Honda: Ridgeline News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2004, 12:52 PM
  #41  
Three Wheelin'
 
AcuraFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess all the good names were taken?
Old 11-03-2004, 01:23 PM
  #42  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Honda Names New Truck "RidgeLine"

Torrance, Calif. 11/02/2004 --

Honda's all-new 4-door, 4WD truck will be named the "Ridgeline" when it goes on-sale at Honda dealerships nationwide in Spring 2005 as a 2006 model. The Honda Ridgeline is a next-generation truck that takes the utility and versatility of an open bed truck and adds a new dimension of dynamic performance, integrated styling and packaging efficiency previously unattainable in traditional body-on-frame trucks. The Ridgeline name was chosen to emphasize the vehicle's adventurous spirit and truck capabilities.

American Honda announced the Ridgeline name at the Specialty Equipment Manufacturer's Association (SEMA) show in Las Vegas, where it displayed an updated concept version of the truck with a new paint scheme, revised suspension and new wheel and tire package. The production Ridgeline will make its world debut at the 2005 North American International Auto Show in Detroit next January.

"The growing market for aftermarket truck parts and accessories makes SEMA the perfect place to announce the Ridgeline name," said Dan Bonawitz, vice president in charge of corporate planning for American Honda. "The Ridgeline will make a great platform for customization and we think that people are going to be truly surprised by the capabilities of this new Honda truck."

The Ridgeline takes advantage of the industry's first fully integrated, closed-box frame with unibody construction to deliver superior ride, handling and packaging efficiency along with half-ton payload capacity and significantly stronger body rigidity versus traditional body-on-frame trucks. For hauling, the Ridgeline features a five-foot bed with minimal wheel arch intrusion and is designed to carry a wide variety of cargo including two of Honda's largest off-road motorcycles, the CRF450. Inside, the Ridgeline will feature a spacious, full-size, five-passenger interior in a more maneuverable and garageable mid-size truck package. Utilizing a four-wheel independent suspension mounted to a highly rigid body, the Ridgeline will deliver superior handling and ride comfort versus other trucks in its class.

Combining next generation truck performance and environmental responsibility, Ridgeline will be powered by 3.5-liter, high-output, V-6 engine and 5-speed automatic transmission with a fully automatic 4-wheel drive system and a long list of standard safety features including 4-wheel anti-lock brakes, side curtain airbags and Vehicle Stability Assist (VSA) with traction control. Complete details on the Ridgeline's innovative new approach to the truck market will be available at the 2005 North American International Auto Show in January.

Additional media information and media photography is available at www.hondanews.com. Consumer information is available at www.honda.com.
Discuss.
Old 11-03-2004, 01:33 PM
  #43  
Obnoxious Philadelphian
 
jcg878's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
:ghey:
Old 11-03-2004, 01:36 PM
  #44  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,306
Received 624 Likes on 503 Posts
Doesn't exactly roll of the tongue but I assume the marketing guys did some homework coming up with that name.
Somehow, I just don't see this one doing all that great. The meat and potatoes middle America that has been raised on a diet of nothing but F150s and Silverados might be difficult to wean off them.
Old 11-03-2004, 01:36 PM
  #45  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
I kind of like the name actually
Old 11-03-2004, 01:37 PM
  #46  
such a dirty birdy
 
majormojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old 11-03-2004, 01:38 PM
  #47  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
Doesn't exactly roll of the tongue but I assume the marketing guys did some homework coming up with that name.
Somehow, I just don't see this one doing all that great. The meat and potatoes middle America that has been raised on a diet of nothing but F150s and Silverados might be difficult to wean off them.

But they won't be going after that market. There going after the people who at times need a load bed for their SUV's. I'd be shocked to see even one person convert over from a F-150 or Silverado but I can see alot of SUV buyers moving over.

Now about that engine
Old 11-03-2004, 01:40 PM
  #48  
Obnoxious Philadelphian
 
jcg878's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by domn
I kind of like the name actually
:gheylaugh:
Old 11-03-2004, 01:41 PM
  #49  
Obnoxious Philadelphian
 
jcg878's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
Doesn't exactly roll of the tongue but I assume the marketing guys did some homework coming up with that name.
Somehow, I just don't see this one doing all that great. The meat and potatoes middle America that has been raised on a diet of nothing but F150s and Silverados might be difficult to wean off them.
It depends on what their sales goal is. I don't see it getting anywhere near the full-size numbers of the domestics, but it could be profitable without that.
Old 11-03-2004, 01:42 PM
  #50  
such a dirty birdy
 
majormojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by domn
Now about that engine
Indeed. Toyota and Nissan have already demonstrated that a truck MUST have a V8 to be taken seriously.
Old 11-03-2004, 01:45 PM
  #51  
such a dirty birdy
 
majormojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh and about the styling. My bet is the Avalanche will be successfully de-uglified before the RidgeLine is. Chevy is making progress:

Old 11-03-2004, 01:45 PM
  #52  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by majormojo
Indeed. Toyota and Nissan have already demonstrated that a truck MUST have a V8 to be taken seriously.

I don't agree with that only because this won't be marketed or at least should not be as a true pickup to compete with the Big 3 or even Toyota or Nissan. Its a utility truck, its max tow capacity is ~5000lbs. But Honda better have a unique ad campaign.

Now where's that 4.0L V6
Old 11-03-2004, 01:47 PM
  #53  
Three Wheelin'
 
bigwilliestyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by domn
I don't agree with that only because this won't be marketed or at least should not be as a true pickup to compete with the Big 3 or even Toyota or Nissan. Its a utility truck, its max tow capacity is ~5000lbs. But Honda better have a unique ad campaign.

Now where's that 4.0L V6
Speaking of Nissan, that Titan is pretty badass too.

The Honda truck looks pretty cool. I'd like to see it in person.
Old 11-03-2004, 01:52 PM
  #54  
Old fart
 
TSX 'R' US's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 20,455
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
the name is soooo :ghey:

Should've left it as Honda SUT...
Old 11-03-2004, 01:53 PM
  #55  
such a dirty birdy
 
majormojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by domn
Its a utility truck, its max tow capacity is ~5000lbs.
I agree that its capabilities are limited, but look at the things they are saying about it in the press release:

"... we think that people are going to be truly surprised by the capabilities of this new Honda truck"

"... half-ton payload capacity and significantly stronger body rigidity versus traditional body-on-frame trucks."


That sure sounds like they are making direct comparison to traditional pickups. In that sense they're bringing a knife to a gunfight. Honda should be pushing the increased utility vs mini and mid size SUVs. Or that it comes in pretty colours. :ghey:
Old 11-03-2004, 01:55 PM
  #56  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by majormojo
I agree that its capabilities are limited, but look at the things they are saying about it in the press release:

"... we think that people are going to be truly surprised by the capabilities of this new Honda truck"

"... half-ton payload capacity and significantly stronger body rigidity versus traditional body-on-frame trucks."


That sure sounds like they are making direct comparison to traditional pickups. In that sense they're bringing a knife to a gunfight. Honda should be pushing the increased utility vs mini and mid size SUVs. Or that it comes in pretty colours. :ghey:



And its more like a pocket knife.
Old 11-03-2004, 02:01 PM
  #57  
such a dirty birdy
 
majormojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TSX 'R' US
the name is soooo :ghey:

Should've left it as Honda SUT...
Better yet, they could call it a Sports Lifestyle Utility Truck.
Old 11-03-2004, 02:23 PM
  #58  
 
dabuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
honda is late to the game...unless they have a V8 or hybrid option i dont think it'll compete well

ppl that buy trucks usually buy them to haul things around
Old 11-03-2004, 02:27 PM
  #59  
such a dirty birdy
 
majormojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dabuda
ppl that buy trucks usually buy them to haul things around
Exactly:

Old 11-03-2004, 02:27 PM
  #60  
Suzuka Master
 
DEI99662's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA
Age: 47
Posts: 9,808
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not a big fan of the name yet.
Old 11-03-2004, 02:30 PM
  #61  
Suzuka Master
 
DEI99662's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA
Age: 47
Posts: 9,808
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by majormojo
Indeed. Toyota and Nissan have already demonstrated that a truck MUST have a V8 to be taken seriously.


In order for this "truck" to compete, I think you need to have a V8 option.
Old 11-03-2004, 02:31 PM
  #62  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 48
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
All the jap companies are trying hard to get into the pickup game. its a HUGE market in NA. Best selling vehicles are always pickups.


Anyone know how the Nissan Titan is doing?
Old 11-03-2004, 02:38 PM
  #63  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by majormojo
Oh and about the styling. My bet is the Avalanche will be successfully de-uglified before the RidgeLine is. Chevy is making progress:

Am I going crazy, or does that actually look pretty good?!
Old 11-03-2004, 02:39 PM
  #64  
such a dirty birdy
 
majormojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fdl
Anyone know how the Nissan Titan is doing?
When Titan hit showrooms in December, Nissan predicted 100,000 annual sales. It's on a pace of about 60,000. But "Titan has been well received in the marketplace," says Jed Connelly, a senior vice president at Nissan North America. Still, he says, "We are going to have to do more advertising and marketing."

http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...1-nissan_x.htm
Old 11-03-2004, 02:39 PM
  #65  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jcg878
:ghey:
Old 11-03-2004, 02:50 PM
  #66  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
Am I going crazy, or does that actually look pretty good?!

Old 11-03-2004, 02:57 PM
  #67  
Three Wheelin'
 
DEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with majormojo on the name
Old 11-03-2004, 02:57 PM
  #68  
Drifting
 
sipark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: D.C. area
Age: 46
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Ridgeline takes advantage of the industry's first fully integrated, closed-box frame with unibody construction to deliver superior ride, handling and packaging efficiency along with half-ton payload capacity and significantly stronger body rigidity versus traditional body-on-frame trucks. For hauling, the Ridgeline features a five-foot bed with minimal wheel arch intrusion and is designed to carry a wide variety of cargo including two of Honda's largest off-road motorcycles, the CRF450. Inside, the Ridgeline will feature a spacious, full-size, five-passenger interior in a more maneuverable and garageable mid-size truck package. Utilizing a four-wheel independent suspension mounted to a highly rigid body, the Ridgeline will deliver superior handling and ride comfort versus other trucks in its class.
Sounds like advertising a crossover vehicle, not a pickup truck..
Old 11-03-2004, 03:28 PM
  #69  
Boy Genius
 
lokman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Secret Laboratory
Age: 49
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fugliest vehicle that Honda has yet brought to North America, whether car or truck. Still, I'm not sure it's intended to compete directly against the big pickups (there's no way it can without a V8 and at that size), but it probably will appeal to a certain segment of the population that wants something like an Explorer SportTrac with Honda reliability. If Honda is serious about the pickup market though, then I would expect their second attempt to do better, just as Honda did from 1st gen to 2nd gen Odyssey and Toyota from T100 to Tundra.

And I think that picture of the Avalanche majormojo posted was pretty good looking too.
Old 11-03-2004, 03:32 PM
  #70  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Eh...it's not the best name, but I suppose it'll do.
Old 11-03-2004, 03:34 PM
  #71  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
So it looks like the did their homework and spent considerable $$ on R&D to make this truck a winner. So why not spend alittle extra and develope a proper truck engine
Old 11-03-2004, 03:36 PM
  #72  
 
dabuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
because honda engineers dont know how to build a V8?
Old 11-03-2004, 03:39 PM
  #73  
Drifting
 
sipark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: D.C. area
Age: 46
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by domn
So it looks like the did their homework and spent considerable $$ on R&D to make this truck a winner. So why not spend alittle extra and develope a proper truck engine
I don't think they make many trucks.. Even their SUVs are crossovers from minivan frame.. I'd expect Honda to introduce a couple more trucks before they develop a dedicated truck engine (big torque & displacements..... no V8 still ).
Old 11-03-2004, 03:41 PM
  #74  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by dabuda
because honda engineers dont know how to build a V8?
They know how, they just don't want to.
Old 11-03-2004, 03:45 PM
  #75  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
I'm not even suggesting a V8, I'm suggesting a larger displacement thus tourquier V6. Just like Nissan bumped displacement of the 3.5 to 4.0L for the Pathfinder/Xterra/Titan/Fronteir it would have been nice for Honda to do the same.

The engine couldbe used in the Pilot/MDX/RidgeLine and maybe even the RL.

And it doesn't have to be a 4.0L. Honda's great at making more with less so a 3.8 or even 3.7 may do the trick.
Old 11-03-2004, 03:51 PM
  #76  
Engineer
 
savage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston
Age: 41
Posts: 4,525
Received 76 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
Am I going crazy, or does that actually look pretty good?!
yeah because it does when you dont get all those ugly plastic bumper and fender pieces...

they made it a free option you can remove a year or two ago...i almost got an avalanche one without those ugly fenders added...

then i realized i wanted a sports car...
Old 11-03-2004, 03:52 PM
  #77  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by domn
I'm not even suggesting a V8, I'm suggesting a larger displacement thus tourquier V6. Just like Nissan bumped displacement of the 3.5 to 4.0L for the Pathfinder/Xterra/Titan/Fronteir it would have been nice for Honda to do the same.

The engine couldbe used in the Pilot/MDX/RidgeLine and maybe even the RL.

And it doesn't have to be a 4.0L. Honda's great at making more with less so a 3.8 or even 3.7 may do the trick.
In order for Honda to improve those torque numbers, they need to redesign the engine. The problem is that Honda's engines tend to be long stroke engines, which are great for horsepower, but not so much for torque. To get low end grunt, you need engines that are oversquare (greater bore than stroke). This would produce greater torque, but limit the amount of horsepower you can ultimately produce.
Old 11-03-2004, 03:54 PM
  #78  
such a dirty birdy
 
majormojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DEVO
I agree with majormojo on the name
Thanks, but I'm pretty sure I haven't commented on the name. That would be dangerously close to being on-topic for the thread. :P

But for the record, I think the name is OK. It has a nice outdoorsy sound to it. When I think of "ridgeline", I think of a day spent hiking in the mountains. I'm guessing that's what the marketroids were after.
Old 11-03-2004, 03:57 PM
  #79  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
In order for Honda to improve those torque numbers, they need to redesign the engine. The problem is that Honda's engines tend to be long stroke engines, which are great for horsepower, but not so much for torque. To get low end grunt, you need engines that are oversquare (greater bore than stroke). This would produce greater torque, but limit the amount of horsepower you can ultimately produce.

Which explains why the 3.5L Honda trails the 3.5L Nissan in TQ. The Nissan VQ is pushing 298 and 270 lb-ft which is 10 lb-ft more than the RL.

If more bore than stroke is what they need then they should make it so. I just don't see why not
Old 11-03-2004, 04:01 PM
  #80  
Baka Unco
 
corbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by majormojo
Better yet, they could call it a Sports Lifestyle Utility Truck.
Nobody else that was funny?


Quick Reply: Honda: Ridgeline News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 AM.