Ferrari: 488 GTB News
#41
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
I know that's your position, but it's a nuanced one and it's not one I think the general car buying public (even the small portion likely to look at high dollar super cars) is likely to share. Honda/Acura had one supercar in its history. One. Then they discontinued it and toyed with various replacements in concept form. Emphasizing the importance of whether those concepts were called "NSX" is a legalistic read on the situation. Everyone knew the purpose of such a concept - be the successor to the NSX; whether it had the same badge or not. If they were ignorant of having created that perception, then it's just a further indication of how tone deaf management at this company has become relative to the mood of the market, etc.
That's not a good thing from Honda and that's a mistake. Based on that, I understand the reasoning as to people saying Honda in the past decade was lost in direction, etc. That's perfectly fine.
So yea, from 2003 to 2010, they spent 7-8 years showing us HSC, ASCC, HSV, talking about tier-1 and what not.
However, the actual 2G NSX, from announcement to concept, and from concept to production is vastly different. From the first announcement, Honda has followed through on their promises. For instance, they said they would have the production verison by 2015. They have done that. And the 2G NSX as far as I know, is a clean sheet design from the ground up. Not exactly using anything from previous concepts.
So yes, it took Honda 10+ years to come up with the actual NSX replacement. But the development time is closer to 3-4 years.
#42
AZ Community Team
Oy, this isn't the thread for Acura Apologetics. Chevrolet was cagey, but had a product with enough buzz to let it slide. Honda's actions over the years re: the NSX have created the perception (justified or not) of a company that can't make up its mind and can't get its house in order. I believe Yummy's position is that he believes they needed to come out strong and lay out all the details to really grab attention, rather than a slow strip-tease that leaves doubters able to say "I-told-you-so" if things don't come to fruition in a way that is consistent with the teases.
Isn't it ironic don't ya thinK
As far as I know, the 2G NSX was initialized in 2011, first shown in 2012. And Sure, they made changes, but I wouldn't mind having a longitudinally boosted V6 instead of the NA J35.
HSC, HSV-010, ASCC, well, they were never called the NSX.
I understand Yumcha's point. Though there are really many ways to do things. And there are pros and cons.
Ferrari certainly has the power to pull this off with ease. They probably don't have that many models to show to world at every auto show too.
HSC, HSV-010, ASCC, well, they were never called the NSX.
I understand Yumcha's point. Though there are really many ways to do things. And there are pros and cons.
Ferrari certainly has the power to pull this off with ease. They probably don't have that many models to show to world at every auto show too.
I know that's your position, but it's a nuanced one and it's not one I think the general car buying public (even the small portion likely to look at high dollar super cars) is likely to share. Honda/Acura had one supercar in its history. One. Then they discontinued it and toyed with various replacements in concept form. Emphasizing the importance of whether those concepts were called "NSX" is a legalistic read on the situation. Everyone knew the purpose of such a concept - be the successor to the NSX; whether it had the same badge or not. If they were ignorant of having created that perception, then it's just a further indication of how tone deaf management at this company has become relative to the mood of the market, etc.
NOT A HONDA APOLOGIST...
Yes Honda waited WAY too damn long to reveal the NSX and we still don't know when they'll start showing up at dealerships (probably after the 488 )
But is there any slack when you're comparing the performance of a $150k car to a $250k+ car?
Is it that Honda is saying "we can do as well as Ferrari et al for half the price?"
Yes Honda waited WAY too damn long to reveal the NSX and we still don't know when they'll start showing up at dealerships (probably after the 488 )
But is there any slack when you're comparing the performance of a $150k car to a $250k+ car?
Is it that Honda is saying "we can do as well as Ferrari et al for half the price?"
#43
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes
on
5,162 Posts
Can't wait to see this one....
#44
Senior Moderator
agreed
agreed again - it's wild to think the 488GTB is an evolution of the meager 308.
images for comparison
images for comparison
Last edited by srika; 02-05-2015 at 01:47 AM.
#45
AZ Community Team
I don't know man, but when GM revealed the new production C7 Corvette in Jan 2013, they didn't give out exact power figures, weight, nor prices too:
2014 Chevrolet C7 Corvette Stingray / Z51 Photos and Info ? News ? Car and Driver
In April 2013, they announced pricing info, still no power figures though:
2014 Chevrolet Stingray Coupe and Convertible Priced ? News ? Car and Driver | Car and Driver Blog
Power figures were finally revealled in May 2013:
Chevrolet Finally Announces 2014 Corvette Stingray's Power Figures ? News ? Car and Driver | Car and Driver Blog
Then in June 2013, Chevy released some performance figures of the C7 Vette:
2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Z51 Performance Estimates Revealed! ?News ?Car and Driver | Car and Driver Blog
The Vette as we all know was released in the 3rd quarter of 2013.
But I think the above clearly shows that not all companies would reveal everything when the production version is shown in the auto show.
2014 Chevrolet C7 Corvette Stingray / Z51 Photos and Info ? News ? Car and Driver
In April 2013, they announced pricing info, still no power figures though:
2014 Chevrolet Stingray Coupe and Convertible Priced ? News ? Car and Driver | Car and Driver Blog
Power figures were finally revealled in May 2013:
Chevrolet Finally Announces 2014 Corvette Stingray's Power Figures ? News ? Car and Driver | Car and Driver Blog
Then in June 2013, Chevy released some performance figures of the C7 Vette:
2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Z51 Performance Estimates Revealed! ?News ?Car and Driver | Car and Driver Blog
The Vette as we all know was released in the 3rd quarter of 2013.
But I think the above clearly shows that not all companies would reveal everything when the production version is shown in the auto show.
I perfectly understand and share the frustration that car enthusiasts get with Honda teasing us with concept cars that are supposed to be the NSX replacement, and then subsequently cancelling them.
That's not a good thing from Honda and that's a mistake. Based on that, I understand the reasoning as to people saying Honda in the past decade was lost in direction, etc. That's perfectly fine.
So yea, from 2003 to 2010, they spent 7-8 years showing us HSC, ASCC, HSV, talking about tier-1 and what not.
However, the actual 2G NSX, from announcement to concept, and from concept to production is vastly different. From the first announcement, Honda has followed through on their promises. For instance, they said they would have the production verison by 2015. They have done that. And the 2G NSX as far as I know, is a clean sheet design from the ground up. Not exactly using anything from previous concepts.
So yes, it took Honda 10+ years to come up with the actual NSX replacement. But the development time is closer to 3-4 years.
It would be very smart to show the C7 3 years prior to its release just so more people will buy the C6 or the C6 Z06.
That's not a good thing from Honda and that's a mistake. Based on that, I understand the reasoning as to people saying Honda in the past decade was lost in direction, etc. That's perfectly fine.
So yea, from 2003 to 2010, they spent 7-8 years showing us HSC, ASCC, HSV, talking about tier-1 and what not.
However, the actual 2G NSX, from announcement to concept, and from concept to production is vastly different. From the first announcement, Honda has followed through on their promises. For instance, they said they would have the production verison by 2015. They have done that. And the 2G NSX as far as I know, is a clean sheet design from the ground up. Not exactly using anything from previous concepts.
So yes, it took Honda 10+ years to come up with the actual NSX replacement. But the development time is closer to 3-4 years.
It would be very smart to show the C7 3 years prior to its release just so more people will buy the C6 or the C6 Z06.
Last edited by Legend2TL; 02-05-2015 at 05:32 AM.
The following users liked this post:
charliemike (02-13-2015)
#46
Moderator
#47
AZ Community Team
#48
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
#49
Senior Moderator
here is the 308 image
#51
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#52
Moderator
#53
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
My guess on the C7 was alot was in tech development so it was not too easy to release numbers. A all new aluminum chassis (previous C6 Z06's chassis was outsourced to Alcoa) so GM was working on aluminum extrusions, stamped sheets/stock, and cast pieces and getting them in a automated welding/riveting tooling. GM used sand cast hollow aluminum control arms for the suspension which was a first AFAIK. Other tech was the DI LT1, electronic diff, and other goodies so much so they reused the 6AT while a new 8AT was phased in later on the 2015 model. Much nicer materials and components on the interior with minimal cost impact. So it took some time to ensure all that was gonna work into the schedule, releasing numbers was probably the least of their worries.
That's what I'd do
That's what I'd do
#54
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes
on
5,162 Posts
#55
Living the Dream
#56
AZ Community Team
Yeah, I imagine there are still small changes mostly related to production transistion going on up until production and even some after production has started (S/W and F/W).
#57
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
#58
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes
on
5,162 Posts
^^^ Just when you thought it couldn't get any better.....
#59
Moderator
Note to Acura - this his how you show your car at various shows. 1) Bring a couple that can actually be inspected up close; 2) Allow people to actually get close/in to the thing; and 3) release the specs!
#60
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes
on
5,162 Posts
^^^ Agreed.
#61
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#62
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
It would also be such a great idea if Honda is releasing a new NSX every 6 years or so with special versions coming out every couple years, like what Ferrari has been doing to the their entry model for the past 15+ years:
1999: 360 Modena
2000: 360 Spider
2003: 360 Challenge Stradale
2005: F430
2005: F430 Spider
2007: 430 Scuderia
2009: 458 Italia
2011: 458 Spider
2013: 458 Speciale
2015: 488 GTB
There are more than enough exotic models from Ferrari to not have to "milk" for more press coverage.
#63
Moderator
Definitely a brilliant idea if Honda is as famous as Ferrari for making exotics.
It would also be such a great idea if Honda is releasing a new NSX every 6 years or so with special versions coming out every couple years, like what Ferrari has been doing to the their entry model for the past 15+ years:
1999: 360 Modena
2000: 360 Spider
2003: 360 Challenge Stradale
2005: F430
2005: F430 Spider
2007: 430 Scuderia
2009: 458 Italia
2011: 458 Spider
2013: 458 Speciale
2015: 488 GTB
There are more than enough exotic models from Ferrari to not have to "milk" for more press coverage.
It would also be such a great idea if Honda is releasing a new NSX every 6 years or so with special versions coming out every couple years, like what Ferrari has been doing to the their entry model for the past 15+ years:
1999: 360 Modena
2000: 360 Spider
2003: 360 Challenge Stradale
2005: F430
2005: F430 Spider
2007: 430 Scuderia
2009: 458 Italia
2011: 458 Spider
2013: 458 Speciale
2015: 488 GTB
There are more than enough exotic models from Ferrari to not have to "milk" for more press coverage.
#64
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
Ferrari is well known for making exotics. As such, Ferrari doesn't have to do much marketing/advertising to let the world know about its latest and greatest offerings. People will just know, and the press will just report it.
Not only that, but Ferrari actually updates its entry level model very frequently as I've shown. That means Ferrari does not need to "milk" for more press coverage. Conversely, the last generation of NSX came out in 1990, and received very little updates for 15 years or so. There's not much to talk about for many years. As a result, Honda is trying to get free press coverage by releasing info gradually which obviously pisses some people off.
#65
Moderator
My bad for being unclear.
Ferrari is well known for making exotics. As such, Ferrari doesn't have to do much marketing/advertising to let the world know about its latest and greatest offerings. People will just know, and the press will just report it.
Not only that, but Ferrari actually updates its entry level model very frequently as I've shown. That means Ferrari does not need to "milk" for more press coverage. Conversely, the last generation of NSX came out in 1990, and received very little updates for 15 years or so. There's not much to talk about for many years. As a result, Honda is trying to get free press coverage by releasing info gradually which obviously pisses some people off.
Ferrari is well known for making exotics. As such, Ferrari doesn't have to do much marketing/advertising to let the world know about its latest and greatest offerings. People will just know, and the press will just report it.
Not only that, but Ferrari actually updates its entry level model very frequently as I've shown. That means Ferrari does not need to "milk" for more press coverage. Conversely, the last generation of NSX came out in 1990, and received very little updates for 15 years or so. There's not much to talk about for many years. As a result, Honda is trying to get free press coverage by releasing info gradually which obviously pisses some people off.
#67
Moderator
Ferrari, on the hand, shows up in Geneva with two complete prototypes. Allows close inspection by the press corps (hell, they had them on lifts for people to every part of the car) and comes to market on day one with specs.
Acura says it wanted to benchmark Ferrari with the NSX. Well, time to look to Ferrari as a benchmark for how to market it as well, Acura.
#68
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes
on
5,162 Posts
Nice vid!
#69
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
one of these days.. would love to visit maranello
#70
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#71
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
I'm not talking about it's actual performance. That goes with out saying that it needs to get in the hands of testers. No, I'm referring to a company that trots out one version of the car in Detroit, then shows up in Toronto with a cleverly disguised shell, neither of which are subjected to close inspection of any kind. None. The failure to disclose specs is just the icing on the cake. I think all of this will promote skepticism (given Acura's history) rather than an appetite for more information.
Ferrari, on the hand, shows up in Geneva with two complete prototypes. Allows close inspection by the press corps (hell, they had them on lifts for people to every part of the car) and comes to market on day one with specs.
Acura says it wanted to benchmark Ferrari with the NSX. Well, time to look to Ferrari as a benchmark for how to market it as well, Acura.
Ferrari, on the hand, shows up in Geneva with two complete prototypes. Allows close inspection by the press corps (hell, they had them on lifts for people to every part of the car) and comes to market on day one with specs.
Acura says it wanted to benchmark Ferrari with the NSX. Well, time to look to Ferrari as a benchmark for how to market it as well, Acura.
I don't know about you, but I think there's a huge difference between the status of the NSX nameplate and the status of the Ferrari nameplate.
#72
Moderator
This goes back to my previous about how Ferrari is Ferrari, and that Honda is no Ferrari. Everyone knows what Ferrari is all about. There's no need to make many appearances for the same car over and over. People are familiar with the entry MR exotic by Ferrari (360 Mondena, F430, 458 model, etc). Models from this line up comes out every 2 years or so. There's no real need to generate buzz. Can the same be said about the NSX? I'm not so sure. Just because Ferrari can do it, doesn't mean Honda can follow be be successful. I mean, Ferrari can charge $250k+ for the 458, can Honda charge the same starting price for the NSX without getting people apeshxt on them? Probably not.
I don't know about you, but I think there's a huge difference between the status of the NSX nameplate and the status of the Ferrari nameplate.
I don't know about you, but I think there's a huge difference between the status of the NSX nameplate and the status of the Ferrari nameplate.
#73
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
I don't think I'm missing your point.
In short, what you are saying is that you think Honda's method of introducing the NSX is not ideal because of different reasons. And that Honda should look at how Ferrari introduces its cars.
What I'm saying is, Ferrari and Honda are two different companies with very different background. The same can be said for the 430/458 vs the NSX. What works for Ferrari doesn't mean it will work for the NSX.
I'm not saying what Honda doing now is the best and cannot be improved on. Likewise, I also don't think what Ferrari does is the best method for Honda to follow too. For instance, by following the Ferrari method, that means Honda would only launch the 2G NSX production model with all the details announced at once, no concept, whatsoever. That would be quite a bit for the press to cover and not also much exposure, don't you think so?
For the GT-R, Nissan launched a few protos starting in 2001. The production model was on sale in December 2007. But even by late 2007 (2009 Nissan GT-R - Spied - Car and Driver), the exact details weren't available. The C&D article was still saying "in excess of 500hp" rather than 480hp.
In short, what you are saying is that you think Honda's method of introducing the NSX is not ideal because of different reasons. And that Honda should look at how Ferrari introduces its cars.
What I'm saying is, Ferrari and Honda are two different companies with very different background. The same can be said for the 430/458 vs the NSX. What works for Ferrari doesn't mean it will work for the NSX.
I'm not saying what Honda doing now is the best and cannot be improved on. Likewise, I also don't think what Ferrari does is the best method for Honda to follow too. For instance, by following the Ferrari method, that means Honda would only launch the 2G NSX production model with all the details announced at once, no concept, whatsoever. That would be quite a bit for the press to cover and not also much exposure, don't you think so?
For the GT-R, Nissan launched a few protos starting in 2001. The production model was on sale in December 2007. But even by late 2007 (2009 Nissan GT-R - Spied - Car and Driver), the exact details weren't available. The C&D article was still saying "in excess of 500hp" rather than 480hp.
#74
Senior Moderator
I don't think I'm missing your point.
In short, what you are saying is that you think Honda's method of introducing the NSX is not ideal because of different reasons. And that Honda should look at how Ferrari introduces its cars.
What I'm saying is, Ferrari and Honda are two different companies with very different background. The same can be said for the 430/458 vs the NSX. What works for Ferrari doesn't mean it will work for the NSX.
I'm not saying what Honda doing now is the best and cannot be improved on. Likewise, I also don't think what Ferrari does is the best method for Honda to follow too. For instance, by following the Ferrari method, that means Honda would only launch the 2G NSX production model with all the details announced at once, no concept, whatsoever. That would be quite a bit for the press to cover and not also much exposure, don't you think so?
For the GT-R, Nissan launched a few protos starting in 2001. The production model was on sale in December 2007. But even by late 2007 (2009 Nissan GT-R - Spied - Car and Driver), the exact details weren't available. The C&D article was still saying "in excess of 500hp" rather than 480hp.
In short, what you are saying is that you think Honda's method of introducing the NSX is not ideal because of different reasons. And that Honda should look at how Ferrari introduces its cars.
What I'm saying is, Ferrari and Honda are two different companies with very different background. The same can be said for the 430/458 vs the NSX. What works for Ferrari doesn't mean it will work for the NSX.
I'm not saying what Honda doing now is the best and cannot be improved on. Likewise, I also don't think what Ferrari does is the best method for Honda to follow too. For instance, by following the Ferrari method, that means Honda would only launch the 2G NSX production model with all the details announced at once, no concept, whatsoever. That would be quite a bit for the press to cover and not also much exposure, don't you think so?
For the GT-R, Nissan launched a few protos starting in 2001. The production model was on sale in December 2007. But even by late 2007 (2009 Nissan GT-R - Spied - Car and Driver), the exact details weren't available. The C&D article was still saying "in excess of 500hp" rather than 480hp.
The NSX is Acura (Honda)'s most special model, it's highest and most thought out and developed endeavor. By contrast, the 488 is a member of Ferrari's lowest lineage of cars. Ferrari's equivalent to the NSX would be it's highest end supercars, if anything. But even THAT is a lineage with multiple models.
The 488 isn't even a new model, it's designed as an update to the 458.
#75
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes
on
519 Posts
you are absolutely right. The cars aren't similar in their scope and target.
The NSX is Acura (Honda)'s most special model, it's highest and most thought out and developed endeavor. By contrast, the 488 is a member of Ferrari's lowest lineage of cars. Ferrari's equivalent to the NSX would be it's highest end supercars, if anything. But even THAT is a lineage with multiple models.
The 488 isn't even a new model, it's designed as an update to the 458.
The NSX is Acura (Honda)'s most special model, it's highest and most thought out and developed endeavor. By contrast, the 488 is a member of Ferrari's lowest lineage of cars. Ferrari's equivalent to the NSX would be it's highest end supercars, if anything. But even THAT is a lineage with multiple models.
The 488 isn't even a new model, it's designed as an update to the 458.
My take is that Ferrari can be bold and do whatever they want as long since they know the 488 GTB is highly competitive and will meet their sales target. People know exactly what 355, 360, 430, 458 are, and they know the 488 is just a updated model of that range.
The NSX? People have no clue as the last one came out in 1990. Besides, my understanding is that even though the production model was shown, the final design is still not finalized. Things like the power output and percentage of CF/composite parts are yet to be finalized.
#76
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
The following users liked this post:
Yumcha (03-06-2015)
#77
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
#78
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
In silver...
#79
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,248
Received 2,787 Likes
on
1,987 Posts
it was shown in the video i linked above
#80
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes
on
5,162 Posts
This thing is going to be a monster!