Focal length comparison: 10mm - 200mm
08-07-2007, 06:18 PM
#41
Earth-bound misfit
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
No, I'm OK. I think that I'll be waiting to see what Canon has in store for the 5D's predecessor. Thanks for thinking of me. How's the NW??
Good stuff. Good hiking. 
08-07-2007, 06:18 PM
#42
Earth-bound misfit
Originally Posted by srika
thanks for clearing that up - I was about to chop it into thirds!
But seriously, do you see yourself switching bodies any time soon?
08-07-2007, 06:26 PM
#43
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by wndrlst
But seriously, do you see yourself switching bodies any time soon?
08-08-2007, 09:16 AM
#44
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
I don't see myself using sRAW if I had it. I wouldn't want to limit myself to such a small (2.5 mp) pic just like I don't want to limit myself by taking jpegs. What situations do you think you'd use it the most?
08-08-2007, 11:36 AM
#45
Senior Moderator
Well if they did it on the 5d I would think sRAW would be at what, like 6.3MP or so (if Im understanding the concept correctly). Which for the club stuff, would be just fine. And, I would get the luxury of RAW processing. Which is really helpful in those low light conditions.
08-08-2007, 03:28 PM
#47
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
I went and looked at the 24-105 today... I really want that lens. Couldn't bring myself to get it yet though, it's just not wide enough. My new plan is to acquire the 10-22 now.
08-08-2007, 03:33 PM
#48
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by danny25
I don't know, it's about 1/4 of the mp on the MK3, so it would only be about 3.2 on the 5D if they stuck to the same formula.
09-06-2007, 09:46 PM
#49
The Creator
Originally Posted by Speed_Racer
I did this a couple years back when I picked up the 10-22mm and the 100-400mm Canon lenses. All from the same spot on a tripod.
that's a wicked comparo
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IBankMouse
1G TSX (2004-2008)
8
06-13-2020 12:53 PM
lanechanger
Member Cars for Sale
4
10-13-2015 10:56 AM
