Sept Road & Track/Car and Driver: USA vs Europe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2006, 09:29 PM
  #1  
dom
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Sept Road & Track/Car and Driver: USA vs Europe

Can't scan it and the full articles aren't on-line yet but here are some numbers to chew on for now. Great reads BTW.

Road & Track

Z06, Viper, Ford GT vs 911 Turbo, Gallardo, F430

0-60
Z06 - 4.1
Viper - 4.2
GT - 3.8

Gallardo - 3.9
911 - 3.9
F430 - 3.8

1/4 Mile
Z06 - 12.2 @118.7
Viper - 12.3 @116.5
GT - 11.7 @126.1

Gallardo - 12.3 @ 115.6
911 - 12.3 @113.7
F430 - 11.9 @123.3

Lap Times(1.74 mile)
Z06 - 1:19.5
Viper - 1:19.5
GT - 1:19.8

Gallardo - 1:17.8
911 - 1:20.0
F430 - 1:17.4

0-100-0
Z06 - 13.1
Viper - 13.5
GT - 12.4

Gallardo - 13.0
911 - 13.4
F430 - 12.5

Its important to note that R&T makes no adjustments to these times as do other mags. They report exactly what they get. Interesting considering the results C&D got from 3 of these competitors.



Car & Driver

0-60
Z06 - 3.5
911 - 3.4
F430 - 4.1*

1/4 Mile
Z06 - 11.7 @123
911 - 11.7 @121
F430 - 12.5 @116*

Lap Times (1.6 mile)
Z06 - 1:15.85/75.9(mph)
911 - 1:17.55/74.3
F430 - 1:18.20/73.7

*Test results from Aug 2005. Ferrari couldn't provide C&D with a car so they used a customer's car and standing start runs were not allowed. So the data isn't really accurate.

1st - F430
2nd - 911 Turbo
3rd - Z06

R&T's conclusion.

"There's no clear winner. Both sides showed alot of heart, the europeans have the edge in overall handling finesse, sophistication and sheer high revving excitement, whereas the Americans show their mettle with big pistons, thundering tourque and a general blunt-force trauma approach to battle. Of course, the Europeans are the far procier lot, but the stop watch registers in seconds, not dollar signs."
Old 08-02-2006, 09:43 PM
  #2  
Engineer
 
savage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston
Age: 41
Posts: 4,525
Received 76 Likes on 53 Posts
that first set of Z06 results seemed slower than expected...
Old 08-02-2006, 09:49 PM
  #3  
dom
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Not the first time R&T has tested the Z06 that "slow" If I recall their previous test was also pretty similar. 4.1 as well.

The F430 was kind of surprising for me. But I think its also important to mention that since the testing took place in Europe, R&T may have used a Euro spec F430 F1 which has launch control for better standing start times which isn't available on US spec F430's. Although the article doesn't get into that.
Old 08-02-2006, 10:19 PM
  #4  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
My type of thread!

Im actually really shocked how well the Gallardo did.
Old 08-02-2006, 11:36 PM
  #5  
Senior Moderator
 
West6MT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
Age: 41
Posts: 9,232
Received 165 Likes on 127 Posts
I have not read the article yet (trying to get through last months R&T and my F1 mag before I start on this R&T issue), but I am looking forward to reading this one. Maybe I will just read it tomorrow so I can participate in the discussion.

Just skimming over the numbers though (in the actual mag), I was surprised at some of the 911's numbers (ie a tad slower than I expected).
Old 08-03-2006, 12:48 AM
  #6  
Suzuka Master
 
Maximized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pathetic times! The Ford GT times are the worst. 11.9@126...HAHA!! It just proves that Road and Track is the WORST car magazine. A 126 trap is good for low 11s. The Z06 traps are off about 6-7 mph too. It appears to me that they can only get good times out of cars that do the driving for themselves. All the cars with true manuals had SLOW ET's and traps.
Old 08-03-2006, 05:55 PM
  #7  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think whats important is that all cars were tested together, not that the times posted are the fastest for each car. It shows what is what among the cars tested.
Old 08-03-2006, 09:11 PM
  #8  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
The C&D Test here:

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...911-turbo.html
Old 08-03-2006, 09:15 PM
  #9  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
On paper, the Z06 Corvette is the best car here. It accelerates as quickly as the 911 Turbo through the quarter and wastes both the Porsche and Ferrari at speeds above 120 mph. How about 0 to 150 mph in 17.7 seconds? That’s up there in Ford GT territory, if not as stupid fast as a McLaren F1. The Z06 has the most grip at 1.01 g and the best braking performance. On an autobahn, it was still accelerating while the Ferrari was topped out in sixth gear at 186 mph. Around our road course, it was an easy victor, 1.7 seconds quicker than the Porsche on a near-76-second lap. It does all this for about a third of the Ferrari’s price. The Z06 is the best performance value in the world, period.

...

But impressive as it is, the Z06 just isn’t as good as the two others. It might stop from 70 mph in the shortest distance — 146 feet — but the brake-pedal feel isn’t as good as the Ferrari’s and Porsche’s. The shifter is a bit crude and requires relatively high effort. The steering has plenty of weight but isn’t very linear and lacks feel.

Around the handling course, light weight works to the Corvette’s benefit, but it is tricky to drive fast, and you had better be able to deal with power oversteer. If you can, it’s a lot of fun. In the wet, with the stability system disengaged, the car is a horror show, understeering on turn-in and snapping into oversteer with power. Correct, hold the attitude on the throttle, and — whoa! — the car snaps back the other way as you straighten, a corollary of the slightly numb steering and vicious torque reaction. At speed on the highway, we didn’t think it was as stable as the other cars here, the way the hood and mirrors flapped around was disconcerting, and the ride was choppy over broken pavement. Hit a bump in the middle of a corner, and you can become a passenger.

Also on the debit side, the interior looks decidedly low rent in this company. Sure, it’s the cheapest car here, so we will cut it some slack, but we’re confident that Z06 buyers would be willing to spend an extra five grand for an interior that has plastics and leather that are comparable with the Porsche’s. And although the seats are comfortable enough over long journeys, they lack lateral support and feel flimsy.

So the Corvette places last, but being a strong contender in this company is a victory for Chevrolet. Look at it this way: Finishing third in this test is like getting a date with Jessica Simpson rather than Claudia Schiffer or Monica Bellucci.

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...vette-z06.html
Old 08-03-2006, 09:17 PM
  #10  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
The Z06 is also impressive because the 911T just came out and it's smoked out of the factory by the Z06, which is already a year old.
Old 08-04-2006, 10:36 PM
  #11  
Burning Brakes
 
AlterZgo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 950
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Maximized
Pathetic times! The Ford GT times are the worst. 11.9@126...HAHA!! It just proves that Road and Track is the WORST car magazine. A 126 trap is good for low 11s. The Z06 traps are off about 6-7 mph too. It appears to me that they can only get good times out of cars that do the driving for themselves. All the cars with true manuals had SLOW ET's and traps.
As noted by the original poster, R&T does NOT do any corrections for altitude, weather conditions, etc. whereas C&D does. This is why C&D typically posts better results than R&T. It's not that the R&T test drivers suck. In fact, I think a couple of the older writers/testers for R&T were world F1 champions so I wouldn't say that they suck.
Old 08-05-2006, 11:39 AM
  #12  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Maximized
Pathetic times! The Ford GT times are the worst. 11.9@126...HAHA!! It just proves that Road and Track is the WORST car magazine. A 126 trap is good for low 11s. The Z06 traps are off about 6-7 mph too. It appears to me that they can only get good times out of cars that do the driving for themselves. All the cars with true manuals had SLOW ET's and traps.
C+D adjusts for climate conditions. I am sure RT folks can drive.

Z06 and GT numbers have been variying a lot since last year. For the Z06 I have seen from 11.7 to 12.2 as I can remember.
Old 08-05-2006, 11:42 AM
  #13  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Dam that 430 is a monster.
Old 08-06-2006, 11:07 PM
  #14  
Suzuka Master
 
Maximized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
C+D adjusts for climate conditions. I am sure RT folks can drive.

Z06 and GT numbers have been variying a lot since last year. For the Z06 I have seen from 11.7 to 12.2 as I can remember.
Nothing wrong with corrected numbers if they are done across the board. R&T is notorious for posting slow times. Sorry, I've seen plenty of Z06 times and those traps are way off. That would lead me to think that they are A. Slow Shifters or B. Short shifting. I can understand a mph or two difference, but not THAT much.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
Euro4gen
2G RL (2005-2012)
11
12-12-2015 03:14 AM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM
rockyboy
2G RDX (2013-2018)
0
09-23-2015 12:19 AM



Quick Reply: Sept Road & Track/Car and Driver: USA vs Europe



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM.