Federal Gas Tax news

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2008, 10:39 AM
  #1  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Federal Gas Tax news

U.S. Panel May Push 40-Cent Gas-Tax Rise, Person Says

By John Hughes and Angela Greiling Keane

Jan. 9 (Bloomberg) -- A U.S. panel created to recommend ways to fund road construction plans to propose that federal gasoline taxes rise as much as 40 cents per gallon over five years, a person with direct knowledge of the plan said.

The group will suggest that the current tax of 18.4 cents per gallon increase by 5 cents to 8 cents annually and be indexed to inflation after the five years, said the person, who didn't want to be named before the report is made public.

The panel, called the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission, is scheduled to release its recommendations including the federal fuel-tax increase Jan. 15 in Washington. Congress created the panel in 2005 for the purpose of issuing the report.

The findings may bolster efforts by members of Congress who have tried unsuccessfully to raise fuel taxes over the objections of President George W. Bush. The tax increase wouldn't go into effect until after Bush leaves office in 2009.

The commission will also recommend that state fuel taxes rise by an amount slightly larger than the federal increases, according to the person. The U.S. tax on gasoline was last boosted in 1993, by 4.3 cents a gallon.

Trina Leonard, a spokeswoman for the commission, declined to comment on details of the report.

Dissent

The recommendations may also include greater use of tolls and public-private partnerships, said Janet Kavinoky, transportation director for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters and two other members of the commission plan objections over the group's majority findings that fuel taxes should be increased, Kavinoky said.

Those objecting also include Peters' former deputy, Maria Cino, and Rick Geddes, a Cornell University professor, Kavinoky said. The Chamber backs an increase in the fuel tax as well as other means to pay for infrastructure improvements, she said.

Brian Turmail, a spokesman for Peters, said raising taxes won't cut congestion and will send more dollars to Washington that will be misspent.

``The last thing we need is more of the same kind of broken policies and ineffective tax hikes that have given commuters traffic to everywhere and bridges to nowhere,'' Turmail said.

Turmail and Leonard declined to comment on potential dissent by members. Geddes said he wouldn't discuss contents of the report until it is released to the public.

``The commission did recognize the need for more investment in the nation's infrastructure,'' he said in an interview. ``Everyone on the commission agrees with that.''

A Cino spokeswoman referred a request for a comment to the highway commission.

Partnerships

Rather than tax increases, the Bush administration has promoted public-private partnerships in which financial firms such as Macquarie Bank Ltd. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. join other investors to provide roadway funding.

Goldman and Macquarie, as well as Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte SA and Transurban Group, yesterday announced they formed a group to advocate for more private investment in U.S. infrastructure.

Congress in the same 2005 law that created the commission approved $286.5 billion for highway and transit projects.

To contact the reporters on this story: John Hughes in Washington at Jhughes5@bloomberg.net Angela Greiling Keane in Washington at agreilingkea@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: January 9, 2008 18:53 EST

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...vSPUc&refer=us
Old 01-16-2008, 10:40 AM
  #2  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
That diesel TSX is looking better and better to me.
Old 01-16-2008, 12:09 PM
  #3  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
If they raised the fed tax on the gas...there would be no need for revised cafe mpg standards.

The increased cost of gas would drive the public to more efficient automobiles, and natural market condition of supply and demand would have the automakers produce more efficient vehicles....and massive SUV's would be DONE.
Old 01-16-2008, 12:14 PM
  #4  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
^^ That would be nice, but somehow I doubt it. People are whining about gas prices now, but not actually doing much about it. I thought more people would have given up big SUVs by now, honestly, with all the bitching that goes on. It seems the threshold is higher, like maybe a couple bucks more, then maybe we'd see more people switching.

Plus, all the extra money from this tax won't go towards fixing roads and bridges. It'll go into politician's pockets to piss away like always. They keep adding and raising taxes everywhere, instead of learning to spend less and be less corrupt. It pisses me off.
Old 01-16-2008, 01:23 PM
  #5  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
^^ That would be nice, but somehow I doubt it. People are whining about gas prices now, but not actually doing much about it. I thought more people would have given up big SUVs by now, honestly, with all the bitching that goes on. It seems the threshold is higher, like maybe a couple bucks more, then maybe we'd see more people switching.

Plus, all the extra money from this tax won't go towards fixing roads and bridges. It'll go into politician's pockets to piss away like always. They keep adding and raising taxes everywhere, instead of learning to spend less and be less corrupt. It pisses me off.
and
The gas prices have impacted auto mfg's. Truck based SUV's are dying a slow death and cross-overs are on the rise....not to mention small car sales are on the rise....and the rise of hybrids and diesel vehicles being produced. If there was no demand, there would be no vehicles of this type.

Sure, politicians have pissed away all the tax $$...as usual.....but, there has been little to no investment in National transportation infrastructure. This is gonna bite us in the @ss!! It already has....bridge failures, and massive traffic problems, are the tip of the iceberg.

I'm the last guy who is for tax increases, but on the other hand transportation infrastructure is failing on a large scale. It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't scenario.
Old 01-16-2008, 01:34 PM
  #6  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
and
The gas prices have impacted auto mfg's. Truck based SUV's are dying a slow death and cross-overs are on the rise....not to mention small car sales are on the rise....and the rise of hybrids and diesel vehicles being produced. If there was no demand, there would be no vehicles of this type.

Sure, politicians have pissed away all the tax $$...as usual.....but, there has been little to no investment in National transportation infrastructure. This is gonna bite us in the @ss!! It already has....bridge failures, and massive traffic problems, are the tip of the iceberg.

I'm the last guy who is for tax increases, but on the other hand transportation infrastructure is failing on a large scale. It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't scenario.
Agreed. I'm just a bit salty being from NJ and getting taxed to death all ready, as you Californians are familiar with as well. I hate politicians and I'm sick and tired of taxes b/c the money gets pissed away no matter how much we give them. It's just never enough.
Old 01-16-2008, 01:44 PM
  #7  
99 TL, 06 E350
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 5,030
Received 164 Likes on 110 Posts
welcome to Canada's way to paying for gas.
Old 01-16-2008, 02:21 PM
  #8  
luvs redheads!
 
swift22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: back in WI
Age: 39
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^ahaha.

<<<i love your avatar.


Also what i dont get is the industry does have the patents on technology they have hidden on increasing gas mileage and now the time would be to release it. Instead they come out with diesels(which were before gasoline anyways) and we wont be saving money anyways because the price of diesel went up even though it takes less refining than gas and is what gasoline is made of...so there can be some magical shortage of diesel....arg.
Old 01-16-2008, 03:00 PM
  #9  
Unofficial Goat
iTrader: (1)
 
The Dougler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 39
Posts: 15,744
Received 112 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by Black Tire
welcome to Canada's way to paying for gas.
at least for the most part our vehicle infrastructure is in rather good shape, except for quebec, and well the bridges...........
Old 01-16-2008, 04:05 PM
  #10  
Por Favor?
 
Brandon24pdx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 43
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Pfft, 40 cents...I bet gas will be $5.00 by 2015
Old 01-16-2008, 04:12 PM
  #11  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by Brandon24pdx
Pfft, 40 cents...I bet gas will be $5.00 by 2010
Fixed
Old 01-16-2008, 05:50 PM
  #12  
Por Favor?
 
Brandon24pdx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 43
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Fixed
Doh!
Old 01-17-2008, 01:11 AM
  #13  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,376
Received 632 Likes on 508 Posts
Index to inflation and ensuring the money actually is spent on roads would make it palatable - but a 200+% increase is not something most folks would go for.
Old 01-17-2008, 05:21 PM
  #14  
Suzuka Master
 
Ashburner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Outside Houston
Age: 46
Posts: 6,034
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
How about we lower taxes and only hire illegals to do our roads. Then you won't see 5 white dude, with 4 of them watching one work.
Old 01-17-2008, 05:43 PM
  #15  
_____ like a rabbit
 
stangg172004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edgewater, Chicago, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 8,594
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
whats worse, $.40 more per gallon or ~5k more per car? someone do the math!
Old 01-17-2008, 06:28 PM
  #16  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,901
Received 1,671 Likes on 932 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
Agreed. I'm just a bit salty being from NJ and getting taxed to death all ready, as you Californians are familiar with as well. I hate politicians and I'm sick and tired of taxes b/c the money gets pissed away no matter how much we give them. It's just never enough.
Par for the course in Jersey.

As one who rides NJ Transit commuter rail daily, I would say that any $.40 increase in pump price makes me happy that I ride the rails. However, we usually see higher fares later on mainly due to increased ridership demands.

All that said, Americans will gripe about any increases at the pump but will continue to drive ceaselessly nonetheless. My wife is a good example: she would ONLY take mass transit IF she is going into Manhattan during a weekday. It would pretty much take gas prices in the double digits for her to curb her driving. (Then again, she is from South America where the concept of resource conservation is seen as ridiculous.)
Old 01-17-2008, 07:42 PM
  #17  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
Originally Posted by Ashburner
How about we lower taxes and only hire illegals to do our roads. Then you won't see 5 white dude, with 4 of them watching one work.
Old 01-18-2008, 10:50 AM
  #18  
Three Wheelin'
 
Ruski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Age: 53
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ashburner
How about we lower taxes and only hire illegals to do our roads. Then you won't see 5 white dude, with 4 of them watching one work.

Send out the prisoners to work on the road construction for free too.

P.S. with the higher gas prices, hasn't the government already been pocketing more tax money?
Old 01-18-2008, 11:23 AM
  #19  
The hair says it all
 
Python2121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Manhattan, NYC
Age: 38
Posts: 7,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NYC prices their trains at the cost of gas + tolls. When gas prices go up, train prices ALWAYS follow. It $12 for a 30 minute round trip into NYC from the suburbs. This means they are just going to hike prices .
Old 01-18-2008, 12:02 PM
  #20  
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
JediMindTricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 44
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Fixed
Old 01-18-2008, 01:17 PM
  #21  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by Ruski
P.S. with the higher gas prices, hasn't the government already been pocketing more tax money?
Old 01-18-2008, 02:08 PM
  #22  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 53
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,569 Likes on 986 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
No, gas tax is a flat tax, not a percentage. At least federally ... I think the states I buy gas in are also flat.
Old 01-18-2008, 02:10 PM
  #23  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
No, gas tax is a flat tax, not a percentage. At least federally ... I think the states I buy gas in are also flat.
Exactly...no confustion here...just wondering how he came up with the logic that the fed is getting more $$ off of higher gax prices.
Old 01-18-2008, 03:34 PM
  #24  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,901
Received 1,671 Likes on 932 Posts
Originally Posted by Python2121
NYC prices their trains at the cost of gas + tolls. When gas prices go up, train prices ALWAYS follow. It $12 for a 30 minute round trip into NYC from the suburbs. This means they are just going to hike prices .
Indeed, I pay $200/mo for my monthly commuter rail pass and another $40/mo for the PATH. Sad part is, that $240/mo is SO MUCH cheaper than if I were to drive.

But yes: Gas/diesel prices increase --> a segment of driving commuters take to mass transit --> commuter agencies adjust with more trains/buses (concomitant with that are more delays and equipment problems) --> denouement: fare increases.
Old 01-18-2008, 06:58 PM
  #25  
Smitty's Moral Police
 
unlemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by stangg172004
whats worse, $.40 more per gallon or ~5k more per car? someone do the math!
$.40 more per gallon will drive people to buy more efficient cars.

$5k more per car will cause people to buy cheaper cars or keep their current gas guzzlers.
Old 01-18-2008, 09:58 PM
  #26  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
Index to inflation and ensuring the money actually is spent on roads would make it palatable - but a 200+% increase is not something most folks would go for.

That's the problem, the last report I saw said not even 50% of the current tax is used for roads.
Old 01-18-2008, 10:44 PM
  #27  
Advanced
 
amv12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 39
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
That diesel TSX is looking better and better to me.
^yup
Or I can just use my acura Two Legs
Old 01-19-2008, 09:34 PM
  #28  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh gosh, i want to get a car that runs on garbage like mr. fusion on the 2015 DeLorean.
Old 08-15-2011, 06:54 AM
  #29  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,376
Received 632 Likes on 508 Posts
http://content.usatoday.com/communit...e-mile-taxes/1

The age of free driving could be coming to an end. With the advent of GPS navigation that electronically tracks how far you drive, more states are looking at charging drivers by the mile.

Oregon, for instance, is among several states that are taking a hard look at the idea, reports Paul Eisenstein of the Detroit Bureau. As proposed in the Oregon legislature, drivers could be charged 0.85 cents per mile through 2015, with the figure jumping to 1.85 cents per mile by 2018. The bill, for the moment, appears stalled. Texas and Minnesota are reportedly also taking a look.

Mileage fees would take the place of gasoline taxes, which will decrease as more fuel-efficient and electric cars are introduced. The Detroit Bureau says the typical American motorist getting a combined 25 mpg today pays just under 2 cents a mile in gas taxes.

Still, the Big Brother aspects of taxing by the mile are sure to make any such plan an uphill battle.
While this is a "third rail" kind of an issue both at the state and federal level, there's no getting around the fact that with the EPA mandated fuel mileage gains in the next few years, the tax revenue will fall causing politicians to try to make up the revenue short fall some other way. So all of you electric car driving tree huggers - you're not getting away without paying your "fair share".
Old 08-15-2011, 12:29 PM
  #30  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 53
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,569 Likes on 986 Posts
Those motherfuckers cannot do that and provide no alternative.

I swear to god the elected officials in this country are trying to destroy it as quickly as possible.
Old 08-15-2011, 12:51 PM
  #31  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts


ridiculous.
Old 08-15-2011, 02:41 PM
  #32  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Get your nanny state GPS out of my car!!!!
Old 08-15-2011, 03:22 PM
  #33  
B A N N E D
 
Invisible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 357
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Remember, Obama's appointment to Energy Secretary - Steven Chu.

Chu vowed to TRIPLE the price of gas. So far he is well on his way to meeting his promise.
Old 08-15-2011, 03:28 PM
  #34  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Fuck that shit. No way in hell im paying per mile on top of the already high prices of fuel when i put on average 50k miles on my vehicles a year.
Old 08-15-2011, 03:30 PM
  #35  
Burning Brakes
 
Moose Muscles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Age: 38
Posts: 771
Received 83 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by Invisible
Remember, Obama's appointment to Energy Secretary - Steven Chu.

Chu vowed to TRIPLE the price of gas. So far he is well on his way to meeting his promise.
hmm...now I have something to research during the boredom of tomorrows class.
Old 08-16-2011, 03:47 AM
  #36  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
.40c tax increase proposal was beyond ridiculous.... now this?!?!

Any politician who even thinks that's a good idea can go eat dicks. Maybe they should implement a bill to charge politicians for making bad propositions. Every time you get a NO from a representative, you get charged $100 for each vote. If your suggested bill doesn't pass, double that total amount.
Old 08-16-2011, 04:48 AM
  #37  
Burning Brakes
 
Moose Muscles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Age: 38
Posts: 771
Received 83 Likes on 48 Posts
Maybe we should just use the education funding for gas, and the defense funding for education. That will solve our problems.

And I agree Costco, at some point the politicians need to be held accountable.
Old 08-16-2011, 09:59 AM
  #38  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,376
Received 632 Likes on 508 Posts
I don't mind paying a fee/tax that is only used for reasonable (no $200 mil bridges to nowhere in Alaska) road improvements. But don't tax me twice and don't use the revenue for other stuff.
Old 08-16-2011, 09:35 PM
  #39  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
This is REDONKULOUS. I'd have to consider moving next to the hospital if this happens. Watching where I go via GPS is a non-starter for me. Increasing the fuel surcharge during a recession? Thupid.
Old 08-17-2011, 12:14 AM
  #40  
Evil Mazda Driver
 
PortlandRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 37
Posts: 11,212
Received 174 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
Those motherfuckers cannot do that and provide no alternative.

I swear to god the elected officials in this country are trying to destroy it as quickly as possible.
Amen. Anybody who tries to get near my car with any sort of tracking device will not take another step.

This country is fast on its way to becoming an Orwellian police state and the great state of Oregon is proud to be at the front of that movement. The sign coming into the state really should say 'Welcome to Oregon - Leave Your Freedoms at the State Line; You're Too Stupid To Use Them'.


Quick Reply: Federal Gas Tax news



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 AM.