GReddy 350Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2004, 10:17 PM
  #1  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
GReddy 350Z

Ready for GReddy? - - - By AUTOWEEK

After first writing about it almost a year ago (AW, May 19, 2003), the GReddy Nissan 350Z turbo kit is finally in the mail. GReddy said the delay was caused by “the time it took to properly manufacture a durable cast manifold.” The company has done that and has been taking orders since November, shipping 50 kits so far. Unlike supercharger kits from Stillen or the S-tuned parts from NISMO, there is no warranty with the GReddy unit. It costs $6,495 with everything you need to gain 65 hp; an intercooler kit, which boosts output to 80 hp, is available for $1,695. A turbo kit for the similar manual-transmission Infiniti G35 is in production and the first shipments should be out the door by late March or early April.

Source: Autoweek
Old 02-04-2004, 10:18 PM
  #2  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
So 370HP Z. Not bad.
Old 02-04-2004, 11:23 PM
  #3  
Got da Internet Goin Nutz
 
bl^5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The Land of Sugar, TEXAS
Age: 48
Posts: 1,997
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
What can you get for $10K more than a Z though?
Old 02-04-2004, 11:38 PM
  #4  
Subie Dubie
 
Red Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: PDX
Age: 70
Posts: 5,987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And people said the Comptech SC was too much !!

With install and tax, it's close to 10 grand, and no warranty
Old 02-05-2004, 09:11 AM
  #5  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 53
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,569 Likes on 986 Posts
Originally posted by Red Rider
And people said the Comptech SC was too much !!

With install and tax, it's close to 10 grand, and no warranty
No kidding. I'll take a NISMO supercharger and 60hp + a warranty
Old 02-05-2004, 09:14 AM
  #6  
Homeless
 
chef chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern DEL-A-Where?
Age: 51
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WOW
Old 02-05-2004, 12:05 PM
  #7  
Race Director
 
Chaptorial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 18,552
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Be on the look out for those Greddy Z's now.
Old 02-05-2004, 04:49 PM
  #8  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not bad concerning the price/power ratio to other stock cars. But talk about a Supra snack...
Old 02-06-2004, 09:43 AM
  #9  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Red Rider
And people said the Comptech SC was too much !!

With install and tax, it's close to 10 grand, and no warranty
Umm comparing a SC to a TWIN turbo setup doesn't make sense.

And then take some time into figuring which can produce more power /w some minor tweaks.

Compare one of the Z SC packages to comptechs SC package.


I wouldn't warranty it either. You know people are going to turn the boost up. A well tweaked greddy TT kit will smash the SC in performance.

Well, after 5 weeks of waiting, the happiest day of my life is here. I now have the car back and have dyno'd the car with 3 different boost settings. The highest boost is 8.5 psi and 450rwhp. There is a 5psi mode at 350 rwhp and a 8psi mode at 438 rwhp. I know.... enough talk, here are the pics. I have the dyno if I can attach the file too!
for those of you with a my350z.com account.

http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...threadid=59436
Old 02-06-2004, 10:28 AM
  #10  
Moderator Alumnus
 
mantis23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Age: 46
Posts: 17,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
8.5 psi = 450 whp... daaayum! I wouldn't mind having one of those!
Old 02-06-2004, 10:48 AM
  #11  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by gavriil
So 370HP Z. Not bad.
Still won't out run a Cobra though.
Old 02-06-2004, 10:51 AM
  #12  
Moderator Alumnus
 
mantis23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Age: 46
Posts: 17,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Black CL-S 4-Life
Still won't out run a Cobra though.
at 8.5 psi, it'll give that cobra a serious run for its money though.
Old 02-06-2004, 10:53 AM
  #13  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by mantis23
at 8.5 psi, it'll give that cobra a serious run for its money though.
True...until the stock Cobra adds a pulley then its all over.
Old 02-06-2004, 11:06 AM
  #14  
Moderator Alumnus
 
mantis23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Age: 46
Posts: 17,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what kinda rwhp does the cobra get with a pulley?

(dont mean to hijack)
Old 02-06-2004, 12:20 PM
  #15  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by mantis23
what kinda rwhp does the cobra get with a pulley?

(dont mean to hijack)
450-500whp from what I read awhile back. That about all the stock SC is good for.

Someone may have found some way to unleash a few more ponies thought. It's been awhile since I did some reading on the Ford forums.
Old 02-06-2004, 01:49 PM
  #16  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
so you're essentially paying for kit that isn't warrantied and if you want to utilized its potential, you'll blow the motor up?

how is it worth 8k???????
Old 02-06-2004, 02:20 PM
  #17  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Zapata
so you're essentially paying for kit that isn't warrantied and if you want to utilized its potential, you'll blow the motor up?

how is it worth 8k???????
Assumption conjunction.

where's your stats on motors blowing up?

Lots of SC guys are running 8.5LBS of boost too, but are not getting 450WHP. Intercooler and efficiency factors come into play. And there have been a few SC engines which have bit the dust.

In order to play sometimes you have to pay.

So I guess all of the Supra guys were stupid too when they upgraded components...

How is it not worth $8k?
Old 02-06-2004, 02:29 PM
  #18  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by SiGGy
Assumption conjunction.

where's your stats on motors blowing up?

Lots of SC guys are running 8.5LBS of boost too, but are not getting 450WHP. Intercooler and efficiency factors come into play. And there have been a few SC engines which have bit the dust.

In order to play sometimes you have to pay.

So I guess all of the Supra guys were stupid too when they upgraded components...

How is it not worth $8k?


Yes of course the motor blowup issue isn't akin to the CLS tranny problem. Yet, the price is high for little gain.

I'm not knocking the upgrade just the cost is pretty high....that is all.
Old 02-06-2004, 03:43 PM
  #19  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Zapata
Yes of course the motor blowup issue isn't akin to the CLS tranny problem. Yet, the price is high for little gain.

I'm not knocking the upgrade just the cost is pretty high....that is all.
ya, without tweaking it I'll agree. But I imagine less than 1% of people who purchase it will be leaving it "as-is".

With some minor tweaks/addons that guy managed 450WHP from the kit.

I don't consider that a small gain.
Old 02-06-2004, 11:20 PM
  #20  
Subie Dubie
 
Red Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: PDX
Age: 70
Posts: 5,987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by SiGGy
Umm comparing a SC to a TWIN turbo setup doesn't make sense.

And then take some time into figuring which can produce more power /w some minor tweaks.

Compare one of the Z SC packages to comptechs SC package.


I wouldn't warranty it either. You know people are going to turn the boost up. A well tweaked greddy TT kit will smash the SC in performance.



for those of you with a my350z.com account.

http://www.my350z.com/forum/showthre...threadid=59436
I wasn't comparing the twin turbo, i assumed with only 60 H.P. it was a single for close to 10K with no warranty.
Old 02-07-2004, 01:28 AM
  #21  
-S namyaC-
 
proaudio22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Age: 39
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by SiGGy
450-500whp from what I read awhile back. That about all the stock SC is good for.

Someone may have found some way to unleash a few more ponies thought. It's been awhile since I did some reading on the Ford forums.
You need more than a pulley to pull 500whp. You need a full exhaust, plus a ECU flash/chip. Most peeps spend <$1500 for the whole setup, which isn't bad at all. It's a kick ass motor. If all goes well, I'll be pulling one out of a crate this summer.
Old 02-07-2004, 08:18 AM
  #22  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So I guess all of the Supra guys were stupid too when they upgraded components...
U can't compare the VQ with the 2JZ boost wise. You can push 400hp tops with the stock twin turbos on the Supra with BPU mods. When you go single turbo, 400-450hp to the wheels is a walk in the park.

I do think this kit will make the Z fast enough for 99% of the people out there and give it the extra oomph it is missing.
Old 02-07-2004, 09:03 AM
  #23  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
U can't compare the VQ with the 2JZ boost wise. You can push 400hp tops with the stock twin turbos on the Supra with BPU mods. When you go single turbo, 400-450hp to the wheels is a walk in the park.

I do think this kit will make the Z fast enough for 99% of the people out there and give it the extra oomph it is missing.
It's about 450HP BPU on the Supra /w stock turbos. But I wasn't comparing the two engines.

I was comparing the thought involed with making the modifications to the car and voiding the warranty. I think you read into my sentence.
Old 02-07-2004, 09:10 AM
  #24  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by proaudio22
You need more than a pulley to pull 500whp. You need a full exhaust, plus a ECU flash/chip. Most peeps spend <$1500 for the whole setup, which isn't bad at all. It's a kick ass motor. If all goes well, I'll be pulling one out of a crate this summer.

Ya, I was mainly just stating what the stock SC is good for HP wise.
Old 02-07-2004, 10:25 AM
  #25  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you go F/I I would expect the car company to void the warrenty. That is why I would do it to a used Z with an expired warrenty. I'd just wait. Shame Nissan will not turbo it themselves. They must know something we don't.
Old 02-07-2004, 11:26 AM
  #26  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
Shame Nissan will not turbo it themselves. They must know something we don't.
The reason why Nissan didn't add a turbo to the Z was to avoid the same thing that happened to the early 90's Japanese sports cars: 300ZX and Supra, etc...

If they added a turbo, the car would be too expensive. They wanted this Z to be affordable and relatively simple. The NA VQ in the Z provides plenty of HP for most people, and keeps the cost down.

If you want Turbo Nissan/Infiniti sports car, wait for the next Skyline. That's the version that will have the Turbos
Old 02-07-2004, 01:30 PM
  #27  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cusdaddy, good reasoning. A vert Z/Track Z is what, 37/38k, already do expensive in my book. I think for 25-30k, it is an outstanding buy.

I cannot see the GT-R using the VQ.
Old 02-07-2004, 02:23 PM
  #28  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The z does need an update in performance, they should be aiming for the GTO when they next tune the engine.
Old 02-07-2004, 06:24 PM
  #29  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by heyitsme
The z does need an update in performance, they should be aiming for the GTO when they next tune the engine.
According to the last MT, the Z actually performed BETTER than the new GTO.. The Z got 5.3 0-60 and 13.77 1/4 mile figures. I know this is just mag racing, but the Z is very close to the GTO stock for stock. Granted, I think the GTO might be slightly faster, but it's very close nonetheless.

The Z beats or comes close in performance to most of the cars in it's price class. If you want any faster, there are plenty of FI options available.
Old 02-07-2004, 06:25 PM
  #30  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
Cusdaddy, good reasoning. A vert Z/Track Z is what, 37/38k, already do expensive in my book. I think for 25-30k, it is an outstanding buy.

I cannot see the GT-R using the VQ.
I personally agree the Vert/Track Z's are a little overpriced for what you get. That's why I went with the Enthusiast model for $28k even. Same performance as the Track for about $7k less
Old 02-08-2004, 11:26 AM
  #31  
 
1SICKLEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 46
Posts: 12,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
28k! That is a great deal.
Old 02-08-2004, 11:46 AM
  #32  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
28k! That is a great deal.
That's why I couldn't pass the deal up. I just went to test drive the car and not buy it, but after seeing the deal, I traded in my CL and got the Z
Old 02-08-2004, 02:53 PM
  #33  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by heyitsme
The z does need an update in performance, they should be aiming for the GTO when they next tune the engine.

The GTO and Z are par on performance.
Old 02-09-2004, 08:37 AM
  #34  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by cusdaddy
According to the last MT, the Z actually performed BETTER than the new GTO.. The Z got 5.3 0-60 and 13.77 1/4 mile figures. I know this is just mag racing, but the Z is very close to the GTO stock for stock. Granted, I think the GTO might be slightly faster, but it's very close nonetheless.

The Z beats or comes close in performance to most of the cars in it's price class. If you want any faster, there are plenty of FI options available.
How did they get these numbers??? In all mags I've seen The Z runs 14.0 - 14.4. I've never seen one mag where the Z got into the 13s.
Old 02-09-2004, 06:07 PM
  #35  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Black CL-S 4-Life
How did they get these numbers??? In all mags I've seen The Z runs 14.0 - 14.4. I've never seen one mag where the Z got into the 13s.
There are a number of stock Z's on the my350z website that have run in the high 13's bone stock. It basically comes down to launching the car right and the conditions at the track. High 13's definitely are do-able with the Z
Old 02-10-2004, 05:12 PM
  #36  
it tastes like burning
 
phattyCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Reston, VA
Age: 44
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
28k! That is a great deal.
That's awesome!!! But I still like my S2K....ahhhhh, red and black leather...yummmmmmmmmmmmmmy.
Old 02-10-2004, 05:15 PM
  #37  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,909
Received 10,928 Likes on 5,543 Posts
or you could put a 300 shot of NAWS in it and blow the motor to pieces!!!
Old 02-10-2004, 05:17 PM
  #38  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,909
Received 10,928 Likes on 5,543 Posts
Z does not run 13.7 stock..... maybe 13.9 with a tailwind, but not 13.7
Old 02-10-2004, 05:18 PM
  #39  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,909
Received 10,928 Likes on 5,543 Posts
and even if it does run a 13.9, its a s l o w 13.9 - I mean, the car just doesn't feel fast!!!!!!
Old 02-10-2004, 05:27 PM
  #40  
-S namyaC-
 
proaudio22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Age: 39
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It also doesn't feel like a Pontiac, what's your point?


Quick Reply: GReddy 350Z



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.