GM vs. Toyota: By the numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2005, 09:24 PM
  #1  
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
65 Fury Convert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,637
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
GM vs. Toyota: By the numbers

GM vs. Toyota: By the Numbers
by Diane Geng

Dec. 19, 2005 -- General Motors has been the world's No. 1 automaker since 1931. But GM's dominant position is eroding rapidly. Last year, Toyota surpassed Ford Motor Co. to become No. 2 in the global vehicle market. Some analysts predict Toyota will catch up to GM in two to three years. In November 2005, GM announced that over the next three years it plans to cut 30,000 jobs and reduce capacity by 30 percent from 2002 levels. We compare the global auto industry's two titans, with an emphasis on the U.S. and North American markets.

Vehicle Production Started in U.S.
Source: GM & Toyota

GM:
1908

Toyota:
1986


Brands Sold in North America
Source: GM & Toyota

GM:
Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, HUMMER, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn

Toyota:
Toyota, Lexus, Scion, Hino


Best-Selling Vehicle in U.S.
Source: GM & Toyota

GM:
Chevrolet Silverado
680,768 sold in 2004

Toyota:
Toyota Camry
426,990 sold in 2004


U.S. Sales in 2004

Source: Harbour Consulting & Toyota

GM:
4,655,459

Toyota:
2,060,049


U.S. Market Share
Source: First nine months of 2005, Harbour Consulting

GM:
26.8%

Toyota:
13%


Vehicle Production in North America 2004
Source: GM & Toyota

GM:
5.2 million

Toyota:
1.44 million


Profitability per Vehicle
Source: 2005 Harbour Report

GM:
Loses $2,331 per vehicle

Toyota:
Makes $1,488 per vehicle


Net Income in the First 9 Months of 2005

Source: Harbour Consulting

GM:
$4.15 billion loss from North America operations off-set by profits in Europe and Asia for an overall loss of $3.8 billion

Toyota:
$7.89 billion (¥921.7 billion, converted at 116.81 yen to $1)


Number of Plants in North America

Source: GM & Toyota

GM:
77, all unionized. Plans to close 12 facilities by 2008 (see press release).

Toyota:
12, three unionized in Long Beach, Calif., Fremont, Calif., and Tijuana, Mexico.


Average Plant Capacity Utilization
Source: Harbour Report 2005

GM:
85%

Toyota:
107% using overtime workers


Production Time per Vehicle
Source: 2005 Harbour Report

GM:
34.3 hours, 2.5% improvement since 2003

Toyota:
27.9 hours, 5.5% improvement since 2003


North American Workforce
Source: GM & Toyota, Dec. 2005

GM:
White collar: 36,000
Production: 106,000.
Retirees: 460,000

Toyota:
White collar: 17,000
Production: 21,000
Retirees: 1,600


Average Hourly Salary for Non-Skilled, Assembly Line Worker

Source: Center for Automotive Research

GM:
$31.35/hour
NOTE: Includes idle workers still on payroll and those on protected status.

Toyota:
$27/hour
NOTE: Includes year-end bonus.


Health Care Costs per Vehicle in 2004

Source: 2005 Harbour Report & A.T. Kearny Inc.

GM:
$1,525

Toyota:
$201


Average Labor Cost per U.S. Hourly Worker
Source: GM & Toyota

GM:
$73.73

Toyota:
$48


Worldwide Sales in 2004

Source: Harbour Consulting

GM:
8.9 million

Toyota:
7.7 million


Global Market Share
Source: Automotive News annual ranking of the world's automakers by sales and production, figures for 2004

GM:
13.2%, down from 14.6% in 2002

Toyota:
10.9% up from 10.6% in 2002


Worldwide Vehicle Production Projected for 2005

Source: 2005 Harbour Report

GM:
9 million
Manufacturing operations in 32 countries, vehicles sold in 200 countries

Toyota:
8.4 million
Manufacturing operations in 26 countries and regions, vehicles sold in over 170 countries
Source: http://www.npr.org/news/specials/gmv...omparison.html
Old 12-20-2005, 09:29 PM
  #2  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
It's just funny to watch GM flounder while companies like Toyota do amazing things with what they have.

And seriously, 107% capacity at its plants...
Old 12-20-2005, 09:29 PM
  #3  
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
65 Fury Convert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,637
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Check out the health care costs per vehicle! It's $1,525 per car for GM and only $201 for Toyota
Old 12-20-2005, 09:31 PM
  #4  
_____ like a rabbit
 
stangg172004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edgewater, Chicago, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 8,594
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
so GM makes more cars, sells more but makes less of a profit? i know some of it goes to health care and benifits which from up there seem to be a lot better than Toyota but they are making nearly 10 billion more? am i missing something?
Old 12-20-2005, 09:32 PM
  #5  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
...and we wonder how GM got itself into this mess
Old 12-20-2005, 09:33 PM
  #6  
_____ like a rabbit
 
stangg172004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edgewater, Chicago, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 8,594
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
It's just funny to watch GM flounder while companies like Toyota do amazing things with what they have.

And seriously, 107% capacity at its plants...
well they have the resources to cover 12 plants in NA, where as GM has 70 some odd plants to cover, GM seems to be spread out too thin when it comes to employees...
Old 12-20-2005, 09:50 PM
  #7  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,663
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
Unfortunately, those numbers are old. The gap in profitability between the two has increased, while the gap between production numbers are decreased. Toyota is now even more profitable than GM and nearly producing as many vehicles.

https://acurazine.com/forums/automotive-news-6/toyota-sales-marketing-financial-news-322970/
Old 12-20-2005, 10:08 PM
  #8  
Team Owner
 
Shawn S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Age: 56
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I’d like to see a comparison of the numbers at the EXECUTIVE level.
Employee totals, salary and retirement costs.
I bet those numbers are STAGGERING with all the pork that’s on staff there.
Old 12-20-2005, 11:52 PM
  #9  
Suzuka Master
 
SpeedyV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lakeway, TX
Posts: 7,516
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Average Hourly Salary for Non-Skilled, Assembly Line Worker
Source: Center for Automotive Research

GM:
$31.35/hour
NOTE: Includes idle workers still on payroll and those on protected status.

Toyota:
$27/hour
NOTE: Includes year-end bonus.


Health Care Costs per Vehicle in 2004
Source: 2005 Harbour Report & A.T. Kearny Inc.

GM:
$1,525

Toyota:
$201


Average Labor Cost per U.S. Hourly Worker
Source: GM & Toyota

GM:
$73.73

Toyota:
$48
Kiunda weird that "Hourly Salary for Non-Skilled, Assembly Line Worker" are close but "Average Labor Cost per U.S. Hourly Worker" are so far apart.
Old 12-21-2005, 12:07 AM
  #10  
Banned
 
M TYPE X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Age: 41
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing like comparing GM in its home market to a foreign competitor. If you want to see how Toyota operates, you need to look at its Japanese expenses and payroll.
Old 12-21-2005, 01:07 AM
  #11  
The Oracle of Acurazine!
 
Teh Jatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 28,706
Received 44 Likes on 12 Posts
Old 12-21-2005, 11:04 AM
  #12  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its interesting to see the numbers. It seems at this point of the game it would make sense for GM to spin off Chevrolet to start an independent auto company. As shown by Toyota, a company doesn't need a dozen brands to please the masses.
Old 12-21-2005, 01:09 PM
  #13  
Drifting
 
sipark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: D.C. area
Age: 46
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

North American Workforce
Source: GM & Toyota, Dec. 2005

GM:
White collar: 36,000
Production: 106,000.
Retirees: 460,000

Toyota:
White collar: 17,000
Production: 21,000
Retirees: 1,600



Old 12-21-2005, 01:12 PM
  #14  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 48
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
These numbers really prove that GM's problem is in the union, and the labours costs associated with building there vehicle. They are selling more, but loosing money on every vehicle they sell.
Old 12-21-2005, 01:19 PM
  #15  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

North American Workforce
Source: GM & Toyota, Dec. 2005

GM:
White collar: 36,000
Production: 106,000.
Retirees: 460,000

Toyota:
White collar: 17,000
Production: 21,000
Retirees: 1,600


Average Hourly Salary for Non-Skilled, Assembly Line Worker
Source: Center for Automotive Research

GM:
$31.35/hour
NOTE: Includes idle workers still on payroll and those on protected status.

Toyota:
$27/hour
NOTE: Includes year-end bonus.


Health Care Costs per Vehicle in 2004
Source: 2005 Harbour Report & A.T. Kearny Inc.

GM:
$1,525

Toyota:
$201
And this is where the problem lies for GM. I am surprised they are not extinct by now with those numbers.
Old 12-21-2005, 01:22 PM
  #16  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 48
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, the only solution is GM outsourcing manufactoring operations to a 3rd world country. It seems to be the only way a manufactoring business can stay afloat in this globalized economy. But of course the union (and probably the government) would never stand for that. I.e. they are fucked.
Old 12-21-2005, 01:23 PM
  #17  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by M TYPE X
Nothing like comparing GM in its home market to a foreign competitor. If you want to see how Toyota operates, you need to look at its Japanese expenses and payroll.
Which I'll bet still look prettier than what GM is looking at.
Old 12-21-2005, 01:27 PM
  #18  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 48
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Which I'll bet still look prettier than what GM is looking at.

It will look WAY better. The most fair comparison would be US to US operations, and the GM labour costs are still significantly higher. GM needs to break the union to survive, but they are bound by labour contracts. Like a BOA slowly squeezing them to death.
Old 12-21-2005, 01:47 PM
  #19  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure there is a loop hole to dump the UAW/and their debt but it seems like GM's path is to carry those debts and just hope that new products change things around.
Old 12-21-2005, 04:11 PM
  #20  
Changin bulbs since '73
iTrader: (1)
 
Loseit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chi-town burbs
Age: 50
Posts: 8,111
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
Unhappy

Originally Posted by Shawn S
I’d like to see a comparison of the numbers at the EXECUTIVE level.
Employee totals, salary and retirement costs.
I bet those numbers are STAGGERING with all the pork that’s on staff there.

and how!
Old 12-21-2005, 04:51 PM
  #21  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 48
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by heyitsme
I'm sure there is a loop hole to dump the UAW/and their debt
I doubt it. Besides, even if there was a loophole it would be extremely hard to do and could criple the company in he short term. Perhaps so much that they could not recover.
Old 12-21-2005, 06:17 PM
  #22  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It already seems like they can't recover. They lose $2,331 per vehicle, so even if they become as effiecient/profitable as Toyota tomorrow with nice products they would still be losing ~$800 a car due to their higher overhead.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
08KBP_VA
2G RL (2005-2012)
44
10-22-2019 01:55 PM
emailnatec
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
29
09-28-2018 04:27 PM
jterp7
3G MDX (2014-2020)
9
02-03-2016 08:34 PM
InFaMouSLink
Car Parts for Sale
3
10-30-2015 09:43 AM
eastcoastguy
3G TL (2004-2008)
1
09-23-2015 06:29 AM



Quick Reply: GM vs. Toyota: By the numbers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM.