J.D. Power: Initial Quality News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2008, 09:31 PM
  #81  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Built in Japan
hmm trying to think the only nissan models built in japan are the murano, rogue, GT-R, and 350z?
Old 06-05-2008, 09:33 PM
  #82  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,640
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by Mokos23
hmm trying to think the only nissan models built in japan are the murano, rogue, GT-R, and 350z?
Not sure. I just know Infinitis are all built in Japan
Old 06-05-2008, 10:22 PM
  #83  
Advanced
 
amv12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 39
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Not sure. I just know Infinitis are all built in Japan
Theres a plaque under the hood of my G35 that proudly reads "Made in Japan"
Old 06-05-2008, 10:41 PM
  #84  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by amv12
Theres a plaque under the hood of my G35 that proudly reads "Made in Japan"
i did some research and the only Infiniti not made in Japan is the QX56 based Armada.
Old 06-05-2008, 10:44 PM
  #85  
Three Wheelin'
 
vishnus11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lexington
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Lets see how these same vehicles are after 3, 5 and 10 years

Initial quality means NOTHING in these surveys anyway.

What counts as a problem? Is 1 engine falling out the same as 1 rattle that the service department technician can't duplicate?
At least someone gets it.

THIS SURVEY = A PILE OF SHIT

Someone close this thread and lets move on. By discussing this crap we give more attention and publicity to this J.D. Power sham of a survey.

Like Ken said - what the hell constitutues a problem. A sticking cupholder = a spun bearing. Puh-lease.

And the survey is done by customer. Is a BMW customer going to be as tolerant of a erratic cupholder as a Kia owner?

What a BS survey and a waste of server space.
Old 06-06-2008, 07:42 AM
  #86  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,891
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
Originally Posted by Mokos23
i did some research and the only Infiniti not made in Japan is the QX56 based Armada.
Indeed. In prior years, it was the Canton, Miss. built QX56 alone that adversely affected Infiniti's quality ratings.
Old 06-06-2008, 08:54 AM
  #87  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
Indeed. In prior years, it was the Canton, Miss. built QX56 alone that adversely affected Infiniti's quality ratings.
so, is it still hurting them?
Old 06-06-2008, 10:33 AM
  #88  
Suzuka Master
 
mrdeeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mokos23
so, is it still hurting them?
considering it's the 2nd highest rated "Large Premium MAV", it's probably helping them.
Old 06-06-2008, 11:11 AM
  #89  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think acura is so low cause of the TL and RDX are made in ohio then, the MDX is made in Canada
Old 06-06-2008, 03:40 PM
  #90  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SeCsTaC




vs 2007



where on the jdpower website is this article and graph of this? i can't locate it.
Old 06-07-2008, 11:17 AM
  #91  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
The CLK winning its segment was my red flag. It does not make sense, the car is worn out at this point. Every year I get in it and it looks and feels older and older. Very weird for people to be so satisfied with it.

Glad to see Audi do better.
Old 06-07-2008, 07:25 PM
  #92  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,182
Received 1,143 Likes on 817 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
The CLK winning its segment was my red flag. It does not make sense, the car is worn out at this point. Every year I get in it and it looks and feels older and older. Very weird for people to be so satisfied with it.

Glad to see Audi do better.
I guess much of the satisfaction with the CLK is contributed by the MB brand name.
Old 06-22-2009, 03:21 PM
  #93  
Racer
 
msl82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 41
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 Initial Vehicle Quality

NEW YORK – Ford, General Motors and Chrysler have made strides in new vehicle quality over the last year, but they still lag behind their foreign competitors, according to a closely watched study released Monday by J.D. Power and Associates.

The initial quality of 2009 model year vehicles sold by the Detroit Three improved by an average of 10 percent from last year, the marketing and consulting company said. Industrywide, scores improved an average of 8 percent.
"The Detroit automakers are keeping their focus on designing and building high-quality vehicles, which is a precondition for long-term success," said David Sargent, vice president of automotive research at J.D. Power, in a statement.


Lexus, Toyota Motor Corp.'s luxury line, was the top brand in J.D. Power's initial quality study, an annual survey of vehicle owners that measures mechanical and design problems in the first 90 days of ownership.
Porsche was the No. 2 brand, followed by GM's Cadillac, then Hyundai and Honda.

Toyota, which supplanted General Motors Corp. as the world's largest automaker last year, also swept 10 vehicle segment awards. Its assembly facility in Higashi-Fuji, Japan, that builds the Lexus SC 430 and the Toyota Corolla took the J.D. Power's top plant award.

The worst-performing brand was Mini, with owners reporting 165 problems per 100 vehicles. Though Chrysler's scores improved year over year, it had no brands above the industry average. It tied for one segment award, with its PT Cruiser Wagon sharing the top award in the compact activity vehicle segment with Honda's CR-V. Chrysler, however, is discontinuing the car.

Cadillac and Chevrolet were GM's only two brands whose 2009 models performed above average. The four brands GM is purging under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection — Pontiac, Saturn, Hummer and Saab — were the company's worst rated. The Chevrolet TrailBlazer and GMC Yukon SUVs were rated best in their segments.
Jamie Hresko, GM's vice president for global quality, said the automaker has worked hard to improve vehicle quality over the last five years. Chevrolet and Cadillac account for 70 percent of GM's volume, he said, and top marks for those segments are an indication the effort is paying off.
"Is it where we need to be? No," Hresko said. "To have our core brands — Cadillac and Chevrolet — be on par with Toyota, we have reached a level of quality that will allow us to change perceptions."

Ford Motor Co., the only major U.S. automaker that has not filed for bankruptcy protection or accepted government aid, also saw scores improve for three of its four brands: Ford, Mercury and Volvo. But its Lincoln brand's score fell, and only Ford and Mercury performed above the industry average.

The average industry score improved to 108 problems per 100 vehicles, down from 118 in 2008.
J.D. Power credited the improvement to several well-received new models that were launched in 2009. It said vehicles like Hyundai's Genesis, Kia's Borrego, Toyota's Venza and Volkswagen's CC performed better than their segment averages. Several redesigned 2009 models also scored well, J.D. Power said.

The scores come during a tumultuous time for the auto industry, with sales at their worst level in decades and taxpayers stuck funding the restructuring of GM and Chrysler Group LLC to the tune of billions of dollars. Although the two automakers have been pummeled by the economic crisis, many analysts have complained that a shortage of high-quality small car offerings has hobbled their performance in the down market.

GM has several new, small vehicles on the way that industry analysts say should help it better compete with established offerings from Toyota, Honda and other foreign competitors. It plans to start building the subcompact Chevrolet Cruze next year and says it will get about 40 miles per gallon. It also plans to sell the Chevrolet Spark minicar in the U.S. in 2011.

The road may be tougher for Chrysler. Cars like the sporty 500 made by its new owner, Italy's Fiat Group SpA, won't make it to the U.S. until late next year. The Auburn Hills, Mich., company plans to roll out new versions of its popular Jeep Grand Cherokee SUV and Chrysler 300 large sedan by the end of next year, along with a rechargeable electric vehicle, but these plans likely have been delayed by the bankruptcy process.

J.D. Power's rankings were based on questionnaires from 80,900 people who bought or leased new 2009 vehicles between February and May. The questionnaires ask 228 questions on issues from handling, braking and engine trouble, to seat comfort and stereo systems.
The rankings are closely watched by automakers and consumers, and are frequently used in advertising. However, some critics question whether they show any real statistical difference between automakers. Mini's ranking, for example, equates to 1.65 problems per vehicle. Top-performer Lexus had 84 problems per 100 vehicles, or 0.84 per vehicle. So on average, less than one problem per vehicle separates the best brand from the worst.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090622/...ehicle_quality

It seems like for initial quality, Hyundai > Honda.

Its only a matter of time that Hyundai will be permanently better than Honda in quality over time, just give us, the proud Koreans, 3-4 years.

Last edited by msl82; 06-22-2009 at 03:24 PM.
Old 06-22-2009, 03:44 PM
  #94  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 44
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Long term quality is more important than initial quality. I don't even look at this study much.
Old 06-22-2009, 04:02 PM
  #95  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
^ Yeah, initial quality doesn't really mean too much to me either. Anyone can polish a turd to look good at first.

While Hyundai has come a long way and I would seriously consider the Genesis (coupe or sedan) myself... they still need to prove themselves in long-term quality in order to be considered with Toyota, Honda, or Nissan (as well as their luxury counterparts)...
Old 06-22-2009, 04:03 PM
  #96  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
Long term quality is more important than initial quality. I don't even look at this study much.
Old 06-22-2009, 04:15 PM
  #97  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,385
Received 22,761 Likes on 13,958 Posts
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
to the ...



And merged...
Old 06-23-2009, 03:35 AM
  #98  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,334
Received 625 Likes on 504 Posts
Originally Posted by msl82
[URL]
Its only a matter of time that Hyundai will be permanently better than Honda in quality over time, just give us, the proud Koreans, 3-4 years.
That's what folks thought of Toyota 10 years ago over GM. That permenantely thing is not so permanent.
Old 06-23-2009, 07:01 AM
  #99  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,891
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
Long term quality is more important than initial quality. I don't even look at this study much.
I just scanned through the article to determine whether its IQS or VDS. Since it is IQS my only respons was :meh: .

Let's see how the PT Cruiser fares after 5 years vs that same CR-V. And we know how that'll go. As for Hyundai...we'll see.
Old 06-23-2009, 07:25 AM
  #100  
Safety Car
 
TSX69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 4,789
Received 1,400 Likes on 704 Posts
Lightbulb Hyundai

I think that it was last year or so that JD Powers pointed out that altho Hyundai scored well in the Initial Quality Survey, the same people experienced far more problems 3 years down the road in the Long Term Study.

Toyota/Lexus started slipping ~2006 but the president apologized & announced that they would do better last year & it looks like they are on their way. I would imagine that Honda/Acura would do the same if their reliability started tanking.
Old 06-23-2009, 07:21 PM
  #101  
YEH
Burning Brakes
 
YEH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 972
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by juniorbean
^ Yeah, initial quality doesn't really mean too much to me either. Anyone can polish a turd to look good at first.

While Hyundai has come a long way and I would seriously consider the Genesis (coupe or sedan) myself... they still need to prove themselves in long-term quality in order to be considered with Toyota, Honda, or Nissan (as well as their luxury counterparts)...
IQS and VDS measure two different things.

IQS, aside from early mechanical breakdowns, measures fit/finish, ease of use, etc.

But yeah, long-term reliability is more important.

Btw, Hyundai's long-term reliability (according to JD Power, CR and Auto Bild) has surpassed Nissan's for a no. of years.
Old 06-23-2009, 07:25 PM
  #102  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,189
Received 4,843 Likes on 2,583 Posts
Originally Posted by msl82
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090622/...ehicle_quality
Its only a matter of time that Hyundai will be permanently better than Honda in quality over time, just give us, the proud Koreans, 3-4 years.
You may be proud but you certainly don't know grammar for shit.

Shut up already and go drive around in your Nissan.
Old 06-23-2009, 07:40 PM
  #103  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
The most annoying kind of fanboy is the persistent, not-yet-permabanned one....

That said, I'll agree with the belief that initial quality is a false indicator of ultimate dependability. Some cars have problems initially in the first year or so then once those are rectified, the cars end up to not be problematic at all. On the other hand, some cars may be perfect in the first year or years of ownership, then all of a sudden an ugly problem rears its head up. A blown tranny 3 years down the road is a bigger deal than a faulty window regulator within 6 months of ownership
Old 06-23-2009, 09:24 PM
  #104  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,182
Received 1,143 Likes on 817 Posts
Originally Posted by TSX69
I think that it was last year or so that JD Powers pointed out that altho Hyundai scored well in the Initial Quality Survey, the same people experienced far more problems 3 years down the road in the Long Term Study.

.....

I agree that long term quality is more important that initial quality. One example is that Audi vehicles tend to fall apart starting at the 4th year of ownership - as soon as the 4-year-bumper-to-bumper factory warranty has expired.

Initial quality problems will be fixed free by the dealerships, whereas long term quality problems will be fixed out of your own pocket.
Old 06-24-2009, 08:48 AM
  #105  
Racer
 
msl82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 41
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe there is a correlation between initial quality to the long-term dependability/reliability. It may not always be true in terms of cause and effect/outcome, however, i believe there is a linear relationships between these two factors.

If you look at the long-term dependability of these cars, most of them also appear on initial quality survey.

Old 06-24-2009, 06:50 PM
  #106  
Safety Car
 
Gilgamesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SLC, UT
Age: 43
Posts: 4,954
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by msl82
I believe there is a correlation between initial quality to the long-term dependability/reliability. It may not always be true in terms of cause and effect/outcome, however, i believe there is a linear relationships between these two factors.

If you look at the long-term dependability of these cars, most of them also appear on initial quality survey.

Yes, because Mitsubishis, Lincolns, Mercurys and Jaguars are well known for lasting forever.
Old 06-24-2009, 06:54 PM
  #107  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
^^
Old 06-24-2009, 10:17 PM
  #108  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,613 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Cadillac is third in the IQS? You're kidding? Better than Honda and Acura?

Hell has surely frozen over.

As much as I love my CTS-V, though, even I don't expect reliability over the long term to be as good as in my Hondas/Acuras. I've got only 3200 miles, so the car is still brand new; it's too early for reliability comments on my car.
Old 06-25-2009, 04:06 PM
  #109  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,891
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
to Gilgamesh and neuronbob for keeping it real.

Time will tell but history as has been far from kind.
Old 06-17-2010, 12:13 PM
  #110  
Safety Car
 
TSX69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 4,789
Received 1,400 Likes on 704 Posts
Post 2010





J.D. Power and Associates has released its 2010 Initial Quality Study (IQS) and Porsche has earned back the top spot that was occupied by Lexus in last year's study. The annual J.D. Power study measures IQS based on problems reported per 100 vehicles (PP100) – a lower score means a lower rate of problem incidences and higher quality.

Domestic brands, as a whole, demonstrated higher initial quality than import brands for the first time in an IQS (impressive, as the company has been conducting the study for 24 years). "Domestic automakers have made impressive strides in steadily improving vehicle quality, particularly since 2007," said David Sargent, vice president of global vehicle research at J.D. Power and Associates. "This year may mark a key turning point for U.S. brands as they continue to fight the battle against lingering negative perceptions of their quality." According to J.D. Power, the industry average for initial quality is 109 problems per 100 vehicles (PP100) in 2010 (that is a slight increase from 108 PP100 in 2009). However, initial quality for domestic brands as a whole has improved to an average of 108 PP100, slightly better than the initial quality of import brands, which average 109 PP100 in 2010.

Acura made an impressive improvement in the 2010 study. The automaker climbed from 111 PP100 in 2009 to just 86 PP100 in 2010, earning second spot just under Porsche (83 PP100). Mercedes-Benz (87 PP100) earned third position with Lexus (88 PP100) immediately following. Ford (93 PP100) and Lincoln (106 PP100) also earned Top 10 positions. Interestingly enough, Toyota (117 PP100) fell from its seventh position in 2009 to 21st in the 2010 study. The complete J.D. Power press release and charts can be found after the jump and in the gallery below.
Old 06-17-2010, 12:31 PM
  #111  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
POS German cars.
Old 06-17-2010, 12:33 PM
  #112  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Initial quality studies are a nuts....look at the jump from 118 to now 109 problems on the industry average....in 2 years year.

Long term is what you want to look at.
Old 06-17-2010, 01:47 PM
  #113  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,891
Received 1,662 Likes on 927 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Initial quality studies are a nuts....look at the jump from 118 to now 109 problems on the industry average....in 2 years year.

Long term is what you want to look at.
aka JD Power VDS




Last edited by F23A4; 06-17-2010 at 03:28 PM.
Old 06-17-2010, 02:24 PM
  #114  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,334
Received 625 Likes on 504 Posts
I guess Toyota's problems translated into a beating on this list.
Old 06-17-2010, 04:01 PM
  #115  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
^^ Doesn't matter....long term they are up with the best.
Old 06-17-2010, 07:05 PM
  #116  
Three Wheelin'
 
Type34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,282
Received 169 Likes on 101 Posts
Volkswagen and Land Rover at the bottom of both lists.

Ouch.

Nice to see the domestics performing better and better each year. Go Ford.
Old 06-17-2010, 11:40 PM
  #117  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Go Infiniti! No problems with mine so far....
Old 06-18-2010, 09:44 AM
  #118  
אני עומד עם ישראל
 
Hapa DC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 9,860
Received 810 Likes on 522 Posts
^ how many miles on your G now?
Old 06-18-2010, 10:25 AM
  #119  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
2900....
Old 06-18-2010, 02:28 PM
  #120  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,334
Received 625 Likes on 504 Posts
Originally Posted by Type34
Volkswagen and Land Rover at the bottom of both lists.

Ouch.

....and they never seem to get out of the cellar.


Quick Reply: J.D. Power: Initial Quality News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 AM.