50 - $75 I think.

It does better with larger photos. If you have a small photo that it has to stretch to fit the frame, then it gets a little fuzzy.

There were lots of settings too, time between pics and all that. The transition from one pic to the next is very quick though, under a second I'd say.

It also plays mp3's, which is kind of retarted. It would be nice if the mp3 was a background to the pics, but it plays it as just a separate file. Meaning: one pic shows, then it goes black and plays the mp3 alone, than the music cuts off and it goes to the next pic. That's pointless.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 09:31 AM
  #8  
is300eater's Avatar
Thread Starter
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 3,664
From: Vancouver BC
thanks, do you know what brand it is?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 09:43 AM
  #9  
t_in_maine's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: FAR northern Maine
I've just purchased a small desktop one (4x6 photo) with a digital clock, calendar, temperature, etc... The resolution is OK, *because the display size is small and I have mostly large, high-quality photos on my card* but my probelem is, it tilts back to be able to sit on my desk, like an easel, and the lighting from the ceiling glares off the frame and I can hardly see the photos, I've got it sort of "propped" more forward, but still it's hard to see. Just an FYI if somebody is buying one like this.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #10  
agean's Avatar
yeah i'm bored.
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
From: clifton, nj
Originally Posted by is300eater
thanks, do you know what brand it is?
I'll check when I get back home, but off the top of my head I don't remember it being any familiar brand.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 12:12 PM
  #11  
JLatimer's Avatar
Creepy guy in the mirror.
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 35
From: Ontario, Canada
I have a 7" one that has less than tv resolution (480x234) when I first saw it I was really disappointed. I thought it was a complete waste of money.

But...

In reality how often do you sit and stare at a picture sitting on your end table and critique image quality. Typically they are used for memory photos and less than art photos. That being the case it is perfectly fine. The one I got serves it purpose very well - it sit on the window ledge and from time to time I glance over at it and smile at the image of the moment... Without even thinking of the details that are missed because of the abysmal resolution.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 01:49 PM
  #12  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
If only the frames could rotate automatically to match the portrait vs. landscape shots...
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 01:55 PM
  #13  
CorvettePoor's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Witness Protection Program Somewhere, USA
Go to Walmart photo center and look at the Kodak brand. They're a little pricey but are great quality.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 01:58 PM
  #14  
is300eater's Avatar
Thread Starter
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 3,664
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by CorvettePoor
Go to Walmart photo center and look at the Kodak brand. They're a little pricey but are great quality.
yeah, cnet gave one of them a good rating... but it had some kinda wifi feature that the person I'm giving it to won't need... I'll check it out tho...
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 02:22 PM
  #15  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,134
Likes: 14,284
after seeing this thread I checked around on digital frames and notice several on the market with "high definition" in their description.. might be what you're looking for.

Wow these really have erupted since the last time I really looked - B&H has 114 available!

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/shop/2...re_Frames.html
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 08:33 PM
  #16  
agean's Avatar
yeah i'm bored.
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
From: clifton, nj
http://www.amazon.com/Digital-Spectr.../dp/B000BP8AMY

That's the one I got. Out of stock, but maybe you can search the model # and find it somewhere else. I'm sure it's a bit outdated at this point, but it serves the purpose pretty well.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 02:14 AM
  #17  
Kikaida's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
A couple things I can think of...

First, is the frame you bought a widescreen version or a 4x3? I notice they sell both types, and the ones that are widescreen will stretch out the picture if you camera takes normal 4x3 pictures.

Also, I used to have a digital camera that would save a thumbnail in addition to the regular picture. I was not aware of this until I printed a bunch of pictures at costco, and I ended up with 2 sets, one set was good, and the other was total crap due to the small size of the thumbnail.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 11:22 AM
  #18  
ChodTheWacko's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 121
From: Ronkonkoma, NY
The digital picture frame I whipped together by frankensteining a 14" laptop is still going strong, and I love it to pieces. I hang mine on the wall of my cube.

If you are putting it on your desk, you really don't need a large one.
Definitely look for a picture frame that doesn't stretch pictures - that's silly.
And definitely resize your pictures down to the resolution of the frame.

My frame's resolution is 1024x768, and pictures shrunk to that size are tiny.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 09:24 AM
  #19  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Today QVC has one for $140.00 plus tax and shipping 11" frame. If you use a CC you can spilt the payments into 3 and it can be return until the Jan 31st. It will play mp3 and video.

http://www.qvc.com/
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 11:21 AM
  #20  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,134
Likes: 14,284
Originally Posted by is300eater
My question is... are quality all the same on these things?
definitely .. hope nobody bought one of these gems.

http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...-laden-digital

Best Buy sold malware-laden digital picture frames

Not saying much about it

By Egan Orion: Friday, 25 January 2008, 8:38 AM

US ELECTRONICS retailer Best Buy recently admitted that it sold digital picture frames over the holidays containing malicious software targetting Windows PCs. The LCD panels were "contaminated with a computer virus during the manufacturing process," the company said.

The company said that only a "limited number" of the malware infested digital picture frames were sold, but it hasn't revealed how many. The offending digital picture frames were Best Buy's house brand Insignia 10.4 inch items with part number NS-DPF10A. They have been discontinued and pulled, Best Buy said.

The company didn't reveal whether the malicious software is a mere virus or a more dangerous trojan, rootkit, bot or self-replicating worm. It said that only Windows PCs are vulnerable and that the malware payload would be detected by up-to-date antivirus software.

Best Buy said it's continuing to investigate the problem and is "connecting with our customers who may have been impacted."

Best Buy published a special toll-free help desk phone number for customers.

"We apologise for the inconvenience that has been caused as a result of this incident," it said in a statement posted online at its Insignia brand website.

Its PR department reportedly did not return a phone call requesting comment. µ
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 10:23 AM
  #21  
Ashburner's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,034
Likes: 10
From: Outside Houston
Guys, any updates on recommendations? I'm looking to get a high resolution 7-8" for valentines day for my fiance and load it up with pics via SD. Don't really need wi-fi as she doesn't have a pc at work where i intend her to use it.

Thanks...
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #22  
LKLD's Avatar
I've been Canonized ;)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 31
From: FL
If it has at least 800x600, you'll be fine......imo
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 08:55 PM
  #23  
is300eater's Avatar
Thread Starter
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 3,664
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by Ashburner
Guys, any updates on recommendations? I'm looking to get a high resolution 7-8" for valentines day for my fiance and load it up with pics via SD. Don't really need wi-fi as she doesn't have a pc at work where i intend her to use it.

Thanks...
sorry, I meant to reply to your post but couldn't remember the name until just now when I was at Bed Bath & Beyond... anyway, the one that I got for my parents that has great resolution/picture is by "Pamdigital"... I got it at Costco. My local Costco has since, switched to another brand but I'm quite certain it's made by the same people cuz the packaging looks very similar... What you can do is... after you're done compiling all the pictures on the SD card... take the SD card wherever you go, be it Costco or Best Buys... and just plug in the card to sample the quality with YOUR pictures

Last edited by is300eater; Feb 7, 2008 at 08:59 PM.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 04:22 PM
  #24  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
So, any new or revised recommendations?

I just picked up an 8" Pandigital from CC, but I am not really impressed with it. Even though it's 800x600, the image quality isn't that great and it doesn't deal with bright spots very well. It will most likely be going back. I might run to Costco and see what they have.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #25  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
I've been looking at this one, but the reviews are ALL of the board.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...pf_rd_i=507846
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 04:54 PM
  #26  
is300eater's Avatar
Thread Starter
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 3,664
From: Vancouver BC
sorry you're not happy with the Pandigital... the one I bought my parents seems pretty good...

btw, take your own SD card into Costco or wherever you go and try the demo with your own pictures

Last edited by is300eater; May 8, 2008 at 04:57 PM.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #27  
t_in_maine's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: FAR northern Maine
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
I've been looking at this one, but the reviews are ALL of the board.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...pf_rd_i=507846
I bought a SmartParts one from Circuit City based on its recommendations from Consumer Reports and user reviews.... but I bought it for a friend, so can't attest to its quality, etc.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 05:02 PM
  #28  
t_in_maine's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: FAR northern Maine
Originally Posted by t_in_maine
I bought a SmartParts one from Circuit City based on its recommendations from Consumer Reports and user reviews.... but I bought it for a friend, so can't attest to its quality, etc.

Linked here: (time limit )

link
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 06:25 PM
  #29  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
I'm really thrown at the reviews for these frames, it's not just a couple for or against. But totally across the board. Some have complete hate or complete at a boys for them, for the same item.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 06:27 PM
  #30  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,134
Likes: 14,284
Yeah this kind of thing is very subjective, you really have to go see it for yourself, WITH YOUR OWN pictures. Most places will let you bring a card in and try em out.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 06:36 PM
  #31  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by is300eater
sorry you're not happy with the Pandigital... the one I bought my parents seems pretty good...

btw, take your own SD card into Costco or wherever you go and try the demo with your own pictures
The one on display and the one I got seem to do will with landscapes, but not so well for people pictures. All of the bright spots get blown out beyond how they look on my monitor.

I saw a really nice looking Kodak screen, but aside from the price, it was widescreen. These aren't HD TVs - wtf is with widescreen frames?
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 04:42 PM
  #32  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
I went to Staples to look at frames and saw a Pandigital that looked pretty nice. The tag said it was a 9", but I didn't see any on the shelf. So, I asked a sales person about it and he got one from the back and brought it to the counter for me when I was ready. Not until after I bought it and got back to work did I realize the 9" was widescreen and NOT what I was looking at. Turns out the one I liked was an 8" :wtf: The one from CC was a different model number. Now I have two frames to return and one more to buy.

Cliffs -
- it appears the Pandigital 8" (PAN80-2) is actually a decent frame if you get the right one.
- I hate CC for having old/bad models, among several other reasons.
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 05:03 PM
  #33  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
Arghh!!... The more I search around the more confused I get.

There is actually a "touch-frame" version of the Pandigital that is due out soon (though some people already have them?!?! It has more memory (512MB) and touch controls in the "matted" area rather than on the screen. I was told I might be able to find one at Costco or Walmart. As much as I hate to, I might bite the bullet and go to Walmart, since the Costco I go to definitely didn't have them.
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 07:11 PM
  #34  
is300eater's Avatar
Thread Starter
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 3,664
From: Vancouver BC
that's the one I bought my parents... the 8" one
Reply
Old May 12, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #35  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by is300eater
that's the one I bought my parents... the 8" one
You got the "touch frame" version?

I checked out another Costco and no dice. So, we did the midnight run to Walmart (after Iron Man) and found exactly what I was looking for. The picture quality is way better than the one from CC, has more memory, the touch frame and was about $20 cheaper. Too bad my mom is out of town and had to settle for e-mailed pictures of the picture frame
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
08_UA7_Gr33k
Member Cars for Sale
13
Feb 11, 2016 02:17 PM
InFaMouSLink
Car Parts for Sale
3
Oct 30, 2015 09:43 AM
lanechanger
Member Cars for Sale
4
Oct 13, 2015 10:56 AM
MilanoRedDashR
3G TL (2004-2008)
5
Sep 27, 2015 10:15 PM
Matthew Purpura
1G CL (1997-1999)
3
Sep 25, 2015 06:10 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM.