Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

My First Wedding

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 18, 2014 | 12:42 PM
  #1  
Nicks2001tl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,515
Likes: 505
From: New Berlin, WI.
My First Wedding

The wedding was at 5:30 and at the last minute my sister in law says they don`t have a Photographer and I have to take the pictures. Did it pro bono.








Reply
Old Mar 19, 2014 | 05:42 AM
  #2  
einsatz's Avatar
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 445
From: Washington, DC
Love that red brick path.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 09:46 PM
  #3  
Steven Bell's Avatar
Team Owner
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 36,545
Likes: 6,470
From: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Very nice.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 09:51 PM
  #4  
LoveMyTL-S's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,999
Likes: 362
From: St. Cloud, FL
Some nice shots. I also shot my first wedding this past weekend. It was my brothers wedding and he didn't hire a photographer.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2014 | 11:08 AM
  #5  
Italiano's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,432
Likes: 486
From: North Carolina
First pic the composition is way off and blurry..I would have gotten lower and shot it vertically..You have to watch your cropping of fingers, hands etc.. as well. Shooting with a shallower DOF whould have isolated the subjects better to make it pop..Post-processing looks flat. I would bump the contrast up atleast..
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2014 | 11:30 AM
  #6  
Italiano's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,432
Likes: 486
From: North Carolina
untitled-4013.jpg


I cropped some of the negative space from top and re-touched the jpeg..
This is your strongest image out of the batch.. Click on pic to see it bigger..
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2014 | 12:20 PM
  #7  
pttl's Avatar
My first Avatar....
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 33,040
Likes: 9,137
From: NJ
*sigh

Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 10:48 AM
  #8  
Nicks2001tl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,515
Likes: 505
From: New Berlin, WI.



Shot the whole wedding with the 18-55 kit lens. After this it prompted me to buy some better glass. I was happy enough and the bride and groom (friends of over 20 years) were ecstatic.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 11:11 AM
  #9  
Italiano's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,432
Likes: 486
From: North Carolina
What glass did you buy?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 11:25 AM
  #10  
Nicks2001tl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,515
Likes: 505
From: New Berlin, WI.
Bought a 17-85. Now I am thinking of doing an upgrade from that. I have 5 lens and my goal is to replace all of them with either a nicer walk around lens or combo with telephoto.


And I hope nobody asks me to shoot a wedding at the last minute again. Haha. Especially one I was invited to.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 11:30 AM
  #11  
Italiano's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,432
Likes: 486
From: North Carolina
Fast glass is the way to go for sure...2.8 or lower...
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 11:45 AM
  #12  
Nicks2001tl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,515
Likes: 505
From: New Berlin, WI.
I have convinced myself that a better lens would have yielded better results. The 18-55 is a nice kit lens, but as I get into photography more and more there are some options out there I want to explore.


Here is a few I have been looking at:
Canon 17-55 f2.8
Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4
Canon 15-85 f3.5-f5.6 (this one is the direct replacement to the 17-85)
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 11:56 AM
  #13  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 50,494
Likes: 5,869
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Originally Posted by Nicks2001tl
I have convinced myself that a better lens would have yielded better results.
How so?

Anyone can convince themselves that throwing money into gear will make them better, one of those very people is posting in here now...

I'll jump real quick and mention a couple things...and I'll do it without being a complete douchebag and just retouching your photos with asking your permission.

The quality of the images you posted are fine. Good even. What you need to concentrate on is your composition (head room/lead space/etc) which focal length to use when, and getting the shot in focus.

You have some decent shots in your posted selection from someone with little experience who was singled out last minute to shoot. You just need to hone your skills before you start dropping coin.

Example, you have a vertical/portrait frame of a row of guests...it would have been better as a horizontal/landscape shot maybe taking a step or 3 back.

Keep practicing...worry about spending money later.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 12:03 PM
  #14  
Mr. Maker's Avatar
Team Owner
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 22,957
Likes: 3,630
From: Southeast, Va
.......
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 04:47 PM
  #15  
Italiano's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,432
Likes: 486
From: North Carolina
Putting better glass in front of your camera will help your photography by allowing you to shoot better in low-light situations and help with DOF..Not to mention better build quality and lens elements, coatings etc...If you have the $$ and really hooked on shooting. Then go for it Nick..Camera bodies come and go. But the glass makes all the difference...
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2014 | 04:51 PM
  #16  
Italiano's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,432
Likes: 486
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by Nicks2001tl
I have convinced myself that a better lens would have yielded better results. The 18-55 is a nice kit lens, but as I get into photography more and more there are some options out there I want to explore.


Here is a few I have been looking at:
Canon 17-55 f2.8
Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4
Canon 15-85 f3.5-f5.6 (this one is the direct replacement to the 17-85)
Out of those 3 I would choose the first one..But if you want to get more into shooting people, then the longer lenses will be more flattering for portraiture or events of people..The 85mm 1.8L would be one of the best lens for that..But for events the 70mm-200mm 2.8L would be more versatile. Just depends on what type of photographer you want to be..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PortlandRL
Car Talk
2
Sep 14, 2015 12:01 PM
AccordFlex
Car Parts for Sale
4
Sep 4, 2015 01:07 PM
Chief F1 Fan
Motorsports News
1
Feb 1, 2003 09:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.