NAV elevation?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2004 | 04:43 PM
  #1  
pbanerji's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Question NAV elevation?

Anyone know how to get current location elevation from the NAV?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2004 | 05:12 PM
  #2  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
Sorry, I don't have nav but if you do find out how to get the elevation I wouldn't put much faith in the numbers. The GPS units in everything but airplanes are pretty bad at resolving elevation. They're easily off by +/- 300-500ft.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2004 | 05:36 PM
  #3  
pbanerji's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Why is that? With enough satellites I would think that they would be dead on.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 12:47 AM
  #4  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
I don't know the physics of it but I know that when I was in death valley my Garmin 76 told me I was 412' below sea level and my friends Magellan told us that we were 150' below sea level. We were actually at -282'.

I've seen even larger discrepancies at higher altitudes.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 07:53 AM
  #5  
kiteboy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Originally posted by pbanerji
Why is that? With enough satellites I would think that they would be dead on.
GPS satellites are in low Earth orbit, which is 100-200 miles above ground. That means the vertical separation between the receiver and satellites is much smaller than the lateral separation (which could be tens of thousands of miles). Furthermore, all the satellites are roughly at the same altitude, in the same direction (up). Again, compared to the lateral difference, which could be in every direction and various distances. Since GPS uses triangulation for a position fix, the receiver has less range and separation to work with in the veritical (think of an inverted 3D pyramid that's not very high). As a result, there is more error in the vertical.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 08:56 AM
  #6  
RogerPodacter's Avatar
So, do you like...stuff?
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 924
Likes: 3
From: PA/NJ, now in CA (SoCal), USA
Originally posted by kiteboy
GPS satellites are in low Earth orbit, which is 100-200 miles above ground. That means the vertical separation between the receiver and satellites is much smaller than the lateral separation (which could be tens of thousands of miles). Furthermore, all the satellites are roughly at the same altitude, in the same direction (up). Again, compared to the lateral difference, which could be in every direction and various distances. Since GPS uses triangulation for a position fix, the receiver has less range and separation to work with in the veritical (think of an inverted 3D pyramid that's not very high). As a result, there is more error in the vertical.
damn that was a good explanation
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 09:03 AM
  #7  
pbanerji's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Hmm... You may be right about most of what you said - I'm not sure. What I can say with some degree of certainty is that GPS satellites are NOT low earth orbit. So they circle the earth thousands of miles above it, not a couple of hundred miles.

From http://www.gisillinois.org/gps/GPSDEF/sat.htm:

The 24 GPS satellites (21 active, 3 spare) are in orbit at 10,600 miles above the earth.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 09:18 AM
  #8  
kiteboy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Originally posted by pbanerji
Hmm... You may be right about most of what you said - I'm not sure. What I can say with some degree of certainty is that GPS satellites are NOT low earth orbit. So they circle the earth thousands of miles above it, not a couple of hundred miles.

From http://www.gisillinois.org/gps/GPSDEF/sat.htm:

The 24 GPS satellites (21 active, 3 spare) are in orbit at 10,600 miles above the earth.
Thanks for pointing that out - they are much higher than I thought.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 04:08 PM
  #9  
Arcticcl9's Avatar
Can't wait to drive
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 803
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Re: NAV elevation?

Originally posted by pbanerji
Anyone know how to get current location elevation from the NAV?
To answer the question: Just press the center circle part of your touchscreen when you have the map displayed. It will show you your current longitude, latitude, and elevation. Elevation only works when you have satallite coverage (your GPS text is green instead of white). I find it accurate within 10-20feet in elevation (when compared to signs on the roads about elevation).
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #10  
gpsiir's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Re: NAV elevation?

Originally posted by pbanerji
Anyone know how to get current location elevation from the NAV?
Two ways. On the Map screen, touch the little "A" (that's suppose to be you in the TSX). Also, go to the diagnostics screen and hit the GPS info, although the info is in meters.....
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 04:50 PM
  #11  
gpsiir's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by Dan Martin
Sorry, I don't have nav but if you do find out how to get the elevation I wouldn't put much faith in the numbers. The GPS units in everything but airplanes are pretty bad at resolving elevation. They're easily off by +/- 300-500ft.
Actually, the altitude error would be the same as the longitute and latitude errors, about +/- 25 feet typically..... much worse before we turned off S/A (selective availability) about 5 years ago.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 04:56 PM
  #12  
gpsiir's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by Dan Martin
I don't know the physics of it but I know that when I was in death valley my Garmin 76 told me I was 412' below sea level and my friends Magellan told us that we were 150' below sea level. We were actually at -282'.

I've seen even larger discrepancies at higher altitudes.
When did you do this test? With a couple of good receivers, you shouldn't see more than 50 feet of difference, usually much less today. (It's not uncommon to have accuracies of +/- 15 feet) If this was over 5 years ago, then S/A would have made that much worse......
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 05:06 PM
  #13  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
Actually, the altitude error would be the same as the longitute and latitude errors, about +/- 25 feet typically..... much worse before we turned off S/A (selective availability) about 5 years ago.
Thanks gpsiir! What's the best way to check elevation accuracy? I'm curious to see how good my iQue is....
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 05:10 PM
  #14  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
Originally posted by gpsiir
When did you do this test? With a couple of good receivers, you shouldn't see more than 50 feet of difference, usually much less today. (It's not uncommon to have accuracies of +/- 15 feet) If this was over 5 years ago, then S/A would have made that much worse......
This was only in the summer. I wonder if it was because we were in a valley or if it was because both of our gps are fairly old. My GPS 76 has to be 4yrs+. I replaced it with an iQue shortly after and I'm hoping it's going to be a little more accurate.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 09:21 AM
  #15  
gpsiir's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by Dan Martin
Thanks gpsiir! What's the best way to check elevation accuracy? I'm curious to see how good my iQue is....
Best way is to find a survey crew that is using a differential GPS unit, those are typically accurate to +/- 1-2 inches. Are in or near a major city? There are differential transmitters in most major cities. BTW, "differential" is basically an additional signal that receivers can get that is transmitted from a ground based system that "soups up" the accuracy, a lot.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 09:25 AM
  #16  
gpsiir's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by Dan Martin
This was only in the summer. I wonder if it was because we were in a valley or if it was because both of our gps are fairly old. My GPS 76 has to be 4yrs+. I replaced it with an iQue shortly after and I'm hoping it's going to be a little more accurate.
The valley shouldn't affect it unless you are in a narrow very high valley. I've never been to death valley, but the pictures I've seen show a wide open hellish sort of place. You want a clear view of the sky in all directions, at least 120 degrees of view for optimum performance.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 09:54 AM
  #17  
DEVO's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
I always thought that the reason you couldn't get accurate elevation through a consumer model GPS unit is because that data isn't released to consumers... were as the military model have access to the full range of data. I know that more and more information is released now versus a few years ago... but I thought elevation was still hidden from consumer models.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2004 | 06:11 PM
  #18  
kiteboy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Originally posted by DEVO
I always thought that the reason you couldn't get accurate elevation through a consumer model GPS unit is because that data isn't released to consumers... were as the military model have access to the full range of data. I know that more and more information is released now versus a few years ago... but I thought elevation was still hidden from consumer models.
The military accuracy is the selective availabiity mentioned a few posts ago. Turned off 5 years ago. Consumer models have had elevation display for a long time - that's the discussion point of this thread.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2004 | 02:37 AM
  #19  
gpsiir's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally posted by DEVO
I always thought that the reason you couldn't get accurate elevation through a consumer model GPS unit is because that data isn't released to consumers... were as the military model have access to the full range of data. I know that more and more information is released now versus a few years ago... but I thought elevation was still hidden from consumer models.
Not quite right. "Civilian" GPS units can only access the unencrypted GPS navigation signal, but they have always been able to give users latitude, longitude, and altitude. When "Selective Availability" was enabled, the military deliberately degraded the civilian GPS navigation signal to the point that "normal" accuracy was +/- 150-250 feet. This was to make it less usable to US enemies and terrorists. In May 2000, by order of the president, S/A (selective availability) was turned off (and there was much rejoicing!). So, all civilian GPS receivers got much more accurate. Whew, okay, as I said, civilian GPS units can only get the unencrypted GPS, as you might guess, that implies that the US military (and its allies) get GPS units that also receive and decrypt another GPS navigation signal, one that makes military units much more accurate (the actual numbers are, of course, classified). Bottom line, both civilian and military GPS receivers give you the same information (lat., long., altitude, very very very very very accurate time), but the military units have better accuracy on the positioning coordinates.

Hope I didn't over-answer too much!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
Jul 16, 2017 07:33 AM
navtool.com
3G MDX (2014-2020)
32
Jan 20, 2016 11:43 AM
navtool.com
5G TLX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
31
Nov 16, 2015 08:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.