Ford: Fusion News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2005, 08:00 AM
  #41  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by MSZ
G35 rip-off?
looks nothing like it. no resemblance whatsoever.
Old 05-13-2005, 10:57 AM
  #42  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by MSZ
G35 rip-off?
Looks nothing like a G35.
Looks nice though.
Old 05-13-2005, 11:09 AM
  #43  
Drifting
 
DownUnder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MSZ
G35 rip-off?
The only similarity to the G35 I can see is the side blinker and the maybe the headlights, but it’s not that obvious to call it a G35 rip-off.

That's the best-looking sedan from Ford for the US in a LONG time; I hope it has power and good driving dynamics to back it up though.
Old 05-13-2005, 01:47 PM
  #44  
Safety Car
 
titan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DownUnder
The only similarity to the G35 I can see is the side blinker and the maybe the headlights, but it’s not that obvious to call it a G35 rip-off.

That's the best-looking sedan from Ford for the US in a LONG time; I hope it has power and good driving dynamics to back it up though.
Agreed on the G35 comment. This is definitely a good looking car. It's based off the 6 platform, so I have high hopes for the driving dynamics. But the eninge is the same lame 6cyl found in the 500.
Old 05-13-2005, 04:08 PM
  #45  
MSZ
Lola
 
MSZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 42
Posts: 3,985
Received 257 Likes on 150 Posts
Originally Posted by zeroday
looks nothing like it. no resemblance whatsoever.
I do think it looks like the G35 sedan from that very angle. I guess I have bad eyes.
Old 05-13-2005, 04:20 PM
  #46  
The Oracle of Acurazine!
 
Teh Jatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 28,706
Received 44 Likes on 12 Posts
Cts
Old 05-13-2005, 04:37 PM
  #47  
TMQ
Pro
 
TMQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North by Northwest
Age: 47
Posts: 608
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Headlights definitely remind me of G35. Without the Ford badge, it looks Japanese.
Old 05-13-2005, 05:48 PM
  #48  
Suzuka Master
 
SpeedyV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lakeway, TX
Posts: 7,516
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by kansaiwalker1
Right now there's a gaping hole in Ford's car lineup....Ford says 10,000 Focus owners defect to other brands each year because it doesn't offer an attractive step-up model.

Conclusion: Jennifer wants to look good but cares less about what's under the hood.

Who knows? Maybe there are 800,000 people like this.
Maybe Ford doesn't really understand why it can't sell cars to "Jennifer."
Old 05-13-2005, 08:15 PM
  #49  
Kabachitare!
Thread Starter
 
kansaiwalker1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jennifer probably got a used BMW 3 series instead
Old 05-14-2005, 02:00 AM
  #50  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 11,981
Received 641 Likes on 395 Posts
Headlights look like the Prelude's actually. Tail lights look like the IS300.
Old 05-14-2005, 09:42 PM
  #51  
Burning Brakes
 
Nato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Teh Jatt
Cts
thats what i think too... it looks like a cadillac cts thats squared look
Old 06-26-2005, 09:14 AM
  #52  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Ford sets Fusion base price at $17,995 - - By Dale Jewett - - Source: Automotive News

DETROIT -- The 2006 Ford Fusion mid-sized sedan will carry a base price of $17,995, including shipping charges -- a price that the Ford Division asserts will undercut many of the car's competitors.

The base Fusion is powered by a 160-hp, 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine mated to a five-speed manual transmission. A five-speed automatic transmission is optional, but Ford did not release the price of the option.

The Fusion will begin reaching dealerships in September. It marks Ford Division's return to a segment it walked away from with the end of the Contour in 2000. Ford thinks it can sell up to 160,000 Fusions annually.

Standard equipment on the base Fusion includes 16-inch wheels, four-wheel disc brakes, power windows and door locks, cruise control, air conditioning, tilt and telescoping steering wheel, and radio with single CD player.

The Fusion will be offered in three trim levels for 2006 -- S, SE and SEL. Buyers of the S model will get only the four-cylinder engine, with either the five-speed manual or five-speed automatic transmission.

Side-impact airbags, side curtain airbags and anti-lock brakes are available as part of an option package.

Buyers of a Fusion SE or SEL can opt for a 221-hp, 3.0-liter V-6 engine mated to a six-speed automatic transmission. A Fusion SE with the V-6 will have a base price of $21,275 including shipping, Ford said. A Fusion SEL with the V-6 will be priced less than $22,400, Ford said without being more specific.

The Fusion is one of a slew of new vehicles from Ford Motor Co. based on the Mazda6 platform. Two other vehicles that also use the platform, the Mercury Milan and Lincoln Zephyr, also go on sale this fall.

For the Fusion, engineers widened the platform by about 1.2 inches and lengthened it by about 2.2 inches, with the extra space devoted to rear-seat leg room.

An all-wheel-drive option will likely be added for the second model year. Ford also plans a hybrid-powertrain version of the Fusion in the future. Hybrids use gasoline engines and one or more electric motors to power the wheels.
Old 06-26-2005, 09:15 AM
  #53  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Very aggressive pricing by Ford with this car and Mercury's Milan .
Old 06-26-2005, 11:01 AM
  #54  
Safety Car
 
titan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
Very aggressive pricing by Ford with this car and Mercury's Milan .
Agreed. Awesome pricing, IMO. Especially coming in under the Sonata's price. That, with it's good looks should help it do well.
Old 08-13-2005, 08:04 PM
  #55  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old 08-13-2005, 10:37 PM
  #56  
Drifting
 
DownUnder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, it looks pretty damn nice and a lot better looking then the 500.
Old 08-14-2005, 01:23 AM
  #57  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
This will be a homerun for Ford, especially the 4 cyl. with the price of fuel going up.
Old 08-14-2005, 02:09 AM
  #58  
That's Racist
 
Time For Sleeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego native. UCLA resident. =)
Age: 38
Posts: 5,634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prelude head lights.

And I think it woudl be a lot better looking if they did away w/ those APC taillights. Ugh.
Old 08-14-2005, 06:18 AM
  #59  
Kabachitare!
Thread Starter
 
kansaiwalker1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, I really like it. Looks like a winner for Ford. And way better than the anemic 500.
Old 08-14-2005, 09:17 AM
  #60  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Dual exhaust is overkill considering the power. Overall a very nice design which I can confirm from a live standpoint as well. This is a winner inside and out for Fusion.
Old 08-14-2005, 09:45 AM
  #61  
Changin bulbs since '73
iTrader: (1)
 
Loseit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chi-town burbs
Age: 50
Posts: 8,111
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
It looks cool from the inside
but the inside looks real plasticky, doesn't it?
Old 08-14-2005, 11:01 AM
  #62  
MSZ
Lola
 
MSZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 42
Posts: 3,985
Received 257 Likes on 150 Posts
Originally Posted by Loseit
It looks cool from the inside
but the inside looks real plasticky, doesn't it?
Yea it does.

But it is still lightyears ahead of that PoS Taurus.
Old 08-14-2005, 04:04 PM
  #63  
Chloe @ 17mo
 
AsianRage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 3,931
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chrome inner trim in Tail light was never a great design feature. On this car, it looks cheap.

The interior looks like it's full of hard plastics. But I guess for the price.... can't complain much.
Old 08-14-2005, 05:16 PM
  #64  
Kabachitare!
Thread Starter
 
kansaiwalker1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by heyitsme
So this will be the new "corporate face" of the reskinned 500 and future Fords?

Not bad. I first thought it looked stupid on the 427 concept car but on the Fusion it looks nice. Not as in your face as the 300 but it does add something distinctive to the car. And I like it better than the Mercury "waterfall" grill.

PS. I also like in the above pic how Ford squeezed in the tweaked Explorer and Expedition in the background. They kinda look like bodyguards for the new Fusion.

Last edited by kansaiwalker1; 08-14-2005 at 05:18 PM.
Old 08-14-2005, 06:11 PM
  #65  
Suzuka Master
 
SpeedyV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lakeway, TX
Posts: 7,516
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not bad. It looks a lot better than the Chevy Cobalt or Malibu Maxx IMHO.
Old 08-15-2005, 11:10 AM
  #66  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,663
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
The plastics may look hard, but the design is well done. The price is also very attractive - I would actually pick this over a Honda Accord LX.
Old 08-15-2005, 11:33 AM
  #67  
Luke 1:37
 
virtualbong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 44
Posts: 4,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's a very attractive Ford Sedan. I don't think I'd pick one up, but those hardcore domestic lovers will like it to have as a nice weekend car.
Old 08-15-2005, 11:41 AM
  #68  
Registered Abuser of VTEC
 
youngTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Age: 40
Posts: 6,542
Received 115 Likes on 84 Posts
LIGHT YEARS ahead of the Taurus! The front end is pseduo-G35 sedan-esque, the tail end looks bad with those lights, but the interior is well done for the price. They made a mistake though by not gracing the SEL with better materials than the other ones. Oh well, for the price, I can see a lot of people buying this. More importantly, like someone else said, it will undercut the Sonata, and more importantly, the Pontiac G6 sedan. Despite the hard plastics, the G6 sedan's interior looks more Fisher-Price than the Fusion's.
Old 08-15-2005, 12:18 PM
  #69  
fap fap fap
 
Infamous425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kirkland
Age: 43
Posts: 4,239
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
it does look nice but i'd rather get the better looking and sportier mazda6
Old 08-15-2005, 03:19 PM
  #70  
Senior Moderator
 
cM3go's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 15,295
Received 131 Likes on 79 Posts
not a bad front... not feeling the inside.
Old 08-15-2005, 03:52 PM
  #71  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
I think this will be a true contender when cross-shopping the camry, accord & altima.
Old 08-31-2005, 03:00 PM
  #72  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Ford Fusion Launches With Incentives - - Source: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/

DEARBORN, Mich. — Eager to kick-start sales of its all-important Fusion, Ford has announced incentives that can amount to as much as $1,000 on the car that has yet to arrive in showrooms.

A Ford spokesman told Inside Line that Ford will give $500 to customers who finance their Fusion through Ford Motor Credit. Ford further will match a buyer's down payment up to $500. No expiration date has been established for the incentives.

"It's not uncommon for Ford or any other car company to offer incentives at a start of a launch," said company spokesman Dave Reuter. "This is the most important car the Ford brand has launched in the last several years."

The Fusion, the larger Ford Five Hundred sedan and the Freestyle crossover cover the mid- to full-size car range previously occupied solely by the once high-volume Ford Taurus, which is being phased out. The midsize car segment is critical for automakers because it is one of the largest categories in the car business. Ford sees the Fusion as a vehicle to help stop its market share losses.

The five-passenger Fusion will begin arriving in showrooms in small numbers next month. The 160-horsepower, 2.3-liter four-cylinder with a five-speed manual starts at $17,995, including delivery charges. The 221-hp, 3.0-liter V6 with the six-speed automatic — a rare feature for the segment — starts at $21,275.
Old 08-31-2005, 03:13 PM
  #73  
That's Racist
 
Time For Sleeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego native. UCLA resident. =)
Age: 38
Posts: 5,634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Waht someone said before, chrome trim on taillights = cheap look. (saw one in person, and it woul dlook better with solid red taillights for sure).

And I dont' think the dual exhaust is overkill. Our CL-S's and TL/TL-S's don't need dual exhaust either. If anything, it will be an additional incentive to buy the car. Dual exhaust, even if it is useless in that design gives a sporty/classy look that people shopping in this market segment will want.
Old 09-01-2005, 08:18 PM
  #74  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,663
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
The chrome taillights don't seem that bad, but I think they could've slimmed it down a bit and allow more red to squeeze through.
Old 09-02-2005, 12:06 PM
  #75  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,306
Received 624 Likes on 503 Posts
I hope this thing drives better than the POS Focus rental I'm driving around now.
Old 09-02-2005, 12:34 PM
  #76  
Drifting
 
DownUnder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Edmund's First Drive: 2006 Ford Fusion

Stone-Cold Fusion


Vehicle Tested:
2006 Ford Fusion

First Impressions:
Based on an expanded Mazda 6 chassis, the Fusion offers a solid entry into the competitive midsize sedan market, finally proving that the domestic carmaker can battle the best from Japan and Korea.

* Four-cylinder, 160-horsepower model starts at $17,995
* V6, 221-horsepower model starts at $21,275
* Available 6-speed automatic transmission
* Five-passenger seating


By Basem Wasef
Date posted: 09-01-2005

Back in 1986, the Taurus was heralded as the car that would save Ford Motor Company. And it did. Now, 20 years later the same monumental responsibility has been thrust upon the 2006 Ford Fusion.

Although its outgoing Taurus sold 6.7 million units in its 21-year run, Ford has never really offered a proper midsize sedan to battle the Honda Accord, Hyundai Sonata, and Toyota Camry — until now. Positioned with neat alliteration between the Focus and the Five Hundred, Ford hopes the Fusion will bridge the long-standing abyss in the company's product lineup.

A Mazda Underneath
Although it's based on a Mazda 6 chassis that has been lengthened over 2 inches and widened over an inch, the Fusion is Ford's first completely digital car, featuring computerized design, engineering and testing. The results, according to Ford, are improved interior and exterior panel fit, tighter tolerances, more efficient aerodynamics, and increased torsional stiffness (by 12.7 percent) without adding weight.

Visually, the Fusion appears smaller than its competitors, though the spec sheet indicates differently. It's greater in wheelbase, overall length and width than the Honda, Hyundai and Toyota.

Inspired by the 427 sedan concept car from 2003, the Fusion's styling is slick and uniform. Body panels are smooth and flush, and come across as looking expensive for the price point. Although its face recalls the somewhat staid Cadillac STS, its clear-lensed taillights are pure 20-something tuner.

Three Models/Two Engines
Three models are offered: the base S, which starts at $17,995; the SE; and the top-of-the-line SEL. Each comes standard with the same 2.3-liter, all-aluminum, DOHC four-cylinder that's used in the Mazda 6. It makes 160 horsepower at 6,500 rpm and 150 pound-feet of torque at 4,000 rpm and can be paired with a five-speed manual or five-speed automatic.

If you want V6 power you have to step up to the SE model. Its optional 3.0-liter six-cylinder, which is also borrowed from the Mazda, makes 221 hp at 6,250 rpm and zings the price up to $21,275. Although still more expensive and less powerful than a 2006 Hyundai Sonata GLS V6, the Fusion SE V6 is cheaper than its Japanese competition.

The V6 SEL costs about $22,000 and features 17-inch aluminum wheels, automatic temperature control, upgraded interior trim, and a leather-wrapped steering wheel with redundant stereo and climate controls. Add all the stand-alone options and the price can climb as high as $26,000.

Perhaps the biggest foul in the Fusion's specs are its lack of a manual transmission with the V6. Despite this V6 being paired with a five-speed manual in the Mazda, it's only partnered with a six-speed automatic in the Fusion.

Nice and Roomy
Fusions come in three different interior color schemes based on trim levels, and our SEL model featured a discreetly tasteful charcoal interior with off-white top stitching and piano black accents. The large analog gauges are also a high point, clearly indicating Ford's desire to step up the quality of its interiors. Seat comfort is also good.

Most textures are nicely finished and the secondary controls are ergonomically sound, though cabin temperature was inadvertently raised on more than one occasion by an awkwardly positioned steering wheel-mounted climate control button. In keeping with the domestic theme of supersized excess, Fusions offer six cupholders for five passengers.

Head and legroom measurements are just within the competition's range, and its 15.8 cubic feet of trunk space places it ahead of the Accord but behind Camry and Sonata in the cargo room department. The Fusion's trunk opening is extra large, however, and its rear seats drop flat with the pull of a lever.

Fusing With the Road
During the several hours we spent driving the SEL-trimmed V6 Fusion on North Carolina's winding Blue Ridge Parkway, the car felt well sorted, composed and connected to the road.

Torque peaks at 205 lb-ft at 4,800 rpm, but feels evenly spread across the power band thanks to the V6's variable valve timing. Ford estimates a six-cylinder Fusion can run from zero to 60 mph in the mid-8-second range, which would make it significantly slower than the last V6 Accord we tested, which hit 60 mph in 7 seconds flat.

The six-speed automatic transmission was the weak link in our V6 Fusion's driving dynamic. Though the six-speed automatic offers well-chosen ratios that maximize the engine's torque curve, it often hunts for the correct gear during aggressive driving. Enter a turn with a slight scrub of speed, and the transmission upshifts. Heavier throttle application will eventually kick the transmission down another gear, though it takes a heavier right foot than it should.

Enthusiasts will also no doubt disdain the transmission shifter's single low gear "L" option. A traditional 3-2-1 option would offer more driver control.

Equipped with V-Rated Michelin Pilot tires and the same four-wheel independent suspension as a Mazda 6, we weren't surprised that the Fusion felt stable and handled predictably. Hard driving yielded some understeer, but torque steer is kept in check, and the Fusion was well mannered for a car of its size.

Steering feel is positive at high speeds and the four-wheel disc brakes provide strong stops, though initial pedal feel is a bit soft. Ford engineers indicated that complaints of excessive brake dust and roughness have been addressed, implying that softer pads have been incorporated into the Fusion.

Although the car we sampled had antilock brakes, the feature does not come standard on all models. Instead, it's available as part of the Safety and Security package, which includes side airbags, first- and second-row side air curtains, and an anti-theft perimeter alarm. A traction control system is also optional, but stability control, which is standard on the Hyundai Sonata, isn't available on the Fusion.

The Verdict
Transmission indecisiveness and lack of stability management aside, the Fusion is a solid performer that feels well equipped to battle the competition. It's aggressively priced and the top trim levels are nicely finished and appointed. Ford seems to have done its homework and finally produced a car that can compete with the finest from Japan and Korea.

At the end of the day, though, it's the public that will decide whether the 2006 Ford Fusion is good enough to save the Ford Motor Company.
Old 09-02-2005, 04:18 PM
  #77  
_____ like a rabbit
 
stangg172004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edgewater, Chicago, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 8,594
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
if i was in the market id so buy this over a camry or accord, its miles ahead of its predecessor and better than the accord and camry. an that interior is great, not something id expect form ford. Black trim, mmmmmm........

Old 09-02-2005, 05:49 PM
  #78  
The Oracle of Acurazine!
 
Teh Jatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 28,706
Received 44 Likes on 12 Posts
Its a FORD!

I'd pick ACCORD/CAMRY over that anytime.
Old 09-02-2005, 08:02 PM
  #79  
_____ like a rabbit
 
stangg172004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edgewater, Chicago, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 8,594
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Teh Jatt
Its a FORD!

I'd pick ACCORD/CAMRY over that anytime.
thats a ignorant thing to say. Ive read that the drivetrain is betters than the Camrys and only a lacks a little when you compare it to the Accord. The cars fit and finish it better than what ford has come out with in a while and it looks a lot better than any accord or camry. Quality wise its to par with them too, the only problem i see with it is that it is assembled in mexico, so at the you just end up right....
Old 09-02-2005, 08:25 PM
  #80  
The Oracle of Acurazine!
 
Teh Jatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 28,706
Received 44 Likes on 12 Posts
^ :killer:

Did you have goodluck with FORD all ur life?


Quick Reply: Ford: Fusion News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 PM.