J.D. Power: Initial Quality News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #81  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Built in Japan
hmm trying to think the only nissan models built in japan are the murano, rogue, GT-R, and 350z?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #82  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Originally Posted by Mokos23
hmm trying to think the only nissan models built in japan are the murano, rogue, GT-R, and 350z?
Not sure. I just know Infinitis are all built in Japan
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 10:22 PM
  #83  
amv12's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Not sure. I just know Infinitis are all built in Japan
Theres a plaque under the hood of my G35 that proudly reads "Made in Japan"
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 10:41 PM
  #84  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by amv12
Theres a plaque under the hood of my G35 that proudly reads "Made in Japan"
i did some research and the only Infiniti not made in Japan is the QX56 based Armada.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 10:44 PM
  #85  
vishnus11's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 2
From: Lexington
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Lets see how these same vehicles are after 3, 5 and 10 years

Initial quality means NOTHING in these surveys anyway.

What counts as a problem? Is 1 engine falling out the same as 1 rattle that the service department technician can't duplicate?
At least someone gets it.

THIS SURVEY = A PILE OF SHIT

Someone close this thread and lets move on. By discussing this crap we give more attention and publicity to this J.D. Power sham of a survey.

Like Ken said - what the hell constitutues a problem. A sticking cupholder = a spun bearing. Puh-lease.

And the survey is done by customer. Is a BMW customer going to be as tolerant of a erratic cupholder as a Kia owner?

What a BS survey and a waste of server space.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 07:42 AM
  #86  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,015
Likes: 1,736
Originally Posted by Mokos23
i did some research and the only Infiniti not made in Japan is the QX56 based Armada.
Indeed. In prior years, it was the Canton, Miss. built QX56 alone that adversely affected Infiniti's quality ratings.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 08:54 AM
  #87  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by F23A4
Indeed. In prior years, it was the Canton, Miss. built QX56 alone that adversely affected Infiniti's quality ratings.
so, is it still hurting them?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #88  
mrdeeno's Avatar
Suzuka Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 3
From: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Originally Posted by Mokos23
so, is it still hurting them?
considering it's the 2nd highest rated "Large Premium MAV", it's probably helping them.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 11:11 AM
  #89  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
i think acura is so low cause of the TL and RDX are made in ohio then, the MDX is made in Canada
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #90  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by SeCsTaC




vs 2007



where on the jdpower website is this article and graph of this? i can't locate it.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2008 | 11:17 AM
  #91  
gavriil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
The CLK winning its segment was my red flag. It does not make sense, the car is worn out at this point. Every year I get in it and it looks and feels older and older. Very weird for people to be so satisfied with it.

Glad to see Audi do better.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2008 | 07:25 PM
  #92  
Edward'TLS's Avatar
6G TLX-S
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 10,224
Likes: 1,181
From: YVR
Originally Posted by gavriil
The CLK winning its segment was my red flag. It does not make sense, the car is worn out at this point. Every year I get in it and it looks and feels older and older. Very weird for people to be so satisfied with it.

Glad to see Audi do better.
I guess much of the satisfaction with the CLK is contributed by the MB brand name.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #93  
msl82's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
2009 Initial Vehicle Quality

NEW YORK – Ford, General Motors and Chrysler have made strides in new vehicle quality over the last year, but they still lag behind their foreign competitors, according to a closely watched study released Monday by J.D. Power and Associates.

The initial quality of 2009 model year vehicles sold by the Detroit Three improved by an average of 10 percent from last year, the marketing and consulting company said. Industrywide, scores improved an average of 8 percent.
"The Detroit automakers are keeping their focus on designing and building high-quality vehicles, which is a precondition for long-term success," said David Sargent, vice president of automotive research at J.D. Power, in a statement.


Lexus, Toyota Motor Corp.'s luxury line, was the top brand in J.D. Power's initial quality study, an annual survey of vehicle owners that measures mechanical and design problems in the first 90 days of ownership.
Porsche was the No. 2 brand, followed by GM's Cadillac, then Hyundai and Honda.

Toyota, which supplanted General Motors Corp. as the world's largest automaker last year, also swept 10 vehicle segment awards. Its assembly facility in Higashi-Fuji, Japan, that builds the Lexus SC 430 and the Toyota Corolla took the J.D. Power's top plant award.

The worst-performing brand was Mini, with owners reporting 165 problems per 100 vehicles. Though Chrysler's scores improved year over year, it had no brands above the industry average. It tied for one segment award, with its PT Cruiser Wagon sharing the top award in the compact activity vehicle segment with Honda's CR-V. Chrysler, however, is discontinuing the car.

Cadillac and Chevrolet were GM's only two brands whose 2009 models performed above average. The four brands GM is purging under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection — Pontiac, Saturn, Hummer and Saab — were the company's worst rated. The Chevrolet TrailBlazer and GMC Yukon SUVs were rated best in their segments.
Jamie Hresko, GM's vice president for global quality, said the automaker has worked hard to improve vehicle quality over the last five years. Chevrolet and Cadillac account for 70 percent of GM's volume, he said, and top marks for those segments are an indication the effort is paying off.
"Is it where we need to be? No," Hresko said. "To have our core brands — Cadillac and Chevrolet — be on par with Toyota, we have reached a level of quality that will allow us to change perceptions."

Ford Motor Co., the only major U.S. automaker that has not filed for bankruptcy protection or accepted government aid, also saw scores improve for three of its four brands: Ford, Mercury and Volvo. But its Lincoln brand's score fell, and only Ford and Mercury performed above the industry average.

The average industry score improved to 108 problems per 100 vehicles, down from 118 in 2008.
J.D. Power credited the improvement to several well-received new models that were launched in 2009. It said vehicles like Hyundai's Genesis, Kia's Borrego, Toyota's Venza and Volkswagen's CC performed better than their segment averages. Several redesigned 2009 models also scored well, J.D. Power said.

The scores come during a tumultuous time for the auto industry, with sales at their worst level in decades and taxpayers stuck funding the restructuring of GM and Chrysler Group LLC to the tune of billions of dollars. Although the two automakers have been pummeled by the economic crisis, many analysts have complained that a shortage of high-quality small car offerings has hobbled their performance in the down market.

GM has several new, small vehicles on the way that industry analysts say should help it better compete with established offerings from Toyota, Honda and other foreign competitors. It plans to start building the subcompact Chevrolet Cruze next year and says it will get about 40 miles per gallon. It also plans to sell the Chevrolet Spark minicar in the U.S. in 2011.

The road may be tougher for Chrysler. Cars like the sporty 500 made by its new owner, Italy's Fiat Group SpA, won't make it to the U.S. until late next year. The Auburn Hills, Mich., company plans to roll out new versions of its popular Jeep Grand Cherokee SUV and Chrysler 300 large sedan by the end of next year, along with a rechargeable electric vehicle, but these plans likely have been delayed by the bankruptcy process.

J.D. Power's rankings were based on questionnaires from 80,900 people who bought or leased new 2009 vehicles between February and May. The questionnaires ask 228 questions on issues from handling, braking and engine trouble, to seat comfort and stereo systems.
The rankings are closely watched by automakers and consumers, and are frequently used in advertising. However, some critics question whether they show any real statistical difference between automakers. Mini's ranking, for example, equates to 1.65 problems per vehicle. Top-performer Lexus had 84 problems per 100 vehicles, or 0.84 per vehicle. So on average, less than one problem per vehicle separates the best brand from the worst.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090622/...ehicle_quality

It seems like for initial quality, Hyundai > Honda.

Its only a matter of time that Hyundai will be permanently better than Honda in quality over time, just give us, the proud Koreans, 3-4 years.

Last edited by msl82; Jun 22, 2009 at 03:24 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 03:44 PM
  #94  
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,667
Likes: 13
From: NY
Long term quality is more important than initial quality. I don't even look at this study much.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 04:02 PM
  #95  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
^ Yeah, initial quality doesn't really mean too much to me either. Anyone can polish a turd to look good at first.

While Hyundai has come a long way and I would seriously consider the Genesis (coupe or sedan) myself... they still need to prove themselves in long-term quality in order to be considered with Toyota, Honda, or Nissan (as well as their luxury counterparts)...
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 04:03 PM
  #96  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
Long term quality is more important than initial quality. I don't even look at this study much.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 04:15 PM
  #97  
Yumcha's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 168,919
Likes: 23,738
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
to the ...



And merged...
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 03:35 AM
  #98  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,432
Likes: 637
From: Orlando, Fl
Originally Posted by msl82
[URL]
Its only a matter of time that Hyundai will be permanently better than Honda in quality over time, just give us, the proud Koreans, 3-4 years.
That's what folks thought of Toyota 10 years ago over GM. That permenantely thing is not so permanent.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 07:01 AM
  #99  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,015
Likes: 1,736
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
Long term quality is more important than initial quality. I don't even look at this study much.
I just scanned through the article to determine whether its IQS or VDS. Since it is IQS my only respons was :meh: .

Let's see how the PT Cruiser fares after 5 years vs that same CR-V. And we know how that'll go. As for Hyundai...we'll see.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 07:25 AM
  #100  
TSX69's Avatar
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 1,429
From: NC
Lightbulb Hyundai

I think that it was last year or so that JD Powers pointed out that altho Hyundai scored well in the Initial Quality Survey, the same people experienced far more problems 3 years down the road in the Long Term Study.

Toyota/Lexus started slipping ~2006 but the president apologized & announced that they would do better last year & it looks like they are on their way. I would imagine that Honda/Acura would do the same if their reliability started tanking.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 07:21 PM
  #101  
YEH's Avatar
YEH
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 973
Likes: 115
Originally Posted by juniorbean
^ Yeah, initial quality doesn't really mean too much to me either. Anyone can polish a turd to look good at first.

While Hyundai has come a long way and I would seriously consider the Genesis (coupe or sedan) myself... they still need to prove themselves in long-term quality in order to be considered with Toyota, Honda, or Nissan (as well as their luxury counterparts)...
IQS and VDS measure two different things.

IQS, aside from early mechanical breakdowns, measures fit/finish, ease of use, etc.

But yeah, long-term reliability is more important.

Btw, Hyundai's long-term reliability (according to JD Power, CR and Auto Bild) has surpassed Nissan's for a no. of years.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 07:25 PM
  #102  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 50,481
Likes: 5,865
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Originally Posted by msl82
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090622/...ehicle_quality
Its only a matter of time that Hyundai will be permanently better than Honda in quality over time, just give us, the proud Koreans, 3-4 years.
You may be proud but you certainly don't know grammar for shit.

Shut up already and go drive around in your Nissan.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 07:40 PM
  #103  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
The most annoying kind of fanboy is the persistent, not-yet-permabanned one....

That said, I'll agree with the belief that initial quality is a false indicator of ultimate dependability. Some cars have problems initially in the first year or so then once those are rectified, the cars end up to not be problematic at all. On the other hand, some cars may be perfect in the first year or years of ownership, then all of a sudden an ugly problem rears its head up. A blown tranny 3 years down the road is a bigger deal than a faulty window regulator within 6 months of ownership
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 09:24 PM
  #104  
Edward'TLS's Avatar
6G TLX-S
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 10,224
Likes: 1,181
From: YVR
Originally Posted by TSX69
I think that it was last year or so that JD Powers pointed out that altho Hyundai scored well in the Initial Quality Survey, the same people experienced far more problems 3 years down the road in the Long Term Study.

.....

I agree that long term quality is more important that initial quality. One example is that Audi vehicles tend to fall apart starting at the 4th year of ownership - as soon as the 4-year-bumper-to-bumper factory warranty has expired.

Initial quality problems will be fixed free by the dealerships, whereas long term quality problems will be fixed out of your own pocket.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 08:48 AM
  #105  
msl82's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
I believe there is a correlation between initial quality to the long-term dependability/reliability. It may not always be true in terms of cause and effect/outcome, however, i believe there is a linear relationships between these two factors.

If you look at the long-term dependability of these cars, most of them also appear on initial quality survey.

Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 06:50 PM
  #106  
Gilgamesh's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 22
From: SLC, UT
Originally Posted by msl82
I believe there is a correlation between initial quality to the long-term dependability/reliability. It may not always be true in terms of cause and effect/outcome, however, i believe there is a linear relationships between these two factors.

If you look at the long-term dependability of these cars, most of them also appear on initial quality survey.

Yes, because Mitsubishis, Lincolns, Mercurys and Jaguars are well known for lasting forever.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 06:54 PM
  #107  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
^^
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #108  
neuronbob's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 20,067
Likes: 4,698
From: Cleveland area, OH
Cadillac is third in the IQS? You're kidding? Better than Honda and Acura?

Hell has surely frozen over.

As much as I love my CTS-V, though, even I don't expect reliability over the long term to be as good as in my Hondas/Acuras. I've got only 3200 miles, so the car is still brand new; it's too early for reliability comments on my car.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #109  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,015
Likes: 1,736
to Gilgamesh and neuronbob for keeping it real.

Time will tell but history as has been far from kind.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 12:13 PM
  #110  
TSX69's Avatar
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 1,429
From: NC
Post 2010





J.D. Power and Associates has released its 2010 Initial Quality Study (IQS) and Porsche has earned back the top spot that was occupied by Lexus in last year's study. The annual J.D. Power study measures IQS based on problems reported per 100 vehicles (PP100) – a lower score means a lower rate of problem incidences and higher quality.

Domestic brands, as a whole, demonstrated higher initial quality than import brands for the first time in an IQS (impressive, as the company has been conducting the study for 24 years). "Domestic automakers have made impressive strides in steadily improving vehicle quality, particularly since 2007," said David Sargent, vice president of global vehicle research at J.D. Power and Associates. "This year may mark a key turning point for U.S. brands as they continue to fight the battle against lingering negative perceptions of their quality." According to J.D. Power, the industry average for initial quality is 109 problems per 100 vehicles (PP100) in 2010 (that is a slight increase from 108 PP100 in 2009). However, initial quality for domestic brands as a whole has improved to an average of 108 PP100, slightly better than the initial quality of import brands, which average 109 PP100 in 2010.

Acura made an impressive improvement in the 2010 study. The automaker climbed from 111 PP100 in 2009 to just 86 PP100 in 2010, earning second spot just under Porsche (83 PP100). Mercedes-Benz (87 PP100) earned third position with Lexus (88 PP100) immediately following. Ford (93 PP100) and Lincoln (106 PP100) also earned Top 10 positions. Interestingly enough, Toyota (117 PP100) fell from its seventh position in 2009 to 21st in the 2010 study. The complete J.D. Power press release and charts can be found after the jump and in the gallery below.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 12:31 PM
  #111  
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
Registered Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
POS German cars.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 12:33 PM
  #112  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
Initial quality studies are a nuts....look at the jump from 118 to now 109 problems on the industry average....in 2 years year.

Long term is what you want to look at.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 01:47 PM
  #113  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,015
Likes: 1,736
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Initial quality studies are a nuts....look at the jump from 118 to now 109 problems on the industry average....in 2 years year.

Long term is what you want to look at.
aka JD Power VDS




Last edited by F23A4; Jun 17, 2010 at 03:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 02:24 PM
  #114  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,432
Likes: 637
From: Orlando, Fl
I guess Toyota's problems translated into a beating on this list.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 04:01 PM
  #115  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
^^ Doesn't matter....long term they are up with the best.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 07:05 PM
  #116  
Type34's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 170
From: SoCal
Volkswagen and Land Rover at the bottom of both lists.

Ouch.

Nice to see the domestics performing better and better each year. Go Ford.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 11:40 PM
  #117  
majin ssj eric's Avatar
Punk Rocker
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 79
From: St Simons Island, GA
Go Infiniti! No problems with mine so far....
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 09:44 AM
  #118  
Hapa DC5's Avatar
אני עומד עם ישראל
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,860
Likes: 810
From: Los Gatos, CA
^ how many miles on your G now?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 10:25 AM
  #119  
majin ssj eric's Avatar
Punk Rocker
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 79
From: St Simons Island, GA
2900....
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 02:28 PM
  #120  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,432
Likes: 637
From: Orlando, Fl
Originally Posted by Type34
Volkswagen and Land Rover at the bottom of both lists.

Ouch.

....and they never seem to get out of the cellar.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM.