Mizouse

yea the track and field event was canceled and i didn't goto the car meet, but tonight i will be shooting basketball so i will get to test out the lens with low light

Mizouse

I'm sure it will still be around, pretty sure the demand was crazy for it because of the instant rebates and the additional savings with the B&H coupon.

jupitersolo

Some have speculated that an upgraded version may be coming??

Mizouse

ohh.. wonder what they will change with it.

probably better prevention for the dust issue and a better more reliable version of IS?

moeronn

And maybe $200 cheaper?

Mizouse

ohh and maybe better flare prevention?

Dan Martin

I haven't had any issues with flare or dust in the last 10,000 frames with my 17-55.

I think it's just back ordered because of demand like Mizouse mentioned. Canon actually doesn't make the same lens all year long, they do them in batches. If one model sells better than predicted, there can be a couple week shortage + shipping time to refill shelves here.

Crazy Bimmer

I need to rent a lens for a week or so. Can someone recommend which one to get for my canon XT?

Im trying to get a macro lens that would be able to take close up pictures of circuit boards. Mainly the black flim thats in this pictures

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2019/...91630165_b.jpg

I need a shot like that but it being much more detailed and closer. Any advice?

Mizouse

EF-S 60mm macro?
EF 100mm macro?

Crazy Bimmer

Forgot to also ask, know of any places that rents out lens?

wndrlst

I've used lensrentals.com. I was very happy with their service.

jupitersolo

You also might want to use an extension tube with the macro to get even closer. The size just depends on how close you'll need to get.

Dan Martin

I found that a set of extension tubes is a valuable investment. Even a standard 50mm lens can be turned into a high magnification macro with a few mm of extension.

Crazy Bimmer

Thanks guys.

So something like this should work...?

Canon 100mm f2.8 Macro http://www.lensrentals.com/item/canon-100mm-f2.8-macro

with

Canon 1.4X teleconverter http://www.lensrentals.com/item/cano...-teleconverter

Total: $60.00 to rent for 3 days.

Dan Martin

Teleconverters don`t help with magnification, they just increase the working distance. Extension tubes will let you work closer, hence increasing magnification.

The 100mm macro is a good choice though and should meet your needs without any other extras.

Dan Martin

Oops, I was half asleep when I posted that... yes, the 1.4x converter will magnify 1.4x. It doesn`t let you move closer though.

Crazy Bimmer

Thank Dan!

So something like this instead? http://www.lensrentals.com/item/extension-tube-set

Dan Martin

Ya, that`s the set I use and they work great. In all likelihood though, just the normal 1:1 magnification of the 100mm macro will probably be more than enough for your sort of work.

Dan Martin

The real trick you're going to run into is trying to keep the subject parallel to the focal plane, then trying to get enough light on it. What I would suggest is to get a little tabletop tripod for your camera, then get a little vice clamp for your circuit boards. Flip the boards so they're standing vertically, and use a nice bright lamp to light the surface.

Crazy Bimmer

Dan you tha man! Thanks for the advice!

Will report back once i try this...

Dan Martin

No problem. You're going to have a little bit of a learning curve trying to get used to macro photography.

To start, try turning the lens to it's closest focus point, then move the camera forward or backwards to bring your subject into focus. Then, if the subject still doesn't fill enough of the frame, try adding the 12mm ring. If that doesn't work keep adding rings until the subject is big enough.
The rings will cause some light loss, so the more extension you use, the longer your exposure times will be. That shouldn't be a problem if your camera is on a tripod and your subject isn't moving though. The macro world is a cool one, so I'm looking forward to your shots!

moeronn

The 17-55 EF-S is back in stock at B+H.... what to do, what to do?

The Dougler

iTrader: (1)

EF 50mm f/1.8 should be here tomorrow, looks like ups is getting another 20 bucks outta me. Funny thing is I bought from this store once before and used the same shipping method and was not charged the first time. Arrrgh I hate UPS!

Mizouse

DO IT

The Dougler

iTrader: (1)

EF 50 f/1.8 has arrived with $41 in additional UPS fees I think I'm done buying shit online for awhile.

Dan Martin

Next time, go with UPS Expedited because it includes brokerage and it gets here faster. Typically it's only $15 to $20 more than standard.

The Dougler

iTrader: (1)

Funny story about that, I had purchased an Item from this vendor before, and they're shipping rates are just price brackets, so if your order is between 0.00-100.00 it's just a flat fee of 19.95. The last item I purchased from them it was sent UPS expedited and I paid no additional fees, so I thought I was good to go for this as it fit the same requirements, Boy was I wrong. I guess because the box was a little bigger or whatever they sent it ground

New policy, I'm not ordering shit till they confirm method.

jupitersolo

I'd contact the seller/shipper and let the know what happened, this time as well as last. Let them know this inhibits your chances of buying from the again. Maybe they'll pushed back some money your way.

drigo

ok so it's tax season..i'm looking to replace my kit lens on my 40D...
i'm torn between 2 lenses...
17-55mm f/2.8 IS and 24-70mm f/2.8 L
suggestions/recomendations ?

The Dougler

iTrader: (1)

Email was sent earlier today.

Mizouse

personally i went with the 17-55 because i tend to shoot wide angle quite a bit. now if you arn't the type to shoot wide angle then go with 24-70

jupitersolo

On a 40D the 24-70 is 38-112, what do you want to do. Get a faster lens or lengthen your reach? If you want to lengthen your reach go with 70-200, if you want to spend the same $$$ go with the 4.0 IS.

drigo

i love to shoot wide angle...i have the 10-20mm

drigo

i think i'd rather have a faster lens since i also already have the 70-200 f/4L

wackjum

24 is a bit tight on a cropped body. Its a great lens though. And good to have if you ever plan on upgrading to the EOS-5D.

Its no coincidence that 17-55 comes out to around the same range as the 24-70 on a cropped body. The 24-70 was the walkaround lens of choice for film cameras back in the day.

If you're looking for a general all-around lens, I would recommend the 17-55. Either way, welcome to fast glass.

drigo

thanks guys...i am looking for a general walk-arounds lens...
iv'e read/seen nothing but great things about both lenses...so i know i can't go wrong with either...i just can't decide..oh well..i have a few weeks to decide

The Dougler

iTrader: (1)

Too add insult to injury, the lens is on sale for $99 CAD at bestbuy starting today

drigo

17-55 f/2.8 IS is out of stock again

Crazy Bimmer

Thanks Dan for the help. This is harder than i thought it would be but im slowly getting the hang of it.

Heres a couple test shots...







Any tips are always welcomed.

Dan Martin

The last one looks really cool!

The trick to capturing flat surfaces is to keep them completely parallel to the front of the lens. The depth of field is so shallow with a macro at this distance that even a couple degrees out of parallel will make a big difference.

A simple white or black background also helps to isolate the subject. Try this: put a sheet of white paper down (or use a white table) , then put your subject on a piece of glass. Lift the glass a few inches above the white background, shine some light on the white paper or table. The backlight will give some really nice definition to your subject, but you'll also need a light in front to expose properly.

Did you rent extension tubes with the macro too?